Tumgik
#political candidates
axvoter · 1 year
Text
Index to the Blatantly Partisan Party Reviews, 2023 NSW state edition
Saturday 25 March is election day in NSW, and it's going to be a fascinating and most likely close contest. As well as the major parties, there is a veritable constellation of micro-parties, independent groups, and solo independents running in the election.
I’ve written my blog entries to demystify these micro-parties and indies. I'm sorry I did not post these until the final days of the election; life got in the way. I do not review Labor, Liberal/National, Greens, or One Nation, as I assume anyone reading this blog already has views on them. All entries are written from a left-wing perspective sympathetic to democratic socialism and green politics, so calibrate according to your own predilections. I make no pretension to false objectivity—that’s why these are blatantly partisan party reviews.
When you go to vote, you will receive two ballot papers. One will be a very large ballot for the Legislative Council (the upper house). This is elected at large by the entire state: a candidate requires ~4.55% to win a seat. But the Legislative Council is the house of review; government is formed in the Legislative Assembly (the lower house). It contains 93 seats, and the number of candidates—both party-affiliated and independent—varies significantly between electorates.
On the small ballot for the Legislative Assembly, you must vote 1 for your preferred candidate and then distribute as many or as few additional preferences as you want. Your vote will be more powerful if you distribute as many preferences as possible. Do not skip or repeat a number. If your preferred candidate is not elected, your vote transfers at full value to your second preference, and so on. You might receive a how-to-vote card from party campaigners: this is a suggestion only and you can fill out your preferences in any order you like.
On the large ballot for the Legislative Council, you can either vote above the line or below the line. Whichever way you vote, you control your preferences—NSW does not have a dodgy system to harvest voter preferences like in Victoria.
Every grouping that has registered at least 15 candidates receives a square above the line; if the square is unlabelled, it is because the group does not have formal party registration. Groups with 2–14 candidates receive their own column but no square above the line; you can only vote for them below the line. Solo independents appear in the furthest right column and can only be voted for below the line.
For most voters, voting above the line will suffice: after you vote 1 for your preferred group, you can distribute as many or as few preferences as you like. You accept the order of candidates registered within each individual group, but you control the order of the groups. You will be able to express preferences for any party/grouping likely to win a seat; it is well nigh impossible for candidates who can only be voted for below the line to win a seat.
You should vote below the line if the following apply to you: a) you want to reorder candidates within a group and/or mix and match candidates across groups, b) you want to vote for ungrouped independents or a group of independents without enough candidates to receive a square above the line, or c) you are a completist like me who wants to indicate a preference for everyone. You MUST give at least 15 preference. Be warned that if you want to preference all the way, it will take a while—it took me over 20 minutes at the 2019 election.
In both cases, the further you preference, the more powerful your vote will be. Distribute as many preferences as you feel you can distribute in an informed manner.
This entry includes links to my reviews of each micro-party. There are 8 groups of independents or unregistered parties. These are noted below by their group letter on the ballot. The format is "party name (rough ideology / recommended preference)". A good preference is a party with few or no significant flaws for the left-wing voter; a decent preference indicates a generally positive platform or a single-issue party with a good but limited objective; a middling preference is a mix of positive and negative qualities; a weak or no preference is mainly negative and either you should give them a poor preference or let your vote exhaust—as noted above, your vote is most powerful if you preference as far as possible.
Animal Justice Party (animal rights / middling to decent preference)
Australia One / Riccardo Bosi—Group U (conspiracy theorists who are a threat to public safety / lowest possible preference)
Call to Freedom / Milan Maksimovic—Group E (Christian fundamentalism / weak or no preference)
Christians for Community / Milton Caine—Group T (Christian fundamentalism / weak or no preference)
Elizabeth Farrelly Independents (centre-left NIMBY / middling preference)
Family First / Lyle Shelton—Group A (Christian fundamentalism and conspiracism / weak or no preference)
Group P—Danny Lim (anti-racism personality / middling to decent preference)
Indigenous–Aboriginal Party of Australia (Indigenous rights / good preference)
Informed Medical Options Party (uninformed anti-vaxxers / weak or no preference)
Legalise Cannabis Party (single issue / decent preference)
Liberal Democratic Party (far-right libertarian cookers / weak or no preference)
Public Education Party (single issue / decent preference)
Revive Australia Party / Silvana Nile—Group G (Christian fundamentalism / weak or no preference)
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party (fans of gun violence / weak or no preference)
Socialist Alliance (socialism / good preference)
Socialist Equality Party / Oscar Grenfell—Group K (socialism but for crackpots / weak or no preference)
Sustainable Australia—Stop Overdevelopment/Corruption (anti-immigration NIMBYs / weak or no preference)
United Australia Party / Craig Kelly—Group B (covid conspiracists in a policy-free space of grievance / weak or no preference)
Ungrouped independents (mix of ideologies and recommendations)
Happy voting and enjoy your democracy sausage!
16 notes · View notes
deadpresidents · 11 months
Note
Could a person, who's a current sitting Congressperson, have a spouse run for president? And if that person won, would the Congressperson have to step down?
There's nothing prohibiting someone running for President or serving as President if they are married to an incumbent or prospective member of Congress and vice versa.
It's actually already happened: Bill Clinton was President when Hillary Clinton was elected and sworn in to the U.S. Senate. Bill was finishing up his second term as President, so he was still serving in the White House for only the first 17 days of Hillary's time in the Senate. But it wouldn't have been an issue if their terms had overlapped at any point.
8 notes · View notes
if-you-fan-a-fire · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media
"MONOPOLIES, NOT PEOPLE C.C.F. TARGET, JOLLIFFE SAYS," Toronto Star. July 22, 1943. Page 8. --- Ontario Leader Claims Hysteria Being Shown by "Old Parties" --- RAPS MILK INDUSTRY ---- Stating that George Drew, Progressive Conservative leader, "is attempting to frighten the electors out of their wits by his wailing that the C.C.F. means regimentation and dictatorship," E. B. Jolliffe, Ontario C.C.F. leader, last night said his party stands for democracy and freedom. "The only ones who have anything to fear from the C.C.F. are the monopolies" he said.
Mr. Jolliffe. candidate for South York, addressed a gathering in Humewood school. Earlier in the evening he spoke on behalf of C. H. Millard, C.C.F. candidate for West York, at Roselands public school, Mount Dennis, Flight Lieutenant Leslie Wismer, C.C.F. candidate for Riverdale, spoke at both meetings.
"The tide of support for the C.C.F." Mr. folliffe said. "is rolling in so fast there are distinct signs of hysteria among the old parties. They are becoming very, very fearful, and, when they are fearful, there is no end to the imagination of the old party politicians.
"We must have a basis of economic security," he stated. "We can't mark time, or reverse the years and go back as the Progressive Conservatives intend to do. We must have plans for looking after the members of the armed forces and workers in war industry when this conflict ends. The only party who has such plans is the C.C.F. There is no end to what can be done in regard to per natural resources, starting new industries. equalizing educational facilities and building better homes."
Mr. Jolliffe said there was some excuse for lack of rehabilitation or planning on the part of the Dominion government because it is charged with the gigantic task of prosecuting the war but he said Queen's Park did not have to shoulder this responsibility and claimed no plans have been made there.
Alleges "Monopolies" Referring to "monopolies," he and the tobacco industry "not only does not allow the grower to support his family decently, but also leaves a terrific toll on the people who use tobacco."
"Every time you buy a package of cigarettes you pay tribute to the tobacco industry," he stated. "The distribution and side of tobacco has been reduced to a collection of toll from the people.
"The processing and distribution of milk is also becoming a monopoly." he said. "It is wasteful. Keeping up the pretence of competition, companies. are wasting tires and manpower. Milk is a vital commodity yet it costs the people far more than is necessary."
Mr. Jolliffe said the George Drew, who is claiming the C.CF. means regimentation and dictatorship is the same George Drew who, in 1938, came back from Italy singing the praises of that silly dictator, Mussolini.
"He showed the same bad judgement there as he does in many other matters," he said.
Warning that plans for post-war rehabilitation must be given immediate consideration, Flight Lieut. Wismer said the problems which will have to be faced at the end of this conflict are much greater than those arising out of the last war.
Soldiers Highly Skilled "With few exceptions," he said, "the men who will return this time will be highly skilled technicians. For example, our tank drivers are the best drivers in the world. Their skill could be used equally well in handling trucks and buses. Some people think our army as a lot of stupid fellows who line up and go to war. There is none of that today. Every man is highly skilled. They must be brought back and absorbed by industry."
Mr. Millard said the old political parties, the apologists for private enterprise and monopolies," can no longer hide their identity.
"They do not represent the needs or aspirations of the common man or woman," he said. "Labor does not forget the tanks at Stratford, or the Hepburn Hussars at Oshawa, or the strike-breaking police at Kirkland Lake, Campbell's Soup, Wallaceburg and Galt."
Mr. Millard said that, white more than 30 per cent of the 73 C.C.F. candidates already nominated are members and representatives of unions, not one trade unionist has been nominated by the Conservatives.
"And yet," he stated. "the Conservatives keep up the pretense of having a labor policy to meet the needs of the working people. Even if they did have a policy they wouldn't have anyone to put it to work."
0 notes
neyatimes · 8 months
Text
Guatemala will vote for new president but critics say many anti-corruption candidates were weeded out
CNN  —  Guatemalans head to the polls on June 25 to pick a new president, as regional watchers warn of a downward spiral of kleptocracy and weakening rule of law in Central America’s most populous nation. Social democrat Sandra Torres, the right-wing Zury Ríos and center-right Edmont Mulet lead the pack of more than 20 presidential hopefuls in the general elections. Other candidates have been…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
worldwatcher3072 · 11 months
Text
"Power to The People" - How to Retake Our Country from Corruption and Dark Money
The issue of money in politics has long been a concern for American citizens, who worry that wealthy donors and special interest groups hold undue influence over our elected officials. This concern has only grown in recent years, as the flood of dark money into politics has made it increasingly difficult for ordinary citizens to have their voices heard.
Despite these challenges, there are steps that we can take to retake our country from corruption and dark money and ensure that our democracy remains strong and vibrant. Here are some key strategies that can help to put power back in the hands of the people:
Push for campaign finance reform: One of the most effective ways to limit the influence of dark money in politics is to advocate for campaign finance reform. This might include measures such as public financing of political campaigns, tighter disclosure requirements for political donations, and stronger enforcement of campaign finance laws.
Support candidates who refuse dark money: Another way to combat the influence of dark money is to support political candidates who refuse to accept contributions from wealthy donors and special interest groups. By electing officials who are committed to transparency and who prioritize the needs of their constituents over the interests of wealthy donors, we can help to restore faith in our democratic institutions.
Engage in grassroots activism: Grassroots activism can be a powerful tool for bringing attention to issues related to corruption and dark money in politics. This might include organizing protests, creating social media campaigns, or engaging in community outreach and education.
Educate yourself and others: Finally, it's important to stay informed about the issues related to money in politics and to educate others about these issues. By spreading awareness and engaging in dialogue, we can help to build a movement for change and create a more informed and engaged citizenry.
Ultimately, the fight against corruption and dark money in politics is a long and difficult one. However, by working together and staying committed to our democratic values, we can retake our country from those who seek to undermine our democratic institutions and ensure that power remains in the hands of the people.
0 notes
sweettooth97 · 1 year
Text
Still think one of the creepiest things is getting texts from political campaigns. Like who asked?? Also how did they get my number?!?! Worried and disturbing. Though I guess better than a phone call...
0 notes
worldspotlightnews · 1 year
Text
Nigerians to vote in governorship polls as ruling party scrambles to regain lost ground in key states | CNN
Lagos, Nigeria CNN  —  Nigerians will on Saturday vote in delayed governorship polls, weeks after a controversial and disputed presidential election. The gubernatorial race will be decided in 28 of Nigeria’s 36 states as the ruling party scrambles to regain lost ground in key states. But all eyes will be on the tense contest for control of the country’s wealthy Lagos State, which analysts say…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
reportwire · 1 year
Text
Trump and DeSantis stake out sharpest preview yet of possible 2024 showdown | CNN Politics
CNN  —  Ex-President Donald Trump and his most serious potential rival, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, laid out with unprecedented clarity this weekend how their sharply contrasting personalities and approaches would define the 2024 race for the Republican nomination. Trump served up his familiar brew of fury, falsehoods and dishonest braggadocio at the Conservative Political Action Conference on…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
thesexypolitico · 1 year
Text
Vinnie Potestivo and The Sexy Politico discuss Political Candidates Building a Brand with Podcasting.
It may only be January of 2023, but the next election season is right around the corner.  For new or young candidates trying to gain exposure to voters and build authority in the political arena, podcasting could be the way for you to do it.  Vinnie Potestivo of I have a Podcast, and I discuss what a podcast can do for someone who has had no visibility previously and how different podcasts can…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
satelliteduster · 1 year
Text
oh my god i forgot to post my absolute favorite strip from gay comix (issue #2, 1981)
Tumblr media
14K notes · View notes
axvoter · 1 year
Text
Index to the Blatantly Partisan Party Reviews, 2022 Victorian state edition
This Saturday is election day in Victoria and a record number of candidates are standing. You could find yourself a little bewildered by the plethora of micro-parties on the ballot. You might have also heard about the controversies surrounding Group Ticket Voting, where Victoria is the last state to retain this anti-democratic system that allows parties to control some preferences.
I’ve written my blog entries to demystify these micro-parties and to explain how to ensure you stay in control of your own preferences. All entries are written from a left-wing perspective sympathetic to democratic socialism and green politics, so calibrate according to your own predilections. I make no pretension to false objectivity—that’s why these are blatantly partisan party reviews.
When you go to vote, you will receive two ballot papers. One will be a very large ballot for the Legislative Council (the upper house). The state is divided into eight regions that each elect five members of the Legislative Council. Every registered party is contesting every region. But the Legislative Council is the house of review; government is formed in the Legislative Assembly (the lower house). It contains 88 seats, and the number of candidates—both party-affiliated and independent—varies significantly between electorates.
On the small ballot for the Legislative Assembly, you must number every square. Do not skip or repeat a number. You are in full control of your preferences on this ballot: if your preferred candidate is not elected, your vote transfers at full value to your second preference, and so on. You might receive a How To Vote card from party campaigners: this is a suggestion only and you can fill out your preferences in any order you like.
On the large ballot for the Legislative Council, you can either vote above the line or below the line and I CANNOT EMPHASISE ENOUGH THAT YOU SHOULD VOTE BELOW THE LINE. If you vote above the line, you will receive the preferences lodged on a group ticket by the party for whom you vote 1. Any other preferences you mark will be ignored. Many of these group tickets are dodgy, decided by backroom deals, and none of them reflect what a party’s voters do when they can give preferences freely.
To vote below the line, you must number at least five candidates sequentially 1–5. You can then give as many more preferences as you want. You can stop at 5, or you can preference everyone, or do anything in between; it’s up to you. I recommend preferencing as far as you can express a meaningful preference, including between gradations of bad, as this maximises the power of your vote. I also recommend preparing your vote beforehand on a template such as that from ClueyVoter, and then copying this onto your ballot in the booth. If you want a more detailed discussion of this system and how to make best use of your vote, Kevin Bonham's got you covered.
This entry includes links to my reviews of each micro-party. Earlier today I posted a cheat sheet with my recommended preference categories. I do not review Labor, Liberal/National, Greens, or One Nation, as anyone interested enough to read this blog presumably already has opinions on those parties. I did float the prospect of reviewing the state branch of One Nation when I began the reviews, but their website still lacks meaningful content for the state election and it seems they aren’t presenting any Vic-specific platform, so it's same old guff.
Angry Victorians Party (covid conspiracists)
Animal Justice Party (animal rights)
Australia One (unregistered covid conspiracists endorsing six independents)
Companions and Pets Party (animal breeding and racing industry front)
Democratic Labour Party (Catholic conservatism)
Derryn Hinch’s Justice Party (tough-on-crime centrism)
Family First Victoria (Protestant extreme right)
Fiona Patten’s Reason Party (left-wing civil libertarian)
Freedom Party of Victoria (covid conspiracists)
Fusion: Science, Pirate, Secular, Climate Emergency (centre-left pragmatists; unregistered party endorsing three independents)
Health Australia Party (anti-vaxxers who were anti-vax before covid made it the trendy thing for conspiracists)
Indigenous–Aboriginal Party of Australia (Indigenous rights; unregistered party endorsing three independents)
Legalise Cannabis Victoria (single issue)
Liberal Democratic Party (far-right libertarians)
New Democrats (centre-right)
Restore Democracy Sack Dan Andrews (personal grudge and/or preference-harvesting front)
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party (anti-environmentalist gun nuts)
Socialist Alliance (socialism; unregistered party endorsing four independents)
Sustainable Australia—Stop Overdevelopment/Corruption (anti-immigration NIMBYs)
Transport Matters Party (centre-left taxi industry front)
United Australia Party (covid grievance-mongers floating in a policy-free zone)
Victorian Socialists (socialism)
Overviews of independents for the Legislative Assembly and for the Legislative Council
If you want more perspectives, I recommend the Something for Cate blog for extended takes, and the Notionoriety blog for pithy ones (also this entry covers lower house independents that I haven’t covered). For really short takes, I whipped up a Twitter thread.
Happy voting and enjoy your democracy sausage!
15 notes · View notes
qqueenofhades · 5 months
Text
The number of white, ostensibly liberal male political pundits insisting that elections in the Biden/post-Dobbs era are just Completely Unpredictable and Wild sure is something, huh.
2K notes · View notes
gary232 · 1 year
Link
1 note · View note
amhrancomhrac · 1 month
Text
What annoys me about third parties is how they simply give no fucks about local politics.
They’re not running candidates for city and state elections. No small town mayors. No county commissioners. No city councils. Not even a dog catcher. Just people with zero experience at any level of public service who are only interested in being governor or higher.
We’re never going to have a legitimate option outside the big two if the other parties don’t start actually attempting to govern something, literally fucking ANYTHING, anywhere. To build those networks of people major parties already have nationwide. Instead of crawling from the woodwork every four years to try for the hardest political job in the country.
Like. They do realize part of why the other two are so successful is that they have nationwide networks of people at everything from local school boards on up? And that’s kind of necessary to be anything resembling competitive? And that’s where your national candidates will learn to govern and build a track record to run on? Don’t they?
363 notes · View notes
thehawkseyecn · 2 years
Text
Did Union Billboards Have Anything to do with Crime Spike in Bexar County?
Did Union Billboards Have Anything to do with Crime Spike in Bexar County?
Recently, Sheriff Javier Salazar, of the Bexar County Sheriff’s Office, identified a trend in crime within county patrolled areas. Specifically, he submitted a letter to the Bexar County Commissioners Court stating in the last several months, violent crime has increased: He identified incidents which occurred after billboards were placed by the Deputy Sheriff’s Association of Bexar County…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
reportwire · 1 year
Text
Bola Ahmed Tinubu elected Nigeria's president as opposition calls for new polls | CNN
Lagos, Nigeria CNN  —  Bola Ahmed Tinubu was on Wednesday declared the winner of Nigeria’s controversial presidential elections, as opposition leaders decried the polls as rigged and called for a fresh vote. Tinubu, 70, represents the ruling All Progressives Congress party, which received close to 8.8 million votes – about 36.6% of the total, according to Independent National Electoral…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes