headcanons: what would rúben do when you're not feeling great
author's note: not requested or anything. little domestic!rúben thoughts to get me through the day 🥲 done in like 10' so it's short and not proofread or anything jajajajaj
warnings: period talk, cramps mention, just feeling a lil bad in general.
you feeling bad bc you have cramps and rúben's out in training.
seeing that you've run out of medicine, you send him a quick text like
"hey, can you grab some medicine for me, not feeling great right now xx"
he'll obviously get preoccupied, even more so having read the messages only when the training session has ended
he facetimes you straight away
concerned look on his face, asking what's wrong, if you've gone to the doctor
poor soul
you have to tell him that it's nothing serious, just your period being annoying.
he's calmer after that, but still, after checking what you need, rushes to get everything
including what he thinks you'll need, like maybe something sweet? to cheer you up? maybe?
when he comes home, he expects you to be in the couch watching a movie or just chilling
but you're not there and ????
where are you.
and you're like, in this little space you've sorted for yourself
(kinda like an office but not really, just a lil desk, your notebook, your books and uni-related stuff)
working on something but clearly not feeling well
(posture slouched, warm socks on, a mug with a tea that's certainly too hot to drink right now, waiting to cold down)
his voice kinda startles you when he asks "why are you up here, shouldn't you be in bed?"
and you have to explain that "yeah, i should, but i have to read these texts for uni, and i'm so behind already, and-".
he's sooo done with it.
you're not doing any of that, what the fuck? you're not feeling well so you should rest.
you appreciate it but "well i've had other periods and managed to do work just fine"
"yeah, but that doesn't mean you should".
rúben makes you a warm bath, gets you some nice and warm clothes of his
cuddles you when you join him in bed, and
certainly doesn't let you get out until he's sure you're feeling better after taking the meds
151 notes
·
View notes
Alright uninformed rant time. It kind of bugs me that, when studying the Middle Ages, specifically in western Europe, it doesn’t seem to be a pre-requisite that you have to take some kind of “Basics of Mediaeval Catholic Doctrine in Everyday Practise” class.
Obviously you can’t cover everything- we don’t necessarily need to understand the ins and outs of obscure theological arguments (just as your average mediaeval churchgoer probably didn’t need to), or the inner workings of the Great Schism(s), nor how apparently simple theological disputes could be influenced by political and social factors, and of course the Official Line From The Vatican has changed over the centuries (which is why I’ve seen even modern Catholics getting mixed up about something that happened eight centuries ago). And naturally there are going to be misconceptions no matter how much you try to clarify things for people, and regional/class/temporal variations on how people’s actual everyday beliefs were influenced by the church’s rules.
But it would help if historians studying the Middle Ages, especially western Christendom, were all given a broadly similar training in a) what the official doctrine was at various points on certain important issues and b) how this might translate to what the average layman believed. Because it feels like you’re supposed to pick that up as you go along and even where there are books on the subject they’re not always entirely reliable either (for example, people citing books about how things worked specifically in England to apply to the whole of Europe) and you can’t ask a book a question if you’re confused about any particular point.
I mean I don’t expect to be spoonfed but somehow I don’t think that I’m supposed to accumulate a half-assed religious education from, say, a 15th century nobleman who was probably more interested in translating chivalric romances and rebelling against the Crown than religion; an angry 16th century Protestant; a 12th century nun from some forgotten valley in the Alps; some footnotes spread out over half a dozen modern political histories of Scotland; and an episode of ‘In Our Time’ from 2009.
But equally if you’re not a specialist in church history or theology, I’m not sure that it’s necessary to probe the murky depths of every minor theological point ever, and once you’ve started where does it end?
Anyway this entirely uninformed rant brought to you by my encounter with a sixteenth century bishop who was supposedly writing a completely orthodox book to re-evangelise his flock and tempt them away from Protestantism, but who described the baptismal rite in a way that sounds decidedly sketchy, if not heretical. And rather than being able to engage with the text properly and get what I needed from it, I was instead left sitting there like:
And frankly I didn’t have the time to go down the rabbit hole that would inevitably open up if I tried to find out
128 notes
·
View notes