#october 3st
Text
Um Hewoo ( • ω • )
This is a small DTIYS for 100+ followers. Thank you for following me, I hope at least one of them sees this
(Actually, I just wanted to do something like this)
The echo has completely replaceable parts and with Morro it is seen only during the day
Morro was very surprised when Dr. Julien changed parts of Echo on the pier
I just wanted to publish art but could not resist this idea
Plz @ and me put "D_Ma100DTIYS" in tags
Rule - draw that mermaids Morro and Echo in your style ☜(ﾟヮﾟ☜). Not need to follow the art exactly.
Prizes:
1ST - Render art + scene background
2ST - Shaded art + simple/props bg
3ST - Flat color art
End data 1st → 20 October 00:01 PST
(ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ*:･ﾟ✧
+ maybe a place with a sketch
Fishbs on inktober
+ big Morro
Why not?
#D_Ma100DTIYS#ninjago#ninjago echo#echo#ninjago morro#morro#lego ninjago#lego#mermaid#black ghost knife#redbanded grouper#citrusshipping#dtiys#krita#art#post
56 notes
·
View notes
Note
Was kinktober named that way because October 3rd= october 3st= October thirst?
anyway
pegging revivebur>
or Lmanbur over his presidential desk
ik
Honestly- I like your thought process-
Again- minors. Please no.
Pegging revivebur 😵💫😵💫
His whines and whimpers and pleads for more…. So pretty.
Ok also bending any bursona over a desk and railing tf out of them makes me giggle- like oml… I will say it again- his whines are so pretty!
3 notes
·
View notes
Note
i already replied to the post but im also sending sn ask . HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!! I LOVE U FRIEND!!!!!!!!!! have a happy foog
BROTHER………… LOVE……………………
lord october the 3st
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Gonzalo Lira continued
KHARKIV APPELATIONAL COURD
UHWN
KHARKIV APPELATIONAL COURD
Case No. 638/5519/23 Chairman of Judge I Inststance Person_1
Proceedings No. 11-kp/818/1235/23 Judge Speaker Person_2
Category: Justification, recognition as legitimate, denial of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine, glorification of its participants
The X V A L A
IMENEM OF UKRAINE
On September 11, 2023, the panel of judges of the judicial chamber for criminal proceedings of the Kharkiv Court of Appeal consisting of:
Chairman - Person_2,
Judges - Person_3 , Person_4 ,
with the participation of the secretary - Person_5 ,
Prosecutor - Person_6 ,
accused - Lyr Person_7 ,
defender - lawyer Person_8 ,
Translator - Person_9 ,
having considered the open court session in the military.Kharkiv in the videoconferenceapeling complaint of the accused OSOBA_10 lawyer of the Personba_8 on the time of the investigative court of Dzerzhinskydistrict Court.Kharkiv from 04 August 2023,which is satisfied with the appeal of the prosecutor of Kharkiv Regional Prosecutor of the State of Ukraine_610 , INFORMATION_1 in criminal proceedings No22022200000018from 12.04.2022 of committed criminal offenses, predicted by Part 2st.436-2,part 3st 436-2CC of Ukraine,-
INSTALLED:
This decision was chosen to the accused Person_10 , INFORMATION_1, preventive measure in the form of detention for a period until October 02, 2023 without determining the size of the pledge.
Also, this decision was returned to the state income and credited to the special fund of the State Budget of Ukraine a pledge of UAH 402600, made by the accused on the basis of the decision of the investigating judge of the Kyiv District Court. Kharkiv from 01.May 2023.
In the appeal complaint, the defender of the suspected Personba_10 lawyer of the Person should ask the decision of the investigating judge to cancel and decide a new decision. How to leave a preventive measure in the form of a pledge that acted before the cancellation of it by the Dzerzhinsky District Court of M. Kharkov.
In justifying his appeal, the defender considered the decision so that it was adopted without taking into account the objective circumstances of the proceedings, mental and linguistic barriers for adequate perception of the situation by the accused, misunderstanding the latter of the principles of work and activities of law enforcement agencies and the court of Ukraine and such that it is made in violation of the requirements of the criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine. He believed that the qualification of the prosecution under Part 3rd. 436-2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine is unfounded. He also said that according to Part 2nd. 32 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine is not a repeatable crime consisting of two or more committed at different times identical criminal acts united by a single criminal intention. Therefore, he believes that actions that are incriminalized by the Person_10 should be qualified as an continued crime. Along with this, it refers to the illegality of actions of employees of the USBU in the Kharkiv region, namely that the accused was detained two days before the time specified in the detention protocol. In addition, the defender noted that the materials of the proceedings do not contain any evidence that confirms the presence of risks provided for by paragraph. 1, 2, 5 h.1 p. 177 of the CPC of Ukraine, and the prosecutor in the court session did not prove their existence. At the same time, he referred to information characterizing the defendant’s identity, namely that he is a citizen of the United States and the Republic of Chile, not convicted, has a permanent residence in m. Kharkiv, strong social ties, married, has two young children in the maintenance of two young children. He also took into account the presence of mental and language barriers for adequate perception of the situation, misunderstanding of the latter's principles of work and activities of law enforcement agencies and the court, fear for his life and health, which he felt while in custody.
After hearing the report of the presiding judge, the arguments of the defense defense defense_8 and the accused OSOBA_10, who supported the appeal and asked her to satisfy, as well as the explanation of the prosecutor, who denied the satisfaction of the appeal and considered the decision of the court of first instance legal and reasonable, the panel of judges, examining the materials of the proceedings, checking the decision.
In accordance with the requirements of Article 177 of the CPC of Ukraine, the basis for applying a preventive measure is the presence of a reasonable suspicion of committing a criminal offense by a person, as well as the presence of risks that give sufficient grounds to the investigating judge, the court to believe that the suspect, the accused may take the actions provided for by part one of this article, that is: hide from the pre-trial investigation bodies and / or the court;criminal proceedings; prevent criminal proceedings in another way; to commit another criminal offence or to continue a criminal offence in which the suspected is accused.
In addition, when deciding on the election, the continuation of the preventive measure in the form of detention, the court should take into account the circumstances provided for in Article 178 of the CPC of Ukraine, in particular, the severity of a criminal offense, in the commission of which the person and the data that characterize him and may indicate in favor of increasing (decrease) risk of hiding from justice or other methods of improper conduct.
During the appeal, the panel of judges established that the decision of the court of first instance is justified and decided in compliance with these requirements of current and international legislation.
The panel of judges agrees to the conclusions of the court of first instance regarding the existence of the risks provided for in paragraph. p. 1, 2, 5 part 1 of Article 177 of the CPC of Ukraine, since the risk in the context of criminal proceedings is a certain degree of probability that a person will succeed in actions that will prevent the trial or create a threat to society.
In particular, the risk of escape should be assessed in the context of factors related to the nature of a person, his morality, place of residence, type of occupation, property status, family ties and all types of communication with the country in which such a person is subjected to criminal prosecution (Bekchiev v. Moldova ?58). The seriousness of punishment is a revalent circumstance in assessing the risk that the accused may escape ("Idalov v. Russia", "Hartyky v. Poland", "Country v. Germany", "Ilikov v. Bulgaria"), and the presence of criminalism may be grounds for justifying that the accused may commit a new crime ("Selchuk v. Turkey", "Matznetter v. Austria").
By assessing the possibility of the accused to hide from the court, destroy, hide or distort any of the things or documents that are essential to establish the circumstances of a criminal offence, commit another criminal offence or continue the criminal offence in which he is accused, the panel of judges takes into account that there is a certain probability that the latter may be in order to avoid the punishment.
According to information available in the materials of the proceedings, Lyr Personion_7 is accused of committing crimes provided for in the time. 2 st. 436-2, part 3 p. 436-2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, one of which is classified as a serious crime, the sanction of which provides for punishment in the form of imprisonment for a period of 5 to 8 years with confiscation of property or without such that the court of first instance reasonably referred to in its decision.
In the understanding of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, the severity of the prosecution is not an independent basis for the detention of a person, but such an accusation, combined with other circumstances, increases the risk of escape so much that it cannot be turned away without taking a person into custody. In Iliyev v. Bulgaria, No. 33977/96 of 26 July 2001, the ECHR noted that “the severity of the imposed punishment is an essential element in assessing the risks of hiding or re-prolectioning crimes.”
In addition, the European Court of Human Rights has repeatedly stressed that there is grounds for detention to be assessed in every criminal proceeding, taking into account his specific circumstances.
According to the actual circumstances, the case of ISOBA_10 is not previously convicted, but it is charged with committing, including a serious crime provided for in Part 3 of Article. 436-2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, namely: the production and distribution of materials containing justification, recognition as legitimate, denial of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine, launched in 2014, including by presenting the armed aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine as an internal civil conflict, justifying, recognizing the temporary occupation of part of the territory of Ukraine as legitimate, and recognition of the temporary occupation of part of Ukraine.
In view of the above, there are sufficient and objective grounds to believe that there are risks that the accused Person_10 may hide from court, destroy, hide or distort any of the things or documents that are essential to establish the circumstances of a criminal offence, commit another criminal offence or continue the criminal offence in which he is accused.
According to the established practice of the European Court of Human Rights, the detention of a person can be justified if there are real signs of the presence of true public interest, which, despite the presumption of innocence, the principle of respect for personal freedom prevails. Applying a preventive measure in the form of detention, it is necessary to proceed from the fact that the court decision should ensure not only the rights of the suspect, but also high standards of protection of rights and interests of both society and the victim. The definition of such rights, as the European Court of Human Rights emphasizes, requires society to be more strict in assessing the values of society ("Letelier v. France").
In addition, according to the established practice of the European Court of Human Rights, the human right to freedom is fundamental, but not absolute and may be limited in view of public interest.
Given the specific circumstances of the crime, which is incrowned to the suspect, namely that he is accused of committing crimes that are classified as crimes against peace, the security of mankind and international law and order, the panel of judges considers that there is an public interest in this judicial proceeding, which is the need to protect high standards of protection of the rights and interests of society.
Along with this, as the court of first instance correctly noted, the accused has a passport of a US citizen and a passport of a citizen of the Republic of Chile, which expands the ability of a person to hide abroad, in different countries of the world in order to evade criminal liability.
Along with this, the Person_10 is married, but is in the process of divorce, has two young children, is not officially employed, a psychiatrist and a druglogist is not registered, there are no disabilities, any movable and immovable property in Ukraine does not have, lives in m. Kharkiv in an apartment that does not belong to him, that is, has the right to use, in Ukraine lives since 2017, children are citizens of Ukraine, live with their mother in m. Uzhgorod.
Along with this, it should be taken into account that the accused being under the action of a preventive measure in the form of detention with the introduction of collateral, voluntarily headed to the state border of Ukraine with Hungary. Being in the Transcarpathian region in the period from July 31, 2023 at August 1, 2023, the accused made a failed attempt to cross the state border at the checkpoint "ChOP" (Tisa).
Such information, beyond reasonable doubt, refute the accused's claims that he left m. Harle to his family.
Therefore, the accused’s attempt to cross the state border objectively indicates the existence of a risk of hiding from the court, and therefore the claim of the defense party to lack evidence of such a risk is unjustified.
At the same time, in a court session in the court of appeal, the defender said that after making a pledge, he personally explained to the accused the consequences of his violation of the duties assigned to him as a result of a pledge, and therefore the claim of the defense side about the inexplicability of the conditions regarding the more chosen preventive measure is unjustified.
Therefore, taking into account the above information in the panel of judges there is no doubt about the validity and proof of the risks that the prosecutor justified in the court of first instance and in the appeal proceedings, the need to apply such a preventive measure as keeping an ISOBA_11 in custody, since at the time of consideration of the appeal the risks that existed at the time of election of this preventive measure.
In such circumstances, the panel of judges agrees with the correctness of the conclusions of the court of first instance regarding the existence of established risks, and the same as the fact that the Personba_10 may hide from the court, destroy, hide or distort any of the things or documents that are essential to establish the circumstances of a criminal offence, to commit another criminal offence or continue the criminal offence.
Given the circumstances that are significant for this proceedings, according to the panel of judges, the court of first instance decided on the basis of comprehensively clarified circumstances with which the law associates the possibility of applying an exclusive preventive measure in the form of detention, while examining properly all the information available in the materials of the proceedings and gave in the decision the motives for which the relevant decision took.
In such circumstances, the panel of judges sees that the use of other, milder alternative precautions will not be able to ensure the fulfillment of his procedural rights and duties.
Taking into account this, the panel of judges reached a conclusion on the legality and validity of the decision of the court of first instance on the application of a preventive measure in the form of detention in respect of the Personion_10 without determining the amount of the pledge and the absence of any grounds for changing or canceling the decision under the arguments of the appeal of the lawyer of the Personion_8.
Guided by Art.177, 178, 404, 405, Art.407 part3 of paragraph 1, 418, 419 of the CPC of Ukraine, panel of judges,
In X V A L I LA:
The appeal of the defender of the Person should be left without pleasure.
The decision of the investigating judge Dzerzhinsky District Court of M. Kharkiv from August 04 2023 to leave unchanged.
To draw the attention of the prosecutor to the accused Lere Lopez Gonzalo Angel Kintilio on psychological pressure in the conditions of the SIZO, taking into account the presence of open criminal proceedings on the fact of the appeal of the defense party regarding illegal influence.
The decision of the Court of Appeal is not subject to appeal in cassation.
Heading -
Judges :
Date of decision making
10.09.2023
Posted
21.09.2023
0 notes
Text
Hubabpsjy halowoken. Or October 3st 1st,if you hate halwojeeb. :>
0 notes
Text
Happy October ThirST!
#October 3st#October ThirST#If I were better at deadlines I would be posting a fic to celebrate#But I'm bad at deadlines#So life goes on
17 notes
·
View notes
Text
What if it was october 31st and James was nervous, because Lily finally agreed to go on a date with him.
What if it was october 3st and Sirius kissed Remus for the first time.
What if it was october 31st, and Lily and Remus were getting ready for a double date to celebrate their anniversary with their respective boyfriends.
What if it was october 31st, and Marlene and Dorcas held hands in public for the first time.
What if it was october 31st, and James was on one knee, and Lily was saying yes again, this time, agreeing to a lifetime with him.
What if it was october 31st, and everyone stayed home, because Dorcas hadn't returned from her mission yet, and they all knew what it meant.
What if it was october 31st, and The Marauders were posing for a picture, Mary trying to get little Harry to smile for the camera, but there was an empty space where Marlene and Dorcas should have been.
What if it was october 31st, and James and Lily were alone at Godrics Hollow.
What if it was october 31st, and Lily heard her husband screaming his last words.
What if it was october 31st, and Sirius Black couldn't believe what he was hearing.
What if it was october 31st, and Remus Lupin spent the full moon alone, for the first one since he was fourteen.
What if it was october 31st, and Mary was in the muggle world, and saw little Harry, not so little anymore, and she smiled at him, but the boy seemed confused. He didn't know who that woman was.
What if it was october 31st, and the marauders that had survived the war, were wishing it had been them instead.
#the marauders#marauders#sirius black#james potter#lily evans#dorcas#marlene#harry potter#hp#jily#wolfstar#remus lupin#dorcas x marlene#atyd#halloween#all the young dudes
19 notes
·
View notes
Text
Random holidays that I have posts scheduled for in my queue:
- October 3st
- Thursday the 20th (Oct '22)
- Season's Greasons
- Shitscram
9 notes
·
View notes
Photo
October 3st, 1896: inauguration of the second adress of “Le Chat noir”. (ref here fyi in case)
Lorrain was costumed in bat.
So yes, this is canon, sue me.
17 notes
·
View notes
Text
Gemma Collins reveals she gained 4lbs after eating whole loaves of bread and butter in lockdown
Gemma Collins reveals she gained 4lbs after eating whole loaves of bread and butter in lockdown
Gemma Collins reveals she gained 4lbs after eating whole loaves of bread and butter in lockdown… as she admits she wants to lose another 3st
By Amelia Wynne For Mailonline
Published: 20:34 BST, 12 October 2020 | Updated: 20:34 BST, 12 October 2020
Gemma Collins has revealed she gained 4lbs after eating whole loaves of bread and butter in lockdown.
The Diva Forever star, 39,…
View On WordPress
0 notes
Text
31st July 2020 Daily Current Affairs & Daily GK Update in English
New Post has been published on https://yourclasses.in/3st-july-current-affairs-2020
31st July 2020 Daily Current Affairs & Daily GK Update in English
31st July Current Affairs 2020 in English
Guwahati Development Department Ministry has inaugurated first manhole cleaning robot ______ to ensure minimal human involvement to clean the sewers.
(A) SHREWMOUSE
(B) BANDICOOT
(C) BILBIES
(D) VISHUPT
(E) CLEANTOY
Parvez Khan, who died recently, was a famous personality of which field?
(A) Athlete
(B) Politics
(C) Film Industry
(D) Cricketer
(E) Social Worker
Name the founder of SS Motivation, who has been honoured with “Karamveer Chakra Award” by Global Fellowship Award instituted by United Nations and International Confederation of NGO (iCONGO) at the ReX ConcLIVE hosted in IIT Delhi?
(A) Amit Nayyar
(B) Sunil ydv
(C) Sridhar Singh
(D) Rajiv Malhan
(E) Sukhdev Chopra
Which insurance company has launched a crop insurance campaign titled “Bohot Zaroori Hai” for farmers in Maharashtra and Karnataka to encourage them about their yield protection and financial security?
(A) Bharti AXA General Insurance
(B) Bajaj Allianz General Insurance
(C) HDFC General Insurance Company
(D) Agriculture Insurance Company of India
(E) National Insurance Company
Who has been appointed as the new Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Paytm Money by the investment & wealth management subsidiary of Paytm?
(A) Shekhar Sharma
(B) Varun Sridhar
(C) Ashit Ranjit
(D) Satish Gupta
(E) Sundararajan
United Nations observes which date of July every year as World Day Against Trafficking in Persons?
(A) 30th of July
(B) 31st of July
(C) 22nd of July
(D) 29th of July
(E) 28th of July
Power Finance Corporation (PFC) has signed an agreement with the whom for Training, Research, and Entrepreneurship Development in Smart Grid Technology?
(A) Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
(B) Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
(C) Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
(D) Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati
(E) Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Which international organisation has approved USD 3 million (about Rs 22 crore) grant to India from its Asia Pacific Disaster Response Fund to further support the government”s emergency response to COVID-19 pandemic?
(A) World Bank
(B) Asian Development Bank
(C) International Monetary Fund
(D) New Development Bank
(E) Bank for International Settlements
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) launched its Mars Perseverance Rover 2020, by which year it will reach to Mars?
(A) February 2021
(B) October 2021
(C) January 2021
(D) March 2021
(E) June 2021
The government of India has handed over a symbolic cheque of USD 5.6 million for High Impact Community Development Projects (HICDP) to which country (July 2020)?
(A) Sri Lanka
(B) Australia
(C) Nepal
(D) Cyprus
(E) Maldives
ANSWERS: – 1(B) 2(C) 3(B) 4(A) 5(B) 6(A) 7(E) 8(B) 9(A) 10(E)
0 notes
Link
Join me at Fierce Grace 56 Muswell Hill London N10 3ST, October 1, 2019 at 10:00AM x
0 notes
Note
WRITER ASKS 5 & 8 -
5) If you had to choose a favourite out of all of your multi chaptered stories, which would it be and why?
Oooh. Toughy....Like...I like them all for various reasons.....but....Right now I would have to say In These Tangled Webs. It’s a story I’d been working on for basically a year before I posted it and its popularity within the fandom took me completely off guard. ^^;; lol. But yah. It’s just a fun world to write in and I love the dynamic between all the characters and look forward to returning to it with a sequel.
8) Where do you take your inspiration from?
Anything and Everything. Dreams, Work Experiences, Writing Prompts, Photography/Artwork, TV Shows/Movies, What If Scenarios, Conversations with People, etc etc.
Really inspiration can strike at any time. Like just today I saw a post about October 3st and I’m like !!!! STORY?! *shakes head* I can’t stop it. ^^;; My Creative Muse loves to create. XD lol
Thanks for the ask! :D <3
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
Wednesday 3st of October 2018
please keep in mind "you" may as well be considered the name of the person and not specifically you. just wrote this as i woke up.
i feel as the world kept fallling. trapped in a loop of inconsistant lost stories but the only constant was you.
every time i opened my eyes, grasping that escape i felt the force of gravity pull me down "the rabbit hole".
the blink of an eye and the story changed every time, you had been the constant, my saving grace.
even as i opened my eyes all i wanted was you. the feeling of your presence real until i escaped the loop and wake only to lose you in the real world too.
this an easy reminder of a nightmare of lonlyness.
a flash in my head of every moment i just had dreamed that i know would shortly be forgotten.
even the moments of the dream, so real rest with feelings forgotten. no longer can i picture your voice nor can i see the beauty that was the colour in your eyes. no longer is there warmth to your touch but fear instead as my fingers slip through your hand like a ghost and everything dissapears, up in a swirl of smoke. this is truely lost.
0 notes
Text
The Report for Tuesday, June 12th (Happy E3!)
_________________________________________
Upcoming Game Releases:
Mario Tennis Aces–Nintendo Switch–June 30th
Captain Toad: Treasure Tracker—Nintendo Switch & Nintendo 3DS—July 13th
WarioWare Gold—Nintendo 3DS—August 3rd
Super Mario Party--Nintendo Switch--October 5th
Pokemon: Let’s Go Eeevee!–Nintendo Switch–November 16th
Pokemon: Let’s Go Pikachu!–Nintendo Switch–November 16th
Super Smash Bros.—Nintendo Switch—December 7th
Yoshi for Nintendo Switch–Nintendo Switch–2018
Luigi’s Mansion—Nintendo 3DS—2018
Mario Kart Tour–Mobile–March 2019
Fire Emblem: Three Houses–Nintendo Switch–Spring 2019
Mario & Luigi: Bowser’s Inside Story + Bowser Jr.’s Journey—Nintendo 3DS—2019
Pokemon–Nintendo Switch–2019
Metroid Prime 4–Nintendo Switch–TBA
___________________________________________
On-Going Contests:
My Nintendo Sweepstakes (US and Canada only)
___________________________________________
Events:
E3, June 12-14, Los Angeles, CA
PAX West, August 3st thru September 3rd, Seattle, WA
PAX Aus, October 26-28, Melbourn, VIC, Australia
0 notes
Last Seen Blogs
cjprg090590
Blessed Beyond
random-shit-i-think-about
Random Shit
hanawakihei
brainrot central
mastermindlissi
I can still make the whole place shimmer!
escrita-despida
escrita-despida