#logical reasoning

[officialiqtest]

Boost IQ: Tips & Tricks to Enhance Your Cognitive Abilities

Intelligence is a highly sought-after trait in today’s competitive world. Whether it’s acing exams, solving complex problems, or making informed decisions, a higher IQ can give you an edge. But is it possible to boost your IQ? The answer is yes! In this article, we’ll explore some practical tips and tricks to enhance your cognitive abilities and boost your IQ. Let’s dive in!

Discover how to boost your IQ with practical tips and tricks. Learn effective strategies to enhance cognitive abilities and unlock your intellectual potential.

Read More: https://medium.com/iq-test/boost-iq-tips-tricks-to-enhance-your-cognitive-abilities-5e2aed30b25c

#IQ #iqtest #cognitive abilities #brain challenge #logical reasoning #problem solving #sharper mind #puzzle #crossword

[zpxz]

Why I think jam/take/tomake/tomxjake/jom cannot workout(in general).

Their a light-switch couple except, they actually broke-up(officially?..) in the recent episode..

I don’t HATE Tom or Jake, yes they have their own struggles, yes they said they were gonna talk to eachother in needs of help, but episode 10 literally broke me.

I myself, the person who is saying this, a tomjake shipper. But although it’s at the seems of canon(their most likely going to be canon in the end) Jake is seemingly always falling for fiore’s and alec’s traps.

Tom is.. ok.. but he’s not exactly the sharpest tool in the shed.( even tho bro’s got mortal combat skills he’s not the first person to think of in need of comfort. )

Anddd finally.. I actually have to blame the writers for screwing jam up. Like they could’ve kept going with the jam stuff till ATLEAST episode 12 if they hadn’t agreed to make Ellie go with alec&fiore, but I gotta say that breakup was.. something.

#Zp’s talk #imo jam is still a good ship buttt #maybe they’ll have to work some stuff out yea? #tom disventure camp #tom x jake #jake disventure camp #Tom/Jake disventure camp #logical reasoning #disventure camp ep 10! #don’t get me wrong I LOVE jam but it’s just #let’s just say gabellie’s on top? #ive been pretty productive on tumblr woohoo!! #tv series #disventure camp

[omegaphilosophia]

Exploring the Foundations of Belief: Justifications and Perspectives

Beliefs, the mental attitudes or convictions that something is true or exists, can be justified through various means. People often rely on different justifications depending on the nature of the belief and the context. Here are some common justifications for beliefs:

Empirical Evidence:

Definition: Empirical evidence is information acquired through observation or experimentation. Example: Believing that the sun rises in the east and sets in the west is justified by the repeated empirical observation of this phenomenon.

Logical Reasoning:

Definition: Logical reasoning involves using valid deductive or inductive arguments to arrive at a conclusion. Example: Believing that all humans are mortal because a specific person is mortal (inductive reasoning based on observation).

Personal Experience:

Definition: Personal experiences contribute to the formation of beliefs based on individual encounters and observations. Example: Believing a particular food is delicious because of personal enjoyment during past consumption.

Testimony:

Definition: Testimony involves believing something because it has been communicated by a credible source. Example: Trusting a friend's recommendation for a good book or movie.

Intuition:

Definition: Intuition is the ability to understand or know something immediately without the need for conscious reasoning. Example: Having a gut feeling that a decision is right without being able to articulate specific reasons.

Authority:

Definition: Believing something because it comes from an authoritative figure or source. Example: Accepting scientific theories because they are endorsed by reputable scientists.

Cultural or Social Influence:

Definition: Beliefs can be shaped by the cultural or social environment in which an individual is embedded. Example: Adopting religious beliefs prevalent in one's cultural or familial context.

Pragmatism:

Definition: Pragmatism justifies beliefs based on their practical consequences or usefulness. Example: Believing in the value of education because it leads to better career opportunities.

Consistency with Existing Beliefs:

Definition: Individuals may justify new beliefs by ensuring they align with their existing belief system. Example: Accepting a new scientific discovery that is consistent with one's understanding of related scientific principles.

Existential or Emotional Need:

Definition: Some beliefs fulfill existential or emotional needs, providing comfort or purpose. Example: Believing in an afterlife may provide comfort in the face of mortality.

People often use a combination of these justifications to form and maintain their beliefs, and the weight given to each justification can vary based on individual preferences, cognitive styles, and cultural influences. It's essential to critically evaluate beliefs and the justifications supporting them to promote a more rational and informed worldview.

#philosophy #epistemology #knowledge #ontology #learning #chatgpt #education #metaphysics #psychology #politics #belief formation #empirical evidence #logical reasoning #personal experience #testimony #intuition #authority #cultural influence #pragmatism #existential needs #critical thinking

[thedeductionpage]

Denial

I’m a person who loves psychological deduction. I prefer working on a person’s psyche / personality rather than getting more physical, sherlockian deductions. If you happen to get your deductions confirmed, you’ll come across a few forks in the road, make a few mistakes, and that’s fine. Sometimes, though, you are completely correct and the problem lies in whoever you’re deducing, because they’re living in denial.

How will you be able to tell if you’re actually onto something or if you’ve made an error?

1.) self-awareness. Was that deduction really reasonable, or did you just want to feel better about yourself? Did you just want the drama, or were there pieces of evidence to support it? Check yourself.

2.) establish a baseline. Is it in the person’s behavior to be in denial about this? if yes, then…there you go!

3.) look for inconsistencies. Prod them a little, see how they react, emotionally.

4.) ask the right questions.

I’ve got two examples from two people i’ve deduced, one in denial, one I was incorrect about.

I deduced a girl in her teens who claimed I got everything correct, but one: that she cared about how people saw her and her looks. According to her, she didn’t. Of course, that was a lie.

Why? Here’s what I got (keep in mind that these were all confirmed)

- 13-16, female, stable economic status, not as comfortable as she liked.

- active online

- wants to be seen as funny, charming, someone intelligent, interesting, and with substance.

- strong personality, opinionated, rich inner world, yet introverted and shy.

- has older siblings that are perceived as either more attractive, intelligent, or both.

- complicated but alright relationship, closer to mother.

- lonely

- has trouble asserting herself.

- feels a lot of pressure to live up to her own and others’ expectations of her, academically, physically, behaviorally.

She claimed she didn’t care how she looked and what people thought of her and that I was wrong. I ended up being right, but we’ll get to that, later. Why did I stick to my guns?

- had on undetectable makeup, face covered with hair that was braided.

- fashion had a clear niche or message.

- psych profile: insecure, pressured, self-perception, trouble with assertion

—> Her psych profile, that she confirmed, all points to a certain pattern. What I knew about her was she was insecure, feeling pressured, wanted to seen as interesting, all that— but what’s the root cause of all this?

She draws a lot of her self-image from those around her.

Whether she wants to be pretty and smart enough or wants to prove she doesn’t care are not as important the fact that she feels she has something to prove to these people. There’s a difference between not caring and wanting to look like you don’t care. There’s a difference between thinking/being something, and wanting people to see you as that. Look for inconsistencies.

What about when I was wrong?

I deduced a girl and got:

- introverted

- young adult to teen female, around 17.

- artistic or creative, sketches or writes.

- very active online, expressive.

- very particular about self expression.

- outspoken

- insecure, specifically when it comes to the physical self.

- wants a sense of belonging, to be seen by the right people in the right ways.

- feels misunderstood.

- skeptic

- anxious

- closed off, emotionally distant and can be seen as cold or abrasive

- “I wouldn’t say you have a terrible reputation or relationship with people in your social circle, you may just not be involved enough.”

- your parents / family, I think may be an okay relationship? They’re not terrible, at the very least.

I got things wrong because of biases, honestly. The things she called out were reasonable.

introverted—> actually extroverted. I was led on by her activity online and the stereotypes that came with the “edgy-activist”, outspoken type.

relationship with parents—> i wanted to play safe and didn’t want to risk it, ironically, didn’t want to engage in stereotypes even if the answer was right there.

I also got her economic status slightly wrong, mainly because I got lazy/careless and didn’t want to offend her. I’ll admit, I didn’t have the balls and was biased.

Hindsight’s 20/20, learn from your mistakes.

As you can see, there’s a clear difference between someone who’s in denial and someone you’re wrong about. Remember, when you talk to those in denial, that you’re altering their perception of reality slightly. There will be feelings. So, how do you approach the problem?

Ask the right questions. I didn’t ask the first girl why she was lying, I asked questions that I knew she would answer a certain way, if my suspicions were true.

- you use fashion to express yourself? yes.

- you did your own hair? yes.

- “i normally do my hair”

Ask questions with answers you know they’ll answer a certain way if your deduction was correct. Look for reluctance or a highly emotional response. These all, + my previous deductions, pointed to me being correct. Stick to your guns. Make it make sense. Learn how to detect shit. I’m gonna be honest, I’m getting sick of writing this post so i’ll stop here. I hope you learned something from this. Bye.

#deduction #deductive reasoning #Sherlock #logical reasoning #deduce #psychology #observer #learning #sherlockbbc #bbc sherlock

[ijustsmackedmynewtattoo]

[Social Control and the 80/20 Rule]

So I'm about to talk about Social Deviance in my next post and I'll tie that and this into Goffman's theory in their respective posts, but for now let's chat about Social Control and a fun theory my professor exemplified in class called the 80/20 rule. I do want to note here I briefly give examples of religious control through fear and that may be triggering to some with religious trauma so please proceed with caution.

The Two Types of Social Control

Self - Control: This is where we place the responsibility on the individual to follow the rules, and we ensure this through a few different ways, an extremely common one we see all the time is control through fear and we place that fear through things like mysticism found in paganism and christianity, "if you're bad you go to hell. God knows what you're doing and he's judging you right now," it sets the stage for religious compliance and compliance through guilt, karma, and conscience.

Man - Made Control: Control produced by man often seen in the Deterrence Model which is police, courts, jails, etc.

The 80/20 Rule

My professor had a fun little experiment for us, he proposed a question, "If I left $200 in my car with the window rolled down, who would take it?" Most people said no, quite a few cited God or their conscience. 3 or 4 people said that they either would take it or would think about it (for the record I wouldn't have taken it bc there would be too many opportunities for me to be seen). Then he asked, "If it was $2,000 and you could walk away scot-free no one would ever know, would you take it?" As you can imagine the number of people suddenly willing to abandon God's ethics increased but we still had a majority of the class saying they wouldn't take it. This is called the 80/20 rule, we can expect 80% of people to follow the laws based purely on self-control aspects, and for the other 20% we have man-made social control, especially for a $2,000 reason someone's morals might take a hike.

How Does This Tie Into Deduction and Goffman's Theory?

Remember that Goffman proposed that we are always displaying Latent personas to some degree and in my last post I said we could try to figure out why someone is putting up a front and where that front ends. It's no secret that people may pretend to be a little more morally upright then they are, and finding out if someone is controlled through the self or through man-made social control can lend us a bit of an insight into their internal motives. Internal motives can make a world of difference for deductive continuity. Example being someone sorting a series of books because their mom wants them to vs. bc they are deeply attached to those books. If we just look at the books and decide someone is a tidy person based off that alone we might try to start cramming other info to fit into a tidy-person box when the person isn't actually tidy at all, they're just doing it bc of the repercussions if it isn't done, then we've got a whole bunch of incorrect deductions. Bit of a ramble but I found this experiment interesting and thought it could be useful to keep it in mind. Social deviance is up next!

-Graham

#logical reasoning #deduction #deductive reasoning #sociology #80/20

[quotes-by-dilanka]

Epicurus's trilemma:

If God is unable to prevent evil, then he is not all-powerful.

If God is not willing to prevent evil, then he is not all-good.

If God is both willing and able to prevent evil, then why does evil exist?

The original questions posed by Epicurus:

God, he says, either wishes to take away evils, and is unable; or He is able, and is unwilling; or He is neither willing nor able, or He is both willing and able.

If He is willing and is unable, He is feeble, which is not in accordance with the character of God;

If He is able and unwilling, He is envious, which is equally at variance with God;

If He is neither willing nor able, He is both envious and feeble, and therefore not God;

If He is both willing and able, which alone is suitable to God, from what source then are evils? Or why does He not remove them?

#philosophy #epicurus #god #religion #atheism #christianity #jesus christ #islam #muslim #judaism #logic #logical reasoning #reasoning #evil #satan #devil

[nanobookreview]

Anthropologists who spend years talking to indigenous people in their own languages and watching them argue with one another tend to be well aware that even those who make their living hunting elephants or gathering lotus buds are just as skeptical, imaginative, thoughtful, and capable of critical analysis as those who make their living by operating tractors, managing restaurants, or chairing university departments.

– The Dawn of Everything

#anthropology #society #humans #sociology #psychology #logical reasoning #arguments

[m3djed]

"he would not fucking say that" but you ever be looking at fanart and suddenly its "he would not fucking have abs"

#txt #guys. guys this is not about hcs. do you hear me this is about when a guy with no logical reason to have abs is drawn like a hollister model #like when a guy who does nothing but go to coffee shops and read books is drawn with abs like hes been hiking mountains and climbing trees #do you hear me are you hearing me

[vkrproducts]

Dielison Puzzles - High IQ Logical Reasoning Puzzle Games Connect Same Colors Hard brainstorm Puzzles Link given below

Dielison Puzzles - An ancient puzzle technique that will brainstorm you. Connect the same color with a line. The line which connecting same color should not touch the other lines that are connecting other matching colors. Sounds interesting, right? Just try it. Be ready to get brainstormed.

A fun guaranteed puzzle game. Color matching puzzle activity sheet for kids. Not only for kids, there are so many hard puzzles which will challenges adults and grown-ups too.

Connect Same Colors, High IQ Printable Color Matching Kids Activity Sheet, Brain Logic Color Puzzles instant download pdf

Link:👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻

#dielison #dielisonpuzzle #puzzles #puzzle #mind games #challenge #logical #logical reasoning #problem solving #color matching #new challenge #challenge accepted #activities #indoor activities #summer activities #holiday activities #kids activities #retirement gifts #smart #intelligent #mindfulness #morning refresh #riddles #riddle #puzzle challenge #color matching activity #iq play #iq test #iq moodboard #board games

[knowledgevariabledarcy]

#logical stans advice #logical fallacies #logical olivia rodrigo #logical reasoning #Youtube

[officialiqtest]

Unlocking the Secrets of Your IQ: A Comprehensive Guide

In the contemporary realm of cognitive assessment, Intelligence Quotient (IQ) emerges as a cornerstone metric, offering invaluable insights into an individual’s mental prowess and potential. This quantifiable measure extends beyond mere academic capabilities, delving into the realms of problem-solving, logical reasoning, and memory.

The significance of IQ in shaping educational trajectories, career paths, and personal growth strategies cannot be overstated. It serves as a pivotal tool for identifying cognitive strengths and weaknesses, thereby facilitating tailored developmental interventions.

Read more: https://officialiqtest.medium.com/unlocking-the-secrets-of-your-iq-a-comprehensive-guide-8cc2e4a7387a

#secret #iqscore #mental health #problem solving #logical reasoning #morality #society #intellegent #brilliant #smart

[lostinw0nderlandd]

Ugh, a full day of logical reasoning 😭 fucking wahhhhh

#personal. #logical reasoning #lsat prep #⚖️ #🤮

[jacksonjackk]

Decoding Logic Thinking: Your Everyday Guide to Clear Thinking

Logical thinking is like a secret superpower that everyone possesses. It's the ability to reason, make sense of things, and solve problems by following a clear path of thought. In this blog, we'll dive into the world of logical thinking, uncover its significance, and explore ways to harness its potential.

Understanding Logical Thinking

At its core, logical thinking is about using reasoning to reach conclusions based on evidence and facts. It’s not just about being smart; it’s about making sense of the world around us by connecting the dots logically. Think of it as building a bridge from what you know to what you need to figure out.

Why Is It Important?

Logical thinking is more than just a handy skill—it's a fundamental tool in our everyday lives. It helps us make better decisions, solve problems efficiently, and understand complex ideas. Whether you're balancing your budget, analyzing information, or making choices, logical thinking guides you toward sensible solutions.

Developing Logical Thinking

The good news is that logical thinking is a skill that can be honed and sharpened. Here are a few ways to enhance your logical thinking abilities:

1. Question Everything

Challenge assumptions and ask lots of questions. This helps in examining information from different angles and avoiding jumping to conclusions.

2. Seek Evidence

Look for evidence and facts to support your conclusions. Reliable information forms the foundation of logical reasoning.

3. Practice Puzzles and Riddles

Solving puzzles or riddles exercises your brain and enhances your ability to think logically.

4. Analyze Arguments

Learn to dissect arguments. Understand how premises lead to conclusions and identify flaws in reasoning.

5. Practice Logical Reasoning Exercises

Engage in activities that specifically target logical reasoning, such as solving Sudoku or logic puzzles.

Applying Logical Thinking in Daily Life

From making decisions to evaluating information, logical thinking is a valuable tool in various aspects of life:

Decision Making

Break down decisions into smaller parts, weigh the pros and cons, and assess possible outcomes logically.

Problem Solving

Identify the problem, gather information, consider possible solutions, and evaluate their effectiveness.

Information Evaluation

Be critical of the information you receive. Check sources, verify facts, and discern credible information from misleading data.

Conclusion

Logical thinking isn’t just for scientists or mathematicians; it’s a skill that empowers everyone. By embracing logical thinking, we can navigate through life's challenges with clarity and make informed choices. Practice, challenge your mind, and unleash the power of logical reasoning in your everyday adventures.

Unlock your inner logician and discover the world through the lens of clear, coherent thinking.

Remember, the world makes more sense when you think logically.

Your Turn

How do you use logical thinking in your daily life? Share your experiences and tips on enhancing logical thinking in the comments below! Let’s learn and grow together.

#logicalthinking #logical reasoning #decisionmaking #problem solving #information #question everything

[omegaphilosophia]

Enhancing Everyday Conversations: Applying Logic for Effective Communication

Logic is a powerful tool that can greatly enhance our everyday conversations. By employing logical frameworks and models, we can construct sound arguments, analyze information, resolve disagreements, and foster a deeper understanding of various topics. In this blog post, we will explore some valuable models and frameworks that can assist us in using logic effectively during our conversations, promoting rational discourse and critical thinking.

Socratic Method: Uncovering the Truth through Inquiry- The Socratic Method, named after the ancient Greek philosopher Socrates, involves the art of asking insightful questions to stimulate critical thinking. By engaging in thoughtful questioning, we can challenge assumptions, identify inconsistencies, and encourage a deeper examination of our beliefs and reasoning. This method helps us navigate conversations with intellectual curiosity and promotes logical analysis.

Toulmin Model: Constructing and Evaluating Arguments- The Toulmin Model provides a structured approach to constructing and evaluating arguments. Its elements include the claim (the main statement), grounds (supporting evidence), warrant (connecting the claim and grounds), backing (additional support), qualifier (specifying the strength of the argument), and rebuttal (addressing counterarguments). By employing the Toulmin Model, we can formulate logical arguments and critically assess the strength and validity of others' arguments.

Rhetorical Appeals: Balancing Emotions, Credibility, and Logic- Rhetorical appeals, comprising ethos (credibility), pathos (emotions), and logos (logic), are persuasive tools that help us communicate effectively. While emotions and credibility play important roles in conversations, incorporating logical appeals allows us to present sound reasoning, evidence, and logical coherence. By striking a balance between these appeals, we can influence others through rational persuasion.

Argument Mapping: Visualizing Logical Structures- Argument mapping involves visually representing the structure of an argument using diagrams or software tools. This approach helps us visualize the logical flow of information, identify premises and conclusions, and evaluate the strength and coherence of an argument. Employing argument mapping can bring clarity to complex discussions and facilitate a more systematic evaluation of ideas.

Decision-Making Models: Weighing Options with Logic- Decision-making models, such as cost-benefit analysis, SWOT analysis, or decision trees, integrate logical reasoning to assess options and make informed choices. By applying these models, we can organize relevant information, consider different factors, and weigh the pros and cons based on logical evaluation. These frameworks enable us to make decisions that align with our goals and values.

Critical Thinking Frameworks: Nurturing Rational Discourse- Critical thinking frameworks, such as Bloom's Taxonomy or Paul-Elder's Model of Critical Thinking, provide a structured approach to developing and applying critical thinking skills. These frameworks guide us in analyzing information, evaluating evidence, and constructing logical arguments during conversations. By cultivating critical thinking skills, we can engage in more meaningful and intellectually stimulating discussions.

By incorporating logical models and frameworks into our everyday conversations, we can elevate the quality of our communication. The Socratic Method encourages inquiry and critical thinking, while the Toulmin Model assists in constructing and evaluating arguments. Rhetorical appeals help us balance emotions, credibility, and logic, ensuring persuasive effectiveness. Argument mapping aids in visualizing logical structures, decision-making models facilitate informed choices, and critical thinking frameworks nurture rational discourse.

#Logic in conversations #Critical thinking skills #Rational discourse #Effective communication #Socratic Method #Toulmin Model #Rhetorical appeals #Argument mapping #Decision-making models #Critical thinking frameworks #Logical reasoning #Constructing arguments #Analyzing information #Resolving disagreements #Influential persuasion #Visualizing logical structures #Informed decision making #Rationality in conversations #Productive discussions #Intellectual curiosity #philosophy #epistemology #knowledge #learning #education #chatgpt

[ijustsmackedmynewtattoo]

A Quick and Simplified Definition of Deduction

I realized this recently. I've made it known before this is an extremely beginner friendly deduction blog and that my most common issue that I run into like a lot of beginners is that I overcomplicate. So if you take absolutely nothing else from my blog take this: Deduction is pattern recognition and math. That's it. You don't have to be a genius or closed off and emotionless to do deduction, you don't have to train for years to even begin making deductions. You just have to recognize patterns and do some balance of probability math. Don't get to in your head, you're doing a great job. I'll be back with some stuff about personality disorders in the future hopefully.

#deduction #logical reasoning #deductive reasoning #logical deduction

[the-darling-crusader]

dude people always like "omg my dog doesnt care about me like they do in the movies." ... the fuck they gonna do, say sorry?????

#logical thinking #logical reasoning #bombastic side eye