Good person or successful person!!!
The social fabric of every society revolves around a few concepts. Some are fundamental while others are secondary. However, all these concepts are interrelated in such a way that a change in one concept leads to a change in another. This change can be positive or negative.
When the solid environment of a society changes, human behaviors change, indicating that the central concepts or ideas of that society are changing. The problem with prepared societies is that instead of looking for the causes of the changes in the central concepts of society in society's central ideas, ordinary people look for them in social institutions that are themselves the products of those central ideas. For example, the ongoing crisis in our society is sometimes attributed to the instability of political institutions, sometimes to social slavery, sometimes to dependence on others in science and technology, and sometimes to the deterioration of the educational situation. This perception is common that if we correct the functioning of all these institutions, our society will start to resemble paradise. In my opinion, this is a simple, if not foolish, perception.
In my opinion, the cause of the ongoing crisis in our society is not the failure or malfunction of those institutions, but the real reason is that our concept of humanity has changed. We have rejected an ideal concept of humanity and adopted an imperfect concept of humanity, whether we admit it or not, but that is the truth. The debate on the concept of humanity is somewhat philosophical, but since some of my readers complain that my columns become too heavy, I will try to present this discussion in simple words as much as possible.
It is believed that in our society, the idea of a "successful person" has replaced the idea of a "good person." We need not good people but successful people. Parents, siblings, friends all aim to make society a seeker of successful people. A successful person is an ideal person.
Generally, when one central behavior of society replaces another behavior, it first rejects it before replacing it. Until it can provide a logical basis for its existence. But here in our case, this did not happen under the concept of humanity. The concept of a successful person replaced the concept of a good person but was not rejected. This is why there is so much mental turmoil here. It is human nature that one cannot remain mentally stable and healthy by being associated with two similar central concepts at the same time.
Here you can ask that we first said that the concept of a successful person has become prevalent in our society, while in the previous paragraphs we said that we are associated with both good and successful people. What does this mean? In fact, what I mean is that although practically we have accepted the concept of a successful person, but since this concept has not rejected the concept of a good person on philosophical or logical grounds, it is also present as a concept in our minds. The mental turmoil of our society is fundamentally caused by the tug of war between these two concepts.
The short story is that the concept of a successful person has become prevalent here. Here it is necessary to explain that by a successful person, I mean a socially successful person, in which the economic aspect is of fundamental importance.
The yeast of this successful person rises from competition and rivalry. The concepts of victory and defeat are born out of competition. In competition, someone's victory is born from someone's defeat, and someone's defeat is born from someone's victory. The winner is successful and the loser is unsuccessful, meaning the determination of the importance of a person is from victory and defeat.
You may know that when hockey started, the team that had the most physically powerful players used to win. The rules and regulations of the game had not yet been set. Therefore, the player who was physically strong used to push the players of the other team and score goals. But gradually, this game developed its rules. When the rules were made, the attention of the players shifted from strength to skill. Thus, craft was born in the game, but this process took time.
Since the game of success and failure is new here, its central principle is also strength. It is legal to push someone down and move forward. As Nadia Fazli says:
No one shows you the way here If you can fall and move forward, then go It is possible that after some time this game will also create its rules. But experience shows that in those societies where this game has also created its rules, even there the era of peace in human life has not come because fundamentally this is an inhuman game.
Now let's look at some other aspects of this issue. The issue of a good person being less or more good. There is no arrogance of victory or defeat in it. However, happiness and sorrow are obtained from the struggle for maximum goodness and failure. But this happiness does not come from someone else's defeat and this sorrow does not come from someone else's victory. The competition is with oneself, not with others. His thought comes not from conversation but from self-talk.
You will think that if you want to bring about change in your society, change your concept of humanity. Since I am not eligible to do so from any aspect, I request the learned scholars to please try to see if our society's "concept of God" and "concept of religion" are the same as they used to be? Or have we made a change in it too.
0 notes
im sure its been said already but as the election draws near more and more liberals will come out of the woodwork to shame people with a conscience to give away their vote to the democrats for free. i'm already seeing posts saying "why aren't people more concerned about a trump presidency?" you want to know why? it's because people already know he's bad. everyone already knows what he is and what he's done and what he'll do. there's nothing to discuss. he's a racist despotic worm of a man. there's nothing else to say.
biden is currently president. the genocide is happening under his watch. he's the one funding isra*l and arming them; he's sidestepped congress more than once to give them weapons. by oct. 27, the biden administration already knew that "Israel was regularly bombing buildings without solid intelligence that they were legitimate military targets." the state department/biden have engaged in atrocity propaganda, cast doubt on the legitimacy of the death toll recorded by the gaza health ministry, and so on. the united states is currently in the process of trying to pin the "war in gaza" on netanyahu (see sen. schumer's speech) after months of backing blatant genocide as a means to act as if they're "doing something" about the genocide (Instead of, say, threatening to cut off all aid to israel with the condition that all hostilities in gaza, the west bank, and occupied jerusalem are halted immediately and permanently, allowing palestinians freedom to travel, allowing aid into gaza, etc etc etc.)
the long and short of it is that liberals view their own lives as being worth more than palestinians'. that's it. they'll vote for another 4 years of the guy ushering in genocide and supporting apartheid + settler colonialism because he isn't outright attacking them (despite various laws and rulings happening both at the supreme court level and at the local level all over the country that will endanger people). they'll settle for the illusion of safety and security and shame anyone with a conscience and accuse them of "supporting the republicans" when in an actual democracy you would be able to use your vote as leverage to extract concessions from those who want to be elected. that's how it's supposed to fucking work.
democrats are not owed people's vote. if biden loses, it will be biden's fault; it will be his campaign's fault; it will be the democrats' fault. trump is bad; the republicans are bad. we already know this. this is not an endorsement of either. but if democrats are too cowardly and feckless and servile to the motivations of the american empire and never do anything for their constituents then why the fuck should anyone vote for them. you want to get mad at someone, why don't you do something useful and stop worrying about team-sports with a purely selfish basis and start hounding the people in power who are supposed to serve you, the voter.
384 notes
·
View notes
i think there's an interesting connective thread between sarah snook saying she thinks shiv just reads whatever's currently popular and got people talking ("everyone's reading this? all right, fine."), and alan ruck saying he thinks connor only reads books that are very old and considered classics - that way he doesn't have to decide if it has literary merit, because everyone else has already decided it's a seminal work. like, it takes them in the opposite direction when looking for materials, but in both cases they're being driven by a desire to not have to have original artistic tastes or opinions and just defer to someone else's judgements. which is just so telling?
shiv can be a bit of a black sheep politically, but she arrived there by just trying to define herself in opposition to her family; it's an indirect way of having someone else decide for you to keep trying to do the opposite of what's expected. it requires little in the way of genuine beliefs, which is why she flips very easily when it's convenient. connor meanwhile just wants any scrap of attention he can get, which is why he brings up random trivia or collects bizarre historical items. he likes to be able to just say or have something that gets people's attention, without having to provide any real explanation or show understanding. and i think it's interesting how that carries over into things like entertainment or art - the lack of self conception makes it hard to do things like pick up a random book you've never heard of because it looks interesting.
266 notes
·
View notes
50 African proverbs.
"A bird that flies off the earth and lands on an anthill is still on the ground."
"If you want to go quickly, go alone. If you want to go far, go together."
"The lion does not turn around when a small dog barks."
"When elephants fight, it is the grass that suffers."
"The wise create bridges, the foolish build barriers."
"He who learns, teaches."
"Unity is strength, division is weakness."
"Do not look where you fell, but where you slipped."
"Smooth seas do not make skillful sailors."
"A tree is known by its fruits."
"The one who loves an unsightly person is the one who makes him beautiful."
"The strength of a crocodile is in the water."
"The old woman looks after the child to grow its teeth and the young one in turn looks after the old woman when she loses her teeth."
"A wise person will always find a way."
"Where you will sit when you are old shows where you stood in youth."
"Do not be a spectator before life; participate!"
"The rain beats the leopard’s skin, but it does not wash out the spots."
"No matter how full the river, it still wants to grow."
"Wisdom is like a baobab tree; no one individual can embrace it."
"When the mouse laughs at the cat, there is a hole nearby."
"The goat says, 'Where there is blood, there is plenty of food.'"
"By the time the fool has learned the game, the players have dispersed."
"He who is destined for power does not have to fight for it."
"The chameleon changes color to match the earth; the earth doesn’t change colors to match the chameleon."
"The heart of the wise man lies quiet like limpid water."
"If you close your eyes to facts, you will learn through accidents."
"You can't build a reputation on what you are going to do."
"A wise person learns more from his enemies than a fool from his friends."
"You cannot climb to the mountain top without crushing some weeds with your feet."
"A roaring lion kills no game."
"Knowledge without wisdom is like water in the sand."
"Where there is love, there is no darkness."
"The strength of a nation lies in its homes."
"The best way to eat an elephant in your path is to cut him up into little pieces."
"He who refuses to obey cannot command."
"It is the calm and silent water that drowns a man."
"Patience is the mother of a beautiful child."
"A good deed is something one returns."
"When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends."
"If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together."
"If you want to go quickly, go alone. If you want to go far, go together."
"When spider webs unite, they can tie up a lion."
"No matter how tall a tree grows, the leaves always fall to the ground."
"When the moon is not full, the stars shine more brightly."
"A leopard cannot change its spots."
"A village without elders is like a well without water."
"The sun will shine on those who stand before it shines on those who kneel under them."
"The eye never forgets what the heart has seen."
"A dog with a bone in its mouth cannot bite."
"The axe forgets, but the tree remembers."
107 notes
·
View notes
For example, a show like Succession. We spend much energy and many inches of print and websites talking about the show’s gray morality. The fact that the show follows a set of uber-rich people who do things that feel icky to us, but who, within the world of the show, do not themselves feel icky doing those things. In the world of Succession, the only moral debts that accrue are the interpersonal ones among our cast of characters. That is part of the show’s irony. That they blithely destroy democracy in the background, but look at each other and say not cool when someone is rude to them or lies.
-Brandon Taylor, no redemption arcs in hell
84 notes
·
View notes