there's a particular tentativeness to how imogen and laudna are interacting, that is so careful and raw and unsure- but still affectionate. still weighted. it feels like- both of them, reaching out occasionally, in turn, both of them drawing back a bit at different moments. its. so good. its a very specific post Incident/Argument tenseness that still has the threads of affection and effort underlying it, and its delicious and layered and i am thrilled.
727 notes
·
View notes
hey Fully Weeping after rewatching the amelia earhart ep
14 notes
·
View notes
If you could have any Asmo/reader fic what would be the things you would want from it? like an ideal fic would contain what tropes or AUS or situations or whatever
uhmm anything wellwritten that characterizes asmo similar to the way i do ! i rlly like character exploration , both more serious stuff & just sillycute...anything where asmo is a little cunning and toxic and also gets railed into oblivion.anything where hes a vampire. ill write a tag essay about the specifics
65 notes
·
View notes
obsessed with the whole jyn and cassian as penelope and odysseys thing like the metatextual levels of the Ordinary Human couple in the midst of this mass mythos of gods and war but also the sense they are for almost their entire lives separated and yet inexorably bound by the narrative, they are threaded together they are looking in a mirror they are drowning in the wine dark sea they are standing on the beach they are the warp and weft they are coming home to each other they have never not once in their lives yet met
85 notes
·
View notes
sorry if this is a dumb question, but what was the problem with keito calling him “nacchan”? is it because they’re filming? what does keito usually call him? (from what i know, fanta is more chill about honorifics among the members? sorry i’m new here 😭)
not a dumb question at all!!! japanese formal language can be very confusing!!
(disclaimer: i will say first that my japanese is not very good and i'm also not very familiar with other LDH groups so anyone pls correct me if im wrong!! i wouldn't be surprised if fanta is more casual about it,, so i'm not super confident about it but this is my general impression!!)
under the cut bc this got very long🙇♂️
from my understanding fanta (and LDH as a whole) actually tend to be quite strict with honorifics and formal speech. i remember just recently seeing a video of some Johnny Company groups on tv with some LDH members where they discussed the LDH high five rule, which is that kouhai must ALWAYS high five senpais with two hands
the J company members were very shocked (and maybe impressed?) by this because J company groups will apparently be quite casual with senpais
i won't speak to other groups because I'm not familiar with them, but in Fanta the members tend to be very strict with calling each other formally. all younger members will call members older than them with "name-kun" (except sekai, every member calls him sekai-san) and use honorific speech. Keito always calls nacchan as "horinatsu-kun" because he is younger, as does sota (though sota will also occasionally use "hori-san")
and all of this is despite many members knowing each other for 10+ years or being childhood friends (keito still speaks formally with sawa and horinatsu still calls leiya "leiya-kun". though from what i can think of, whenever horinatsu refers to shota, he does not use -kun), so i would say ldh is just very strict about it.🤷♀️ there is even a weird case with sawa and taiki, where sawa is older but taiki is the senpai so they both call each other taiki-kun and natsuki-kun (or sometimes sawa-san)
however i will say that while they are strict, because fanta is obviously very close the times i can think of off the top of my head where a younger member will drop honorifics, the older member will call them out, but they never actually seem very bothered (like with horinatsu, he is still laughing while hitting keito, and im pretty sure keito didn't apologize)
others i can think of are leiya calling taiki with no honorifics here (at 1:04): the question is "who do you think is most improved since debut" and leiya just says "taiki" and taiki yells "don't call me without honorifics!" but is still just laughing, and leiya does not apologize
and taiki dropping to informal speech while talking to sekai here (at 2:03). the question is "please tell us a good point of the next member!" which in this case is taiki, and taiki says "please tell me! (informally)" and sekai says "why are you speaking informally?" and taiki and the members just laugh🥰
in terms of using formal vs informal speech in general there are some members that i have definitely seen drop them from time to time (like yusei to leiya and sota to yusei) but even then they will always still call the older one with -kun
though all of this is to say its very possible that they are just like this in front of the camera to follow ldh rules and are very friendly and informal behind camera but i cant speak to that;;🙇♂️
5 notes
·
View notes
In another life itd be cool if i had a night time only roommate who like came out of a wall and was a human version of an owl (not vibes but horrible lab accident) and we chatted and socialized when i have insomnia and cant sleep so its like. A positive opportunity instead of a failure that will be pointed out 150 times tomorrow
3 notes
·
View notes
i have a lot of leftist friends who are very strongly pro-voting and i have a lot of leftist friends who are very strongly anti-voting and i'm always telling them the same fucking thing: being a condescending asshole about your voting perspective is not going bridge that difference. it is just going to drive a further wedge in our movement.
2 notes
·
View notes
me when doctor who presents a species (daleks) at its worst (season one episode six the dalek) and asks the audience to sympathize Anyway. me when doctor who posits the idea that, yeah, this thing is the embodiment of evil it is in a forever war against the doctor personally and even HE. the DOCTKR. wants the entire species wiped from existence. it is going to kill Everyone because it honestly believes they should die. it is a person. it is scared. it is in pain. it is dying. the doctor wants to kill it: the last dalek and the last time lord locked in eternal battle, except its not eternal, is it? this is the only time we ever see the doctor with an honest to god advantage over any dalek and i dont remember how the episode ends but ive seen him torture it im watching him debate ethics with it- whats the point? whats it good for? and then revert under stress to: i think you should kill yourself. why dont you just die? he would make a good dalek.
5 notes
·
View notes
girl help im going back n forth on whether or not i should send an email to thank the beautiful man fr letting me join the drawing session last week (more info on that entire situation here and here) and letting him know i probably wont be back but appreciate having had the experience either way. great or horrible idea leave a comment or DM to lmk.
2 notes
·
View notes
twitter this elon that i dont give a fuck
6 notes
·
View notes
ppl who complain that muto hates finn or that the show loses focus on finn bc it also includes side character episodes……..are u ok
1 note
·
View note
i love your blog and need need NEED to ask you if you have any opinion on this because people were talking abt it on twitter recently. if u don't tho it's fine! just wanna hear your thoughts. someone was talking about moments in kpop that were popular with the ppl but actually shouldn't be because they were designed for the male gaze and the two cbs mentioned were monster by irene&seulgi which, shocked me a bit. but more so the second which was sumni's tail. do you feel like tail stages/mv were designed to appeal mainly to men? genuinely this took me a aback a bit because yeah sure choreography makes sunmi appear extremely attractive and she wears revealing clothes but the power dynamics in the choreo and just in general in the camera movements in her performances during tail always made me think she's actually mocking men more than catering to them? anyways I hope this makes sense. sorry. just read it and immediately thought of u so I came here lol
;ALSKJF;LASJKF;LKJF THE CB WHERE THE ORIGINAL CHOREO WAS HER DIGGING HER HEELS INTO A MAN'S THIGHS????? THE MV WHERE SHE TIES A MAN TO RAILROAD TRACKS?????? THAT TAIL????????? god this is such a fucking stupid take i'm so sorry you had to read any of that anon. anyways here's my analysis post on the costumes in the tail mv and how they illustrate sunmi's (character's) reclaimation of power and masculine imagery.
but besides tail specifically, there is actually something i want to talk about here in regards to how this particular take smacks of an inability to understand basic critical and media analysis theory.
when you say that something shouldn't be enjoyed or engaged with, you imply that there is a should; a 'correct' way to engage or interpret a work. and there is NO correct way to interpret art. a massive problem with social media is that there is a hegemony on moralistic opinions. you have to have a 'good' opinion, you have to like the right things and hate the right things and why. because reasons. because some anonymous icon on the bird app said it was male gazy and therefore that apparently means it's bad. and yea i'm gonna sound like a fucking crank about this but you need to do your own readings. the male gaze is not a code of ethics, it is a theory of media analysis. and theories are tools that are meant to help you better understand the life you live and the ways that you engage with the world. YOU are the one that uses the tool, that makes the choice on when and how and where you use that tool, and also if you take into account the information that that tool provides. it's all about the nuance. unfortunate that the internet went and shot it in the back.
16 notes
·
View notes
Its kinda hilarious how id been thinking about wilburs lore finale because yknow more endings today. and how with time ive gotten to both love and hate the ending more. like i always liked utah mans should leave who cares where it was but everything around it was. a bit rushed and also too slow and Some People who dont let their characters be wrong and there was too much wet cat etc but the idea was there
At least i dont have complicated feelings about this one. can just wholeheartedly hate it
3 notes
·
View notes
this is the thing. if i talk to a zionist and tell them my stance, they tell me i’m a zionist. if i talk to an antizionist and tell them my stance, they tell me i’m an antizionist.
this is the exact reason i don’t identify myself as either. because in online discourse, they are essentially meaningless. if i’m talking to someone who identifies themself as a zionist, i don’t know if i’m talking to someone who just thinks jews should be able to live peacefully in the levant if they want to, or to someone who wants an authoritarian jewish theocracy at the cost of palestinian lives. if i’m talking to someone who identifies themselves as an antizionist, i don’t know if i’m talking to someone who staunchly opposes the israeli government and its occupation, or to someone who thinks every israeli citizen should die and hamas should establish an authoritarian islamic theocracy.
when i think about my stance, what my goal is, what i want to accomplish with my activism, my last priority is trying to decide what to call myself. i don’t give a fuck which word people on the internet decide matches up with my opinions. i care about what i can do in the diaspora to facilitate liberation. and to be clear, there really is not much i can do. i will not single handedly free palestine. but i’m hoping i can appeal to both zionists who care about the well-being of palestinians and oppose the atrocities committed by the israeli government, and to antizionists who care about the well-being of jews and want to find a solution that keeps us all safe.
and like. i know this is the arguing about labels website. but these labels are so charged that there’s constantly pressure from both “sides” to pick one. and i am simply not going to do that. bc i do not matter. my opinions do not matter. what matters is the safety and well-being of palestinians, so instead of arguing with tankies on the internet who will always demand i be more violent, i’m going to do what i do best. which is just be some guy on the internet who does their best to post some educational stuff and try to have nuanced discussions for people who actually want to have them.
1K notes
·
View notes
So Lea Michele on Broadway killed it are we surprised?
We are not.
If nothing else the dependability on her voice and work ethic alone (also which has gotten her into trouble) are always going to put her above and beyond most people.
I mean truly, it wasn't even like she came in with a whimper, it was a roar and a mighty perfect one. All the videos coming through, I legit teared up with happiness for her, for doing the job she was cast to do and for singing the fuck out those songs that were meant to be sung the fuck out of.
Its not...a hurtless win either obviously, she for many has not atoned for her past behaviour and there is a level of it that still feels problematic to me but I also have a very clear bias towards Lea because I DO think she's an exceptional performer and actor and in that bias I can understand just slightly her poor professionalism that is still in all its fanfare - someone who took her job seriously...too seriously but seriously in the way that women are called out for and men are praised for. The same way Christian Bale seriously ripped into his crew for disrupting him working and the media and everyone else brushed it aside as 'method acting' and sympathizing with the grueling work he had to do off camera to get into character. No different than actors who have to learn multiple dance numbers a day, plus their lines plus recording multiple songs a day. Its of the same but its not treated as the same.
However I also don't want to do what the hundreds of twitter users, journalists, comedians and Hollywood elite have done - by ignoring what Lea did so they can craft the perfect 142 tweet with the hopes of Likes and Reblog's, to get a viral tweet for which they will follow up the thread with, 'Woah this tweet blow up - since your here peep my Etsy page below! By my stuff! Oh here's a link to my soundcloud music.'
Every act is further proof that no one actually cares what Lea did, the people she harmed are nameless and faceless, they were a means to an end so that the perfect tweet could be sent and liked. If people genuinely cared about what Lea did they wouldn't spend time diminishing and erasing the stories of those who came forward instead turning that turmoil into an incredibly overplayed joke about her being illiterate.
This quote all but sums it up;
Now there’s a very boring rumor-joke going around that Michele can’t read. Boring because it’s gone past the specificity of the actual “Wait … can she?” moment and into the arena of an incessantly retweeted generic “joke” that doesn’t actually require much cognition x
I hope she has made amends with those that were willingly - it might not be something we ever know, it could just be as likely those people were unwilling or she just didn't reach out. For me there has to be some separation so that I can enjoy the fact that she's playing a role she is perfect for and she's doing what we all expected her to do, which is kill it.
I am happy for her as a performer - as a person...I don't know her but hopefully she's learned from this and understands the power that comes with being #1 on a call sheet and respecting that.
I guess the question is....when are we allowed to forgive people for past mistakes if we can see a change in them? What level of atoning is enough before we forgive them?
0 notes
I am fully in support of all of those posts that critique fandom's obsession with making the clones completely Mandalorian in every way curse you Traviss, and I think it's valid to take a second look at the impulse, but I also take umbrage with the idea that the clones have nothing to do with Mandalorian culture at all. Literally the most visible clone in the whole of TCW wears jaig eyes, used the same way the Mandalorians use them, and so do multiple other clones. Multiple clones also picked Mando'a names for themselves, or wear traditional Mandalorian hairstyles, and Boil isn't the only clone who wears some sort of Death Watch insignia (which is fascinating in its own right).
There's just - nuance to all of it, I think. The clones aren't wholly Mandalorian, but they aren't not Mandalorian either. Whatever canon you want to take re: Jango and the trainers he picked, the clones clearly picked up bits of the culture from them, whether because of or despite them. Especially considering Mandalorian culture was largely spread through conquest originally, and adoption, the clones have as much of a right to it as anyone, and writing that off or ignoring the fact that at least some of them clearly do consider themselves part of the culture in some way removes a lot of the grey area from them as their own thing, imo.
The clones are a grey area, as a whole. I think that's part of the tragedy of them. They don't have one people who are their own except other clones. They don't have one specific homeworld or culture. They were created literally to die as cannon fodder, and they made themselves into a people despite that. Taking away one of the major pieces they incorporated into their lives (in strict canon, even if you want to ignore everything Traviss ever touched) is weird and overlooks a lot of what's presented about the clones in TCW.
They don't have to be perfectly Mandalorian in every way. That's just as much of an injustice to them. But removing the Mandalorian bits entirely strips away a lot of how they clearly see themselves, too.
1K notes
·
View notes