Too many liberals in bubbles have this peculiar view of US politics that it's supposed to be like the Oxford Debating Society where the person with the soundest argument wins.
Such people need to quit watching reruns of "The West Wing" on auto-repeat. 😆🤣😃
Whether you like it or not, if you are personally attacked by your opponent then the most effective thing is to hit back in kind twice as hard. That's what needs to happen to Trump.
And nobody is as vulnerable to personal attacks as Donald Trump. Late night comics and political cartoonists did more to defeat Donald Trump's re-election bid than all the terabytes of position papers and political analyses combined.
As I argued last time around, the best hope may lie in messages that Win It Back hasn't been as eager to test. They must strip him of the strongman persona he tries so hard to create: Use ads that portray him as a laughingstock and paint his supporters as chumps. Make it embarrassing to support Trump—so that wearing a MAGA hat in public feels like wearing an advertisement for your favorite hemorrhoid cream.
Trump's been walking right into that potential trap in recent weeks by delivering rally speeches that sound like complete gibberish, peppered with verbal flubs that Fox News would base entire news cycles around if it were a Democrat making the gaffe. Any ad campaign looking to prove Trump to be a bumbling clown clinging only tenuously to his own persona would have ample material to work with.
Republican primary voters don't mind that Trump tried to overthrow the government, because Republican primary voters think that, well, maybe they ought to be able to do that if Black Americans keep insisting on their rights or if Fox News throws up another B-reel of migrants wading across the southern border to ask for asylum. But Republican primary voters do care—a lot—that so much of the rest of the country considers them to be muleheaded saps.
You might think that all the voters have seen all the derisive stuff about Trump. But not everybody has the same media menu that we do.
Of course the hardcore MAGA cultists will stick with Trump even if he personally poops the digested remnants of well-done steak with ketchup on them. But there are some squishy backers who are just going along for the ride. And there are also low information voters who don't pay a lot of attention to politics who need to know that Trump is an unstable crackpot who kept classified nuclear secrets in boxes next to his toilet.
The more personal, the better – though such interjections probably need to have at least a small grain of truth in them so they can't be completely refuted.
With numerous elections in states that are decided by less than two percent of the vote, every little bit helps. Just referring to Trump as a "nut" may go a lot further with some people than a long-winded explanation of how his poor response to the COVID-19 emergency led to hundreds of thousands of deaths and a terrible hit on the US economy.
Nobody wants to be associated with a loser. Making personal fun of Trump in various ways will go far if done propitiously.
11 notes
·
View notes
just rewatched ‘i kissed a girl’ and it reminded me of how much I hate this episode, so here’s my alternate, wishful version of that episode:
It basically starts the same, with finn forcing santana to participate, despite being the one who outed her. But it is clearly framed as him being the bad guy in the situation. He kicks it off with his stupid cover and santana basically reacts the way she reacted to klaine’s number in the actual episode, but additionally pointing out that he outed her
britanny realises how unhappy santana is with the situation and they have a private talk where britanny points out that the glee club does genuinely care for her and then she sings to santana a la a reversed ‘songbird’ number
next klaine sing to her (something better than ‘perfect’ 🙄) and this time santana is a little more open to it. afterwards, the two couples meet up and discuss how being queer impacts them (especially living in ohio and being around a bunch of otherwise straight people) and santana seems to finally make peace with the situation, despite the circumstances that led to them
cue the scene leading up to ‘i kissed a girl’ but it leads into a britanna duet instead. the sequence ends the same, with santana coming out to her abuela and it ending badly. maybe this is followed by a pep talk from britanny
episode ends with a santana solo (also generally more focus on santana’s emotions throughout the episode)
15 notes
·
View notes
this is all reminding me of what I did with the favorite teams google form. pens had the largest percentage though not a majority, but of course that was not an exclusive choice, had a much smaller sample size, and wasn't based on individual people but teams
in the end though crosby-malkin won the presidency, but that could easily have been because it was against the leafs
1 note
·
View note
And how it was always contrasted with overjoyed Trump supporters.
26 notes
·
View notes
Thank fuck the far right hasn't won the French Presidential elections, but I can't stop being worried when I look at their scores getting bigger every time. What are we doing? What are we becoming? I'm scared for the next election in 5 years
15 notes
·
View notes
Trump's Narcissism Apparent in His Campaign Strategy
We all know Trump is a textbook narcissist, so why does anyone wonder when he pursues asinine goals in asinine ways? He's a narcissist surrounded by sycophants who are eager to pick up whatever crumbs they can from him and goose-step them out back & shot.
SUMMARY: Why isn’t Trump following conventional campaign wisdom and trying to grow his coalition by appealing to more swing voters instead of doubling and tripling down on the fascist racist violent anti-democratic rhetoric that has lost every election since 2018 and caused the 6 January Insurrection? The answer, as to every question about Trump, is that he’s a narcissist. Review the signs and…
View On WordPress
0 notes
My god the tiktok kiddos are romanticizing being in high school in 2016. I feel faint
0 notes
I'm so tired of cis people asking stuff like, "Why would Texas want a list of trans people who legally changed their names?" or "Why would Florida want a list of college students who have seeking gender affirming care? We can't figure it out."
It's eliminationist.
Ken Paxton wants a list of trans people who have changed their name in Texas so he can reverse all of those decisions (and that's the most charitable interpretation). Ron DeSantis wants a list of college students who have sought affirming care so he can force them to detransition.
Oklahoma introduced a bill to forcibly detransition people under the age of 21 (ironically doing what they accuse us of doing, forcing someone to live as the wrong gender). Texas has a new bill that will ban gender affirming care for every Texan of any age and makes it a felony for doctors to provide it. Multiple states either have passed or will pass bills that will ban legal name changes. Some states have slipped in language to anti-drag bills (which are horrific enough on their own) that ban anyone from displaying, presenting, or dressing outside their "biological" gender (one state has language about "DNA gender") in public.
It's about legally and morally mandating trans people out of existence.
Plain and simple. It's about making sure that trans people can not exist. Period. It's not about restrictions, or "think of the children!" It's about eliminating us from public life and then eliminating us from private life so that we have a choice of either die or conform.
When will y'all realize this isn't some wedge issue or a political football that they'll just give up on if they lose an election or two. These are ideologues who are singularly focused. They don't care about the marketplace of ideas. They don't give a shit if they get mocked on lefty Twitter and the late night shows. They only care about one thing: gaining and then wielding power to achieve their goal of eliminating trans people (and then gay people, and then women who don't conform to their gender standards, ect).
If you give them that power they will use it.
35K notes
·
View notes