If there is any contemporary meaning of the Antichrist (or “the principalities and powers”), the white church seems to be a manifestation of it. It is the enemy of Christ. It was the white “Christian” church that took the lead in establishing slavery as an institution and segregation as a pattern in society by sanctioning all-white congregations. As Frank Loescher pointed out, its very existence as an institution is a symbol of the “philosophy of white supremacy.” “Long before the little signs—‘White Only’ and ‘Colored’—appeared in the public utilities they had appeared in the church.” Haselden shows clearly the work of the Church in setting the pattern that later became general law for all of America:
“First came the segregation of the Negro within the church; then followed the separation of the churches by the “spontaneous” withdrawal of the Negro Christians; much later, the elaborate patterns of segregation were to arise in the church and in secular society.”
With its all-white congregations, it makes racism a respectable attitude. By remaining silent it creates an ethos that dehumanizes blacks. It is the Church that preaches that blacks are inferior to whites—if not by word, certainly by “moral” example.
James H. Cone, Black Theology and Black Power
35 notes
·
View notes
i'm never knowingly going to reblog a post that includes the phrase 'touch grass,' and that's not because i don't think it can be psychologically beneficial to get in some outdoor time if possible—i went for a walk earlier! it was great!—or to take a break from conversations that are getting you wound up, but because i think that particular wording generally reveals two things:
first, that the writer is speaking not from a place of genuine concern and sympathy, but from judgmental impatience à la 'get therapy,' which—i too have felt judgmental and impatient in my time, god knows! but when i feel that way i try to go unpack those feelings in private with a thoughtful friend, instead of pretending they constitute a source of wisdom or a helpful sort of energy to direct at people, you know? and i'm definitely not particularly interested in boosting a ventpost from someone else—who pretty clearly hasn't bothered to take the breather they're urging on others, if they're making little digs like that—as if it were actually sincere, carefully-reasoned advice.
and second, that the writer's argument embraces some seriously sloppy assumptions, which pretty immediately undermines my trust in the rest of their analysis—i mean, there's absolutely no guarantee someone's local scene will be any less parochial, just because it's playing out irl! there's also not actually a clean divide between 'people who spend time in the Real World' and 'people who spend time on the internet, which is for porn losers,' as demonstrated by a number of phenomena including, again, the aforementioned grass-recommenders' own presence right here on tumblr…
anyway. obviously we all have our own particular lines we draw around particular rhetoric that bugs us! these are just some reasons why that particular phrasing bugs me.
8 notes
·
View notes
Two things about Olivia Rodrigo she’s not afraid to call a man gay and she loves to do a bit of jealous homoeroticism
9 notes
·
View notes
“please be upstanding for our national anthem” *teenage kicks plays*
150 notes
·
View notes
graffiti on the wall outside of the amazon building
4 notes
·
View notes
not now kitten, daddy's about to have a mental breakdown from seeing the prices at the grocery store
114K notes
·
View notes