there is a severe lack of undead unluck x readers anywhere.......
24 notes
·
View notes
wait did he say something or has he just become the poster child for hating the monarchy
409 notes
·
View notes
one thing about me is that if you say Rogue One is your favorite SW movie, I will literally trust you with my life
109 notes
·
View notes
so um anyway jiang cheng canonically does not consider wei wuxian a servant—let alone “just a servant”—and does not treat him like one. idk where this idea came from but it is factually untrue.
in fact, jc repeatedly indicates that he thinks wwx’s station is on par with other gentry, that he likes the idea of being part of a pair with wwx, and even jokes with wwx, mocking the notion that wwx could be a servant.
after wwx was taken in, they were functionally raised as equals, and there is nothing in their interactions as youths that indicates or even hints that their relationship was master/servant instead of simply childhood friends.
and obviously wwx is not sect leader, so yeah, he is expected to defer to jc after the war, (and that’s not an inherently bad thing, that’s how leadership works) but jc lets him get away with SO much shit that Would Not Fly if wwx were a servant (or treated like one). if jc only regarded wwx as a servant, there is literally no reason to be as lenient as jc was with wwx’s loose canon tendencies.
i’m sorry, but there is simply no valid reading of their relationship where the dynamic of their relationship is master/servant. their relationship simply is not built on obligation, as much as they both try to act like it. this assumption undercuts a huge amount of context and motivation, leaving nonsensical character decisions and gaping plot holes. there is no mdzs unless they care about each other as individuals.
173 notes
·
View notes
yk if past chief and chief w the new outfit were like- clones and the current is an actual person.... omg the most earth shattering and mind blowing foursome would happen
36 notes
·
View notes
Transformers Earthspark (2022)
390 notes
·
View notes
i think ppl can and should project onto fictional characters. that's kind of what they're for a lot of the time. even if in the story they dont have the exact same experiences the audience can still find similarities with them and it's empowering to headcanon that, because of these similarities, the character has a similar identity to you. a lot of writers purposely give their characters experiences similar to marginalized groups to make those groups feel seen.
that being said, if you project your own experiences onto your blorbos you HAVE to be able to tell when the story is purposely making the character a metaphor for your experiences and when the story is. not doing that. just because you personally relate to a character doesn't mean the character literally is your marginalized identity. and it definitely doesn't mean that the writers hate your marginalized identity, specifically, if they don't do what you want them to do with that character.
20 notes
·
View notes
“sTicKinG oUt yOuR gyAtT foR thE riZzLEr yOur sO sK-” SHUT UP I WILL PULL A JACK MERRIDEW ON U
16 notes
·
View notes
I should've put "the Doctor and the Master calling each other Theta and Koschei post-Academy Era" on the poll tbh
15 notes
·
View notes