So, I just know all of Tumblr was wondering, "hey, you remember that really weird ZoLaw fan with the annoyingly overly stylized post? I wonder if she's seen this and if she has any theories or thoughts, an observation or two?"
Well, allow me to set your wandering mind at ease, fictional Tumblr fan. The answer is: No. No, I really don't.
I have like three hundred.
[I also spent time just trying to track down as many translations as possible. Is Tera A Criminal's Daughter or The Daughter Of Thieving Bandits! These are CLEARLY separate things and can ENTIRELY change how her utter nonpresence in Zoro's life shaped him! Though I can take comfort in knowing that, regardless of what kind of crimes her father was committing they were more important than anything his daughter ever did in her entire life.]
And, hey, as might as well jump right into that whole mess.
1. Wait, Zoro's mom is dead? Thank goodness, I was worried Oda forgot one!
(AKA: Stop. Murdering. Moms.)
I'll go first, I don't mind saying when I was wrong. True, in the past I may have suggested that the vast majority of female characters in One Piece come off as ever so slightly, "leaning into sexist tropes with unadulterated joy; it's the misogynistic tropes equivalent of a child running naked through a grocery store. It's right there, everyone sees it, yet people shut up and continue shopping in part because, well, these days you just expect most people to cover that junk! What would you even say? And if you DO speak up and call out the inappropriate, be prepared for blank stares and tantrums; but THEY don't mind! THEY don't think it's wrong! You're just being mean!"
More or less a direct quote.
However, I see now that I rushed to judgement and the reality of the situation is far more nuanced. With that in mind, I was just wondering if someone could help answer some of the questions I have.
Like: Why does Oda believe that it's illegal for (maternal) female characters to survive other character's backstories?
More importantly, why hasn't someone just reached out to explain the misconception!? It can't be that difficult. If nothing else, just have a lawyer or judge or other expert in censorship on hand. Or is the one of those cases where back in highschool his friends made something up and then kept pretending it was real to see if he'd believe you and not only did he fall for it, it took over 20 years before he learned that, what, no that's not illegal. That would be crazy if it were an actual law. Cause you know, after the first 10 years I think yeah you have to just lean into it. Pretend it's a creative decision on your part and definitely not because you were terrified of being sentenced to a slow and humiliating public death.
Just to be clear that's definitely what's up, right? I mean, I'm struggling to think of another reason....able excuse why a story that I really enjoy keeps playing the same old sexist tropes cards again and again to the point of absurdity. It would just help if I had a valid excus- explanation. I almost mistyped the word explanation.
....
....
So I imagine it went like.
"That's the third mangaka they've had to Publically Execute this week!"
"They've started taking this law way more serious lately."
"This one really deserved it though! I heard his main character has a mother in her late forties!"
"That does seem old to have your first child."
"No, he's the middle of three and 22 years old. The story even has flashbacks of defining moments in his childhood and never once did she try to sacrifice herself for him, get murdered by his enemies, or die in meaningless unrelated accidents."
"Damn, that's cold to be there for all the protagonist core moments and not die and help him develop and grow a character? They must have a very antagonistic relationship. Is she actually the villain."
"Not that we know, and when they asked about this being a possible plot twist since - obviously if she's evil no laws are being broken."
"Well, of course, that's the whole reason Statue 2-dash-57 exists; if creators can show they have consistently been building up to a surprise twist then the female character in question can continue to live so long as she continues to be unrepentant and unlikable until the resolution of her arch by the protagonist."
"That's the thing! Under oath not only did man present no evidence to support her identity as a secret villain, he went on the record stating he wanted to depict their relationship as one of a normal modern 20 year old and his mother."
"That can't be true! What publishing company would even print that!?"
"It gets worse. I told you he was a middle child? Well, according to those who've read the actual manga, his younger sister was really sick as a child."
"Oh, well, at least-"
"It was just a fish allergy. She's perfectly fine."
"Sometimes I feel this law is unnecessarily harsh but.... Then you hear stories like that, and you realize that some people really are monsters."
49 notes
·
View notes
(re: language, & i have thought about this some and i think that is important to include people who aren't women who are directly impacted by restrictions on abortion access, but i also think that anti-choice rhetoric & activism is driven by misogyny, so it is also important to me to consistently name women as a group when abortion specifically is being discussed. and i think obviously you can't separate misogyny from a lot of other things, but i also think something is lost when you lose the ability to name misogyny in contexts where it's central or relevant, which i feel like i have seen happen not infrequently. i have thought about specifying "cis women" but if the issue is that not all women can get pregnant and therefore not all women have the potential to require access to abortion, that's true even if you are talking specifically about cis women, and it would feel strange to be like, "cis women without infertility issues who are between menarche and menopause." in mulling that over i landed on something like: i think that ultimately any manifestation of misogyny is relevant to all women, even if for whatever particular circumstances of their lives specific individual women may not ever have to deal with that. i don't have to deal with tabloids dissecting my perceived physical flaws because i am not a celebrity, but i do have to deal with being a woman in a culture where women's bodies are considered acceptable sites of public commentary and beauty is considered an obligation women owe the public. similarly, a woman who can't get pregnant, whether it's because she's trans or because she had uterine cancer, technically doesn't have her life impacted by a lack of access to abortion, but she is still impacted by the underlying ideology of restrictions on abortion access, which is that women's lives are not inherently valuable and women cannot be trusted to make decisions about their own bodies or reproductive futures. hence, "women & others who can get pregnant" is where i have landed for my own use in this and similar contexts, for now at least.)
35 notes
·
View notes
“And cannon-fire, two miles downriver on this glorious May morning, will get me started. One brutal blast and the queen is dead, long live the queen. Will she, herself, hear anything of the split of her own nape under the sword blade? Not that I pity her, but still: the cracking in two of the bony stem of her, the pouring of her blood to the ground. Perhaps I should have been brave enough to ask the king: ‘Couldn’t she just...?’ Perhaps she could have just gone away. Because surely a nunnery would have done.
I’m listening hard for that cannon blast [...] I want to be alone when it gets to me; if anyone were here with me, I wouldn’t know where to look.
As soon as those cannons have sounded, I have a job to do: be a queen as if the last one never existed. Give me a job to do and I’ll do it, and I’m nothing if not thorough. And in this case it’ll be my pleasure. Give me time and no one will so much as remember the name Anne Boleyn. Just give me time.
No block for her, no axe: she’ll die with her head up. She was a mistake of the king’s but the king never makes a mistake, so she’ll be struck out with such speed that no one sees it happen and then the blood will slide in a single wipe from so sharp a blade. For not even three years did England have a pretend-queen. Blink and you’ve missed it.”
The May Bride, Suzannah Dunn
8 notes
·
View notes
You know, I still think that women that are actually written in Riyaria are well written, but man this guy has a problem with fridging female characters. The amoun of women who die in these books simply for plot of specifically the male characters is eeeeehhhhhhh. Which is a real shame honestly, because Arista, Amilia, and Thrace are such good characters, I love them. He does unfortunately also have a lack of buff women. So, to remedy these problems I suggest one main fix: make Hadrian a woman. You can even leave the name, I am perfectly happy having a woman called Hadrian run around. You also have to change nothing about his plot or character. Leave it as it is. This would give us a buff female himbo knight, it would mean that for once the male and female protagonist are not in a relationship, and it would make Hadrian’s and Arista’s romance immediatly 10 times more compelling. Give me knight/princess leasbians! And from there you could totally genderflip a few more characters, Esrahaddon would be a prime example. Merrick is another one. Literally the only character that you can’t just genderflip or it would break part of the plot is Royce. Everyone else is fair game.
also give Thrace a half elf bard girlfriend i dare you
just kidding I’ll do it myself
7 notes
·
View notes