Tumgik
#greek religion
lionofchaeronea · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
Polychrome terracotta sculpture of the god Dionysos, holding an egg and a rooster. The unusual attributes may hint at a connection to Orphism, which held that the first deity, Phanes or Protogonos ("First-Born"), was hatched from a cosmic egg. Adherents of Orphism saw humankind as the descendants of Dionysos (under the name "Zagreus"), created when the Titans devoured the young Zagreus and were then struck by Zeus' thunderbolt. Artist unknown; created in Tanagra, Boeotia (an important center of terracotta production) ca. 350 BCE. Now in the British Museum.
505 notes · View notes
mask131 · 11 months
Text
While checking around for my “Roman gods are not Greek gods” posts, I found back this tripartition of mythology, which is actually a fact that everybody should kno about if they want to dabble in Greco-Roman myths (especially Greek myths).
We know that, during Antiquity, the Romans and the Greeks thought that there wasn’t just one, but three different types of “theology” - three different views, perceptions and reception of the gods.
The first theology was the theology of the priests and of the state - aka, religion. The Greek gods as perceived and described by religion, as honored through rituals and festivals.
The second theology is the “mythic theology” - what we call “mythology today”. It is a set of legends, folktales and stories that are not part of religion, but rather used and carried by art - it is the gods are seen, perceived and described by the poets, by the epics, by the theater plays.
The third theology is the theology of the philosophers - who used the gods and their tales as images and allegories for various abstract or concrete topics. It is the gods as depictions and description of natural phenomenon, or the myths as a way to actualy exemplify a social fact or explain psychological workings. 
For the classic Greeks and Romans, there was a clear divide between those three very different point of view of the gods. It was basically three different versions of the pantheon. This is notably why you will find texts noting that priests disliked and condemned the poets’ mythological works, due to them being blasphemous and making the gods too human when religion described them as perfect ; and it is also why the philosophers of old dissed on and rejected the literary works of mythology as nonsense only good to feed superstitions, because for them the gods weren’t characters or realities, but rather abstract concepts and rhetorical allegories.
This is something I feel needs to be reminded, because today these three different theologies have been mixed up into one big mess - as literary myths are placed one the same level as philosophical “myths” (actually texts taking the shape of myths), and both considered of outmost religious importance. When in fact, things were quite different... 
EDIT: I was asked if there was a myth that could illustrate the three different theologies, and on the spot I would say “the affair between Aphrodite and Ares”.
This story originates from the “mythological theology”. It is primarily a story, and a good one. It is the story of a husband who discovers his wife is unfaithful and tries to get revenge, it is the story of an extra-marital affair gone wrong, it is typical set of divine shenanigans ending on a grotesque display of divine humiliation - it is an excellent narrative material for plays and poems (and the legend does originates from poems).
The story was also dearly beloved and reused by the “philosophical theology”, because the philosophers adored the idea of the love between Ares and Aphrodite - for them it was the perfect depiction of how the concepts of “love” and “war” , despite being seemingly opposite, attracted each other and were closely tied. For them, this story isn’t to be taken literaly as “a god cheated on another god”, but rather as “this is an allegory showing that love and war are two sides of the same coin, which is why Aphrodite falls for Ares despite being married to Hephaistos”. But for them the whole net part is just poetic nonsense invented to make people laugh ; or maybe they will reinvent them as a moral, cautionary tale that should be used to warn people of the dangers of unfaithfulness. 
And then there’s the “religious theology”, the point of view of the priests - for whom such a story is mockery and sacrilege. You can imagine them saying: “You are making the gods look like fools! Gods don’t cheat on each other, gods don’t get captured in nets while butt-naked, gods don’t even sleep on beds - GODS DO NOT EVEN HAVE HUMAN FORMS IN THEIR NATURAL STATE - what the heck is this bullshit you’re saying, you’re just insulting the gods by turning them into lecherous humans and grotesque clowns for your vulgar story!” (This is a reconstitution and not the actual words of an Ancient Greek priest)
604 notes · View notes
divinepithets · 5 months
Text
Do you like Persephone? Please read if you do!
Hi! I'm Meli, and I'm a classics student who is writing a paper on Persephone and modern reception of her myth. In doing so, I'd like to gather information from as many people as possible to get a well-rounded view of how she is perceived by people interested in her! This includes Hellenic polytheists, academics, fans of Greek myth in general, or fans of modern retellings like Lore Olympus, Hadestown, Punderworld, etc.
Thank you if you do participate! Reblogs are appreciated!
128 notes · View notes
olympianbutch · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
I am legitimately intimidated by this Athena I’m drawing 💀
220 notes · View notes
romegreeceart · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
Black figure cup depicting a rural sacrifice scene
* c. 550 BCE
* British Museum
London, July 2022
69 notes · View notes
en-theos · 3 months
Note
How did synchronism in ancient greece work? Especially when it came to Egyptian deities? Some of the Greek pantheon were worshipped in Egypt and vice versa. Did they adapt their practice to pray to the Greek gods in the Egyptian style? I've seen many people talk about the Egyptian gods being worshipped in Greece and Rome but I barely hear about the Greek gods who were worshipped in Egypt. Did the practice change based on that region, did they do it a bit differently? I'm not even sure that I'm explaining this correctly.
Also, how did the Greeks deal with regional differences within the myths? Like the Arkadians? Or how some later claimed that in Egypt - Dionysus (Osiris) was married to Demeter (Isis) and their children were Apollo (Horus) and Artemis (Bastet). Like it's so different from the usually similar formula and genealogy of the pantheon that it's difficult to imagine that there weren't more fights and arguments about it?
i'm addressing the second part of your question first. they didn't deal with it, because they didn't feel the need to! when studying greek religion, we learn of the difference between orthodoxy and orthopraxy: religions that determine themselves by the (written) word, and attempt to find essential truth and decree by adhering to one or a set of texts (christianity and islam are examples of this) and orthopraxy, religions which hold the proper execution of rites in highest esteem, and often don't have sacred texts or don't consider them as instructional. Greek polytheism fell in the orthopraxic category, allowing for a lot of pluralism on the basis of the nature of the gods, the stories concerning those gods (this is why greek mythology has no one true version of every story) and the right way to live a moral life. discussion and debate was a part of this, which is why already very early on we had philosophers arguing against the homeric interpretation of the gods, arguing that the gods' anthropomorphism is suspect ('horses like horses and cattle like cattle also would depict the gods' shapes and make their bodies of such a sort as the form they themselves have.').
because of this, cults could create their own beliefs, tied to the cultsite/region, with little to no conflict about singular Truth. if the rituals were performed properly and the Divine Power was honoured, the fundamental requirements for Greek worship were fulfilled. thus, if a cult in any particular place had different beliefs, those were considered peculiar to the cult, but often still validated. this is also how fringe cults like orphism could have a place in or alongside greek religion, although a fraught one. the greeks were very self-aware about this, btw: herodotus and pausanias for example constantly indicate that whatever cultic beliefs, histories or practices they're documenting are true to that cults' worshippers, and they often provide a contradictory account to support their own scientific objectivity.
you'll notice that in that first part of the answer i already indicate that there was also no one right greek way to worship a god. there were certain fundamentals, of course: build a temple, have it house a cult statue, provide votive gifts, sacrifice things, have festivals, sing hymns: but 'ancient Greece' consisted of a LOT of small city-states with all their regional differences, and each cult to each god had its peculiarities. speaking of syncretism: often local gods would appropiate an Olympian god's name and so become a bigger cult than before, but retain their name as an epithet and their own cultic practices. good examples are Athena Aphaia on Aegina and Artemis Orthia in sparta. another possible early syncretism is the ephesian artemis, who had many mother goddess/fertility goddess aspects possible lent from an older regional goddess. those aspects are nearly antithetical to the common artemis, but syncretism allowed for this!
so yes, ritual practices ABSOLUTELY transferred from one culture to another as well. entire gods even got adopted, cult and all: cases of these are the phrygian cybele/kubaba, and the thracian Bendis, which both had cults alongside Isis in the harbour of Athens, Piraeus. the latter especially entered greek religion because of the popularity of thracian slaves in Athens.
that isn't to say that they didn't get greekified to an extent however: especially temples and cult statues often stayed recognizably hellenic, and in ptolemaic egypt for example you'll see egyptian depictions of isis used alongside graeco-roman depictions, etc etc.
tl;dr it's a mixed bag! anything goes! there's fundamental essentials to greek worship, mostly concerning rites rather than stories/beliefs, and highly regional differences ensure that we cannot generalize ANYTHING when it comes to a deity's worship. you'd have to look up individual cultsites to figure out what did and did not occur when gods got syncretized or transferred between cultures, however.
i have some sources from an old mediterraneanism course i followed during my first MA:
Simms, Ronda, (1989) 'Isis in classical Athens', CJ 84, 216-221
Parker, Robert (1996) Athenian religion; a history, 188-98.
Wijma, S. (2014). Embracing the immigrant: the participation of metics in Athenian polis religion (5th-4th century BC). Stuttgart.
Garland, Robert (20012), The Piraeus, Bristol, with chapter 3 on religion, immigrant religion, and syncretism
Parker, R. (2018). Greek Gods Abroad: Names, Natures and Transformations
hope this helps! for a particularly egyptological perspective i'm phoning in @rudjedet and @thatlittleegyptologist (although neither are experts on hellenistic or roman egypt afaik!!!!)
33 notes · View notes
feriorem · 6 months
Text
Classicstober day 7!!! Persephone
Tumblr media
I missed a few days because of school but hopefully this makes up for it
36 notes · View notes
sparagmosenthusiast · 3 months
Text
Does anyone want to share their ways of connecting with the greek gods? Especially Dionysus.
I've recently decided to finally listen to myself and try to pray,after studying greek history and Hellenism for years without practicing it. The first time,it just felt extremely natural and I really felt like I was finally connecting with something that I had inside of me for a long time,but now that I'm trying to pray two or three times everyday I'm struggling to focus.
I can read (and,with some patience,translate) ancient greek,so I was considering looking up some hymns to Dionysus. Is there anything you would recommend?
Also,how exactly do offerings work? As of now I've limited myself to making a little altar,praying while burning incense and candles,and burning some herbs and flowers. How do I consecrate something to a god? Do I have to burn it?Do I have to say something before offering it?How do I offer it if not by burning it?
Sorry for all the questions,it's just that I really care about this.
22 notes · View notes
dostoievskism · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Julian Morrow took on the name of Walter Burkert and wrote 𝘏𝘰𝘮𝘰 𝘕𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘴 after Henry Winter told him about the successful bacchanal
« Students of religion have used the following concepts to describe the experience of the Holy: terror, bliss, and recognition of an absolute authority, 𝘮𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘶𝘮, 𝘧𝘢𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘴, and 𝘢𝘶𝘨𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘮. »
« Orgies and death are close neighbors. »
« they agree in speaking of a murder and blood guilt that left its mark upon the drinking of wine. »
« The worshipper experiences the god most powerfully not just in pious conduct or in prayer, song, and dance, but in the deadly blow of the axe, the gush of blood and the burning of thigh-pieces. The realm of the gods is sacred, but the ‘sacred’ act done at the ‘sacred’ place by the ‘consecrating’ actor consists of slaughtering »
32 notes · View notes
Text
By religious, I mean actively believing in a higher power(s). Cultural experiences related to religion (holidays, days of rest, sayings) don't count for the purpose of this poll.
This is hardly very scientific, but I'm curious.
11 notes · View notes
lionofchaeronea · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
The god Dionysos, holding a kantharos (two-handled drinking cup) in his right hand and a grapevine in his left. Side A of an Attic red-figure amphora attributed to the Berlin Painter and dated between 490 and 480 BCE. Found at Vulci; now in the Louvre.
460 notes · View notes
mask131 · 3 months
Text
The myth of Dionysos (3)
For the previous posts, see here and here.
Tumblr media
V) The cult of Dionysos : Outside the city, inside the city
Such a god apparently does not have his place in the Ancient Greek city. Séchan-Lévêque reminds us that his religion, at the same time joyful and wild, is centered around the “thiasus”, that is to say a gathering of male and female beings joining outside of any civic or familial setting. According to Euripides’ description and to the various visual depictions of Ancient Greece, all the cultural elements surrounding Dionysos are the very opposite of the rational organization of a State. His cult takes place on the countryside, in woods and mountains. It takes place at night. The participants wear an animal skins over their clothes (or replacing their chiton), their hair is wild or crowned by ivy or laurel, their belt is made of a snake or a baby leopard hangs from it ; in one hand they hold the thyrsus and in the other a small animal (hare or young fawn). The music played for Dionysos is strange: flutes, tympanum and castanets. His ceremonies are chaotic: wild dances, convulsions, exhausting races. His sacrifice is performed by ripping apart animals before eating their raw flesh. The thiasus could be made of men, but the most famous of all the thiasus is the female one, and its members are called the Menads, the Bacchants, the Thyads, the Bassarides… Ordinarily, women of Ancient Greece were locked up inside the gynaeceum, so to have them becoming wild and savage makes the cult of Dionysos a unique one, set apart by the official religious events of the city, since he breaks all urban religious rules. Similarly, the mysteries of Dionysos unite together men and women, citizens and slaves, which meant breaking apart the Ancient Greek social hierarchy.
And yet, this Dionysos that destroys the order of the city is greatly honored at Delphi, the domain of the Greekest of all gods, Apollo. The Pythia reminds the audience, in Aeschylus’ Eumenids, that she honors the nymphs over which rules Bromios and his Bacchants, with explicit references to the story of Pentheus. Every year, during the three months of winter, while Apollo leaves for Hyperborea, Dionysos replaces him. And every two years, the Thyads of Delphi and the Bacchants of Athens, holding torches, celebrate on mount Parnassus the son of Semele. In the adyton of Apollo’s temple, legends claimed Dionysos’ tomb could be found. The poets frequently exchanged the names and nicknames of the two deities: Aeschylus wrote in Bassarids of “Apollo with ivy, a bacchant and a seer”, while Euripides in Likymnion wrote of “Lord Bakchos, friend of the laurel, Pean-Apollon with the beautiful lyre”. As such, despite Nietzsche’s strict opposition between the god of harmonious restraint and the deity of savage drunkenness, the two gods are actually far from being polar opposites.
Dionysos also finds a home at Athens. We already saw several of the festivals in his honor there: Apaturia, Anthesteria, Oschophoria… But to those can be added the agrarian Dionysia, the the Lenaia, and especially the great Dionysia: during those, contests of dithyrambic, of tragedies and of comedies were held, gathering an audience coming from all four corners of Greece. Traditionally, the tragedy, the “tragodia”, is read as meaning “the song of the goat”, tragou-ôdè, since the goat was the animal traditionally sacrificed to the god. During the first day of the Great Dionysia, the statue of Dionysos was carried inside the “orchestra”, at the very heart of the city. And during the contests, a place of honor was kept for the priest of Dionysos. The marginal god clearly earned his place among men and Olympians.
Because, according to the Bacchants, inside the Dionysian chaos, there si a superior order, an “eukosmia” that unfortunately Pentheus fails to see, since he is a young tyrant filled with hubris. However the wise rulers of Athens did perceive and honor this superior order – unlike the Roman Senators that, in 186 BCE, harshly repressed any participations to the Bacchanals.
Tumblr media
VI) Dionysos in service of political and religious doctrines: various uses
Multiple, complex, contradictory and shapeshifting: the god offered to the political and religious domains a very malleable material. For example, there are obvious links and mutual influences between the eastward journey of Dionysos and the eastward journey of Alexander. Alexander, just like his soldiers, and just like his historians, know of the story of the god’s travel to the East – the Dionysos of Euripides, in the Bacchants, said himself: “I left Lydia with his gold-fertile fields, I left the plains of Phrygia for the sun-burned plateaus of Persia, the walled cities of Bactrian, and the land of the Medes, frozen by winter ; and happy Arabia ; and finally all of Asia, laying by the salted waters…” Alexander took his army on the very steps of Dionysos. Of course, the Great was going to make the god the patron of his expedition, and as such Alexander was celebrated as the “new Dionysos” (a title that future rulers of Alexandria will also bear). The parallel grows stronger with the encounter by Alexander’s army of a town named Nysa, located near the mount Meros (a word that sounds similar to the Greek word for “thigh”) – the prince claimed the people of Nysa were descendants of the Greek people that Dionysos took with his on his own journey. However, in a complete circle, the adventure of Alexander the Great influenced greatly Dionysos’ own travels. India, for example, was never named in the tale of the Bacchants. But after the exploits of Alexander, Dionysos became the conqueror of India. Poets, painters and sculptors all depicted him taking part in this “war of India” that Euripides had never heard about. In the 5th century CE, this tale grew to enormous proportions thanks to Nonnus’ Dionysiaca, an epic in 48 chants, and where the Indian travel is described from chant 13 to 40.
Despite the recent doubts of some scholars, there is a possibility that Cesar and Augustus used for their political agenda the glory of this god celebrated everywhere in the oriental part of the Roman empire, and even in Rome itself – by both the Greco-Oriental population and the administrative elite of the Hellenism. Indeed, the assimilation between Dionysos and the Latium god Liber Pater had been done for a long time by now, and that despite some strong oppositions (such as the stern repression of the cult of Dionysos in 186). And the success of this religion was noticed by the political authorities. Servius commented what Virgil wrote in his Bucolics, about how Daphnis, on a “chariot pulled by Armenian tigers”, was the first to introduce the “thiasos of Bacchus”. Servius reminds his reader that in truth, it was Cesar that first brought the “mysteries of Liber Pater” to Rome – and as such behind the triumph of Daphnis, one reads as much the travels of Alexander as the exploits of Cesar… Two men that Augustus claims to be the heir of.
This “politic of Dionysos” knew its climax between the second and third century CE, through Hadrian the philhellenic, who demanded to be called the “new Dionysos”. In the same tradition as Alexander the Great, and as the many Hellenistic rulers, from Gallian (who, while leading a double fight against the Barbarians and the Christians, wanted to return to the Greek tradition) to Elagabalus (who had the habit of driving a chariot pulled by lions and tigers).
Dionysos was also used for philosophical and religious agendas. As such, the Orphics, reused in their beliefs the myth of the god’s murder by the Titans. Marcel Detienne wrote about how the myth of Dionysos was the perfect illustration for the main teaching of Orpheus: refrain from murder. In its double sense of 1) do not kill your fellow human being ; but also as 2) do not eat meat. On top of that, Dionysos’ resurrection echoed the belief in palingenesis of the disciples of Orpheus.
With this context, it makes sense that Christian writers, such as Clement of Alexandria or Firmicus Maternus, focused their attacks onto a myth that, for them, was a caricature of their beliefs and a parody of the sacraments of their own religion. Passion and Resurrection (Gregory of Nazianzus even used three hundred verses of the Bacchants in his Christus Patiem), Eucharist, and even the concept of Original Sin – because Dion Chrysostom wrote that mankind was born from the ashes of the Titans mixed with the earth. As such, humanity was part at the same time of the crime of the Titans, and of the divinity of Dionysos (who had been eaten by the Titans). The Christian attacks were also very strong because Orphism, through this myth, had brought to the cult of Dionysos the theology that it lacked (since in the Mysteries of Dionysos, the ritual had a larger and stronger place than the theory).
Tumblr media
VII) A diversity of interpretations
In front of such a complex and elusive personality, it is impossible to give just one interpretation of the character of Dionysos. From the third millennium BCE to the fall of the Roman Empire, the god constantly played a role – his figure was constantly shaped by societies, governments and people. As such, the interpretations offered by mythologists allow us to better understand Dionysos, but they will never be complete or exhaustive. As much, all they can do is bring to light some key elements of his being.
While the mythologists of the early 20th century were prone to excesses, the interpretations of names such as Frazer, Farnell or Miss Harrison are still very interesting. Dionysos is first and foremost a vegetation god, a fecundity god, a chthonian god. Many of his ceremonies are rituals celebrating renewal. He is a god of plants; his emblem if the thyrsus, a branch or a reed stalk crowned by leaves of ivy/vine, or by a pine cone. All these plants play a important role in both the rites and the myth of Dionysos, even though from the 7th century BCE onward he specializes himself as the god of the grapevine and of wine. Dionysos is the lord of the tree. As we saw before, he is related to the Oriental mother-goddesses and to the Aegean world. His wife is Ariadne – who might have been during the Classical era a human, but that was once an Aegean goddess of vegetation. Dionysos is the master of both animal and human fecundity – his favorite companions, the satyrs, the donkeys, the goats, the bulls, are all depicted with a very large phallus. He went down into the Underworld to bring back his mother Semele, and he presides over the Anthesteria, which was a celebration of the dead. Zagreus was believed to have for a mother Persephone, and for a father either Zeus or Hades – and in fact, Zagreus was sometimes identified as being an alternate identity of Hades. This chthonian side of Dionysos was developed in his mysteries: the initiation, the purifications, the teaches of sacred formulas have for a main purpose to allow the dead to escape all the dangers that threaten their travel to the afterlife ; and ultimately, to allow them to find happiness in the Hades.
The Bacchic drunkenness and the possessios/trances of the Menads have also brought forward numerous psychological, psychoanalytical and ethnological commentaries. The dances of the Bacchants were compared to those of the whirling dervishes, of the Jewish Hasidim, of the Siberian shamans and of the American Shakers. This phenomenon was proven to have been widespread throughout all of the Antique Mediterranean world – and to still be existing today in a part of Africa. Séchan-Lévêque noted that the “delirium of the Bacchants” was in many ways similar to neuropathic manifestations. Convulsive and spasmodic movements, the body bending backwards, the neck being thrown around… Both also involve a feeling of depersonalization, the feeling of the self being invaded by an outside persona or entity. Psychanalysts saw a parallel between the mechanisms of the Dionysian possession and various concepts of child-psychanalysis: they claimed that the ritual of the god had a therapeutic effect. The Dionysos-Hades becomes a Dionsyso-Asclepios.
Another theory that should not be ignored is the theory of the “pharmakos”, or the theory of the “scape-goat”, that was popularized by Frazer and then by René Girard in his interpretation of Euripides’ play. The tragedy of the Bacchants presents itself at first like a ritual bacchanal. All differences are erased: all take part in the celebration, be them old or young, male or female, citizens or slaves. But the party goes wrong, violence arrives. The difference becomes an inversion: women perform martial activities, men disguise themselves into women. Human and animal worlds are confused for one another: the Bacchants rip apart of a herd of cow they mistake for men, Pentheus ties up a bull he thought was Dionysos, Agave murders Pentheus while seeing before her a lion. Pentheus, in his transvestite outfit, is a Carnival prince, a temporary king – as Jeanne Roux notes, he is at the same time the scape-goat carrying with him all the soiling and vices of the past year, and the sacrificial victim to open a new and clean year. The symbolism becomes even more obvious due to the fact that Pentheus, in his female disguise, climbs on top of a pine and falls from it. A. G. Bather, in The Problem of the Bacchae (Journal of Hellenic Studies, 1894), noted that in Russia, during Pentecost Thursday, there was a very similar ritual. Villagers had to cut down a young pine-tree and disguise it as a woman before bringing “her” to the village in great joy. Three days later, on Trinity Sunday, the wooden figure was taken out of the village and thrown in a body of water. In Euripides’ play, at the end of the party, the pine-tree is ripped away, the king is killed and torn apart: Pentheus is inflicted a diasparagmos (a dismemberment) by the hands of his own mother and of his aunts. Which in turn will become new scapegoats, as they will be banished from the city afterwar. A new order will rule over Thebes: as René Girard notes in La Violence et le sacré (Violence and the sacred), Dionysos is the god “of the successful lynching”. However we saw previously that Pentheus is the double of Dionysos. Just like his adversary/reflection, the god, in the myth of the Titans, also suffers a diasparagmos. As such there is an identification between the pine-tree that is uprooted, and Dionysos Dendritès, god of the trees. While in Euripides’ play the god appears as the organizer and the force behind the scapegoat ceremony, it is possible that in ancient times he used to be the victim of said ceremony.
Finally, numerous analogies bring Dionysos close to the “kouroi”, the novices that undergo initiation-trials. Pausanias describes how Cadmos placed Semele and young Dionysos in a chest that was thrown in the water and ended in Brasiai/Prasiai (a port of Laconia). This type of trial was also known by other great heroes – Perseus, Moises, Romulus. Just like the initiated ones of the three first classes of Ancient India (the dvija), Dionysos is “twice-born”. Just like Achilles, Herakles and Jason, who were all raised by the horse-man Chiron, Dionysos knew animal-men during his childhood: the goat-men that were the satyrs and the silenes ; but also wolf-men, such as Lycurgus (whose name means “He who acts as a wolf, from lukos “wolf” and “ergon”, action), or Athamas (that Apollodorus compares to a wolf). Just like Achilles that was disguised as a girl, just like Theseus that was mocked for his dress and braided hair, just like Herakles that had put on a dress before queen Omphalus, Dionysos knew the experience of the feminine cross-dressing. Just like Achilles, Melicertes, Herakles, Pelops and Jason, there is the trial of the cauldron – killed, dismembered and boiled, he was resurrected. (Jeanmaire wrote that it is a legend with a strong initiation symbolism, and that seems to answer to very archaic practices explaining or interpreting the dangers that threaten children and teenagers). Just like in African initiation rituals, the rhombus played a key part in his death-resurrection. Just like Pelops, whose homosexual loves for Poseidon have analogies with the initiation of young Cretans, Dionysos, with the mysterious Prosumnos, acts as the hero of an initiation-adventure. Just like Odysseus, Herakles, Orpheus, Theseus, Aeneas or Jason (the latter only through symbolism), he went into the Underworld. Finally, just like Theseus and Gilgamesh, he plunged in the water (and even twice) to escape Lycurgus and to find his mother in the Hades. All those trials are so many shapes of initiation rituals, of obligatory rites of passages allowing the teenager to leave the world of childhood and to join the world of adults.
As such, despite all the critical efforts to understand Dionysos’ personality, to bring an exhaustive interpretation including both his complexity and diversity, the god keeps escaping our minds, breaking our settings, removing the chains with which we would try to bind him. All the way until the end, he will stay elusive. So let us remember how, in both the Homeric hymn to Dionysos, and the Bacchants, Dionysos is always presented as the “un-binder”, as the “Eleuthereus”, the “Luaios”, the “Lusios”, the one that detaches, that sets free ; the god on who all ropes and all binds fall to the ground, the god who can escape any net without effort, the entity that can never be trapped because all those that think they caught him are in fact not even touching him.
Tumblr media
46 notes · View notes
artofapeach · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
Gossipin bros
13 notes · View notes
olympianbutch · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media
Zeus Aithiops 🫓🫒🪺
108 notes · View notes
sapphos-disciple · 12 days
Text
Aphrodite Πάνδημος [Pándēmos]
Tumblr media
my old alter before i updated it, i loved it but i wanted more room for my other deities 💕🌾 γένοιτο
15 notes · View notes
verticordial · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
(1 January 2023)
118 notes · View notes