I may be having an Autism Realization
Like. Patterns are cool right??? Human pattern recognition is astounding and beautiful and part of what makes us unique? Shapes and Numbers and Words?
Seeing shapes and faces in the clouds and in shadows and in the bits of dirt and debris littering the world? How root woods connect and allow you to know the meanings of words you’ve never heard before? How the 9s times table goes 09 18 27 36 45 54 63 72 81 90???? How people an animals behave? The way speech and slang and dialect differs and yet can be so similar?
58 notes
·
View notes
so basically “the gifted kid” is a smokescreen for increasing and/or affirming white privilege/white supremacy?
i’m not the right person to explain this at great length, so i won’t, but—intelligence testing has a long and complicated relationship with classism and racism. gifted (and other sped) programs rely on that testing.
that’s as far as i’m willing to explain as a non-expert, lmao. if you want to know more, there’s about 573857 pages of research/opinions/documented personal experiences available for you to sift through, both within and outside of ‘academic’ circles. here’s an excerpt from the abstract of a case study on the topic:
“We show how gifted and talented status meets the criteria of white property interests and is defended by recourse to law and policy. Efforts to improve identification of students for gifted services reveal that the implicit operation of these Interests is an important reason why identification practices favoring white and middle-class children have been resistant to change. Dismantling underlying white property interests in gifted and talented identification is a necessary, though not sufficient step, toward a more just educational system.” [DOI]
i haven’t read this case study in full—i’m just using it to point out that this is a prominent, ongoing discussion. in my opinion, this should be a much larger part of the “former gifted kid” conversation, but alas
25 notes
·
View notes
Ok so here’s the thing.
I’ve been an adjunct professor for about two years now. Adjunct pay is shit. We cobble together classes at different institutions so that we have enough cash to pay our bills (and don’t even get me started on benefits…it’s like a contracting position & I’m lucky I have a spouse with health insurance).
Last semester I taught five classes and it was literal hell. I was full of dread every single day. When I wasn’t teaching, I was prepping for my next class, and when I wasn’t prepping, I was thinking that I should be prepping. It sucked and for months I had to just keep telling myself that it wouldn’t be forever, and I had no extra emotional capacity for, well, anything.
This semester, I only have three classes. And as I said, the pay is shit. I’m worried I’m going to spend more than I make this semester, & while I’m lucky that I have savings and a partner, it’s still stressful. BUT! My capacity to be a good professor is exponentially greater. I have the space to actually respond to my students and not just give them a grade. I can actually engage with the work they turn in and give them more individual feedback. I had a 30 minute meeting with a student last week because they were having some struggles, and I didn’t feel overwhelmed by it because I didn’t need to race to prepare for the next thing.
The obvious thing here of course is that we need to pay educators more so that none of us have to take on a huge workload in order to get by. We know that. But like, for real, the purpose of education isn’t just to churn out grades and degrees. My job is to create an environment where my students can experiment, connect, try different things, mess up, problem solve. My job is to really see the effort they put in and show them how they can stretch their intellectual wings. I can only do that when I’m not in survival mode. And as long as I need to bust my ass to make a living, I’ll be in survival mode. There’s so much I can say about the complicated inner workings of higher education institutions, but my point is that holy hell, I’m experiencing first hand what it’s like to have the space to invest in my work, and it’s got me reeling a little.
8 notes
·
View notes
Sorry but we're going through this viscous cycle of choice feminism > radfem backlash > choice feminism blacklash like every couple of years like it's an endless loop everytime in different flavors and I feel like it's so tiring we never get to like, collective normal understanding of feminism lol
7 notes
·
View notes
I think a lot of people don’t know how to write essays cuz they don’t know that essays are not just supposed to contain the information you need to make an argument, but also be engaging to read, maybe even enjoyable and creative. People not only understand an argument better when the writer expresses it creatively but also are more likely to agree. There’s also a lot of satisfaction in crafting an argument and connecting points together and expressing a belief and bringing it to light for other people to see. When you finish an essay and you know that you said everything you needed to say and those words flowed together coherently and beautifully no matter how difficult it was to hammer them smooth… there’s nothing more satisfying than that really
9 notes
·
View notes
not sure if youve written abt this before but what is your take on the shiv/kendall/roman's pre show mental breakdowns that are alluded to?
Ah! I don't think I have written about it before, anon, so thank you for asking!
I've been percolating a bit of late on @waystarresourceco's recent posts which have indicated that neither Kendall nor Shiv went entirely to college in America, with Kendall having his EMBA from INSEAD, not Harvard Business School like many of us (including me!) thought (he did do his undergrad at Harvard though), and with Sarah talking about Shiv going to the UK for college.
I'm interested in that for a whoooole range of reasons, haha, but what I think is particularly relevant to your ask is that it sort of emphasises this divide between the four siblings, with Connor and Roman having been sent away as children, and forever fighting their way back in there after, and Kendall and Shiv being kept close as children, only really leaving in early adulthood, but also forever having a sort of mmm, close and given seat at the table as favourite son / heir apparent and treasured / only daughter.
After all, in many ways, both Kendall and Shiv were on the same path, right? Logan laid a map for Kendall which Shiv scoured and did her own variation of to try and best him at the journey. Kendall was groomed for a role, and Shiv was groomed to be a perfect daughter, only to decide she wanted to be the perfect son. The effect of it though I think was that both of them spent formative years under pretty stifling expectations, while both Roman and Connor were forced in their formative years to develop a degree of independence because they were pushed from the nest.
As a result, I do think Kendall and Shiv both tend to thrive within structure, and that they both tend to fall apart when that structure isn't there, while Roman and Connor have learnt to thrive without it, and struggle to exist when they're forced to live within it.
Because I think that's really the implication of all of their meltdowns - Roman's seems to have occured when he had to try and work under Frank in the LA office on projects he hated, while Kendall's and Shiv's both seem to have happened when they're too long left to their own devices. It's all spill, right? Just the context of their respective abuse means it leaks under different forms of pressure.
6 notes
·
View notes