Tumgik
#j street
vyorei · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
Calling for a ceasefire would really put a dent in the whole Terror thing
21 notes · View notes
the-garbanzo-annex-jr · 2 months
Text
by Phyllis Chesler
On Monday, a J Street and Democrat party operative posted a piece at her Substack. I am choosing not to name her or to link to the piece because I don’t want even more people to read it. The piece is titled in this way: “Elie Wiesel on indifference. A child killed in Gaza every 15 minutes. Two mothers every hour. Seven women every two hours. Are you OK with that?”
READ MORE: History Isn’t All Black and White. Just Look at Israel.
The piece then proceeds to trot out a series of mainly fake news talking points about the deaths of women and children in Gaza, hour by hour, day by day. How many J Streeters have expressed similar moral outrage about the much larger body counts in Ukraine (an estimated 30,457 civilians and 31,000 combatants, or 61,500 all together) and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (an estimated 5 to 6 million civilian deaths thus far)? We cannot trust the estimates of civilian and/or combatant deaths in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria, Iraq, China, North Korea, Sudan, Somalia, and so on.
To the best of my knowledge, few J Street–style journalists have presented the much larger body count in Ukraine and warned us against being indifferent to it — at least, not again and again, day after day.
The above-mentioned Substack piece is in gruesome lockstep with the New York Times, which, on the very same day, had five full pages of photos of murdered Gazans, all identified by age, name, and profession. In the paper’s pages, murdered Israelis rarely appear, nor do the many hundreds of thousands of displaced Israelis. They remain nameless and faceless, as do the Israeli hostages who’ve been hidden in Gaza for five months while they’ve been beaten, raped, tortured, starved, and murdered.
I sometimes wonder whether both the New York Times and J Street are on the Hamas/Iran payroll, whether they are simply funded by Soros — or whether they are true-believing Jew haters. One damning piece of evidence that they are Jew haters is their refusal to acknowledge Hamas’ complicity in civilian deaths. Hamas doesn’t just hide behind civilians when they are available; Hamas operates and maneuvers mostly in civilian areas, a clear violation of international law. Given this, and despite Israel’s almost suicidal efforts to prevent civilian deaths, J Street argues that Israel has no right to fight back against those trying to destroy them. (READ MORE from Phyllis Chesler: Silence of the Feminist Lambs: Not a Word on Hamas Horrors)
The piece up at Substack essentially dares to turn Elie Wiesel’s moral authority into a sock puppet in order to use his Holocaust-era perspective to condemn Israel and to warn us against our own “indifference” to Gazan civilian suffering. What Wiesel said, however, was far more relevant than the phrase quoted at Substack. Please allow me to quote from an interview given by him to Merle Hoffman in 1991, as reported in On the Issues magazine (full disclosure: I was the magazine’s editor at large at the time):
HOFFMAN: You have been severely criticized for not condemning Israel about the intifada. What is your current position on the Palestinian situation? WIESEL: I have been criticized for many things… Yes, I refuse to systematically condemn Israel. H: For anything? W: There are certain red lines that I will not cross. If I had known at the time that Israel was involved in torturing I would have spoken out, but it was too late. When I found out, a commission had already been formed and justice prevailed, but I don’t feel I have the right to apply public pressure on Israel. H: But you have the moral authority. W: But what if I’m wrong? H: Can’t you afford to be wrong? W: Yes, but only if I pay the price. What if I am wrong and they pay the price? What if I apply such pressure on a decision and that decision may bring disaster or at least tragedy to Israel? Do I have the right to do this? It is their children who will pay the price, not mine. I do go to Israel and speak to the leaders there[.] I can say what I feel. But here, especially here, I have no right to speak out publicly…. I am offended when I see Jewish intellectuals who all of a sudden remember their Jewishness only to use that Jewishness to attack Israel. These are men and women who have never done anything for Israel [and] all of a sudden they remember they are Jews.
I hope and pray that J Streeters and Democratic Party operatives pay attention to these words of Weisel as well as to those they manipulate in order to condemn Israel.
14 notes · View notes
hero-israel · 6 months
Note
Is JStreet as bad as JVP?
No. J Street does not platform and embrace terrorists, encourage the murder of Israelis, stalk and harass LGBT people, or preach that cops were nicer to black people before 1948.
J Street has at times been excessively, performatively apologetic about mainstream Jewish life and culture. After reading their press for years, I still can't say I'm sure why they exist or who their constituency is, or if they ever had any purpose other than to posture as Jewish support for the reckless and short-sighted Iran deal. But they support a 2SS and blame Hamas for its attacks, so, there are worse things to be than a bit puzzling.
15 notes · View notes
eretzyisrael · 5 months
Text
by Gregg Roman
The shocking and horrific Hamas attack on Israelis on October 7 – the mass murder, rape, abductions, torture, and mutilation – was a paradigm-shifting event. Israel's war in response is a starkly black-and-white conflict.
Yet J Street, the lobbying group that advertises itself as "pro-Israel" and "pro-peace," has not seen it that way. It recently opposed two pro-Israel House bills, arguing that they unduly ruffle Iran's feathers (J Street's view is that Iran must be appeased).
It also pressed House Democrats to oppose another resolution, this one condemning support for Hamas on college campuses.
As for Jewish fears about raging increases in antisemitism, J Street scoffs.
J Street has been consistent in its approach since its founding in 2007: put zero onus on the Palestinian Arab leadership and fire all criticism toward the Jewish state.
As for Jewish fears about raging increases in antisemitism, J Street scoffs.
Per J Street's president Jeremy Ben-Ami, "We're debating whether or not a particular tweet or expression is anti-Semitic. The issues I'd like to see a focus on are the occupation, the settlements, and the question of whether we can end this conflict."
In J Street's view, Israel's government must be treated by the United States as a wayward child and the proper role for Americans living safely in the U.S. is to undercut support for Israel by relentlessly criticizing it while cloaked in a false flag of being "pro-Israel."
13 notes · View notes
philosopherking1887 · 6 months
Text
Congressional Democrats, and the Biden Administration, are far more likely to heed this call if it's coming from a group that unequivocally supports Israel's right to exist and condemns Hamas's atrocities.
5 notes · View notes
plitnick · 11 months
Text
Nakba denial is at the heart of pro-Israel lobbying
The denial of the Nakba has become a virtual sine qua non for pro-Israel advocacy and propaganda. It is not necessary for Zionism; acknowledging the genocide of native people in the Western hemisphere has not led to the destruction of the US, Canada, or Australia. But because of the anti-Arab and anti-Palestinian hate that has, from the start, been such an integral part of the ideology of…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
4 notes · View notes
schraubd · 2 years
Text
AIPAC's Gutlessness
A few weeks ago, following the victory of Rep. Haley Stevens in her D-on-D matchup against Andy Levin, I wrote a sum-up post regarding what we can derive from AIPAC's relatively successful set of Democratic primary interventions. One point I made there is that, because AIPAC's interventions (in the forms of ads, mailers, and the like) have not typically concentrated on Israel-related issues, its hard for AIPAC to claim vindication that the victories for its candidates represent endorsement of its particular vision of pro-Israel. AIPAC, it seems, lacks confidence that its actual message will resonate with voters. It's pouring money into races, but it's doing so in a way that betrays its own skittishness.
Consider now AIPAC's belated brag that it was behind late money spent to tank the candidacy of Yuh-Line Niou, who narrowly trails Dan Goldman in the wide open NY-10 race. AIPAC hid its involvement in the race altogether until after Goldman prevailed, at which point it loudly sought to claim credit for the victory. My guess is that AIPAC was not confident Goldman would win (he only ended up claiming victory by a 2 point margin) and didn't want the embarrassment of a potential high profile loss. Once victory was assured, though, well, victory has a thousand fathers. As I said: gutless.
Meanwhile, AIPAC's increasingly bitter set of attacks on J Street (which had a decent night itself what with Jerry Nadler and Jamaal Bowman prevailing) have now taken to including hitting the latter for accepting money from George Soros -- a rather alarming development given the degree to which anti-Soros rabble rousing has come to occupy a central place in contemporary antisemitic conspiracy theorizing.
George Soros has a long history of backing anti-Israel groups. Now he’s giving $1 million to help @jstreetdotorg support anti-Israel candidates and attack pro-Israel Democrats. AIPAC works to strengthen pro-Israel mainstream Democrats. J Street & Soros work to undermine them. https://t.co/4sQMRQppwB
— AIPAC (@AIPAC) August 24, 2022
It's hard not to see this as AIPAC full-heartedly embracing a new, right-wing identity. There is no constituency even amongst moderate Dems for anti-Soros attacks. The only people who "enjoy" this sort of line are right-wingers who've already imbibed a deep draught of conspiracy about Soros as the evil puppet master pulling the strings. And, of course, right-wingers will most certainly use AIPAC's indulgence in this line to justify their own, even more grotesque, Soros smears.
Leveraging the far-right's favorite antisemitic conspiracy for transient political gain? Again: gutless.
via The Debate Link https://ift.tt/QD1bPql
9 notes · View notes
casaotopame · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Walked in moss and viewed the sunset
5 notes · View notes
userarmyhope · 27 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
HOPE ON THE STREET : EPISODE 1 (2024)
+ bonus handsome boi
Tumblr media
1K notes · View notes
bts-trans · 18 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
240407 J-Hope's Instagram Post
와주셔서 감사했습니다!!! 사랑합니다!!!🫡💜
Thank you for coming!!! I love you!!!🫡💜
Wall Handwriting Translation: L: AFBF* R: Happiness Hobi was here
(T/N: *Stands for 'ARMY Forever Bangtan Forever')
Trans cr; Annie & Aditi @ bts-trans © TAKE OUT WITH FULL CREDITS
1K notes · View notes
webdiggerxxx · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
꧁★꧂
2K notes · View notes
the-garbanzo-annex-jr · 9 months
Text
According to Israel Hayom, Rep. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) has recently begun to meet with “Jewish leaders in her election district.”
OK, so Ariel Kahanah, who reported the story, doesn’t know that AOC represents NY 14, which includes the eastern part of The Bronx and part of north-central Queens. The Queens portion includes Astoria, College Point, Corona, East Elmhurst, Elmhurst, Jackson Heights, and Woodside. The Bronx portion of the district includes City Island, Country Club, Van Nest, Morris Park, Parkchester, Pelham Bay, Schuylerville, and Throggs Neck.
Advertisement
I checked the UJA databank on the Jewish community of NY 14. It has 26,300 individuals who define themselves as Jews, out of roughly 700,000 residents, who are 50% Hispanic, 17% Asian, and 9% Black.
Out of the Jewish population, 8,400 are 65 and older––1,500 of whom live alone, and 12,400 are ages 40 to 64. 7,600 are poor or near-poor. 3,000 are of Russian origin. 5,600 are biracial. Fewer than 7,000 attend any synagogue, be it Orthodox, Conservative, or Reform.
In other words, AOC very likely did not meet with Jewish leaders in her election district. According to Israel Hayom, she held several closed meetings with a group of rabbis and Jewish leaders, men and women, who belong to the progressive wing of the Jewish community and some of whom are close to J Street.
And this is the bag where the AOC cat has been hiding all along. AOC met with progressive Jews from J Street and similar anti-Zionist, anti-Israel circles. And the reason she had to keep those meetings secret is that even those lefty Jews are kind of pariahs to the squad caucus.
19 notes · View notes
nyc-looks · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
Harley, 18 Audra, 18
Audra: “My outfit is primarily thrifted and/or DIY'ed. Today my style is heavily inspired by cult party kei, decora and various j-fashion styles.”
Harley: “I’m wearing a pink blouse from the brand Anna House, and everything else was bought from various thrift stores. I find inspiration In everything, vintage toys, porcelain dolls, the rococo era, but my main inspiration is Japanese street fashion magazines like Fruits, Kera, and Gothic Lolita Bible.”
Sep 21, 2023 ∙ Chelsea
1K notes · View notes
eretzyisrael · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
20 notes · View notes
yooboobies · 26 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
🧡💛🩷
763 notes · View notes
plitnick · 11 months
Text
Blinken address to AIPAC epitomizes the failure of the Biden Administration
Yesterday, Secretary of State Antony Blinken addressed AIPAC and made it clearer than ever that the #Biden administration is committed to blocking #Palestinian rights and promoting regional conflict. Spinning a web of fanatastical non-realities and impossible scenarios, Blinken pandered to the worst tendencies of the Democratic portions of AIPAC while being so desperate to show that his boss had…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
2 notes · View notes