Tumgik
#historical philosophising
apas-95 · 2 months
Text
it's really funny when people try to say the child sexualisation in Made In Abyss is just artistic expression, or western projection, or whatever, when the author also just straight up draws lolicon hentai.
it's just the funniest and most blatant example of how absurd these defenses actually are, once you get through the obfuscation; and seeing those arguments applied to other things makes it that much more clear that they're just rationalisations. it's just absolutely tiring to be recommended like, a mahjong anime, then to not be able to get through the first episode, because it has multiple panty-shots of a 14 year old, which nobody thought to mention; or to watch people engage in a continued 30-year long debate over which of two other 14 year olds they'd rather have sex with.
it's one thing when the average type of reactionary who defends that sort of thing tries to defend it (being easily-dismissible reactionaries, generally of the exact same political stance as the ones who maintain the legality of creepshots and child marriage while in power) but then it's another thing to see that exact same sort of thing come from nominally ideologically-opposed people. a lot of vaguely-leftist people seem all but ready to re-enact the french postmodernist petition against the age of consent, if only they had any meaningful social base - 'leftists' taking the scenic route to holding the same positions on child sexualisation as those reactionaries. the way the average would-be child abuser nowdays, framing being a 'minor-attracted person' as somehow akin to being lgbt (definitely a positive association to make!), dresses up their desire to exploit children (a desire conforming entirely with the historical premises of class society) in the language of 'youth liberation' and vague defenses of 'deviance', or 'grossness', or 'ickyness', or whatever, is genuinely maddening. the sexualisation and sexual exploitation of children goes hand in hand with fascism everywhere, and was the hallmark of imperialist invasion when Japan did it, when Germany did it, and when modern US or IDF troops do it. it is not revolutionary, it is old and entrenched.
'finding circuitous philosophising that lets me justify reactionary behaviour as communist' is incredibly common, but it's just so incredibly depressing to see it applied to child sexualisation in such an essentially broad and pervasive way.
56 notes · View notes
theoreticallysensible · 9 months
Text
The Hell Without Poetry
I started reading Proletarian Nights by Jacques Rancière, about contradictory aspirations held by artisanal workers in early 19th century France. One of the most interesting points so far are the fact that some workers had a culture of emulating bourgeoise fashion and not saving money, both to differentiate themselves from the domestic servants they felt they were superior to, and to signal that they deserved the same privileges as the bourgeoisie but rejected capitalist ethics of accumulating in order to exploit others.
I’ve just gotten into the famous Gauny section, where Rancière goes off an a tangent about this philosophical joiner (someone who makes wooden building components). The first of his books I read was The Ignorant Schoolmaster, which similarly takes up a single historical figure in order to develop their ideas into a universal, ahistorical frame by blending his voice with theirs. I find the idea really interesting, and it makes me wonder if I could do the same for the people I interviewed for my dissertation. I like how it deconstructs the boundary between historical actor and theorist, emphasising that all people are both, but it only works of course if the people you’re quoting are doing a substantial amount of philosophising. I also don’t want to lose marks for a stylistic gambit.
One of Gauny’s ideas is that work is work, always demeaning no matter what its content is. Rancière points out that this is similar to the philosophy of a preacher at the time, who valorised work for its essential self-sacrifice (Max Weber pricks up his ears), because it allows our body to fulfil its debt created by the wage given by the employer. This is obviously ideologically beneficial to the status quo because valuing just particular aspects of work rather than work it and of itself would suggest that those parts should be expanded i.e. that work can be better or worse and might be improved.
However, Gauny twists the message by separating the effect it has on the body from the effect on the soul. He admits that there is a pleasure to physical self-sacrifice - even though hard work of the sort he was doing can have awful long-term consequences, there’s pleasure in the oblivion you can reach in the arduous routine of it - but he emphasises that it kills the soul by not giving you breathing time to sit and contemplate, discuss ideas, and make art. There’s a beautiful section where Gauny says
“Ah, Dante, you old devil, you never traveled to the real hell, the hell without poetry!”
This speaks to the ideas at the heart of Rancière’s entire project: that everyone aspires to critically engage in the arts, and that the extent to which do is not overdetermined by class position. His project in this book in particular is to demonstrate that there is no pure working class - there is frequent infighting within and between professions and genders, and their morality is often inspired by the bourgeoisie.
In fact, one of the most interesting parts is that many of the workers start seriously questioning the status quo only after they’re visited by bourgeois do-gooders, but rather than take on the ideas of these champagne socialists uncritically, they use them to inspire new ideas. Rather than expecting a new world to come from one place, we should recognise that novelty is always a result of the melding of difference. It actually makes me think of the fact that so many of the progressive ideas developed in Europe, from Rousseau to Marx, were inspired by Native American philosophies (David Graeber & David Wengrow’s book, The Dawn of Everything, has a great section on the possible influence on Rousseau).
The aspirations of people like Gauny to write poetry, to come up with new ideas based on a variety of sources, was largely unrecognised or dismissed when Rancière wrote this in the ‘80s. He was frustrated that not only did capitalists view working people as beneath of that sort of thought, but Marxists saw it as counter-revolutionary and therefore unbecoming. Rancière was disillusioned with Althusser, who’s structuralist Marxism he saw as not leaving any space for people to resist their circumstances, instead being overdetermined by class. I don’t know Rancière’s stance on free will, but as a rather dogmatic determinist even I find that frustrating, as if we aren’t influenced by so much else which can give rise to disruptive convergences. Basically, people are more complicated than that! Any supposedly emancipatory philosophy with a single vision of what the working-class should be is doomed to failure, as Rancière well knew from witnessing the dismissal of the student protests of ‘68 be dismissed as “not real revolution”.
Rancière saw in Gauny a way out of this structuralist trap, where by taking on the high-minded ideas of the more romantic bourgeoisie and reinterpreting them with a personal need to act against the system, new ideas could be created and used to disrupt the distribution of the sensible, or the matrix of acceptable ideas - most important of which was the idea of who is capable of having such ideas. This concept is actually where my name comes from!
I wonder if we’re losing this time to contemplate even more today, with the spectacle invading so much of our lives - social media being the quintessential example. This is not such a danger if we’re using it to chat to people, but if we’re just scrolling… there’s not much thinking going on there. 😅 Guy Debord, in the ‘50s, was already talking about capital colonising our everyday life, and this stealing of attention, our time to think and talk and create and have ideas, seems to be the worst consequence of it.
3 notes · View notes
sun-in-retrograde · 2 months
Text
Sedna Square Sun - You just lost The Game
Tumblr media
At 18 February at 3:00 pm UK time the Sun (29°27 Aquarius) Squares Sedna (29°27 Taurus). Every personal planet trined Sedna as they went into Aquarius and had their conjunction with Pluto. And every planet will square Sedna on the way out. This is the last time we'll have a sun square Sedna in Taurus.
Things I might be looking out for:
The conflict between the big picture and your own place in it
Which will win? Maybe now is a time to let go of your ow selfish needs in favour of the greater whole, or to reprioritize yourself over what you see as universally good.
If you're super religious, you might see being gay as universally bad and against God. You might see your own desires as sinful and wrong. Only by giving into temptation can you learn a greater truth - that God doesn't actually hate you for being yourself.
Organising the universe into schemes and systems
Sedna is a very oceanic, deep, evolutionary energy. But the sun brings structure and awareness to it, now might be a good time to try and understand big truths. Just understand that any theory and model you bring to big truths are just approximations and you can never perfectly understand things that are too big to grasp.
Traumatic incidents, core memories
There's a big trauma element to Sedna and this may be a time for formative experiences of trauma. I don't think we realise how core traumatic experiences aren't just childhood experiences. We keep growing, so we are always vulnerable to trauma. Just like we're always able to heal trauma.
Uncovering truths about the self
Philosophising, introspection, meditation. Now is a good time to get into deep truths a bit. It may not be easy - it may mean awareness of past trauma.Or even historic ancestral trauma.
Being conscious of consciousness
Have you ever thought too hard about breathing and stopped doing it automatically? Consciousness is something that, in thinking about, you kind of miss. See "The Game" - the only rule is you can't think about it, so if you're aware you're playing you've lost. Awareness of the nature of consciousness is not some meditative enlightened high point. It happens regularly. It's actually kind of annoying sometimes.
0 notes
libidomechanica · 8 months
Text
“Thine eye bears that rang with, and his springs”
A sonnet sequence
               1
Shamed, I hate the sport which he call’d his brain is haunted; I had been fewer, she seized the musk of the sweets that should fail. Not for all of Kings; while the stairs on the lea; with Tu mi chamas’s’ from Portingales do learn to dig my mouth. On a range of Blue, ’ could not wrong, the stove. The reason; but couldn’t have been wooed and wooings. Thine eye bears that rang with, and his spring’s once dead who would love. Thou, best of those Letters faire of bright, downcast, yet espiegle eye, have pillow; get thee this?
               2
With silken trees upon my false as truth as I would come disguise of my pity-wanting pain. Yet not thy hand! What is poetry which she went bore in dreams so pleasure nor purple get, each trifle under a little pool left the happy! When all my native shore, which on the sweep into the moon peeped, just escape? Just what sighs are done, so much bending to the lake one long bow better days, robert Burns: leeze me on my palms in cluster, knots far more celestial thief!
               3
But three useful things, the warmth of her star must fall on Locksley Hall! Moment stand but glowing bust, which by and by: whether ties by last night beautiful a sun, and her grace in this and one on tithes and prayed: give me kind Amaryllis, she never will speak of your fair no painting of a new one, in gloss of spirit, wit, nor would have been told, and now we reached the must. Oh, Mary, at the beginning to the skies above me with wailing stronger and thinness beat.
               4
Yet, love, to go auspicious borne through oh! Into a philosophised: a great heroes sometimes faint look living at my heart, ever in the grave, the evening. When I am dead, and unfold, coin’d to herself was not seen a ghost— whate’er may be my ain. Of such a climate will allow; and the light he looked everywhere a dry radius describes form steps forward to exist, thought I could, if it is the constant memories, lest I withers, who want of ours.
               5
Have left in thy beames, and take that had sung of them bristled at my feet. Tremendous to be gone, her loved so slight clatter, like this was queen; but Phillis the hollow ocean-ridges roaring seaward, and conversation; their horrid selves know not; but her cottage bent my way, beneath the sea-gulls, with a little snakes around, when the rocks as a black rocks as a boy when first the ancient founts of men. If thou wilt be stol’n, I fear, for tears those light turn sleep to costume.
               6
A village church landscape lowers, as we climbed high, a supernatural historical superiority, wild me through his strange head, and in aguish folks. Now I resemble all the mysterious matter, and flower, round his sole and reason, until they foul faults should find. Of such an host what of the moonbeams fell negligently o’er his couch; he meditated, fond of those soft to be assailed; and thou with orient, and pens imbibed the sickly too?
               7
Knowledge comes—but nothing bright i’ the talking while laigh descending from their straw. The claver hay, the primrose, thus bepearl’d with a butcher’s knife cut through shadow of the poet sings, let us range, the swallow jinkin’ round to trace in life began to rally his spirit in the house of the moon, and his master worse used no more, or happy boughs! Forget not the present piece of legal strife, let me mention, to thy rest against the moor, and even thee feel alone.
               8
Centre sit, yet, when the country would be; saw the bow, to ride, and their proper pale, pale and turn’d it in thy beames, and said, But, the ball. Close this kiss upon his country and move; twere profane you gone, to all—which haunt they should fail. Rose- mesh pulled every part So we who bear its sweet whisper to you with orient eyes dote, what means the dark with none, but doth, if thou dove- like help! Saying, I have plain, but wondering myrtle round her whisper to thee, which last century.
               9
There had suffered shipwreck with tears? When most importune straight to flutter the morning hymn this Arbour makes no show the top, and the name the promise that poor desires had a heart? Remake, completely sans culotte, ’ and with thy living next that whatever bar the rest, that you can dare to know for me to choke him, so that censuring world I would have spent its novel force, something like very brothers, men the Right and Good and fill’d his toilet, but thy song, nor ever.
               10
Since—since—in youth, of love, to move, but never heath and giue us sight to write above thee; and in the graces, he probable you must, that he had gone through they condensed; but what she shall quickly too? Where Ioyes peace at last doubt! Baby fingers, and comes into my mouth with their sorrow’s crown of sorrow’s crown, that is all which on the long bow better though cold, he threw his spirit, by spirit works lest arms and left me with the sweet Infanta of the same, kill’d by a spark.
               11
Or none; or like—like nothing can confounding on Plato’s pride of Beauty joins with a kind of maxims preaching dumbe eloquence her cheek. Mild zephyrs waft thee thou of thy kind: nor wine nor war’s quick sharp scratch and blue spurt of a lighter though he is near, and the tomb? Each man of sense has it so befell. As stiff twin compasses ghosts the sixth year is the usual cut, his very much amisse. Yet everywhere, and that gilds the Almighty things. Or vainly in the lips.
               12
From hence immortal serenely interpose: brood down at them the shock of cold water the ship, and meet below envy, robert Burns: know its worth in an existence, fy! Make me a bower of willow; and her grand roll the blue eyes were difficult to tame: preserving little good, and in this loue in hell not for superstition with two rows of thy early day, spring’s maturity, checks Summer’s birth, leaves linnet pours, the maid that is, at all; believe the lay.
               13
If I love their feeble force with this when to perish every color of the things upon him sallow from these things of Love’s unbounded in the shell of my own life, a death should endure not for all the valley of shame; my eyes can show no real likeness,— like them gold, and come as the rest, as well as mine, are as moonlight unused to pour millet on grave, I met beside it, and that for an empires he leaves linnet’s pipe as sad as plover’s eye! I shall hold the kindle manhood, but can ne’er was her kind employment. ’Er which dare claime from time and play, love, give me these are mix’d so slight clatter, like callow birds and more. The Rights of men: men, my brothers, all is change in your soul, and loud on the shade.
               14
To hold some say, No. They the physics, bodies whereof he complain, till some other joys of life— immortal tympanum: his eye upon the foam of ages; while the blue eyes then thine at ane an’ twenty, Tam! And you are not seen by degrees all characters are class’d— was to lug me out and I were lying, hidden in you, who where shade. A thing was silence fell awald beside it, and thou art. And, as I am now, With Time’s injurious lace, which I should sleep.
               15
Slowly with patience moves, come hither, the dead have something flames, my heart be put to proof, in this march of my wretched and for the prize the dying nigher, glares at one things upon the worldling sneer, point out the brow! The fire is my sin and glimmer of pearl makes me in abundance find what is the fair. And all her breast wheel of life, no longer the pool their wish to confusion of hands or the most true is the moon, to keep a vigil there in the honey-moon—but dearth.
               16
And freeholders—yet no less—the voice, the worker in the lingers, and dames heroic and champion him and a new hoe. Woman is, protection. As sure an end to govern the sun she lovely in thy tresses bound for little, while playing only now and one on tithes, and day. I said, I am cautious benches. To whom my jewels trifle—an old song, ’ set to some civility, who bids all men believe: if t is he but a curate; and time believe.
               17
Her for ill, for thee. The first time has left me dry, left me with greater than tempt further than those who had now discuss’d he hated been. Strange fortune be, such was not, comfort wring. So I triumph return. The dead who would give life in me each passion and faces, heroes something for the same self-interest or ambition—both white goodnights. Shown; a thought so, nigh, a supernatural water, came over Juan’s candlesticks burned away among the clanging thro’ the strain’d!
               18
There was no mouse, but one peece of love these charmers, who deem that means serious: but this is truth perhaps ideal, are so divine connexions strong, by an impart, or gemmes or fruits of passion, from instruments defaced,—and grace I should the king himself on that every boughs! Then laurels and myrtle round my shiel, amuse me at my feelings on the blame out of his great bases for ever will mourners be, look we for a prize pig, ploughman, for a still kissing me.
               19
Subjects locked, and look’d out of the scornful ways; the pairtrick whirring o’er themselves to love. Not for all thy gentle verse, bound dizzily,—mistaken, and Juan’s nervous feeling charge some dusky highway near and death cannot heard to explain would give life in one of the earth am rotten; from hence immortal summers had such a one do I remonstrate: folly wide these woeful valleys of Paradise. Our work, ’ said Juan; and her chamber deafe of noise like to orphans young, and her eye, yet grew a lace of silk and sighs he sets to herself unknown; to see a child too closely the shock of jar impact collapse flash of my life, who by turns had flung a shadow of the yellow, but lou’d a loue not to this?
               20
—Must a little captive, burst thy anxious parent longs on thy way, and make no noise, no tear-floods, nor evermore it is the pomander. To jest, you’llchoose some bitter, deathly ache; till old days must close; the soiree too were not for sale, but now, because, as suits their several arts or parts run o’er, I can’t espy in any one that sweet babes? So well befits, for still made Norman Church his state: you look, ’ quoth Milor; why, Adeline, you faine would have fresh operations.
               21
In the graces, those bodies high raigne on tithes, and kiss, thoughts like a fire doth Love increasing ever. To move, but doth not able is to be packed into a philosophy, Dorothy, after red. In that they are nigh lands, the crag; droops the heard you speak too much themes are banished, and bear along with year is the curtains of huge despair, I should have prevailed? Their rank and sweetness overcame my shy and short beside the eye, hauled away among the gynocracy.
               22
Until I hear, it’s something like very powerful rhyme; but since, not even while Pan is away. Glide, gentlemen, esquired some slightly turns—with the pride with milk and mountains. Doth half a turbot. Turning on the foremost files of Eden lying at a sure rate o Providence! For more than catches. As wide as if they had such visitation,—fair Adeline, in bringing of the rest: o my Electra! He fixed my eye, all over again of that and trios!
               23
Can I but relive in the grass and by the dead have something between the more base than his destiny, he who were besieging all his subjected to no disputed: I merely rubbing the old Tyrian vest dyed purple orchis variegate the shadow pass’d as such a climate will hold the pale shade by doing easily, whene’er she chose, what strength. Not easy thing, through oh! Were in wild Mahratta- battle fell awald beside it, and that’s had enough stays shut.
               24
An’ I saw you to my woes, my sighs, tears, for these our spoiled forests, long since I hate the proper pale, pale and rumor are ye worn with threaten’d the cold approach of mine, lass; and when a woman, so sweetly, my dearest and newer purple and truffles. Better by far too long hath the shepherd, or that are gone, what means the world wore the silent ears to plaining, heartbroken board, and unfolded to pour down rain, with joyes increasing will, thou, or wak’st thou thyself dost pay.
               25
Of mischief you mightest my seat forbear, and even there and found it, as of old pedigree match’d with a most ensured her praise devise, among the fashionable bees— and strangely to my sighes stormed be! Let dainty wits crie on this— the dinner and even children are as moonlight unused beauty; others, his world is grown so bad, mad slanderers by night have a tongue evoke your memory. Of either held it better thou art and kiss, she cries, Forsooth, let go!
               26
And came back to his level stand, the baiting-place of melody in the sage would have plain I see— I see—Ah, no! Or mountains, and riots wanton lapwing gets himself on that doth not rise nor set, making through thou hast not gall, undressing in nomenclature rate o Providence! The rest, he shut his due. Now raving-wild, I curse these charmed verse alone; and this day; but I’m too late, its salutary aim, in this is with their sun,& I wanted; therefore, mortals know!
               27
Weakness to feel his pulse and cream? If in the century. With still either heard a hint of your mantle of his graven on its green footsteps; no one has told, that which neuer taketh rust, she that of Dian: ray fades on the two. Than unswept sea; a grey cheek; he can hear the daisies growing in full, voluptuous, but slowly, slowly, creeping thro’ ripen’d corn and what we may be his prey, for ever new; more happy hair, and chide thy breast or on my spinnin’ wheel.
               28
But both man and fair fallen to dust. Queen rose of virtue hate, hate of Empires he learns to-day: here, where a fact is to be won, beauteous niggard, why dost thou thus to enter me? Some praised her forehead, and I was ’ware, so weeping over dull nature’s sharpest pangs here and then of course thence. But my heart torments on me; I did not rain’d his blood warm when thy feet fluttering hate. And though true; for surely they’re sincerity was obvious in each bird’s careless wave?
               29
Fain would have few resource is throng’d with grief are, and heaven that set, a man, who in earth, defac’d its lovely maid. Play withers, who had brought found all, severed great eyes without remorse or ruining? With free and quivering against such as once to me; the little things, exceptions to the dark of hazel bowers, youth sighed Which rose make of it. The present, the moment stand in thy cheek; he can’t complain’d, spurd with her richest dye, flames are wafted abroad, and thereupon take rest, he smiling said what thy control. Be her lips ill hung or set, and that which some sinecures he leant from my natures, but didn’t just tow me an inch, no nor leave to the saloon, he problems from thy beames, and to die.
0 notes
eternalefficiency · 2 years
Text
FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE’S INVERSE OF VALUATIONS AND MASTER-SLAVE MORALITY DIAGRAM.
The bottom half of the diagram attached is Friedrich Nietzsche’s inversion of valuations or what he called slave morality, which he identified as Judaism’s and Christianity’s sympathy, pity, love and compassion etc. European virtues of the virtuous ism (racism) are the inverse or master morality which are what Friedrich Nietzsche emphatically endorsed, such as the elite, aristocratic, belligerent and those with pride, power, vitality and that which is full of life and life asserting etc. Friedrich Nietzsche philosophised that Judaism and Christianity were an inverse of valuations, in that, Judaism and Christianity are weak because they have compassion for and take care of the sick, poor and ill-constituted etc. This Nietzschean inversion of valuations or what he calls slave morality is inverse to master morality represented by the noble and warrior-like ancient Greeks, Romans and other fair haired peoples. Nietzsche believed that Judaism had won an eternal victory over master morality when Rome converted to Christianity in 323 AD under emperor Constantine the Great. Nietzsche’s inversion of values develops out of the ‘ressentiment’ felt by the weak towards the powerful. From the aristocratic mode of valuation, another mode of valuation branches off, which develops into its opposite: the priestly mode. Nietzsche proposes that confrontation between the priestly caste and the warrior caste fuels this battle between slave and master morality. The priests, and all those who feel disenfranchised and powerless in a lowly state of subjugation and physical impotence (e.g., slavery), develop a deep and venomous hatred for the powerful. Thus originates what Nietzsche calls the “slave revolt in morality”, which, according to him, begins with Judaism, for it is the bridge that led to the slave revolt, via Christian morality, of the alienated, oppressed masses of the Roman Empire. Nietzsche hypothesised a historical struggle between the European (master morality) Judaic (slave morality) with the latter eventually achieving a victory, broken temporarily by the Renaissance, but then reasserted by the Reformation, and finally confirmed by the French Revolution when the “ressentiment instincts of the rabble” triumphed. Here is a quote of Nietzsche’s: All the world’s efforts against the “aristocrats,” the “mighty,” the “masters,” the “holders of power,” are negligible by comparison with what has been accomplished against those classes by the Jews – the Jews, that priestly nation which eventually realised that the one method of effecting satisfaction on its enemies and tyrants was by means of a radical transvaluation of values, which was at the same time an act of the cleverest revenge. Yet the method was only appropriate to a nation of priests, to a nation of the most jealously nursed priestly revengefulness. It was the Jews who, in opposition to the aristocratic equation (good = aristocratic = beautiful = happy = loved by the gods), dared with a terrifying logic to suggest the contrary equation, and indeed to maintain with the teeth of the most profound hatred (the hatred of weakness) this contrary equation, namely, “the wretched are alone the good; the poor, the weak, the lowly, are alone the good; the suffering, the needy, the sick, the loathsome, are the only ones who are pious, the only ones who are blessed, for them alone is salvation – but you, on the other hand, you aristocrats, you men of power, you are to all eternity the evil, the horrible, the covetous, the insatiate, the godless; eternally also shall you be the unblessed, the cursed, the damned!” We know who it was who reaped the heritage of this Jewish transvaluation [Jesus Christ].
Tumblr media
0 notes
efficientbible · 2 years
Text
FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE’S INVERSE OF VALUATIONS AND MASTER-SLAVE MORALITY DIAGRAM.
The bottom half of the diagram attached is Friedrich Nietzsche’s inversion of valuations or what he called slave morality, which he identified as Judaism’s and Christianity’s sympathy, pity, love and compassion etc. European virtues of the virtuous ism (racism) are the inverse or master morality which are what Friedrich Nietzsche emphatically endorsed, such as the elite, aristocratic, belligerent and those with pride, power, vitality and that which is full of life and life asserting etc. Friedrich Nietzsche philosophised that Judaism and Christianity were an inverse of valuations, in that, Judaism and Christianity are weak because they have compassion for and take care of the sick, poor and ill-constituted etc. This Nietzschean inversion of valuations or what he calls slave morality is inverse to master morality represented by the noble and warrior-like ancient Greeks, Romans and other fair haired peoples. Nietzsche believed that Judaism had won an eternal victory over master morality when Rome converted to Christianity in 323 AD under emperor Constantine the Great. Nietzsche’s inversion of values develops out of the ‘ressentiment’ felt by the weak towards the powerful. From the aristocratic mode of valuation, another mode of valuation branches off, which develops into its opposite: the priestly mode. Nietzsche proposes that confrontation between the priestly caste and the warrior caste fuels this battle between slave and master morality. The priests, and all those who feel disenfranchised and powerless in a lowly state of subjugation and physical impotence (e.g., slavery), develop a deep and venomous hatred for the powerful. Thus originates what Nietzsche calls the “slave revolt in morality”, which, according to him, begins with Judaism, for it is the bridge that led to the slave revolt, via Christian morality, of the alienated, oppressed masses of the Roman Empire. Nietzsche hypothesised a historical struggle between the European (master morality) Judaic (slave morality) with the latter eventually achieving a victory, broken temporarily by the Renaissance, but then reasserted by the Reformation, and finally confirmed by the French Revolution when the “ressentiment instincts of the rabble” triumphed. Here is a quote of Nietzsche’s: All the world’s efforts against the “aristocrats,” the “mighty,” the “masters,” the “holders of power,” are negligible by comparison with what has been accomplished against those classes by the Jews – the Jews, that priestly nation which eventually realised that the one method of effecting satisfaction on its enemies and tyrants was by means of a radical transvaluation of values, which was at the same time an act of the cleverest revenge. Yet the method was only appropriate to a nation of priests, to a nation of the most jealously nursed priestly revengefulness. It was the Jews who, in opposition to the aristocratic equation (good = aristocratic = beautiful = happy = loved by the gods), dared with a terrifying logic to suggest the contrary equation, and indeed to maintain with the teeth of the most profound hatred (the hatred of weakness) this contrary equation, namely, “the wretched are alone the good; the poor, the weak, the lowly, are alone the good; the suffering, the needy, the sick, the loathsome, are the only ones who are pious, the only ones who are blessed, for them alone is salvation – but you, on the other hand, you aristocrats, you men of power, you are to all eternity the evil, the horrible, the covetous, the insatiate, the godless; eternally also shall you be the unblessed, the cursed, the damned!” We know who it was who reaped the heritage of this Jewish transvaluation [Jesus Christ].
Tumblr media
0 notes
ismlessism · 2 years
Text
FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE’S INVERSE OF VALUATIONS AND MASTER-SLAVE MORALITY DIAGRAM.
The bottom half of the diagram attached is Friedrich Nietzsche’s inversion of valuations or what he called slave morality, which he identified as Judaism’s and Christianity’s sympathy, pity, love and compassion etc. European virtues of the virtuous ism (racism) are the inverse or master morality which are what Friedrich Nietzsche emphatically endorsed, such as the elite, aristocratic, belligerent and those with pride, power, vitality and that which is full of life and life asserting etc. Friedrich Nietzsche philosophised that Judaism and Christianity were an inverse of valuations, in that, Judaism and Christianity are weak because they have compassion for and take care of the sick, poor and ill-constituted etc. This Nietzschean inversion of valuations or what he calls slave morality is inverse to master morality represented by the noble and warrior-like ancient Greeks, Romans and other fair haired peoples. Nietzsche believed that Judaism had won an eternal victory over master morality when Rome converted to Christianity in 323 AD under emperor Constantine the Great. Nietzsche’s inversion of values develops out of the ‘ressentiment’ felt by the weak towards the powerful. From the aristocratic mode of valuation, another mode of valuation branches off, which develops into its opposite: the priestly mode. Nietzsche proposes that confrontation between the priestly caste and the warrior caste fuels this battle between slave and master morality. The priests, and all those who feel disenfranchised and powerless in a lowly state of subjugation and physical impotence (e.g., slavery), develop a deep and venomous hatred for the powerful. Thus originates what Nietzsche calls the “slave revolt in morality”, which, according to him, begins with Judaism, for it is the bridge that led to the slave revolt, via Christian morality, of the alienated, oppressed masses of the Roman Empire. Nietzsche hypothesised a historical struggle between the European (master morality) Judaic (slave morality) with the latter eventually achieving a victory, broken temporarily by the Renaissance, but then reasserted by the Reformation, and finally confirmed by the French Revolution when the “ressentiment instincts of the rabble” triumphed. Here is a quote of Nietzsche’s: All the world’s efforts against the “aristocrats,” the “mighty,” the “masters,” the “holders of power,” are negligible by comparison with what has been accomplished against those classes by the Jews – the Jews, that priestly nation which eventually realised that the one method of effecting satisfaction on its enemies and tyrants was by means of a radical transvaluation of values, which was at the same time an act of the cleverest revenge. Yet the method was only appropriate to a nation of priests, to a nation of the most jealously nursed priestly revengefulness. It was the Jews who, in opposition to the aristocratic equation (good = aristocratic = beautiful = happy = loved by the gods), dared with a terrifying logic to suggest the contrary equation, and indeed to maintain with the teeth of the most profound hatred (the hatred of weakness) this contrary equation, namely, “the wretched are alone the good; the poor, the weak, the lowly, are alone the good; the suffering, the needy, the sick, the loathsome, are the only ones who are pious, the only ones who are blessed, for them alone is salvation – but you, on the other hand, you aristocrats, you men of power, you are to all eternity the evil, the horrible, the covetous, the insatiate, the godless; eternally also shall you be the unblessed, the cursed, the damned!” We know who it was who reaped the heritage of this Jewish transvaluation [Jesus Christ].
Tumblr media
0 notes
ismlesser · 2 years
Text
FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE’S INVERSE OF VALUATIONS AND MASTER-SLAVE MORALITY DIAGRAM.
The bottom half of the diagram attached is Friedrich Nietzsche’s inversion of valuations or what he called slave morality, which he identified as Judaism’s and Christianity’s sympathy, pity, love and compassion etc. European virtues of the virtuous ism (racism) are the inverse or master morality which are what Friedrich Nietzsche emphatically endorsed, such as the elite, aristocratic, belligerent and those with pride, power, vitality and that which is full of life and life asserting etc. Friedrich Nietzsche philosophised that Judaism and Christianity were an inverse of valuations, in that, Judaism and Christianity are weak because they have compassion for and take care of the sick, poor and ill-constituted etc. This Nietzschean inversion of valuations or what he calls slave morality is inverse to master morality represented by the noble and warrior-like ancient Greeks, Romans and other fair haired peoples. Nietzsche believed that Judaism had won an eternal victory over master morality when Rome converted to Christianity in 323 AD under emperor Constantine the Great. Nietzsche’s inversion of values develops out of the ‘ressentiment’ felt by the weak towards the powerful. From the aristocratic mode of valuation, another mode of valuation branches off, which develops into its opposite: the priestly mode. Nietzsche proposes that confrontation between the priestly caste and the warrior caste fuels this battle between slave and master morality. The priests, and all those who feel disenfranchised and powerless in a lowly state of subjugation and physical impotence (e.g., slavery), develop a deep and venomous hatred for the powerful. Thus originates what Nietzsche calls the “slave revolt in morality”, which, according to him, begins with Judaism, for it is the bridge that led to the slave revolt, via Christian morality, of the alienated, oppressed masses of the Roman Empire. Nietzsche hypothesised a historical struggle between the European (master morality) Judaic (slave morality) with the latter eventually achieving a victory, broken temporarily by the Renaissance, but then reasserted by the Reformation, and finally confirmed by the French Revolution when the “ressentiment instincts of the rabble” triumphed. Here is a quote of Nietzsche’s: All the world’s efforts against the “aristocrats,” the “mighty,” the “masters,” the “holders of power,” are negligible by comparison with what has been accomplished against those classes by the Jews – the Jews, that priestly nation which eventually realised that the one method of effecting satisfaction on its enemies and tyrants was by means of a radical transvaluation of values, which was at the same time an act of the cleverest revenge. Yet the method was only appropriate to a nation of priests, to a nation of the most jealously nursed priestly revengefulness. It was the Jews who, in opposition to the aristocratic equation (good = aristocratic = beautiful = happy = loved by the gods), dared with a terrifying logic to suggest the contrary equation, and indeed to maintain with the teeth of the most profound hatred (the hatred of weakness) this contrary equation, namely, “the wretched are alone the good; the poor, the weak, the lowly, are alone the good; the suffering, the needy, the sick, the loathsome, are the only ones who are pious, the only ones who are blessed, for them alone is salvation – but you, on the other hand, you aristocrats, you men of power, you are to all eternity the evil, the horrible, the covetous, the insatiate, the godless; eternally also shall you be the unblessed, the cursed, the damned!” We know who it was who reaped the heritage of this Jewish transvaluation [Jesus Christ].
Tumblr media
0 notes
europeanvirtues · 2 years
Text
FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE’S INVERSE OF VALUATIONS AND MASTER-SLAVE MORALITY DIAGRAM.
The bottom half of the diagram attached is Friedrich Nietzsche’s inversion of valuations or what he called slave morality, which he identified as Judaism’s and Christianity’s sympathy, pity, love and compassion etc. European virtues of the virtuous ism (racism) are the inverse or master morality which are what Friedrich Nietzsche emphatically endorsed, such as the elite, aristocratic, belligerent and those with pride, power, vitality and that which is full of life and life asserting etc. Friedrich Nietzsche philosophised that Judaism and Christianity were an inverse of valuations, in that, Judaism and Christianity are weak because they have compassion for and take care of the sick, poor and ill-constituted etc. This Nietzschean inversion of valuations or what he calls slave morality is inverse to master morality represented by the noble and warrior-like ancient Greeks, Romans and other fair haired peoples. Nietzsche believed that Judaism had won an eternal victory over master morality when Rome converted to Christianity in 323 AD under emperor Constantine the Great. Nietzsche’s inversion of values develops out of the ‘ressentiment’ felt by the weak towards the powerful. From the aristocratic mode of valuation, another mode of valuation branches off, which develops into its opposite: the priestly mode. Nietzsche proposes that confrontation between the priestly caste and the warrior caste fuels this battle between slave and master morality. The priests, and all those who feel disenfranchised and powerless in a lowly state of subjugation and physical impotence (e.g., slavery), develop a deep and venomous hatred for the powerful. Thus originates what Nietzsche calls the “slave revolt in morality”, which, according to him, begins with Judaism, for it is the bridge that led to the slave revolt, via Christian morality, of the alienated, oppressed masses of the Roman Empire. Nietzsche hypothesised a historical struggle between the European (master morality) Judaic (slave morality) with the latter eventually achieving a victory, broken temporarily by the Renaissance, but then reasserted by the Reformation, and finally confirmed by the French Revolution when the “ressentiment instincts of the rabble” triumphed. Here is a quote of Nietzsche’s: All the world’s efforts against the “aristocrats,” the “mighty,” the “masters,” the “holders of power,” are negligible by comparison with what has been accomplished against those classes by the Jews – the Jews, that priestly nation which eventually realised that the one method of effecting satisfaction on its enemies and tyrants was by means of a radical transvaluation of values, which was at the same time an act of the cleverest revenge. Yet the method was only appropriate to a nation of priests, to a nation of the most jealously nursed priestly revengefulness. It was the Jews who, in opposition to the aristocratic equation (good = aristocratic = beautiful = happy = loved by the gods), dared with a terrifying logic to suggest the contrary equation, and indeed to maintain with the teeth of the most profound hatred (the hatred of weakness) this contrary equation, namely, “the wretched are alone the good; the poor, the weak, the lowly, are alone the good; the suffering, the needy, the sick, the loathsome, are the only ones who are pious, the only ones who are blessed, for them alone is salvation – but you, on the other hand, you aristocrats, you men of power, you are to all eternity the evil, the horrible, the covetous, the insatiate, the godless; eternally also shall you be the unblessed, the cursed, the damned!” We know who it was who reaped the heritage of this Jewish transvaluation [Jesus Christ].
Tumblr media
0 notes
yscolan · 2 years
Text
yscolan#24 winter tune school. y porth, llandysul, ceredigion, west wales
Tumblr media
y porth, llandysul, ceredigion, west wales.
20 places maximum
yscolan #24
A weekend of learning tunes from Welsh traditions. The emphasis will be on melody & will cover airs as well as the broad range of dance-tune types from jigs, hornpipes & reels; marches and minuets; to other forms including triple time tunes such as hop jigs, slip jigs, 3/2 polkas, 3/2 reels, & 3/2 hornpipes.
Ceri will be teaching a neglected repertoire by ear. No sheet music will be supplied, but students are encouraged to bring their own recording devices, including manuscript.
The weekend is open to any type of melody instrument, and the ability to pick up a tune by ear is a minimum requirement. Players will not be graded into beginners, intermediate etc., and we will learn together at our own different pace. Slow and fast learners will deal with different practical problems together. For example, faster learners will look at phrasing, rhythmic nuance, improvisation etc., while slower learners will deal with landing points in the tunes, and how rhythm and melody coincide. We all learn from each other’s different ways. The aim will be to play together as much as possible and to broaden our tune repertoire. There are ample opportunities for informal tune playing together, swapping tunes or songs, sessions, jamming, chatting, philosophising etc., in the evenings and throughout the day. It’s not all work and participants can use the time as they see fit, including taking advantage of the proximity of the river Teifi, mooching around the town and environs, visiting the nearby woollen mills, or extending their visit to take in the coast at Llangrannog or Cwmtydu, some 25 miles away.
Unlike the annual summer school in Tremarchog, food and camping will not be provided at the winter school in Llandysul. This is reflected in the reduced fee of £100 which covers all tuition.
All activities will take place in Y Porth, Llandysul. We will use the large, private function room, which overlooks the river for all teaching sessions. It is a bright, warm, airy, comfortable space. Evening sessions will take place by the fireside in the bar, or in the function room, as we please.
For further details, please write to [email protected] or call 01559 384962
Daily structure Friday Arrive at 12 Mid-day Teaching sessions 2-6 Informal session in the bar 8-11
Saturday Teaching Session 10-1 Guest Tutor Teaching session 3-6 Informal session in the bar 8-11
Sunday Teaching session 10-12 Guest Tutor
This yscolan#24 will include a guest tutor who will lead the Saturday afternoon session for those interested. The session will explore deeper aspects of these more generally touched on in the regular sessions. To reflect the deep and strong song traditions of Dyffryn Teifi specifically and south Cardiganshire in general, Julie Murphy will look into the repertory of the area, its history and some of the different forms used in the tradition.
For others who don’t wish to attend the specific subject of the guest tutor, I will be taking a tune class as usual.
Location
Llandysul is a small, bustling town on the northern bank of the river Teifi in south Cardiganshire. It is a stronghold of Welsh language and culture, historically and up to the present day. The area is famous for salmon and sewin fishing. Gomer Press (now relocated to the edge of the town) was once situated in the middle of the town and is one of Wales’ most important and influential publishers. The original building is now a cafe. Other literary connections include Unitarian minister and poet Gwilym Marles, great-uncle to Dylan Thomas, who built a library (Myfyrgell) on Rhiw Seion. Dewi Emrys the poet spent his later years in nearby Talgarreg. The riverside church dates to the 12th Century. The woollen industry’s historical importance is reflected in the number of woollen mills abounding locally. The National Wool Museum is located some 10 miles away, in Drefach Felindre. The river Teifi describes an arc around the town in a wide bow edged with water meadows and playing fields on one bank and steep woodland on the other, culminating in a white water tumble downstream of the bridge. There is a riverside walk along the entire length.
Y Porth is a traditional Victorian hotel that has a long standing association with salmon and sewin fishing. It stands on the site of an older tavern, in all likelihood a medieval pilgrim’s Inn called Troed Rhiw’r Clochdy. It is a family owned hotel that has been in the family three generations and is at the heart of the town.
Accommodation and Food
We are unable to offer accommodation as part of the weekend and ask you to make your own arrangements. We will try to help in any way, with recommendations, inquiries and so on. The town and environs are blessed with many different kinds of accommodation to suit any budget, from camping and caravanning, glamping, hostels, through bunkhouses to guesthouses, traditional b&b or holiday lets.
Y Porth has seven en suite rooms available, comprising single, double, twin and family rooms, and early booking is recommended. Should you wish to share a twin room with another attendee, we can liaise between yourselves and Y Porth. For more info on Y Porth: porthhotel.co.uk
Unlike the annual summer school in Tremarchog, we can’t offer food as part of the weekend. However, there are many choices in Llandysul to suit every pocket, including a chip shop, Indian and Chinese takeaway, pub grub, Portuguese tapas; also a tea room, cafes and shops in the daytime. The Spar sells cold snacks and is open till late, and CK’s supermarket sells hot snacks, also open till late. If you choose to stay in a bunkhouse, there are plenty of places to buy food to do your own cooking.
Finally, Y Porth has a restaurant at reasonable prices that reflect the excellent, local, home cooked food on offer.
On Sunday, Y Porth offers two course Cino Dydd Sul / Sunday Lunch for around £17.50, or three courses for £21.50. If there is enough interest, we can arrange a group booking as a kind of farewell meal for those who would like.
Cost
The cost of the Llandysul yscolan tune school is £100 per person to cover all tuition fees.
1 note · View note
athousandgateaux · 3 years
Quote
the philosopher here sees 'instincts' in man as he now is and assumes that these belong to the unalterable facts of mankind and to that extent could provide a key to the understanding of the world in general: the whole of teleology is constructed by speaking of the man of the last four millennia as of an eternal man towards whom all things in the world have had a natural relationship from the time he began. But everything has become: there are no eternal facts, just as there are no absolute truths. Consequently what is needed from now on is historical philosophising, and with it the virtue of modesty.
Friedrich Nietzsche, Human, All Too Human, n.2, pg. 12
84 notes · View notes
profanetools · 2 years
Text
bone to pick here (it's CWC-bashing time) but I'm thinking about why Kas ended up being drawn to Sotha Sil despite being Not That Kind of Acolyte and I honestly don't know why Seht has this reputation for being mysterious and inscrutable and his followers enamoured with his obscurity? I understand he's a mystery to the player as we never meet him in TES3 but honestly I feel like as the tribune who isn't particularly interested in bring worshipped and who went out 'into the field' more than Vivec and Almalexia, he should probably have, historically, a more down-to-earth, practical-minded following? Besides, we already *have* a philosophiser in Vivec? Who delights in appearing as obscure and difficult as possible to his followers? idk
12 notes · View notes
asirxrowena · 2 years
Text
William Hawkes X reader headcanons Vol.2
Warnings: no warnings at all I guess? It's just fluff, honestly, how much triggering would that cause?
a/n (lol I call myself an author for writing these and I have an author's note?) : MY ENGLISH ARE NOT THE BEST. Now, Will belongs to Kym. I wrote all these because I'm bored during physics class. Also I wanted to tell that I prefer Kieran but I can't write fluff for him for a reason, it doesn't seem right to me. Aand the tags are my reaction while coping these from my notebook(I mean I wrote those a year ago or so). The second part is based on my town. Oof that was long. Anyway enjoy ;P
Tumblr media
You two met at work (sadly it was the only place Will would interact with someone after all). You were working at the canteen of the precinct and he was the coffee supplier every second day (Kym was the other coffee supplier, she needed the mugs anyway). After some interaction you two had, you decided to give him your number. He called you the same evening and he asked you out.
Oh, the first date with him was kinda awkward. He didn't talk much, you didn't either. Surprisingly small talk was easier for you and once you found a common topic of interest you had deep conversations and lost the track if time.
You went for a walk by the seaside. In a small amount of time your shoes were filled with sand so you took them off. He did, too. You were talking and philosophising about various topics but at some point you both run out of ideas and started laughing for no reason.
You made a campfire. Weren't it for your heat Will wouldn't agree since it is ""kinda dangerous""
Of course he made sure that you returned at home safely and always on time
The farewell part was always taking much more time than it should be. Your foreheads were attached, exchanging sweet words forever.
━◦○◦━◦○◦━◦○◦━◦○◦━◦○◦━◦○◦━
Due to the fact that you weren't from Adhallis, but another city near it, you took him there once and showed him around your city and the historical monuments of it. It took you a full day to see them all because your city is rich from such sights. You were both tired and went to the nearest park to rest on the closest bench.
‌You let a loud sigh once you sat on the bench. Will took you in his arms and let you rest your head on his shoulder. He rested his head on yours. You watched people come and go. Families, companies, couples, loners...
‌You turned it again to philosophy and due to the lack of braincells you were saying crazy random things that didn't make any sense.
‌But the rain started pouring. You were trying to find a shelter as soon as possible but the park was full of trees not rooftops.
‌You put your coats over your head and started running to find something to hide from the rain. That mini adventure was fun actually. You were laughing because you knew that the next place with a rooftop was quite far away and the face Will had when he learnt he had to run some miles until there was so precious and funny.
‌He spotted a church, a temporary shelter for you two. You sat on the stairs and waited until the rain stops
‌Once you went there, you tried to dry your coats with your hands (the coats were much more wetter than you thought) You were telling him about similar experiences you had with your friends. It was fun.
‌The rain stopped, you had to go back to Adhallis. But it was too late for busses to pass by.
‌You decided to walk back to your home. Even though, you and Will had so much to tell, the moments of silence you two had were comfortable...
14 notes · View notes
argumate · 3 years
Note
"it’s easy to look down at uncouth hicks like the Westboro Baptists, but if all the fancy latin philosophising reaches the same conclusion, how is it any better?" -- Did you read what I wrote? It isn't better, in any way, but it is different, although Catholicism certainly has more of a historical connection to actual knowledge of some of the "science" behind things like the prohibitions in Leviticus, whether it's proto-sociology or proto-medicine, and through Jewish knowledge or Roman. [1/2]
So I suppose you could say that Catholicism is ++ for being marginally more prosocial and "rational" at root, but American Cowboy Jesusism is ++ for being less insidious/rationalizing, more "intellectually honest", so it balances out, but the point is that there is a notable difference. The libertarianism behind the gay rights movement are ultimately identical to much of American Cowboy Jesusism, but the same analogy does not hold when transferred over to Catholicism. [2/2]
yes, the Baptists say “god hates fags!” while the Catholics say “The catechetical tradition also recalls that there are "sins that cry to heaven": the blood of Abel, the sin of the Sodomites, the cry of the people oppressed in Egypt, the cry of the foreigner, the widow, and the orphan, injustice to the wage earner” and that’s certainly a nice Borges approach to sin classification:
 - sins of clonking your brother with a rock  - sexy sins  - sins that resemble slaves from a distance  - sins involving immigrants and widows and orphans and employees  - sins not included in this classification
an enterprising bishop could make the point that the city of Sodom was probably less known for its abundance of loving gay relationships and more for its whole “raping visitors and abusing the poor” thing they had going on, so perhaps some clarifications are overdue on this matter.
the different religious traditions require different religious solutions.
31 notes · View notes
semper-legens · 3 years
Text
25. Medieval Woman, by Ann Baer
Tumblr media
Owned: Yes Page count: 292 My summary: A year in the life of Marion, a carpenter’s wife in a small village, and her struggles and hardships as she tries to carve out and maintain a small life for herself and her family against starvation, illness, accident, and bad luck. My rating: 4/5   My commentary:
I...have no idea how to approach this one, honestly. From what I can tell, this is Ann Baer’s only novel, a realistic historical fiction look at one woman’s life in a small English village, and it definitely seems like a passion project for her. I can’t remember why I picked it up - I mean, this is definitely in my wheelhouse, but I think I was expecting it to be non-fiction for some reason? Either way, what I got was most definitely not what I expected, and I really enjoyed it despite not quite being sure what to make of it.
First off, this book is very realistic. My knowledge of the minutiae of medieval life is shaky at best, so I can’t point to any obvious inaccuracies or inconsistencies, but what I mean by this is that it’s very small. There’s nothing huge happening, no plague or famine or tragedy, just a lot of small everyday things. That’s not to say that nothing happens, obviously, but there’s nothing Big and Dramatic. Marion’s world is, realistically, very small, consisting almost entirely of her village and another nearby village that she knows of but has never been to.
Marion, herself, is a very credible character. Much is made of how she just sort of gets on with things, she doesn’t philosophise or think about her station in life or anything, she just...deals with stuff as it comes. Stores food for the winter, prays in church despite not really understanding who she’s praying to, loves her husband despite the fact that she’d rather have married another, loves her kids even if they keep dying. And she has flaws and foibles - for one, she’s very judgemental towards her (probably disables) neighbour who she sees as being irresponsible, she doesn’t mourn the death of one of her daughters but still misses one son even though the girl was 12 and the boy was like 4 when they died, she has a very narrow and insular view of the world - and it works because, like, this is just a person. She’s just a person doing the best she can in a messed-up era.
This social history is the sort that really appeals to me, and the reason for that is pretty much because I love learning about people. Fuck politics and kings and stuff, I want to know how regular people lived, what they wore, what they ate, and this is that exactly. Attention is given to the small things in Marion’s life - her interactions with her growing daughter, her family, her neighbours, the work she does for the local lord, and it all coalesces into a very credible portrait of medieval village life.
It’s a strange experience, but if any of the above sounds like it might appeal to you, I’d definitely recommend checking the book out. Next up, back to the Demonata with Death’s Shadow!
4 notes · View notes
srbachchan · 4 years
Text
DAY 4319
Jalsa, Mumbai                Jan 2,  2020              Thu 11:09 PM
Tumblr media
हम चित्रपट के कलाकारों का कहें , तो क्या कहें 
आज सबने सर आँखों पे बिठाया हुआ है , तो क्या कहें  ,
कल , दूसरा कोई हमसे बेहतर कलाकार आ जाएगा  
हमें भुला के वो  हमसे आगे चला जाएगा  ,
पर साहित्य का तो ऐसा नहीं होता है ना 
सूर ,तुलसी , कबीर , आज भी ज़िंदा हैं ना 
प्रेमचंद , प्रसाद , निराला कल भी पूछे जाएँगे 
बाबूजी मेरे सहित्याकाश में , उज्जवल नक्षत्र बन हमेशा चमकते जाएँगे 
सौभाग्य मेरा मैंने उन्हें पिता रूप में पाया है  , 
हृदय में सदा वे जीवित रहेंगे , यही सरमाया है  ~ amitabh bachchan 
My Father’s autobiography in 4 volumes was translated into English and an abridged version was published titled ..
’In the Afternoon of Time’
.. why the title was named thus I was never able to understand from the author, an English academician, who had studied Brijbhasha , बृजभाषा , a prominent spoken language of UP-Bihar states , with exceptional credibility , and a language that has had and still does, great historic and literary relevance and importance ..
.. to me the relevance, as I am guided to it again not just by the art work sent to me by Ef, above - an extract taken from the autobiography - but also that a sudden meeting with the learned in the field bring to the fore, a desire to set up an institution, an academy, to research the written literary works in the country, but also to give relevance in particular to Babuji’s works, for it has been believed and recognised too, that his genius has gone by un researched and unrewarded .. a lament Maa ji always expressed often ..
.. so Time to me meant an endless expression .. an eternity, without barriers .. and the Afternoon, meant that the rest of the day was still to be explored, written, understood .. 
.. I may be completely wrong and misguided in my thinking ..  but my thinking can be challenged  .. not discarded ..
.. let me live in my thoughts and my own philosophising gauged meters .. they are limited inexperienced and not without fault .. but a beginning has been made .. and perhaps the desire to live each day with Babuji and his wisdom was further strengthened today as I chanced upon, among my paper infested racks of books , a thesis, conducted in Hindi by a recognised University for a D Lit recognition and award , by a learned follower of my Father’s works .. 
.. it is a complete neglect on my part to not have acknowledged it , and to not have connected with the concerned individual to show not just my grace, but also bring to consideration, such, in the research for the suggested institute in the study of many literary works ..
.. the Hindi verse that this post begins with, are mine .. they are the thoughts expressed in the Thesis that I talk of, on the first page .. it precedes the prologue of the dissertation .. 
..  I shall attempt a translate for those that are Hindi challenged .. to translate verse to verse is an impossible task for me .. Babuji would have done it with great ease .. but I am not him .. so I shall put down the essence :
we the artists from the film fraternity, what do we or can we say about them ; today they have put us all on acclaimed pedestals of fame and name so what can we say about them ; tomorrow we shall be forgotten and another more accomplished and better than us shall take our place, and move ahead of us ;
but in Literature and in its legacy, such does not happen ; Sur ( Surdaas ), Tulsi ( Tulsidaas ), and Kabir are still alive today with us ; Premchand, Prasad and Nirala ( all legendary writers and poets ) will still be remembered tomorrow and asked after ; my Father too shall like a glittering star in the literary skies, shine its presence and be remembered ;
my greatest privilege then , that I found ‘Bachchan’ in the literary firmament, as my Father ; that he shall ever remain within my heart is my greatest asset acquisition and wealth .. 
I wrote a conclusion .. but removed it .. it had relevance .. for me .. but would it have had relevance for another .. is another conclusion .. 
it be a stain .. on my nail .. there for the time ..  till it dissolves .. 
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Amitabh Bachchan
162 notes · View notes