Tumgik
#if you are a terf. don’t be that
crtter · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
3K notes · View notes
walnutsupreme · 9 months
Text
btw since there’s like triple the amt of u there was before i’m gonna do a little housekeeping and say this very loudly: u have to be as transgender as possible and you have to do it as incorrectly as possible all the time. any inquiries can be directed to my ask box
924 notes · View notes
cloudabserk · 13 hours
Note
I can't believe you're a guy...your arts are way too cute and adorable to be from a male. I thought you'd promote violence or objectification of women or something male like that. Are you gay? You must be. Straight guys don't have this much taste
so did they have to teach you how to act like a freak in some sort of special academy or are you just like this naturally
105 notes · View notes
acowardinmordor · 6 months
Text
Fucked up thought as I do material spec: transmasc Eddie Munson who gets bullied and called a guy because of how he dresses and acts (transphobic so bad they looped back to what Eddie wants on accident) dating Steve post S2, who knows and supports him, but still has to misgender his bf in public until they can get out of Hawkins. Eddie fails again, they get in a fight about whether they should leave, and aren’t broken up, but aren’t really together as S3 starts. So when Eddie visits Scoops, Steve is so happy to see him that he calls him Eddie and he/him in public, just like the bullies, and can’t explain to Robin, who is absolutely pissed that Steve is treating her Eddie like that.
233 notes · View notes
borf-borfs · 2 years
Text
some of y’all genuinely rb shit like
How to spot a TERF (most common dogwhistles!!!!)
Number 1: they post about WOMEN’S RIGHTS 😨😨😨😨😨😨😨😨😰😰😰😰😰😰😱😱😱😱😱😥😥😥😥😥😓😓😓😓😓🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢
2K notes · View notes
I need to be publicly perceived as a guy asap.
so true
100 notes · View notes
feminist-bitches-only · 7 months
Text
Hey @ trans inclusive radical feminists, how do y’all beat the terf accusations while also talking about sex based oppression as a form of misogyny? I literally highlight my support of trans people in my bio and my pinned post and just got hit with a terf accusation :/
152 notes · View notes
xbuster · 16 days
Text
Now I’m thinking again of that dumb post I saw on this website saying that yaoi is defined by homoerotic violence and yuri is defined by longing or yearning or whatever so like. By that definition MayaKuro would be lesbian yaoi.
69 notes · View notes
minty-mumbles · 4 months
Text
What an excellent day to remember that trans women are people and trans men are people and nonbinary people are people, and all of them deserve bodily autonomy, human rights, and love
Peace and love on planet earth 🥰
86 notes · View notes
freshbeeth · 29 days
Text
hey it's me FreshBeeth
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
hello lesbians (and others) thank u for following me i love u all
i do a lot of shit online you should follow me on my:
YouTube Channels (Main / Highlights + Playthroughs / Music)
Twitch (i stream every wednesday evening)
Twitter (fuckass app but alas)
Discord Server (in its infancy, sorry if it's dry)
TikTok (i rarely post there but nevertheless)
Instagram (art/photography)
Spotify (i have a lot of Black artist playlists that you should listen to even though it has nothing to do with splatoon)
or don't i'm not a cop
ANYWAYS BEAUTIFUL TRANS + DISABLED + RACIALLY MARGINALIZED PEOPLE ARE WELCOME HERE THE ONLY THING I WON’T ALLOW IS BIGOTRY AND HATE 😘
62 notes · View notes
mintharasthrone · 21 days
Text
Tumblr media
more “gay” pages posting complete homophobic garbage claiming bisexual women are lesbians
53 notes · View notes
seaglassmarbles · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
“gender criticals” using misogyny to trans-vestigate cis women will never not be funny
what’s even funnier is that these pictures have been used to prove this point before and they are STILL falling for it
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
91 notes · View notes
verberation · 1 year
Text
The world needs more wounded butch knights, grimly shouldering duty, wandering from lonely town to lonely town in the name of a saint no-one remembers, drinking in the darkest corners of a tavern, fighting with a shield in one hand and wielding a broken sword they cannot bear to replace in the other. The world has broken them upon it but still they keep going, accompanied only by their nameless horse, their impossible burden, the memory of the soft touch of the queen they love in a way that no knight should feel for their liege.
656 notes · View notes
glitter-soda · 6 months
Text
I find it depressing to think about the future, when the majority of people stop thinking being Queer™ is cool and trendy. They’re going to be laughing about how “cringe” they used to be while women and LGB people are stuck cleaning up the mess they made.
145 notes · View notes
terven-queen · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
If I see someone on here being like “terfs fuck off and die” or “terfs are stinky” or “OP is a terf, beware,” I send anonymous praise of terfs to them… just to be a little annoying. 😇
118 notes · View notes
litres-of-cocaine · 3 months
Text
you people don’t know what death of the author is.
it’s from Roland Barthes’ essay of the same name about the viewpoint of academic interpretation. the essay argues that literary criticism should base itself around the reader’s interpretation rather than authorial intention. essentially saying what the author was TRYING to convey is irrelevant in comparison to what the text ACTUALLY conveys. there is some debate about the value of this method, but it is almost universally preferred by academic literary circles.
crucially, it does NOT refer to amputating a writer from the ownership/creation of their work for whatever reason. so people claiming death of the author to justify buying harry potter stuff is just plain wrong. what they are doing is (unsuccessfully) separating the art from the artist which is a dumb as fuck concept anyway but also notably different to what death of the author is.
death of the author does have some relevance to jkr if we are thinking about her attempts to retcon/add/change elements of the books outside of the narrative (i.e. on twitter and even on pottermore to an extent), as it problematises the literary norm to decenter authorial intention that has been a standard since Barthes’ 1967 essay.
(this does get tricky though if we are thinking in terms of popular culture rather than academic standards, as authors commenting upon their work and elaborating on the world their characters inhabit is a perfectly acceptable thing in modern publishing. i would say jkr’s excessive interest in exerting control over her fiction does encroach upon both lines, however, as she tries to alter the potential interpretations of her work without any textual basis and problematises academic interest as well as just the leisure associated with understanding)
this is mostly in response to people saying that death of the author doesn’t work when the author is alive and /no/ you are thinking of ‘separating the art from the artist’ which is a separate but not unconnected idea.
what annoys me about this is that it not only completely misuses death of the author but also suggests that separating the art from the artist can ever work. (it does not).
although they might seem fairly similar they actually assume completely different things. decentering authorial intent does not mean that the artist is unconnected to their output. if we were to analyse The Importance of Being Earnest, ignoring Wilde’s own experience with living a scandalous double-life would be short-sighted. we can’t isolate literature from their contexts and death of the author doesn’t try to do that. The implicit attributes of Wilde’s life seeping into the play’s narrative is a fact and we can talk about that without considering what Wilde intended. What Wilde wanted in his narrative is irrelevant, whether he intended the parallels to his own life is irrelevant, the fact that these similarities are there is interesting. The artist is the creator, a very significant factor in the text’s construction, but they don’t get to decide what their text means with any more authority than the next person.
if we ‘separate the art from the artist’ this is negated. suddenly we cannot analyse the text with any kind of seriousness as the foundations of the text have disappeared. you cannot separate jk rowling from harry potter because so much of the text is built upon white english middle class sensibilities. what we write and how we interpret what other people write is based on our identities, and who we are. you take that away the book might as well be empty.
so yes separating the art from the artist doesn’t work in jkr’s case because it never works, and what you are talking about is definitely NOT death of the author.
if someone wants to buy crummy wizard hats then they should go for it, but pretending that you’re safe from blame is ridiculous .
39 notes · View notes