Tumgik
#libel case
starr-angelofnarnia · 2 years
Text
So... If this defamation lawsuit ends in Johnny's favor (as it should), can the UK case against the Shun (ie Sun) be revisited? They furthered the damage to his character
61 notes · View notes
tmarshconnors · 16 days
Text
"If all of the dead allied soldiers could see their countries now, they would have thrown down their weapons and fought with the Germans."
Tumblr media
David John Cawdell Irving is an English author who has written on the military and political history of World War II, especially Nazi Germany. He was found to be a Holocaust denier in a UK court in 2000 as a result of a failed libel case. 
Born: 24 March 1938 (age 85 years), Hutton, Brentwood
Authorship: David Irving has authored numerous books on World War II, with a focus on Nazi Germany and Adolf Hitler. His works often stirred controversy due to his revisionist perspectives on historical events.
Holocaust Denial: Irving gained infamy for his denial of the Holocaust, claiming that the genocide of Jews during World War II, as well as the existence of gas chambers in concentration camps, were exaggerated or fabricated. This stance led to legal battles and tarnished his reputation in historical circles.
Legal Case: In 2000, Irving filed a libel suit against Deborah Lipstadt and Penguin Books for labeling him a Holocaust denier in one of her works. The case, famously known as Irving v Penguin Books Ltd, resulted in a ruling against Irving, with the judge describing him as an active Holocaust denier and anti-Semitic.
Revisionist Historian: Despite his controversial views, Irving is considered a significant figure in the realm of revisionist history. His works have been scrutinized for their accuracy and ideological biases, leading many historians to reject his interpretations of historical events.
Personal Background: David Irving was born on March 24, 1938, in Hutton, Brentwood, England. His upbringing and early life experiences have been cited by some as influencing his later controversial beliefs and writings.
1 note · View note
seachranaidhe · 11 months
Text
Michelle O'Neill wins libel action against DUP councillor who said she should be put "back in her kennel".
https://www.irishtimes.com/crime-law/courts/2023/05/18/michelle-oneill-wins-libel-action-against-dup-councillor-who-said-she-should-be-put-back-in-her-kennel/
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
1 note · View note
gentrychild · 1 year
Note
Tumblr media
Dear Katydid,
While I did give you a beautiful idea through the terms "B. Hisashi noticing a change in Yoichi's personality after he gave him "Stockpile".", it was right after we talked about some smooth villain Yoichi concept and while I was looking at Erna's beautiful art of Yoichi wearing a suit and the Coat.
Instead of writing the smooth villain Yoichi we deserve with some side of AFO being outclassed, you somehow wrote Yoichi being possessed by a greasy creep who was best friend with his right hand.
Not only do I not owe you child support, as I bear no responsibility for the creation of Neurotopia, but I am the one who was the most wronged, because of this fic and because of your slander.
As such, I shall sue you for defamation, slander, and crime against owlkind. However, since I am kind, benevolent, as beautiful on the inside as I am on the outside, and merciful, my demands will be modest: you owe me sneak previews of your fifteen next fanfictions, a dad for one AU with changeling Izuku, an AU where (tattooed and pink haired) First, Second and Third adopt a non human Izuku, a new tododeku fic, and for you to cease at once to try to pass your brain children for mine (take responsibility and stop trying to claim alimony from innocent owls, you conman).
I shall stop talking to you until you have accepted my demands. In the meantime, you can address your apology to my lawyer, who will soon meet you. Don't worry, they already know where you live and they are burning to talk with you.
Sincerely,
GENTRYCHILD
228 notes · View notes
Note
how is antizionism antisemitic? cosidering lots of american christian evangelicals are also zionist, aka wants all jews to leave america in part because of their idea of how the rapture begins, how is opposing zionism inherently antisemitic?
No BINGO! squares were found. Try better next time!
24 notes · View notes
cassowariess · 8 months
Text
Very tired of living in a world where people have taken the very real and reasonable phrase: "men get abused too" and weaponized it to mean: "every famous powerful man who I personally like that did something bad is automatically innocent uwu."
14 notes · View notes
Note
((@mycelialmadness)) Hey Weston good luck with that libel case in 6 years. You are really going to need it. At least the memes are going to be funny as hell LOL !!!!
I'm sorry... what?!
5 notes · View notes
Note
The audacity.
This is a general thing. About people who interact with you antagonistically. Regardless of which Horse they are Disking, they always seem the same.
The AUDACITY.
Genuinely people online have this bizarre obsession with uncovering which side is “right” and which is “evil”.
That is not how human nature and relationships work. Yes, there are cases where one person has absolute power over the other and abuses them. There are also cases where both parties attack each other relentlessly until they both realize they can’t continue living together.
With this case in particular, many of the most upsetting claims of either party were not something that could be proven. Both parties are also professional actors able to convincingly deliver lines that are not true and cry or show emotional depth on command. I don’t trust either one of these rich and famous white people any more than I can throw them.
Primarily I’m just bored of this 4+ year roller coaster ride of blaming Depp then heard then Depp then heard then Depp over and over. They are both terrible romantic partners and they were awful to each other! It’s their words against each other and I am not a psychic so I absolutely refuse to see any value towards listening and believing either of them because both are playing off of their own most vulnerable qualities.
Heard is claiming to be the victim for being a woman with less popularity and that has traditionally not gone well in Hollywood, Depp is claiming to be a victim because he has severe mental health issues and men abused by women are not taken seriously in most law.
A lot of this drama as been over the fact that neither one of them can go five minutes without trying to sabotage the other.
This became a tangent but it vexes me that people spend so much time defending the honor of random millionaires who are both capable of paying people to do that for them.
54 notes · View notes
ctxrover · 9 months
Text
Had a weird dream last night that Bruce Springsteen was on… I think it was Jimmy Fallon. Who it was wasn’t important so I’m gonna say for the purposes of this it was Fallon. The important thing was that he casually confessed to murdering Jimmy Hoffa for the Mafia in exchange for Born to Run being successful and the confession was all hidden on his next album (that would be Darkness on the Edge of Town) the whole time. And Fallon just was like “cool,” and nothing happened.
And the thing is, I googled it today and Jimmy Hoffa went missing in July of 1975 and Born to Run came out the next month. Now, I’m not saying Bruce Springsteen actually killed Jimmy Hoffa, but…
6 notes · View notes
starr-angelofnarnia · 2 years
Text
It's pretty much everywhere right now, but if you haven't Heard (pun intended), the jury released a verdict on the Depp Heard lawsuits.
I'm sharing this particular article because it's the only one I've found thus far that doesn't make it sound like both won. Johnny Depp won on all three points in his suit, that Amber's op-ed was a defamatory lie that was clearly written about Johnny Depp with malicious intent.
Amber only won on one point of three, on a statement made by Depp's attorney. Really, the particular statement deemed false was just pushing a bit too hard.
This is NOT a win for Amber Heard.
It IS a win for equal rights for women and men.
It IS a win for victims of domestic abuse, especially men.
I'm still going to watch the rest of the trial, even though we know the outcome now. Let me know if you would like me to continue posting my thoughts.
18 notes · View notes
scortchedtoast · 1 year
Text
@juanitasupreme @callmesuyinbeifong
Tumblr media
5 notes · View notes
corbinite · 8 months
Text
Sure wish I could report or block the way too personal slutshaming religious YouTube ads that show right at the very top of my home screen when I open my app
3 notes · View notes
gentrychild · 1 year
Note
Well now, hold on, I've been following this court case and looking at the evidence. Firstly, that "final notice" letter Katydid sent you was the first child support notice I'd seen, and as we all know personal drama must be aired on the internet for it to count. Therefore, that was actually the FIRST child support notice you'd received, which Katydid cannot sue you for.
Secondly, child support must be used FOR the child, in this case Neurotrauma. Katydid has given no evidence that the child support will be used for Neurotrauma, in fact having given evidence AGAINST this, which means she cannot collect child support from you as it is unlikely to be used properly.
Thirdly, and I think this is the big one, child support cannot be enforced across state lines. You live in Non-Feral DFO State, whereas from what I can tell Katydid lives in Feral Brother Fics State. As evidenced by my sperm donor fleeing to Florida to avoid paying child support for me and my sisters, child support cannot be enforced if you do not live in the same state and are not married.
Finally, using my eyeballs and reading Neurotrauma, I see no evidence of you, Gentrychild, having anything to do with the creation of Neurotrauma. A prompt or a brainstorm session does not count.
In conclusion, you clearly do not owe Katydid child support and she is slandering you as a deadbeat father.
Sincerely, A Random Guy
Will you come and testify on my behalf in the upcoming trial, Anon?
121 notes · View notes
Text
Half-formed conspiracy theory about The Idol rattling around in my brain which is that isn’t it interesting how the “twist” at the end of the idol was that the craaaazy woman had conducted an impossibly intricate scheme that came at great personal cost to her where she fabricated years of abuse and the role is played by Johnny Depp’s daughter? Isn’t it interesting………
Tbf I have no idea what Lily-Rose Depp’s relationship with her father is like, for all I know she knows him well enough to believe Amber Heard or she knows him well enough in a different context that she doesn’t believe Amber Heard. I have no clue. And even if it is related I don’t think it would’ve been Lily-Rose Depp’s idea, the show seems too misogynistic on its face to have allowed her that much creative input. But I’m just thinking isn’t that weird
2 notes · View notes
around-your-throat · 1 year
Text
why did the hair debate reach decaydanceredacted??????????
3 notes · View notes
rangerdew · 1 year
Text
“i LOOOOVE when theres dead wifes” - neil aliaoftheknives
9 notes · View notes