#online health | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

dietsandmore · 3 months

Text

Top 7 Most Common Health Issues

Maintaining good health is a priority for everyone, yet many individuals find themselves grappling with common health issues that can impact their overall well-being. In this article, we will explore seven prevalent health concerns and delve into effective solutions to address them. Additionally, we will highlight the valuable insights of Dt. Shreya Katyal, a top dietician in Delhi, who offers online diet consultation through Diets & More, is recognized as the best online dietician in Delhi.

Obesity and Overweight

Stress and Mental Health

Cardiovascular Diseases

Diabetes

Digestive Disorders

Respiratory Problems

Bone and Joint Health

Obesity and Overweight: Obesity is a widespread health issue that can lead to various complications, including heart disease, diabetes, and joint problems. To combat obesity, it is crucial to adopt a holistic approach, combining a balanced diet, regular exercise, and lifestyle changes. Dt. Shreya Katyal emphasizes the importance of personalized diet plans tailored to individual needs, promoting weight loss in a sustainable manner. Stress and Mental Health: Modern lifestyles often contribute to heightened stress levels, negatively impacting mental health. Regular exercise, meditation, and seeking professional counseling are effective ways to manage stress. Dt. Shreya Katyal highlights the connection between nutrition and mental health, emphasizing the role of a well-balanced diet rich in essential nutrients to support mental well-being. Diabetes: Diabetes is a chronic condition affecting millions worldwide. Lifestyle modifications, including a healthy diet and regular exercise, are fundamental in managing diabetes. Dt. Shreya Katyal recommends a diet low in refined sugars and carbohydrates, emphasizing the importance of portion control and balanced meals to regulate blood sugar levels. Cardiovascular Diseases: Heart-related issues, such as hypertension and high cholesterol, are common health concerns. Adopting a heart-healthy lifestyle involves regular exercise, a diet low in saturated fats and cholesterol, and stress management. Dt. Shreya Katyal advocates for a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and lean proteins to support cardiovascular health. Digestive Disorders: Digestive issues like indigestion, bloating, and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) affect many individuals. Dietary changes, such as incorporating fiber-rich foods and staying hydrated, can help alleviate these problems. Dt. Shreya Katyal emphasizes the importance of a well-balanced diet that includes probiotics to promote a healthy gut. Respiratory Problems: Respiratory issues, such as asthma and allergies, are prevalent health concerns. Regular exercise, maintaining a clean living environment, and avoiding triggers can help manage respiratory conditions. Dt. Shreya Katyal highlights the role of antioxidants in supporting respiratory health, recommending a diet rich in fruits and vegetables. Bone and Joint Health: Conditions like osteoporosis and arthritis can impact bone and joint health. Adequate calcium intake, regular exercise, and maintaining a healthy weight are essential for preventing and managing these issues. Dt. Shreya Katyal emphasizes the role of a nutrient-dense diet with adequate calcium, vitamin D, and omega-3 fatty acids to support bone and joint health.

Conclusion:

Addressing common health issues requires a multifaceted approach that includes lifestyle changes, regular exercise, and a balanced diet. Dt. Shreya Katyal, a leading dietician in Delhi, emphasizes the importance of personalized nutrition plans to address specific health concerns. Through online diet consultations at Diets & More, individuals can access expert guidance to achieve and maintain optimal health. By incorporating these solutions, individuals can take proactive steps towards a healthier and more fulfilling life.

#Health Solutions #Diet Consultation #Wellness Tips #Online Health #Dt Shreya Katyal #Common Health Issues #Nutrition Advice #Healthy Lifestyle #Best Dietician Delhi #Diets And More #Obesity and Overweight #Stress and Mental Health #Cardiovascular Diseases #Diabetes #Digestive Disorders #Respiratory Problems #Bone and Joint Health

0 notes

healthviewsonline · 6 months

Text

10 Types of Millets for Better Health and Nutritious Diet

RAGI (FINGER MILLET) KODO MILLET SORGHUM FOXTAIL MILLET PROSO MILLET BARNYARD MILLET LITTLE MILLET PEARL MILLET BROWN TOP MILLET OTHER TYPES OF MILLETS healthviewsonline.com/different-types-of-millets-list-nam…

#health views online #online health #health images #health website

0 notes

thoughtportal · 1 year

Photo

stop telling people to ‘just move’

#toot #toots #mastodon #human rights #systemic oppression #southern united states #United States #inequality #right to privacy #internet privacy #online privacy #medical privacy #privacy #LGBTQ #reproductive justice #reproductive freedom #reproductive rights #reproductive choice #reproductive health

11K notes · View notes

flameraven · 2 years

Text

#fanfiction #fandom #touch grass #gardening #they're not wrong #whenever it tell my friend about online arguments she is baffled #people get mad about this stuff? really? why??#much better for your mental health to go outside for a bit

21K notes · View notes

risingphoenix87 · 6 months

Text

[deep inhale] So...this is bad.

Soulbunni, a talented artist, art student, and YouTube content creator, was doxxed by people who it seems were angered by her criticisms of the racist actions of their favorite "leftist" Internet celebrities, and thus has to move when the fall semester ends in December for her own safety.

I am LIVID, and this is just another case of the toxicity fostered within these online "leftist" spaces that's sadly become all too common.

But what's important right now is helping Soulbunni afford her move. So please pass on her fundraiser, and contribute if you're able. This is just...so inhumane.

#black lives matter #mutual aid #community care #signal boost #online harassment #cornbreadtube #mental health

1K notes · View notes

i-stare-back · 2 months

Text

Why fuck KOSA?

"Its a good act that'll help stop teens and children from being exposed to the worse parts of the internet right?"

NOPE

KOSA is going to basically eliminate most forms of internet anonymity and endanger kids. Let me tell you a few key things;

KOSA is going to make users register their identity to companies. You are no longer anonymous and your activity can be traced back to you.

KOSA is going to make companies that display and distribute social media control what they allow so that it blocks anything loosely deemed "inappropriate". This includes most information about mental health, LGBTQ+, and more. Its essentially going to sweep everything not completely G rated under the rug.

KOSA is going to allow parents full access to see what their child is doing online. This is letting parents completely control what might be their kids only respite from life. Its also going to endanger children of parents who might be homophobic, transphobic, or just extremely strict.

"Well it doesn't say any of that in the .gov site. It says that it'll stop teens from being exposed to stuff that might harm their mental health!"

Do you have any idea how vague that description is? At that point, basically everything could be taken down or hidden because there was a slight debate on whether it was "negatively affecting mental health or not".

This isn't even all of what it could do. I'm just restating everything I've gathered from reading posts and news articles. If you want to know more, there's a ton of information if you go to #kosa or related.

If you want to stop KOSA, spread the word. Protest against it with sites like badinternetbills, reblog and share this post and similar posts on tumblr and other social media sites, and tell your friends and family to as well.

#lgbtq community #lgbtq #fuck kosa #kosa bill #kosa #stop kosa #stop kids online safety act #genderfluid #transgender #mental health #mental illness #bad internet bills #kids online safety act #kids online safety bill #internet censorship

518 notes · View notes

saintvampy · 9 months

Text

lets talk about KOSA

i havent seen any posts about it on my dash, and i think this is really important because it puts Tumblr as well as queer/minority creators on this platform at risk. since i have a lot of queer mutuals, i want to make sure you all are informed.

KOSA (Kids Online Safety Act) is being presented to Congress this upcoming month. its being presented as a way to "protect teens/children and their mental health online by regulating content online". however, it puts queer/minority creators and their content at risk of being totally censored. sites like TikTok, Ao3/Wattpad, Tumblr, and essentially anything that gives queer people a significant platform online is at risk of being deleted/wiped or censored into oblivion. under the guise of "kids mental health" this act would heavily restrict queer people and their voices online.

what can you do?

this linktree provides resources to help you take action and protect queer voices online from KOSA. please take the time to do what you can. if you spend any amount of time on Tumblr and value any of the queer voices you have access to on this platform, take action.

#KOSA #kids online safety act #queer rights #mental health #lgbtqplus #lgbtq #lgbtqiia+#mogai #trans rights #queer #trans #neogender #neopronouns #queer pride #trans pride #.° vampy .°#🧷 long text .*

2K notes · View notes

iirulancorrino · 28 days

Text

The Green brothers are doing effective altruism better than maybe 95% of people who identify online as effective altruists.

#I know it's cringe to be into vlogbrothers in 2024 but I'm incredibly impressed by JG's swerve into fighting global health inequities #and last week's news about their commitment to funding TB prevention was really cool #also I have a lot of respect for creators who seem able to continue to build online communities focused around optimism and trying #to do good in the world in a way that seems genuine--because I've realized how much intentional effort that must take #when social media writ large seems to skew towards either reactionaries or doom and gloom #VB was formed in an era where everyone had a lot more earnest hope in the potential of the internet and (with multiple evolutions)#they've kept going through a seismic change in the way we relate to social media and the creator economy. it's interesting #also I think it's interesting JG is doing his best work 10+ years out from his peak fame. life lesson there maybe

318 notes · View notes

mostlysignssomeportents · 4 months

Text

Privacy first

The internet is embroiled in a vicious polycrisis: child safety, surveillance, discrimination, disinformation, polarization, monopoly, journalism collapse – not only have we failed to agree on what to do about these, there's not even a consensus that all of these are problems.

But in a new whitepaper, my EFF colleagues Corynne McSherry, Mario Trujillo, Cindy Cohn and Thorin Klosowski advance an exciting proposal that slices cleanly through this Gordian knot, which they call "Privacy First":

https://www.eff.org/wp/privacy-first-better-way-address-online-harms

Here's the "Privacy First" pitch: whatever is going on with all of the problems of the internet, all of these problems are made worse by commercial surveillance.

Worried your kid is being made miserable through targeted ads? No surveillance, no targeting.

Worried your uncle was turned into a Qanon by targeted disinformation? No surveillance, no targeting. Worried that racialized people are being targeted for discriminatory hiring or lending by algorithms? No surveillance, no targeting.

Worried that nation-state actors are exploiting surveillance data to attack elections, politicians, or civil servants? No surveillance, no surveillance data.

Worried that AI is being trained on your personal data? No surveillance, no training data.

Worried that the news is being killed by monopolists who exploit the advantage conferred by surveillance ads to cream 51% off every ad-dollar? No surveillance, no surveillance ads.

Worried that social media giants maintain their monopolies by filling up commercial moats with surveillance data? No surveillance, no surveillance moat.

The fact that commercial surveillance hurts so many groups of people in so many ways is terrible, of course, but it's also an amazing opportunity. Thus far, the individual constituencies for, say, saving the news or protecting kids have not been sufficient to change the way these big platforms work. But when you add up all the groups whose most urgent cause would be significantly improved by comprehensive federal privacy law, vigorously enforced, you get an unstoppable coalition.

America is decades behind on privacy. The last really big, broadly applicable privacy law we passed was a law banning video-store clerks from leaking your porn-rental habits to the press (Congress was worried about their own rental histories after a Supreme Court nominee's movie habits were published in the Washington City Paper):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_Privacy_Protection_Act

In the decades since, we've gotten laws that poke around the edges of privacy, like HIPAA (for health) and COPPA (data on under-13s). Both laws are riddled with loopholes and neither is vigorously enforced:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/04/09/how-to-make-a-child-safe-tiktok/

Privacy First starts with the idea of passing a fit-for-purpose, 21st century privacy law with real enforcement teeth (a private right of action, which lets contingency lawyers sue on your behalf for a share of the winnings):

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/07/americans-deserve-more-current-american-data-privacy-protection-act

Here's what should be in that law:

A ban on surveillance advertising:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/03/ban-online-behavioral-advertising

Data minimization: a prohibition on collecting or processing your data beyond what is strictly necessary to deliver the service you're seeking.

Strong opt-in: None of the consent theater click-throughs we suffer through today. If you don't give informed, voluntary, specific opt-in consent, the service can't collect your data. Ignoring a cookie click-through is not consent, so you can just bypass popups and know you won't be spied on.

No preemption. The commercial surveillance industry hates strong state privacy laws like the Illinois biometrics law, and they are hoping that a federal law will pre-empt all those state laws. Federal privacy law should be the floor on privacy nationwide – not the ceiling:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/07/federal-preemption-state-privacy-law-hurts-everyone

No arbitration. Your right to sue for violations of your privacy shouldn't be waivable in a clickthrough agreement:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/04/stop-forced-arbitration-data-privacy-legislation

No "pay for privacy." Privacy is not a luxury good. Everyone deserves privacy, and the people who can least afford to buy private alternatives are most vulnerable to privacy abuses:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/10/why-getting-paid-your-data-bad-deal

No tricks. Getting "consent" with confusing UIs and tiny fine print doesn't count:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/02/designing-welcome-mats-invite-user-privacy-0

A Privacy First approach doesn't merely help all the people harmed by surveillance, it also prevents the collateral damage that today's leading proposals create. For example, laws requiring services to force their users to prove their age ("to protect the kids") are a privacy nightmare. They're also unconstitutional and keep getting struck down.

A better way to improve the kid safety of the internet is to ban surveillance. A surveillance ban doesn't have the foreseeable abuses of a law like KOSA (the Kids Online Safety Act), like bans on information about trans healthcare, medication abortions, or banned books:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/05/kids-online-safety-act-still-huge-danger-our-rights-online

When it comes to the news, banning surveillance advertising would pave the way for a shift to contextual ads (ads based on what you're looking at, not who you are). That switch would change the balance of power between news organizations and tech platforms – no media company will ever know as much about their readers as Google or Facebook do, but no tech company will ever know as much about a news outlet's content as the publisher does:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/05/save-news-we-must-ban-surveillance-advertising

This is a much better approach than the profit-sharing arrangements that are being trialed in Australia, Canada and France (these are sometimes called "News Bargaining Codes" or "Link Taxes"). Funding the news by guaranteeing it a share of Big Tech's profits makes the news into partisans for that profit – not the Big Tech watchdogs we need them to be. When Torstar, Canada's largest news publisher, struck a profit-sharing deal with Google, they killed their longrunning, excellent investigative "Defanging Big Tech" series.

A privacy law would also protect access to healthcare, especially in the post-Roe era, when Big Tech surveillance data is being used to target people who visit abortion clinics or secure medication abortions. It would end the practice of employers forcing workers to wear health-monitoring gadget. This is characterized as a "voluntary" way to get a "discount" on health insurance – but in practice, it's a way of punishing workers who refuse to let their bosses know about their sleep, fertility, and movements.

A privacy law would protect marginalized people from all kinds of digital discrimination, from unfair hiring to unfair lending to unfair renting. The commercial surveillance industry shovels endless quantities of our personal information into the furnaces that fuel these practices. A privacy law shuts off the fuel supply:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/04/digital-privacy-legislation-civil-rights-legislation

There are plenty of ways that AI will make our lives worse, but copyright won't fix it. For issues of labor exploitation (especially by creative workers), the answer lies in labor law:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/10/01/how-the-writers-guild-sunk-ais-ship/

And for many of AI's other harms, a muscular privacy law would starve AI of some of its most potentially toxic training data:

https://www.businessinsider.com/tech-updated-terms-to-use-customer-data-to-train-ai-2023-9

Meanwhile, if you're worried about foreign governments targeting Americans – officials, military, or just plain folks – a privacy law would cut off one of their most prolific and damaging source of information. All those lawmakers trying to ban Tiktok because it's a surveillance tool? What about banning surveillance, instead?

Monopolies and surveillance go together like peanut butter and chocolate. Some of the biggest tech empires were built on mountains of nonconsensually harvested private data – and they use that data to defend their monopolies. Legal privacy guarantees are a necessary precursor to data portability and interoperability:

https://www.eff.org/wp/interoperability-and-privacy

Once we are guaranteed a right to privacy, lawmakers and regulators can order tech giants to tear down their walled gardens, rather than relying on tech companies to (selectively) defend our privacy:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/11/14/luxury-surveillance/#liar-liar

The point here isn't that privacy fixes all the internet's woes. The policy is "privacy first," not "just privacy." When it comes to making a new, good internet, there's plenty of room for labor law, civil rights legislation, antitrust, and other legal regimes. But privacy has the biggest constituency, gets us the most bang for the buck, and has the fewest harmful side-effects. It's a policy we can all agree on, even if we don't agree on much else. It's a coalition in potentia that would be unstoppable in reality. Privacy first! Then – everything else!

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/12/06/privacy-first/#but-not-just-privacy

Image: Cryteria (modified) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HAL9000.svg

CC BY 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en

#pluralistic #privacy first #eff #privacy #surveillance #surveillance advertising #cold war 2.0 #tiktok #saving the news from big tech #competition #interoperability #interop #online harms #ai #digital discrimination #discrimination #health care #hippa #medical privacy

435 notes · View notes