Tumgik
#morphology
Text
124 notes · View notes
drlinguo · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
Source
165 notes · View notes
lingthusiasm · 9 months
Quote
Gretchen: I think the best-known example of do you do the source language versus the target language in terms of plural in English is a certain little creature with eight legs. Lauren: The octopus. Gretchen: The octopus. Lauren: Which I just avoid talking about in the plural at all to save myself a grammatical crisis. Gretchen: I admit that I have also done this. If you were gonna pluralise “octopus” as if it’s English, it would just be “octopuses.” It’s very easy. But there’s a fairly long-standing tradition in English of when a word is borrowed from Latin to make the plural the actual Latin thing. Because, historically, many English speakers did learn Latin, and so you want to show off your education by using the Latin form even though it’s in English. So, if you’re going to pretend that “octopus” is Latin, then you wanna say, “octopi.” However, there is yet a third complication, which is that “octopus,” in fact, is actually Greek – “octo” meaning “eight” and “pus” meaning “feet. So, Greek does not make these plural by adding I to it. In that case, there has recently become popular a yet even more obscure and yet even more pretentious, to be honest, plural. Lauren: Is there where you say, “octopodes”? Gretchen: Well, this is where I used to say, “octopodes.” But I have recently learned that, apparently, it is, for maximum pretentiousness, /aktaˈpodiz/. Lauren: You’ve out-pretentioused my out-pretentiousness.
Excerpt from Lingthusiasm episode ‘Many ways to talk about many things - Plurals, duals and more’
Listen to the episode, read the full transcript, or check out more links about morphology, syntax, and words. 
253 notes · View notes
yvanspijk · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media
The endings of the future tense in many Romance languages look suspiciously like the forms of the verb meaning 'to have' in these languages:
French ils finiront (they'll finish) & ils ont (they have)
Spanish harás (you'll do) & has (you have)
Italian darò (I'll give) & ho (I have)
Well, that's actually what they are! Here's how this future tense originated.
154 notes · View notes
markscherz · 5 months
Note
Hi! Why is the prepollex always called a “false” digit or a pseudothumb? Some species I can see it just has a single bone in there, but in other diagrams of different species (eg Hyalinobatrachium) it looks like it has several separate bones like a normal finger. Is it missing musculature or a joint that would categorize it as a proper thumb? Or is it to do with its origin, so even if it were a perfect copy of a thumb it still would be called a false digit?
The latter; the prepollex does not seem to have the same origin as the rest of the digits. This also means that it lacks the musculature and other structures associated with a normal digit. Frogs are ancestrally tetradactyl on their hands (as are salamanders, by the way, pointing to ancestral tetradactyly in basically all lissamphibians, meaning that the pentadactyl forelimb might actually have crystallised on the amniote branch, rather than already being fixed in the tetrapod common ancestor). So, any fifth 'digit' showing up in modern frog hands today must be secondarily derived.
The inimtable Darren Naish has written a bit about this.
106 notes · View notes
terivarhol · 11 months
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
“The Fourth Way” (Other versions of Sphinx. 1. Cairo Museum, 2. Karnak Temple, 3. Mortuary Temple of Queen Hatshepsut, 4. Karnak Temple (sphinx with ram head)
169 notes · View notes
"An important point of contention in morphology is: does it even exist?" - my theoretical morphology professor
78 notes · View notes
xuexishijian · 30 days
Text
Tumblr media
I saw this on Twitter and then asked some Chinese friends about it because I thought it was super cool. Because yeah, apparently two-syllable (or two-part? Like below with “share”) loanwords can be reanalyzed as separable morphemes.
One friend also said it sounded outdated lol like from when she was little, maybe 15 years ago or so. But still!
33 notes · View notes
facemanart · 4 days
Text
Tumblr media
The Life Cycle of the Stalker by FacemanArt
part of my larger "The Morphology of the Terminids" series! you can get prints here!
28 notes · View notes
the--chaos · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
Days like this 🩷
52 notes · View notes
janmisali · 10 months
Text
one of my favorite bits is turning -ion into a productive suffix
895 notes · View notes
linguistness · 5 months
Text
What is a 'lexeme'?
A lexeme (/ˈlɛksiːm/ ⓘ) is a unit of lexical meaning that underlies a set of words that are related through inflection. It is a basic abstract unit of meaning, a unit of morphological analysis in linguistics that roughly corresponds to a set of forms taken by a single root word. For example, in English, run, runs, ran and running are forms of the same lexeme, which can be represented as run.
One form, the lemma (or citation form), is chosen by convention as the canonical form of a lexeme. The lemma is the form used in dictionaries as an entry's headword. Other forms of a lexeme are often listed later in the entry if they are uncommon or irregularly inflected.
Description
The notion of the lexeme is central to morphology, the basis for defining other concepts in that field. For example, the difference between inflection and derivation can be stated in terms of lexemes:
Inflectional rules relate a lexeme to its forms.
Derivational rules relate a lexeme to another lexeme.
A lexeme belongs to a particular syntactic category, has a certain meaning (semantic value), and in inflecting languages, has a corresponding inflectional paradigm. That is, a lexeme in many languages will have many different forms. For example, the lexeme run has a present third person singular form runs, a present non-third-person singular form run (which also functions as the past participle and non-finite form), a past form ran, and a present participle running. (It does not include runner, runners, runnable etc.) The use of the forms of a lexeme is governed by rules of grammar. In the case of English verbs such as run, they include subject–verb agreement and compound tense rules, which determine the form of a verb that can be used in a given sentence.
In many formal theories of language, lexemes have subcategorization frames to account for the number and types of complements. They occur within sentences and other syntactic structures.
Decomposition
A language's lexemes are often composed of smaller units with individual meaning called morphemes, according to root morpheme + derivational morphemes + suffix (not necessarily in that order), where:
The root morpheme is the primary lexical unit of a word, which carries the most significant aspects of semantic content and cannot be reduced to smaller constituents.
The derivational morphemes carry only derivational information.
The suffix is composed of all inflectional morphemes, and carries only inflectional information.
The compound root morpheme + derivational morphemes is often called the stem. The decomposition stem + desinence can then be used to study inflection.
(Source)
51 notes · View notes
justketerthings · 23 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Harpy genders
Harpies have an odd gender ratio, since males develop their plumage at different rates. Drake males are a slim portion of their population, so to outsiders, harpies look like a species with female majority. Most males, rooks, will develop female coloration until they are sexually mature, they are considered shrikes until there is a development in male color.
Their gender is their color, gender is not related to size or body parts. Leucisticism is shockingly common, and is the result of genetic conditions of the parents. Apollo and his father both carry this gene, and is a reason why Apollo only has sisters. Leucistic males are still counted as shrikes.
Harpies can also alter their color status with dyed feathers, make up, and diets that change the pigment and oil production of their feathers. Though, it is difficult to achieve a drakes full body coloration this way.
next installment will be about secks so rember to liek and suscibez and commet on your favorite harpy gender <3
19 notes · View notes
lingthusiasm · 3 months
Text
Lingthusiasm Episode 87: If I were an irrealis episode
Language lets us talk about things that aren't, strictly speaking, entirely real. Sometimes that's an imaginative object (is a toy sword a real sword? how about Excalibur?). Other times, it's a hypothetical situation (such as "if it rains, we'll cancel the picnic" - but neither the picnic nor the rain have happened yet. And they might never happen. But also they might!). Languages have lots of different ways of talking about different kinds of speculative events, and together they're called the irrealis.
In this episode, your hosts Gretchen McCulloch and Lauren Gawne get enthusiastic about some of our favourite examples under the irrealis umbrella. We talk about various things that we can mean by "reality", such as how existing fictional concepts, like goblins playing Macbeth, differ from newly-constructed fictions, like our new creature the Frenumblinger. We also talk about hypothetical statements using "if" (including the delightfully-named "biscuit conditionals), and using the "if I were a rich man" (Fiddler on the Roof) to "if I was a rich girl" (Gwen Stefani) continuum to track the evolution of the English subjunctive. Finally, a few of our favourite additional types of irrealis categories: the hortative, used to urge or exhort (let's go!), the optative, to express wishes and hopes (if only...), the dubitative, for when you doubt something, and the desiderative (I wish...).
Read the transcript here.
Announcements:
Thank you to everyone who shared Lingthusiasm with a friend or on social media for our seventh anniversary! It was great to see what you love about Lingthusiasm and which episodes you chose to share. We hope you enjoyed the warm fuzzies!
In this month’s bonus episode, Gretchen gets enthusiastic about swearing (including rude gestures) in fiction with science fiction and fantasy authors Jo Walton and Ada Palmer, authors of the Thessaly books and Terra Ignota series, both super interesting series we've ling-nerded out about before on the show. We talk about invented swear words like "frak" and "frell", sweary lexical gaps (why don't we swear with "toe jam!"), and interpreting the nuances of regional swear words like "bloody" in fiction.
Join us on Patreon now to get access to this and 80+ other bonus episodes! You’ll also get access to the Lingthusiasm Discord server where you can chat with other language nerds.
Here are the links mentioned in the episode:
'Irrealis' entry on Wikipedia
'How do you get someone to care about Shakespeare? Two words: Goblin Macbeth' on CBC
xkcd comic 'Conditionals'
'Pedantic about biscuit conditionals' post on Language Log
'The pragmatics of biscuit conditionals' by Michael Franke
Lingthusiasm episode 'This time it gets tense - The grammar of time'
'Realis and Irrealis: Forms and concepts of the grammaticalisation of reality' by Jennifer R. Elliott
'If all the raindrops' on YouTube
'If I Were a Rich Man (song)' entry on Wikipedia
'Rich Girl (Gwen Stefani song)' entry on Wikipedia
'Louchie Lou & Michie One' entry on Wikipedia
'Louchie Lou & Michie One - Rich Girl' on YouTube
'Semi-Toned - Rich Girl (acapella)' on YouTube
'Subjunctive mood' entry on Wikipedia
'Céline Dion - Pour que tu m'aimes encore' on YouTube
WALS entry for 'Feature 73A: The Optative'
Lingthusiasm bonus episode 'How we make Lingthusiasm transcripts - Interview with Sarah Dopierala'
Lingthusiasm episode 'Listen to the imperatives episode'
'Dubitative' entry on Wikipedia
'A grammatical overview of Yolmo (Tibeto-Burman)' entry on WikiJournal of Humanities
You can listen to this episode via Lingthusiasm.com, Soundcloud, RSS, Apple Podcasts/iTunes, Spotify, YouTube, or wherever you get your podcasts. You can also download an mp3 via the Soundcloud page for offline listening.
To receive an email whenever a new episode drops, sign up for the Lingthusiasm mailing list.
You can help keep Lingthusiasm ad-free, get access to bonus content, and more perks by supporting us on Patreon.
Lingthusiasm is on Bluesky, Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Mastodon, and Tumblr. Email us at contact [at] lingthusiasm [dot] com
Gretchen is on Bluesky as @GretchenMcC and blogs at All Things Linguistic.
Lauren is on Bluesky as @superlinguo and blogs at Superlinguo.
Lingthusiasm is created by Gretchen McCulloch and Lauren Gawne. Our senior producer is Claire Gawne, our production editor is Sarah Dopierala, our production assistant is Martha Tsutsui Billins, and our editorial assistant is Jon Kruk. Our music is ‘Ancient City’ by The Triangles.
This episode of Lingthusiasm is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike license (CC 4.0 BY-NC-SA).
78 notes · View notes
great-and-small · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
Here have a dumb joke about Afrotheria because I can’t get the convergent evolution of tenrecs and hedgehogs out of my head
532 notes · View notes
fungusqueen · 10 months
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media
We spotted Flammulina velutipes in this area for the first time. We almost missed it, but while maneuvering away from some trail flooding, we ended up with our faces right next to these eye-level mushrooms. This species is actually the same white enoki species found at the grocery store, which looks different from the same species grown in the wild because it’s been deprived of sunlight
70 notes · View notes