Tumgik
#human rigths
lexlawuk · 2 years
Text
Legal Update for Asylum and Humanitarian Protection Cases: Changes to the Immigration Rules to facilitate the agreement with Rwanda
Legal Update for Asylum and Humanitarian Protection Cases: Changes to the Immigration Rules to facilitate the agreement with Rwanda
A new statement of changes to the Immigration Rules (HC17) has been published by the Home Office. These changes have been made with a view to facilitating the agreement with Rwanda to send refugees to their country. Our Immigration Team has been consulted by numerous clients to alleviate this confusion. This article highlights some of those concerns and provides answers to common problems so that…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
cake-bread · 9 months
Note
If you could change one thing about how everything with Coda happened, what would it be?
I’m glad that you two have made up, by the way, i think it’s very sweet.
I'm very glad to hear someone shares out joy.
And that's a very good question - I thought about that so many times, wondered how the future would look if we've done something different.
Maybe if I'd have already kept my cool the first day we've met, things would have been better. Of if he talked to me instead of ghosting me out of the blue. There were so many small missteps happening, I think it was doomed from the start.
But if I had to choose - instead of what I've said, I'd change my first comment after playing the House.
5 notes · View notes
redbunnydragon · 2 years
Text
The problem with today's economy besides Wall Street and mega corporations is that too much of the market is ad based economy.
Ads do not create value to the consumer, therefore and ad based business model should not exist. I will start calling it the "Air Benders Economy" becouse they made a product out of nothing.
14 notes · View notes
immortal-cataclysm · 2 years
Text
If you aren't giving your blorbo the worst mental illnesses possible and making them literally go insane to a point where they're laughing histerically at other people's deaths n calmly smiling while also saying the most horrible things possible then what's the point!!!!
1 note · View note
this-is-krikkit · 9 months
Note
Send this to ten other bloggers that you think are wonderful. Keep the game going, make someone smile!!! ❤️
Cas thank you, this is so nice! ♥️
i love your blog so much. i absolutely adore non-monocentric blogs (they say, shitposting about nothing but levihan for over a year now lmao) and the diversity of your interests always feels like a breath of fresh air 🥰
0 notes
the-omni-frog-tm · 1 year
Text
𓆝 𓆟 𓆞 𓆝 𓆟
Tumblr media
Today's trans visibility day !!
~all my support goes out to my trans american siblings, i know times are hard for y'all and i hope with all my heart that the anti-trans laws won't pass.
~and for all those whose gender identity turns into a target for the bigots, i wish all the happiness in the world, may you find acceptance somewhere 🙏
( sorry if i made any mistake, english isnr my first language )
0 notes
totallynotcensorship · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
tags update: gaza strip is third on trending with free gaza, middle east, united nations, and human rigths trending as well
DON'T STOP TALKING ABOUT PALESTINE
1K notes · View notes
bho-alt · 15 days
Text
someone just asked to BUY one of my alters
is his something people are actually trying to do.
HOW THE FUCK AND WHYYY THE FUCK DO YOU THIK I WOULD DO THIS????????
you cant??? sell alters??? and why?? the fuck would i sell them?? even if i could??? thats basically like human traficking rijght can someone please tell me that people dont actually tryto do this???? like tjey were joking rigth pls how do you get so misinformed that you think William is on sale for 5 dollars (hes worth at least 6 anyways)
399 notes · View notes
simeon-lovergirl · 3 months
Text
I HATE it when people write Choso like he doesn't know anything about humans, like, do yall realise he's half human rigth? And he lived like he was a fully human. That's why when he realises "Geto" it's his dad, he mentions his mom, he knows how human life works, maybe just not in this era as he's like 150 years old, but still, he KNOWS
246 notes · View notes
merao-mariposa · 1 month
Text
Chef Missa x Shapeshifter-Crow Phil AU.
(Just hear me out)
Missa is a single father looking to be a professional chef, moving to France to work in his idol's restaurant. He takes his daughter, takes his suitcases and moves to Paris, France to fulfill his dreams.
Phil is an ex-fighter who needs a change and get away from everything after a dramatic event (no spoiler) so when he receives an invitation from his brother in arms, Etoiles, to stay with him in France for a while he does not hesitate to accept.
His son Chayanne has trouble adjusting to his new life due to his selective mutism, fortunately Tallulah (Not tula) and Chayanne become friends at school.
Pissa basically know each other through their children.
Time skip to Tallulah finding out that Chayanne likes cooking, and it just so happens that his dad is el mejor chef del mundo! (She says) Missa starts giving cooking classes to Chayanne (it has nothing to do with him wanting to get closer to Phil, nope, absolutely not, he could never ever thought about that, he only does it because he cares about Chay//and his father)
Missa tries to play it cool and suave for Phil which leads to a lot of silly cartoon situations.
Missa and Phil get distracted by cooking, more smoke than normal starts coming out but they are so caught up in their flirting that they don't notice. Missa: Is it hotter here or is it just me?? Phil laughs, looks into his eyes, into his lips and back into his eyes, and slowly approaches, so slowly and Missa's heart almost sto- Until suddenly a blast of dry ice hits them rigth in their faces. Chayanne came back from whatever he was going to do, and found a tower of smoke! What happened!? …Neither Phil nor Missa can answer that. A bit because they are covered in dry ice and another bit because no mames, what a shame.
Jump to Missa, he's feeling homesick and unsure of his abilities. Tallulah has a fever and Missa is too worried.
The cooking classes stop for a few days.
Until a crow suddenly crosses through his window. That should scare him, his daughter is sick! And crows don't exactly prophesy health.
But he doesn't find himself able to chase away the creature that looks almost as worried as Missas feels. If crows had faces he would say that he frowns when he sees the girl. This crow seems to be really used to humans or something because he allows himself to be petted by Tallulah as if he were a cat, his feathers fluff up and rumble as if he were almost purring in his daughter's hands, her tired face lights up cuz of something that It's not the fever.
He decides to leave them alone.
Since that day the crow visits them more often almost like a family pet, he always comes and goes at night and always seems to be there when they need him most.
(Abajo esta en español, no worries my friends)
Missa es un padre soltero que busca ser chef profesional y se muda a Francia para trabajar en el restaurante de su ídolo. Toma a su hija, toma sus maletas y llega a París, Francia para cumplir su sueño.
Phil es un ex-peleador que necesita un cambio y alejarse de todo tras un susceso dramático (no spoiler) por lo que cuando recibe una invitado de su hermano de armas, Etoiles, para quedarse con el en Francia durante un tiempo no duda en aceptar.
Su hijo Chayanne tiene problemas para adaptarse al colegio y su nueva vida por su mutismo selectivo, afortunadamente Tallulah (no tula) y Chayanne se hacen amigos en la escuela.
Básicamente se conocen a través de sus hijos.
Salto de tiempo a que Tallulah se entere de que a Chayanne le gusta cocinar, y da la casualidad de que su papá es el mejor chef del mundo! (Dice ella) Missa empieza darle clases de cocina a Chayanne (no tiene nada que ver que quiera acercarse a su padre, nop, en definitiva y absolutamente nunca pensó en eso, solo lo hace porque le cae bien el niño //y su padre)
Missa trata de jugarlo cool y suave para Phil lo que lleva a un montón de situaciones tontas de caricatura. Missa y Phil se distraen cocinando, empieza salir más humo de lo normal pero ellos están tan atrapados en su coqueteo que no se dan cuenta. Missa: hace más calor aquí o soy solo yo? Phil se ríe, lo mira a los ojo, a los labios y devuelta a los ojos, y se va acercando lentamente, tan lento y el corazón de Missa casi se detien- Hasta que una ráfaga de hielo seco los golpea de lleno en la cara. Chayanne regresó de lo que sea que fue a hacer, volvió y encontró una enorme torre de humo! Qué pasó?! …Ni Phil ni Missa pueden responder a eso. Un poco porque están cubiertos de hielo seco y otro poco porque no mames que vergüenza.
Salto a Missa, tiempo despues, se siente nostálgico e inseguro de sus habilidades, para peor Tallulah tiene fiebre y Missa está demasiado preocupado.
Las clases de cocina paran durante algunos dias.
Hasta que un cuervo se mete por su ventana. Eso debería asustarlo, su hija está enferma! Y los cuervos no profetizan la salud exactamente.
Pero no se encuentra a si mismo capaz de echar a la criatura que se ve casi tan preocupado como el, si los cuervos tuvieran cara diría que tiene el ceño fruncido cuando ve a la niña. Este cuervo parece estar realmente acostumbrado a los humanos o algo así porque se deja acariciar por Tallulah como si fuera un gato, sus plumas se esponjan y retumba como si casi ronroneara y la cara cansada de su hija se ilumina por algo no es la fiebre.
Decide dejarlos solos.
Desde ese día el cuervo los visita más a menudo casi como una mascota de la familia, siempre va y viene por la noche y siempre aparece estar cuando mas lo necesitan.
84 notes · View notes
zonatcannibalism · 1 month
Text
never again isnt "we are so kind and nice so we are going to make sure no one is hurt ever" its "this time we will figth back". saying its a call to end genocides is disrespectful and "all live matter" asf. imagine a white person telling a black person black history month is about teaching kids american history and then proceed to talk about police violence without mentioning racism has something to do with it at all. im not saying that as an assumption that "no one would ever do that to a black person!" beacuse someone probably would, but to adress the double standart of so called leftists who care about human rigths and ending dyscrimination untill it comes to jews.
54 notes · View notes
ftmtftm · 6 months
Note
Genuine question. But how are radical feminists; women's rigths activist who are exactly trying to detect, address and attack the roots of the patriarcy and it's problems (the literal definition of radical, "By the root") to make the world a better place for women and girls, comparable to religious evangelicals, incels and actual Neonazis?
Dunno, correct me if I'm wrong, but last time I checked those 3 last groups and unlike actual radical feminists, not only they don't support but openly and actively despise and try to eliminate progresive ideals like homosexual rigths, reproductive rigths, end workfield innequality, among many others.
Context: This anon is in response to this post. I do want to apologize to anon up front, because I assumed they sent this ask in bad faith based on several other bad faith asks that have been sent to me in the past. They however, did ask this in earnest. I genuinely hope this is a valuable resource to you and anyone else this post crosses paths with.
Okay so there's a lot of things I want to get into here and it's gonna get long so I'm going to break it into chunks. We're gonna look at what political extremism is, what a rhetorical fallacy is, what Feminism is (broadly speaking) and then do a deep dive into the actual nitty gritty people and politics of Radical Feminism in opposition to other types of Feminism.
TL;DR - Radical Feminism is an extremist, female supremacist, hate movement. It has more in common with Political Right / authoritarian extremist movements than it does with any Politically Left / liberation based radical movements.
So let's start with examining political extremism. What is Political Extremism? In turn, what is Political Radicalism?
Political Extremism is a very broad category of belief and action that gets thrown around a lot. Most people just use it to mean "strong politics that exist outside the status quo" however, I'm more interested in the way Astrid Bötticher defines Extremism vs Radicalism. In her definitions (here) she essentially describes that "Political Extremism" tends to get applied to Right Wing leaning politics and "Political Radicalism" tends to get applied to Left Wing leaning politics. She states that there is a fuzzy line between the two (think about the application of the phrase "Go so far left you go right") but that finding ways to define and distinguish the two is still important to political discussion.
Bötticher describes that Radical Politics tend to have a focus on:
anti-violence/selective use of violence
building a positive future
democracy/emancipation
pro-human rights, specifically in the context of providing them to the under privileged
disrupting status quo without a total destruction of society/diversity
standing in opposition to Systemic Institutions and The Establishment
coexistent withdraw with society when existing in small numbers
universal morality - a moral system that applies to all
egalitarianism/sovereignty of the common people
ideas inspired and informed by philosophical movements, starting with the 18th century Enlightenment onward
In contrast she describes that Extremist Politics tend to have a focus on:
violence as a legitimate form of action
looking towards an idealistic past
anti-democracy/authoritarianism/intolerance for other ideologies
anti-human rights (specifically in the context of people outside their own ideology - my own addition)
reinforce status quo while closing society off from conversation and diversity
standing in opposition to Systemic Institutions and The Establishment and also anyone who disagrees with the Extremist dogma
provocation and disruption, even when existing in small numbers in society
particularistic (exclusive) morality - a moral system that only applies to the Extremist group
totalitarianism/authoritarian control
ideas inspired by fanatical, usually (but not always) religious ideas that claim to hold a monopoly on truth on the basis of their own vision (that last part is especially important)
As you can probably gather, under these definitions generally speaking one would define most progressive movements as Politically Radical and most regressive movements as Politically Extremist. The Feminist Movement is, by and large, a Politically Radical Movement. Our conversation doesn't end here though. We have a lot more ground to cover. This is just the framework.
So, now that we've established the characteristics of a Politically Extremist movement, let's delve into the rhetoric they use to assert those aspects of themselves.
What is a rhetorical fallacy?
Rhetorical Devices are an important part of not just politics, but every day life. We use them constantly - I'm using them now, you use them, everyone uses them. When I speak to you, the reader, and appeal to you directly I am invoking Pathos (Emotional Appeal) by creating an air of casualness - as though we are engaging in a conversation. When I give definitions, statistics, cite sources, I am invoking Logos (Logical Appeal) by showing there is traceable, factual, credibility to the things I am saying. When I say that I have been studying Political/Feminist/Philosophical Theory both academically and in my own free time for the last decade of my life I am invoking Ethos (Ethical Appeal) by asserting that I have put an immense amount of time and dedication into this topic to showcase my own credibility.
The important thing about Rhetorical Devices here is how they are applied - especially in political discussions. When applied incorrectly or maliciously Rhetorical Devices begin to fall into Fallacies.
Fallacies are errors, or tricks, of reasoning. The provided link is from a college writing textbook and I highly recommend reading it over if you're able (genuine shout out to LibreTexts for their efforts in making textbooks free and accessible to the public). It gives a good enough explanation of fallacies as a whole that I won't be going too in depth myself, so as not to distract from my main points.
The specific type of fallacies that I'd like to get into are Linguistic Fallacies (equivocation, amphiboly, combination of words, division of words, accent, and form of expression) because they are a type of fallacy that Political Extremists (and really? also most people in politics with weak argumentative skills) like to employ a lot to make their points seem stronger or to manipulate their image. Though it is not listed as a part of the six Linguistic Fallacies, I consider Etymological Fallacy to be a kind of Linguistic Fallacy, as it relies on the explicit dissection of language.
Political Extremists and other oppressive regimes often obscure their nature through carefully chosen linguistic descriptors that rely on fallacious intent. Early Nazis called themselves National Socialists when they were, in fact, not Socialists. The Democratic People's Republic of North Korea is not a Democratic Republic for the People - it is a Dictatorship - and the Chinese Communist Party of the People's Republic of China is not Communist and China is not a Republic.
To obscure yourself behind intentionally chosen progressive sounding language to gain yourself more followers who simply say "Hey, Democracy and Socialism are good! Those guys must not be that bad!" or "Hey, I agree with women's rights and liberation! I think the world should be a better place for women and girls! Those Radical Feminists must be onto something!" is to rely on an intentional political obfuscation tactic that uses the Fallacy of Equivocation.
What is Feminism? What are the different schools of Feminist Theory?
A distinct and important part of Feminist Philosophy is quite genuinely - debating how to define Feminism and it's goals. Though they all follow similar themes, there are a lot of variant ways of defining this. Some definitions of Feminism include:
"The belief in social, economic, and political equality of the sexes." - Britannica / Merriam-Webster
"[The goal of feminism is] all genders having equal rights and opportunities." - International Women's Development Agency
"[Feminism is] the movement to end sexism, sexist exploitation, and oppression." - bell hooks
Generally speaking though, Feminism places itself as a movement for the advocacy of Women as a Class of people, operating under the context of combating / eliminating gender and/or sex based oppression - depending on the Feminist school of thought you are looking at.
Allison Jaggar, feminist scholar, defined four types of Feminism in her 1983 book Feminist Politics and Human Nature. Those types are: Liberal Feminism, Marxist Feminism, Socialist Feminism, and Radical Feminism. These tend to be the schools of thought you see brought up most often today.
I, personally, however, think that it is worth recognizing that there are in fact more schools of Feminist thought than just those four. In particular Intersectional Feminism, which was coined by Kimberlé Crenshaw in her 1989 paper Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex, and Postcolonial Feminism which began to get its footing in 1984 with the publishing Audre Lorde's essay The Master's Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master's House (taken from a 1979 speech) and Chandra Talpade Mohanty's 1984 essay Under Western Eyes.
Postcolonial and Intersectional Feminism exist in direct critique of the Whiteness that was (and still is now) pervasive in Feminist Literature through the 60's-80's and into the beginning of the Third Wave of Feminism, which I will get into shortly.
Who is Radical Feminism by and for as a political movement? Who are the people creating the theory, past and present? Who are the people running the movement via theory, political organizations, and who are the faces of the movement? Who do they truly center?
Let's start with some basic Feminist history for a moment. The Feminist movement is broken into several waves. Presently, we are in what scholars are beginning to define as the Fourth Wave of Feminism, so let's briefly look at all four.
I want to state right off the bat that Feminism and feminist history as a whole is very US American and British centric. The First Wave of Feminism is defined by the Suffrage Movement and (White) Women gaining the right to vote in the USA in 1920. The Second Wave of Feminism is defined by the sexual liberation movement, the beginnings of Queer Theory, and the foundation of Radical Feminism as an organized political movement in the late 60's ('67~'68) on the coasts of the US and in England. The Third Wave of Feminism in the 90's is looser and exists as a dialogue between movements like the Riot Grrls, long standing Radical Feminists, and Feminists of Color (particularly Black Feminists) critiquing the Feminism of the previous few decades. The present Fourth Wave is currently being defined socially by social media usage and the MeToo movement and academically by its continuing recognition of Intersectional Feminist work.
I do think it is deeply important to note the racial dynamics at play here and address the fact that the Feminist Movement has also always been extremely White in many ways. This is not to discredit the work of Feminists of Color, but to say that their work, labor, activism, and theory often goes unrecognized by White Feminists. As previously mentioned, the First Wave of Feminism is largely defined by the Suffragette Movement and women's right to vote - however, Black Women and other Women of Color were not allowed to be fully included in this movement by White Suffragettes. Black Women did not receive suffrage until 1965 with the Voting Rights Act. This was just 2-3 years before the beginning of the Second Wave. I have written about this to a larger extent here so I won't be diving too deep in this ask, since we're already getting very long here.
So let's dive deeper into the Second Wave and Radical Feminist history. I would personally argue that the publishing of the SCUM Manifesto and Valerie Solanas' attempt on Andy Warhol's life is what kick started the Radical Feminist movement. I have talked about this to a larger extent here in relation to Political Lesbianism and really - I just don't want to retype an essay I've already written.
TL;DR - While the SCUM Manifesto may or may not have been satirical (Solanas went back and forth on this publicly) it was the first published work to describe ideas integral to Radical Feminist literature. It was born out of the same New York spaces as the rest of the Radical Feminist Movement and spread thanks to the New York gay newspaper, The Village Voice, and the publicity from Solanas' attempt at Warhol. Male Dominance Theory, the inherent violence of males, the idea that women are safer with other women than with men, the idea that lesbianism or celibacy are the only safe sexual avenues for women, etc. etc. were all published first in SCUM in 1968.
Ti-Grace Atkinson could, and should, be credited with the foundation of organized Radical Feminist politics in written works with her 1969 piece "Radical Feminism". She was an active defender of the SCUM Manifesto and Solanas - going so far as to get in trouble with NOW (The National Organization for Women) during her time as the organization's president for defending Solanas and attempting to involve Flo Kennedy in Solanas' legal defense (pay-walled article, unfortunately). While Solanas wanted no involvement with Atkinson, Kennedy, or NOW it's clear her ideas and actions deeply impacted them and other Radical Feminists. The events with Solanas inspired Atkinson to leave NOW and form the October 17th Movement, which then became the Radical Feminist group The Feminists.
If we look at other foundational Radical Feminists from the late 60's and 70's - Shulamith Firestone, Kathie Sarachild, Carol Hanisch, Roxanne Dunbar, Naomi Weisstein - they all also share one trait in common with Solanas and Atkinson beyond their politics. Whiteness. The only Woman of Color present so far in this history is Flo Kennedy, and Flo Kennedy was open about "Not feeling Black" and not really having community with other Black people. Her work definitionally was more Intersectional than Radical Feminist, however she dedicated most of her efforts to time in Radical Feminist spaces. Unfortunately as the linked book review begins to describe, like a lot of Feminist history, Flo's actual person-hood has been stripped from her work. She is often either used as a Token Black Radical Feminist or as a Token Black Intersectional Feminist in Radical Feminist Spaces, depending on where you look and who you ask.
I don't have the time nor space to do an entire history lesson on Radical Feminism, but suffice to say the works of the women I have previously mentioned very much inspired the works of more commonly cited, more modern Radical Feminist authors like Andrea Dworkin, Sheila Jeffreys, Julie Bindel, Catherine MacKinnon. Again, all White Women. You look to modern Radical Feminist and Women's Liberation activism and you see the same reflected in your average Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist as well as in the women in pop culture who are being celebrated by anti-trans Radfem spaces, like JKR and Kellie-Jay Keen / Posie Parker. Both of whom, by the way are actively buddy-buddy with conservatives and Neo-Nazi's. Shaun, the video essayist, has broken this down better than I can here (JKR) (Posie Parker).
Why talk about all of this? What is the relevance of political extremism and rhetorical fallacies in this conversation?
We began this essay (because, let's be real, that's what this is) discussing Political Extremism vs Political Radicalism so let's come back around to that and my claim that Radical Feminism is Politically Extremist, not Politically Radical now. Radical Feminists, like in this ask, have been in my ask box recently arguing that the "Radical" in "Radical Feminism" means "to the root" - like a mathematical root. That it means "Getting to the root of Patriarchy". However, I genuinely have not been able to find any such claim in any of my research. The "Radical" in "Radical Feminism" has always been used in the political sense of being "politically radical" in all of the reading and historical research I've done. Show me a legitimate source of this claim and I'll take it into consideration though.
I would like to breakdown Bötticher's list of traits of Extremism/Radicalism in relation to Radical Feminism now though, since we have established we are explicitly talking about Political Radicalism several times over.
1. violence as a legitimate form of action
Radical Feminism is founded on the idea that society needs to be completely dismantled in order to procure the safety of women. Be this by genocide, as SCUM suggests, or by a women led revolution as women like Firestone suggested there have always been roots of violence in Radical Feminism. Violence is a complicated topic in of its own right, which I've talked about my own feelings on here. I personally believe that the Radfem idealism towards violence and wanting to "flip" the violence of the Patriarchy back onto men - regardless of it is satirical or not - and the idea that violence begets violence falls under this category of Extremism, rather than under the category of Radicalism.
2. looking towards an idealistic past
I am of the opinion that the way Radical Feminism of the 60's and 70's idealized the Suffragettes and their work is a form of this. It is happening again now with the way modern Radical Feminists idealize the politics of Radfems of the 60's and 70's. There's this idealized version of Feminist history in Radfem spaces that completely ignores or denies the presence of Feminist authors that disagree with or criticize Radical Feminist thought. This happens generally via unwarranted assimilation (You see this happen a lot with theorists like Angela Davis, Audre Lorde, Judith Butler, and even Leslie Feinberg) or complete dismissal (you see this happen a lot with theorists like bell hooks, Kimberlé Crenshaw, Roxane Gay). You know the thing those authors have in common? They are all either Black or non-binary.
3. anti-democracy/pro-authoritarianism/intolerance for other ideologies
Current Radfem culture really hinges on dismissing anything Radfems disagree with as "Liberal Feminism" - referencing Jaggar's previously mentioned work. This is something I've noticed a lot in my own conversations with particularly young Radfems who are new to Feminism. There seems to be this idea that you can only be a pop culture-y, soft, liberal feminist OR a to the teeth, political radical feminist - with no thought for what might exist outside of that binary. Even Jaggar herself talks about Socialist and Marxist Feminism, which are in fact distinct Feminist movements in their own rights, and as previously mentioned Intersectional Feminism and Postcolonial Feminism, among many other types of Feminism also exist. To treat Feminism as though it was a binary dichotomy with a right answer is to fall under this category of Political Extremism.
4. anti-human rights (specifically in the context of people outside their own ideology - my own addition)
I've gone almost this entire post without going too in-depth on the subject of anti-trans rhetoric in Radical Feminism because that is, at least presently, something many, many other people have covered in the past. However, Radical Feminism as an ideology is in explicit opposition to the human rights of transgender individuals. This is not the post for that analysis, so I won't be getting into it to much deeper here. You can see my extended watching section at the bottom of this post if you're truly interested in this topic.
5. reinforce status quo while closing society off from conversation and diversity
Many Radfem spaces and a lot of Radfem literature tend to universalize the "woman" or "female" experience without consideration for the nuances and complexities of those experiences. Given the White American roots of Radical Feminism, I see this as an extension of the phenomenon of White Homogenization - which is the phenomenon related to the history of xenophobia towards groups like Irish and Italian immigrants and their subsequent assimilation into American White Identity once it was deemed convenient for White Supremacists. This is, in part why I would classify Radical Feminism as Female Supremacy. It's got all the makings of White Supremacist rhetoric thanks to the race of its founders, just twisted slightly to fit the means of White women rather than White people as a whole.
Radical Feminism constructs this status quo idea of universal womanhood and regularly shuts down conversations that question the authority of that experience, particularly in relation to Race, Ethnicity, Transgender Identity, and Intersex Identity.
6. standing in opposition to Systemic Institutions and The Establishment and also anyone who disagrees with the Extremist dogma
I feel like this one is self explanatory following the last few points about the universalism of womanhood and the way Radfem culture simplifies Feminist theory. Yes, Radical Feminism stands opposed to the Patriarchy and also it stands opposed to any other Feminist thought that might disagree with it to the point of ostracization, misindentification, and outright dismissal. The way many Radfems resort to pejoratives (as I've been experiencing in my ask box with an influx of asks calling me a tranny pooner among many other expletives I won't be posting) and dehumanizing language like calling trans people "TRAs" as a play off of "MRAs" is a good show of this.
7. provocation and disruption, even when existing in small numbers in society 8. particularistic (exclusive) morality - a moral system that only applies to the Extremist group 9. totalitarianism/authoritarian control
Grouping these three together mostly for the sake of brevity, as I've been working on this post for about 4 days and admittedly, I am getting exhausted exposing myself to rhetoric that fundamentally believes my own existence is incorrect and a bunch of other anons telling me to kill myself.
However, I do briefly want to take time here to address the fact that the way Radfems universalize womanhood ends up perpetuating this idea that women are inherently safer than men. That women, or females, are incapable of abuse because that's what men do. This separatism, this isolationism, is in of itself a breeding ground for abusive people to take advantage of others. These last three points are all three points that I think highlight the cult-like nature of Political Extremism. "Violence is good and justified when women do it to men because men are violent to women" type thinking. It preys on unresolved trauma - which I've briefly spoken about here. I could absolutely go into point 8 farther, and I have a lot more feelings about it that I'm getting into here - but I'm tired. I'll make another post another day and update this one when I do.
10. ideas inspired by fanatical, usually (but not always) religious ideas that claim to hold a monopoly on truth on the basis of their own vision (that last part is especially important)
This is one of the most important points in this list I think. A lot of Radical Feminism positions itself in a way that places itself and it's followers as arbiters of truth. If you disagree with Radical Feminism, you're a misogynist, you're a self hating female, you're wrong, you're ignorant, you hate women and support the Patriarchy. It's classic "Us vs Them" rhetoric.
I brought up rhetorical fallacies earlier as a primer to the fact that Radical Feminist rhetoric is full of rhetorical fallacies. Most specifically notably in this ask is the etymological fallacy of saying the "Radical" in "Radical Feminism" means "to the Root". "Woman = Adult Human Female" is also an etymological fallacy. Acting as though there are only two types of Feminism (Liberal vs Radical) is an argument based on fallacy. The list goes on, as most of the requirements for Bötticher's definition of Political Extremism rely on fallacy on the part of the Extremists because Extremism requires a skewed perception of reality based on the manipulation of facts.
That is all why I classify Radical Feminism as a Politically Extremist Female Supremacist Hate Group - especially modern Radical Feminism. That is why I classify it in the same extremist camp as Evangelicals, White Supremacists, Neo-Nazis, and Incels. They all rely on similar rhetorical tactics to further their goals:
"You are only safe with your own kind. You will only find strength with your own kind. Outsiders are the enemy and you cannot find sympathy or empathy for them, lest you become brainwashed."
What are the alternatives? How do we move forward from Radical Feminism?
One of the most important solutions I can offer, in my opinion, is the encouragement to go and do your own research into Feminism and Feminist history. A Radfem view is one of many, many possible Feminist approaches as I've discussed at length here. I personally think "good feminism" is well-rounded Feminism that takes an Intersectional approach to Institutions of Oppression. Essentially, Feminism that recognizes that the Patriarchy is only one aspect of the oppressive forces of the world and that it works in tandem with other systems to cause direct harm to the oppressed.
First and foremost - I keep a reading list on my blog. I need to go through and do some serious updating to it but what it currently has is still a good jumping off point. The list isn't just reading materials, but also includes talks and interviews and audio books, if those things are more accessible to you personally.
My personal favorite feminist thinkers are bell hooks, Kimberlé Crenshaw, and Leslie Feinberg. Audre Lorde, Judith Butler, and Kate Bornstein are also excellent reads when it comes to theory. I'm also including some extended watching recommendations at the end of this ask because I know for many people watching a video or listening to a talk can be more accessible than academic text. I do however, recommend popping into my reading list and looking at the talks and interviews that I have listed there as well.
If you made it all the way down here? Holy shit - congratulations and thank you for reading all of this, regardless of if we agree on this topic or not. This was a pain in the ass to put together honestly and I'm real fucking tired. I'm gonna go spend a week getting high and listening to live music with my best friend now.
Just remember: Do what you want forever :)
Extended Watching (Interviews + Talks):
In Life: Interview with Kate Bornstein, Leslie Feinberg (captions recommended)
Leslie Feinberg in Buffalo, June 2, 2006
Leslie Feinberg Celebrating Stone Butch Blues at Charis Books 1993 (captions recommended)
Berkley professor explains gender theory | Judith Butler
Feminist icon Judith Butler on JK Rowling, trans rights, feminism, and intersectionality
Extended Watching (Video Essays):
JK Rowling's New Friends - Shaun (previously linked)
Keelie-Jay & the Neo-Nazis - Shaun (previously linked)
Social Constructs (or, 'What is A Woman Really?') - Philosophy Tube
Identity: A Trans Coming Out Story - Philosophy Tube
Transhumanism: "The World's Most Dangerous Idea" - Philosophy Tube
Autogynephilia - ContraPoints
Gender Critical - ContraPoints
125 notes · View notes
Note
So i’ve been watching your au madness and really loving it ,wanted to add my 2cents (if it’s alright)so if no one has done this before
(That i know of)
Angel!radiostatic
Alastor and vox died together in an attempt to save each other (if it was in the adam fight or elsewhere it’s unknown) and because they sacrificed themselves they where sent to heaven
Angel!alastor looks mostly the same except the tips of his hair before the black part are faded to ligth purple and his color looks closer to pink but not quite and has a halo similar to seras, his clothes are quite different however wearing a light purple hoodie and some casual pants there would be a running gag of him complaining about them but not changing them having manifested in heaven with them
Angel!vox would also look mostly the same having a halo above his head with 2 wing like protrusions and the tips of his claws gaining a fade to purple , he wears a similar attire to his normal one except older looking and with the ends ripped like Alastors coat ,the back color would be changed to light purple , finally the symbol on his hat would be a radio dial instead of a wifi symbol
Since I’m cringe anyway and i love it , they end up being soul bound by their death but not in like a healthy fun way but rather in a we psychically own each other kind of way , they would be co-dependent being unable to stay away from too long , (if they are they start coughing flowers ) witch greatly annoys both of them
Thought it also comes with advantages being able to have their powers interact and fuel each other and being able to communicate with great ease , almost like reading each other’s mind
Ironically enough they end up in trouble because of these advantages since their powers interacting can be overwhelming or even cause a short circuit
They also ruin the ability to communicate by using it to professionally sweep everything under the rug, from the way they double died , to the pain they feel while away , they just never talk about anything, even in their fights when they let something slip in five minutes they go back to pretending everything is alright
After getting to heaven they would immediately try to get kicked out and failing so they get more annoying and blood thirsty over time to get out but the angels would just keep bending over backwards to acomódate their “needs ”
They would live together in a cabin in front of a swamp that is located close to the city, alastor would cook and vox would clean the house , they would bicker often and sometimes even fight physically but this is less of a problem and more of them enjoying their squabbles, they would almost never use their powers though for reasons above mentioned
If not arguing they are probably complaining about how boring heaven is with all the peace and all , alastor would be in shambles at the fact he can’t eat human meat , vox would sometimes feed him some of his own flesh to make up for it
Before getting into heaven they wouldn’t be in a relationship , and instead would act similar to the cannon
In heaven their powers would become angelic powers being able to kill sinners and bleeding light blue blood(instead of golden for being redeemed siners or overlords or something, insert reason here) they would constantly complain about being unable to use them for something useful
They would meet alastors mother and she would be delighted that he found someone to be with that isn’t as bad a his father even if a bit appalled by their actions , they would also meet molly and others
Charlie would be absolutely depressed at their deaths but when she finds out they are in heaven she would be extremely happy because if someone like alastor or vox can be redeemed then everyone can rigth ?
When(if) angelic!static radio join the other aus in the hotel they would be absolutely ecstatic ,alastor would immediately drag vox for hunting (now with angelic powers how convenient!)
Sorry if this is too long and sorry for orthography and lack of colons i’m bad at those. Thanks for reading
Contributions are welcome from anyone and everyone, my friend
This is so sweet and good so the part about Vox letting Al cannibalize him caught me off guard for a second there. Sacrificing oneself is always a very solid trope and I love this a lot
33 notes · View notes
todomemolesta18 · 6 months
Text
The amazing digital circus! (review)
So... people actually want my opinion and Im like
Tumblr media
*sniff* Ok, guys! Im gonna try to do my best to review (?) the pilot ep for Tadc! (Spoiler alert: I enjoyed a lot!)
First of all, the animation. IS. BEAUTIFUL.
So elastic, so expresive, so shiny, is just perfect!
Tumblr media
Like, for example, just look at her pupils, how she slightly moves her head, is something little but add a lot of life to the character.
And they are so expresive like you can see their fear and stuff, especially Pomni.
Tumblr media
(I love this shot of her haha)
Everything is so full of life and colours, I just love when animators actually take advantage of animation and go crazy with it.
And the designs are really good too! I love them. The best ones are Caine and Kinger.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
They are so... crazy. And thats great! Besides, I think the giant eyes on Kinger just makes him look more traumatized, which makes sense, because for what we know, he has been in the circus the longest.
Now the characters themselves. I like them. Just so much personality, and fun. Specially Jax.. he is an unapologetic asshole and I just love that.
Ragatha is nice. Hope to see more of her, but rigth know I dont have a lot to say about her, but she is likeable and kind. She is just what Pomni needs.
Il talk about Pomni, but later, cause I wanna comment some interesting stuff about her.
Gangle is cute and deserves a big hug.
Zooble is... okay too. I dont dislike her and she has some funny momens, but like Ragatha, I need to see more of her to make a more complete opinion. I KNOW is the pilot, but I still need more content. IM NOT CRITICIZING, IS JUST MY OPINION. Actually is good that they dont focus a lot on ALL the characters, because it would be a confusing mess, so, well done there, Glitch and Goose.
Kinger was freaking hilarious. Like when Jax mentions how stable Kinger and Gangle are, Kingle start to shake in a really weird but hilarious way. Or when he screams randomly and says that Gangle startled him.
I like this guy :D
Then we have Caine... oh boy, he is one of the most interesting characters, with Pomni and... Kaufmo.
He acts so happy and cheerful and stuff, and like a presenter. He is actually kinda nice, but is obvious that he is hiding something, like when Pomni asks about the exit and he gets all weird.
NOW. Lets talk about my waifu- about Pomni.
She is so realistic and human and relatable and I love that. And not just because she is so super confused and scared and anxious, but for other scenes.
The moment where Ragatha needs help, and Pomni actually extends her hand and grabs her, only to start glitching. She gest scared, apologizes and runs away. But she feels guilty and comes back to apologizes to Ragatha, who forgives her.
I LOVED THIS SCENE SO MUCH. Pomni became more than just the anxious main character and became a bit more tridimensional.
Another moment I loved related to her. This:
Tumblr media
Is a very short scene... but it means so much. How she is just in shock an touches her face, like she just cant believe this is her. This is happening to her. And it adds to the existencial horror of the show.
And the most incredible one and amazed me is when she actually goes in the exit door. Like... she did want to help Ragatha, but this could have been her only chance to escape. Im sure anyone of us, including myself, would have done it.
But then the poor woman is traped in a bucle and starts to get crazy and laugh... I think I would have reacted exactly the same.
Or that last shot of her and her disturbed face.
DAMN, EVERYTHING IS SO GOOD. AND THE MUSIC TOO.
I LOVED THE INTRO. The comedy too! And the outro was so cute!
This show has showed us the potential it has for the horror AND I CANT WAIT.
This are all my personal toughs! What do you guys think?
81 notes · View notes
Text
I got a though about that fungi event! (short fic!)
CW : mind control, fem reader, spoilers of "fabulous fungus frenzy" (aka the lastest event from Sumeru), master/owner kink, oral sex (male receiving), a bit of non-con.
Tumblr media
Who could say that the wisdom orb could also work for humans..
It was just curiosity turning the orb on in the bedroom and then it got you into a long dream.
Aether : oh no,no,no,no!! y/n wake up wake up!, Oh no there should be a way to turn this off..
Aether puts you in the bed while he tries to find a way to turn this ball, what a stupid mistake have you two done?
Aether: HERE! Now I'm gonna turn this devil machin-
You wake up from your dream just to grab his arm and ask "master?" He Immediately jumps from the chair.
Aether: y/n you are ok! Thank ar- wait..did how did you call me?
You said it again "master" and then you ask "is there something i should do for you?"
Aether is questioning himself rigth now, doing what is correct or do what is in his dirty mind now.....of course doing what is in mind is a better option, he will later think in a excuse for later if you ask what happen when you two used the wisdom orb.
Aether : Will you do everything I say? Rigth?
Y/n : Ofcourse my master, anything you ask for even if it's impossible i will try my best to make it possible for you.
Now he is sure of what to ask! He slowly unbutton his pants.
Aether: I need you to take care of this..
You move from the bed to kneel before him, looking at his dick like if it was the last thing you will eat in your life, aether is getting Impatient and start questioning again if this is a good idea or not, but his horny thoughts about you are more intense, he quickly grab your hair and put you more near to his hard dick.
Aether: why..are you looking at me like that? I give you an order, Iam your master..
Once he is desperate when you didn't response to his needy question he grab your head to face his dick si you can start sucking, licking, kissing, touching anything.
Aether : ah- yes, like that, more like that
At the point of a exciting climax he finally ends cumming in your precious face. Aether can't think clear his head goes fuzzy with the feeling of doing it again but this time thrusting into you instead.
...
The next day you wake up as usual and you see the wisdom orb still in the room while your boyfriend has enter the room just in time!
Y/n : eh? We didn't throw this to the trash yesterday? Why are we keeping this?
Aether : don't worry we are just gonna keep this as a decoration.
Y/n : oh, i see so it's like a little toy! How cute
Aether's can't wait for another night to use this cute little toy again on you, after all you won't remember anything.
Tumblr media
It's a bit of thoughts i got from the event, it's very horrendously embarrassing, sorry but haha that event literally was a "mind control" stuff if you know, I just work for headcanon post (˙ᵕ˙).
278 notes · View notes
zzzennin · 2 years
Text
I'll single out the hq fandom today, as a Brazilian I absolutely hate, despise and get mad when I see some Hinata is a fucking horndog, or incredible good a sex cause HeS bEeN tO bRaZiL. Like.
Y'all
Y'all.
Can we please have something fun without fucking it up with your fucking stereotypes? Believe or not, Hinata would experience so much more than samba and sex, brazilians are not this sexy, sensual country you think it is, do you even know from where this came from? From our dictatorship government that tried to sell the country as a sex paradise and this bullshit had shit implications to this day.
Brazilian people being incredible sexualized by the rest of the world, most women not being treated like human beings when we go out or just assumed to be prostitutes, to be grabbed by random gringos cause BRAZILIAN LOVES TO FUCK RIGTH????
So, everytime someone writes something that little Hinata came to brazil just to become this sex God because you know, those brazilians, is just so fucking sad and disappointing but not surprising. Never is surprising to be remembered how y'all don't give a shit about us latinos, you don't care to learn anything else about here to make your headcanons, beach and carnival is enough and of course all the sex he had.
But, yeah, Hinata did came to Brazil and he loved here, not for what you think he did.
Hinata thought was so fucking weird when the "egg car" went down his street the first time, there's a car with a megaphone selling eggs for 10 bucks.
Mangoes on the streets blew his mind, mangoes are so expensive in japan and here you can go anywhere and just grab and eat, for free? And taste amazing?
Batata palha he wanted to get a box to take back home, tiny potato chips that you can put in everything to make it crunchy? Perfect.
Also, brazilians always make their one versions of foods, sushi with cream cheese, salmon and cream cheese being sold in a cup as sushi? He was borderline offended.
Fruits are so cheap and taste so good.
In July is kinda cold, so they have this huge party called festa junina in celebration of crops and all the corn and peanuts foods are amazing. He likes to see the quadrilhas juntinhas dancing, one year he even got to dance as the groom.
Bahia was one of his favorite places to drink a caipirinha in a large cup in the beach with some acarajé was just amazing.
A few of my personal headcanons from his time here, we have much more to offer.
419 notes · View notes