Tumgik
#support your 2nd ammendment
page 4
what else they do.
i have a 2nd ammendment right to bear arms now. I'm not asking. they butchered my pregnancies twice in my life; they stole my property on more than one occasion, they literally broke into my SRO without 24 hours notice and they stole from me and placed it back in my room, bragged they are the KREMLIN. told you "i'm facing displacement". that was the last place i was in. i'm not doing it again. The center at 6636 selma, 90028 is stalking me and threatening me to force me off the streets, they say. i've reported what they've done.
you think i can't do this as a private citizen? i've EARNED my right to live here accordingly ,ok? and i have always been a CITIZEN JOURNALIST.
okies? WHISTLEBLOWER LAWS apply to me. do the math!
Regards,
Sylvia Lydia Morelos, S.L.M., POLITICAL ACTIVIST, B.A. LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES, UCLA, 2003, LEGALLY AND ETHICALLY EARNED. and proud.
i need a restraining order against the stalkers, inc. bobby, robert and whoever is calling himself morrison. didn't he die in 1971? i can prove that! and i can prove that Sylvia Leticia Garcia, dob 10 29 56 died before 2000. ok?
these are the facts.
otherwise i am a perfectly happy woman!
miserly bastards these ghetto. btw, they don't have a right to use my own reports against me either as REMOTE IT, or illegal surveillance or stalking. they've also stolen my intellectual property, do the math, they still read my thoughts against my will. they are the commies and white supremists trash, no education proponents, here still.
UGH!.
Sylvia Lydia Morelos, S.L.M., POLITICAL ACTIVIST...to present...
ONE FINAL NOTE: I AM *NOT A FUCKIN BLEEDING HEART, OKIES? I"M NOT *FUCKIN STUPID, MAN!
Sylvia Lydia Morelos, S.L.M., POLITICAL ACTIVIST
...govt fuckin mules!
YOU'D THINK I CAN DO BETTER! NO I AM *NOT HUMBLE! I"VE GOT A SPINE, DICKS!
DEAL WITH IT YOU UGLY BITCHES!
WHORES!
I HATE COMMUNISTS! I HATE WHITE SUPREMISTS, OKIES? GO LIVE OFF THE LAND IN ALASKA!
GO EAT OATS WITH RICHARD THOMPSON IN VENICE! WHERE THERE'S A WILL, THERE'S A BUEY. OKIES?
HAR DE HAR HAR.
stop stealing my ORIGINAL, QUALITY, SHIT, SHIT FOR BRAINS!
P.S. I HAVE A LEGAL RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS NOW. IN SELF DEFENSE, IN CALIFORNIA, I LIKE THE NRA.
I DONT LIKE THE GHETTO FOR A REASON.
I AM NOT APOLOGIZING.
Sylvia Lydia Morelos, S.L.M., POLITICAL ACTIVIST, PRINCESS (A REAL ONE; i needed my Degree for my PEDIGREE, assholes. Not a part time nor GOVT JOB!
SO MUCH FOR, "WE DON"T WANT YOU MOVING UP!!"
remember that Houston, TX?
Thx for nothing, INGRATES.
NO, my strong little me, my feelings are sooo not hurt.
(*toothy grin.)
Sylvia
P.S.S. I AM OF SOUND MIND AND BODY STILL. VERY PEACEFUL about it. I AM INDEED AN EDUCATED WOMAN. MY DEGREE WAS MY BEST ACCOMPLISHMENT, me thinks. Make my abuelita proud. I am everything i am because of HER. No doubt.
Hey, i did my duty: went all out, military female, included. took charge honestly, walked over no one, took from no one. FUN. I can do it; satisfying. This is my country (NOTE: JFK.) I did just that. Saved lives: yours. ugh. oh well.
No regrets about the innocent, IFF there are any, though. Don't support statutory rape. There is only so much i can do. I'm not stupid, nor am i a*bleeding heart, for real. it's the law, i am conscientious. Held it accountable, transparent included. Proud of me, myself, and i and the values from my ABUELITA, only. That's what i know and remember. she kept me going with her visits, when i was little. i wrote a BOOK OF POEMS against my mother, IN CLASS. she was never aware of it, when i was 11 in junior high, BERENDO, in Korea Town. "When I grow up I want to work with computers, be a lawyer, and be in ballet folklorico." that i wrote on the back of my book. I haven't changed.
I come from a family of a MATRIARCH: ERNESTINA OROZCO, aka MARIA FELIX, dob August 14, 1928, from JALISCO, MEXICO. Sus ojos TAPATIOS. Wow. :)
I'm just like her. Still. "I am WOMAN, Hear me Roar."
Individually acknowledged. I feel complete. I AM complete!
Spinster? More like happy, getting older, unmarried, leading a wonderful pro active life, lost two little girls because of the ghetto, literally, they took their lives, my pregnancies, one at 20 and one at 39. I don't think about them much, to my chagrin. It's come to mind on more than one occasion, so...i will do right by them too.
MOMMA POWERS are me.
:)
...OBVIOUSLY, i'm CAPABLE, right?
no doubt....
...son of a bitch, the fuckin misers....understatement.
S.
1 note · View note
deceasedreese · 2 years
Text
Fuck the NRA.
Fuck the US government.
It's truly so upsetting and concerning how unsurprised I am. Having to do the same drills and live with the same anxiety since I was 12 makes one desensitized to this kind of shit. "Another one?" was the first thought I had when I heard about this yesterday.
Nothing - literally NOTHING - has changed since Sandy Hook. It's so devastating how little our government cares for us, for our children. The US does not give a damn about what happens to us. They don't give a damn about me, you, or your children.
I remember when Sandy Hook happened. I remember Umpqua, Stoneman Douglas, Las Vegas, too many fucking more, and now Robb Elementary. I was young when the majority of these occured. It's not normal to have anxiety going to school and university. It's not normal for college students to tense up and freeze when a door slams too hard down the hall. It's not normal to have a detailed plan for when a shooter enters your vicinity. It's not normal to see that 19 children have been murdered by an automatic weapon that is so easy to gain access too.
This should not be normalized.
The 2nd ammendment was written a million years ago by old white men in powdered wigs. They did not have AR 15s in mind at all. The Constitution was meant to be rewritten every couple of years. We have yet to change it or revise it since 1787 (235 yesrs ago).
Gun lovers can go fuck themselves. You love your guns more than you care about the life of another human being. You care more about a clump of cells more than a living, breathing 10 year old child.
Thoughts and prayers don't do anything for these people. Thoughts and prayers will not bring their children back and it will not stop mass shootings from occuring.
I am so angry for these families.
This country failed these children and their teachers. This country failed these families. This country failed again and continues to fail every day by not having appropriate gun control.
0 notes
neverasafespace · 6 years
Text
2nd Amendment
A well regulated militia being necessary for the security of a free state; the right of the people to keep and bear shall not be infringed.
It is our right as American citizens to own and carry firearms and that right is to be left untouched. This amendment was designed give the people the power to protect and defend themselves from others and a government tyranny. If the time comes, it is our duty to come together as a militia to fight against a tyranny, therefore if we get our guns taken away then we will be unable to maintain our freedom. Instead of taking away guns or implementing strict gun laws, there should be a more thorough background checking system that is equal across the entire united states and required firearm safety courses. It should be noted that there has not been a mass shooting by a NRA (National Rifle Association) member and that should reflect the mentality a vast majority of law abiding, gun owning citizens.
“Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” (The Declaration of Independence)
To protect your life and liberty, you have the right to own guns and if guns and sport shooting/hunting make you happy, then you should be left unbothered. It is your right to own guns and use them in a respectful and moral matter. Safe use and owning of guns is protected by the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, the two documents that make the United States of America that free country it is today.
225 notes · View notes
tatertotsforsupper · 3 years
Text
This guy has some interesting thoughts about the 2nd ammendment and WHY we have it.
I know you’ll probably just brush over this post and call me a redneck hick or something, but I’m going to put the time to give an actual response to this because I think it’s very important that people understand why the Second Amendment is so important.
The use of this trite ‘drones’ argument is to suggest that America’s military power is far too powerful for the people to defeat, thereby making gun ownership for defense against Government tyranny unnecessary. The idea that the one with the bigger stick always wins is a common mistake. People often forget how the country started with a bunch of traitors and revolutionaries who were able to defeat the immensity of the British military.
If this argument was taking place in the 60’s, people would be shouting ‘napalm’ rather than ‘drones’, and yet napalm did very little in stopping the US from being defeated by a bunch of rice burning, pajama wearing, tunnel dwelling
Vietnamese. And speaking of pajama wearing, what about Afghanistan? You go find Al Qaeda and tell them about ‘drones’ and they will be quick to remind you that they were able to drag the US into an eleven-year, unsustainable war, the cost which helped lead America to an incredible financial crisis. If a bunch of cave-dwellers struggling with the cocking handle of Soviet-era AK-47’s can keep a war going for eleven years, thinks of what well-educated, well-armed, partially experienced American citizens could accomplish.
The point is not that you can win pitched battles against a modern professional military with all its weaponry as a ragtag citizen’s militia with small arms. The point is that you can fight.
You can bleed them. When the US Army come patrolling through your neighborhood, you might be able to take a few of them with you. Hell, you might be able to run away and do it again and again- theoretically, you wouldn’t be alone, and they couldn’t possibly engage in endless manhunts for every single person who dared to resist them. And they’d never feel safe, with the possibility of a sniper behind every window.
Of course the Army could call in artillery and air support to just level your neighborhood. What would this get them? Well, it would piss off a lot of people off when innocents die, and play into the hands of the rebels. It would make a lot of soldiers in the professional military seriously consider whether they were doing the right thing or not, whether they were on the good guys’ side. And finally, it would simply kill innocent people.
A drone strike might look effective when shooting at some desert hut, but that wouldn’t translate well to domestic, civil war. Every citizen the Feds bomb is one less taxpayer, one less worker, one less consumer. Every building is one less factory, one less office building, one less residence. Every bomb the Feds would drop on its own soil and people is destroying their own precious resources. Hardly a sustainable way to wage war. Every bomb dropped also invites more and more revolutionaries. If you thought civilian deaths in the Middle East brought outrage here, think about what American civilian deaths would bring.
Let’s say that two-hundred people gathered outside the Pentagon, protesting and screaming for blood? What is the Government going to do, bomb their own military installation? How is that drone going to stop an unarmed protest,
or even effectively distinguish between an unarmed protest and an armed one? How will that drone confiscate weapons and apprehend major revolutionary figureheads? Its been said before and I’ll repeat it, police states need police. Grunts on the ground. And that grunt is in for a bad day when he is head to head with an equally armed American citizen behind every door. In a few seconds, a simple Google search can show you all the shortcomings of drones and how one could combat them.
Further, this argument ignores the human element. Killing rag-heads video game style is one thing, but how is that drone operator going to feel when he is forced to drop bombs on his own countrymen? His brothers and sisters and friends. How quickly are those politicians- who we are so quick to call slimy and self-interested- going to switch sides to save their own skin? Even without this almost certainly occurring variable, military and police amount to a few million while civilians equal hundreds of millions. The military and government could not possibly just kill everyone who resisted them. Nobody wants to rule over a nation of corpses.
The aim of a tyrant is to control, not to kill. What they want is to be able to have militarized police point guns at people and cow them into submission to whatever dictates they might want to impose. If those people are instead waiting behind their doors and ready to shoot first when the jackbooted thugs come around, they’ve already failed.
So the point is to fight. If you resist, you’re not being controlled, and you’re also undermining attempts to control others who can’t or won’t fight; you might die, of course. That’s more or less why Patrick Henry famously said “Give me Liberty, or give me Death!”
As long as people can resist, they can be free, and tyrants can never succeed. But when you’re talking about people who have no firearms using swords and knives and clubs against modern military weapons it actually becomes pointless, because you can’t bleed them at all- they’ll just gun you down.
Finally, even if the Federal government and military were infinitely more well-armed and the chances of victorious revolution against its tyranny was one in a million, so what? Should we just give up without even trying to fight and submit to the jackboot of tyranny? What ever happened to Live Free Or Die? Aren’t our freedoms worth fighting for no matter the odds; are they not worth dying for?
The people who wrote the Second Amendment understood what Government oppression was. They knew what revolution entailed. And they understood that the American people may have to do something similar to what they did to ensure they remained free. So they made sure guns would be available for all citizens. But the main reason their ownership should continue is not to fight a war, but to prevent one. The Second Amendment protects the rest of our rights, and is a constant reminder to the Government that an act of unwarranted aggression against its people can be swiftly retaliated against. Ultimately, its not about guns. It is about liberty.
That’s why having guns is so important.
Put in simpler terms:
A fighter jet cannot stand on street corners and enforce no-assembly edicts.
A fighter jet cannot kick down your door at 3:00 in the morning to search for contraband or anti-social propaganda.
A fighter jet is useless for maintaining a police state.
Police are needed to maintain a police state. And no matter how many police you have, they are always out-numbered by the people, which is why tyrants throughout history have considered it vital that police have automatic weapons, while their subjects have nothing but sticks.
But when every random pedestrian might have a Glock hidden in his waistband or by his bedside, kicking down those doors suddenly becomes a lot riskier, lest you catch a bullet on your way in.
2 notes · View notes
ameasureofpower · 3 years
Note
Considering what this covid vaccine actually is (a synthetic mRNA sequence designed to rewrite your cells' protein synthesis thus permanently altering your dna) I don't mind them keeping it to themselves.
(No need for anonymity. I don't attack people for disagreeing. I actually love polite discourse as I might learn something new. Plus my blog isn't followed by a ton of people or anything haha.
Is this more a statement against the use and making of the vaccine itself or a concern that other countries may not have the technical/mechanical know-how to replicate it?
If the latter (or either, really), my argument stands that people should be given the opportunity (or choice) to defend themselves against this global threat (lol, yes, I am in support of the 2nd ammendment as well it seems, you got me there). If there are gaps in capability or education we should aide in the filling of those gaps rather than refuse them the knowledge. Help lay out a foundation from which they can build any sort of house they want, so to speak.
Plus, we (1st world counties) do not have the monopoly on educated people or the possibility of growth, and I think it is a disservice to assume that countries living with subjectively worse social environments cannot reach or surpass those same goals we have if given the opportunity. ...Not saying that you, personally, are assuming this in any great manner, but we all have our biases.
I will have to look into how this particular vaccine actually works, but if it does permanently alter one's DNA I'm not entirely fearful of that idea, and I'm not sure if it's anything drastically different from other vaccines and medicines that are already out on the market (I may be wrong. I'm a designer, Jim, not a doctor/pharmacist). I'm afraid a lot of what we actively do and consume in our lives has the chance of doing that anyways. Whether the individual wants to take this vaccine or not is up to them. I'm neither for or against people taking it, though if positive results still come in years from now for it I will increasingly lean towards the "get the vaccine" stance. )
3 notes · View notes
charleewritesabook · 5 years
Text
Personal Moodboard
I was tagged by @boredwriter-16 to do this personal moodboard and was told in the tags that I didn't have a choice 😂 but that's ok because I love things like this and I love her.
Since most of us prefer a degree of personal anonymity and I don’t have a mental image for y'all…
Post a moodboard w/ 9-10 images that reflect your personal aesthetic, then share 3 details about your choices. It’s our very own writeblr take on a self portrait.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
To be honest, I had a hard time picking because most of the time I'm not even sure I know who I am but I think I got as close as possible with these.
1. So the first four pictures are who I am as a person. I am first and foremost a Christian and that is one of the most powerful pictures I've seen in a long time. Then I'm always rambling and forgetting what I was saying or where I was going with things, I'm also an aspiring author and an artist.
2. The next 2 pictures are things that matter to me, this would have been a lot bigger of a section except tumblr says I can only have 10 pictures per post. The thin blue line one is for police support, which is what my future career will be, and then of course the second picture would be support of the 2nd Ammendment and guns in general. This section would also have had something for friendship, food, freedom etc.
3. The last four pictures are things I like, so Oceans, Reading, Storms and German Shepherds!
I'd say sorry for the long post but I'm not so I'm gonna tag @annaalexiswrites @winchester-with-wings , @noodle-mum , @benallen-author and whoever else wants to do one. It’s pretty fun putting these together, so you should try it and just say I tagged you.
2 notes · View notes
emmapokelily2 · 7 years
Text
Random post 2- The gun control debate
So I always see lots of arguing about gun control. Some people believe every person should own a gun; whilst others believe no one should have them. Those are both pretty extreme, and I personally believe the solution is something in the middle. Something that aligns with a society's beliefs and values. For this reason, there is no simple answer to gun control. What may work for one country might not work for another. It is so annoying to see something like "omg you want to restrict access to guns! You must be a dumb, uninformed Liberal!"; or "Ban all guns in America, they only kill people! You filthy redneck Republican". I'm definitely not an expert, but here's my take on the subject.
I live in Australia, a young country in a quiet corner of the world. Around 20 years ago, 35 people were massacred at Port Arthur. The government's solution was a gun buyback scheme and strict gun laws across the nation. Since then, there have been 0 mass shootings.
I'm not suggesting that America does the same thing. The Australian Government could afford to buyback around 643,000 firearms at a cost of $350million. I have no idea how many guns there are in America, but economic times aren't that great and I doubt the government could afford it. More importantly, it is not something the majority of Americans would support. Guns are seen as a right and most people use them responsibly. Australia doesn't have a 2nd Ammendment, and statistics show that 80% of people supported stricter gun laws after 35 people were shot. I heard a joke that when the government wanted to buy back guns, Australians were like "Eh fair enough mate. I'll buy me some nice snags and a cold stubbie" (nice sausages and a cold can of beer).
And that's the key difference: guns weren't a part of our culture. Trying to ban guns in America is like trying to ban beers in Australia! It's not possible and would never be supported. We do have a bit of an alcohol problem, but that's a discussion for another topic.
According to my American friend, gun laws are reasonably strict. He assures me there's plenty of background checks etc, and a few restrictions on some of the stronger stuff. My bias belief is that there should be a few more restrictions, but that's just me. There are plenty of other countries that have access to firearms and get along perfectly. Why then, does America have the highest rate of gun related deaths?
The solution isn't to restrict guns, but to tackle the problems in society. What makes someone want to shoot a whole bunch of innocent people? What causes a burglar to break into someone's house? Perhaps its partially due to lack of funding for public education and healthcare. Maybe its to do with gangs, drugs, unemployment, minimum wages, or any other number of things! I don't know the answer, and I'm pretty sure there would be world peace if crime could be solved so easily.
In conclusion, the culture of an area is just as important as laws when it comes to public safety. No matter what your view on guns are, we're all striving for freedom and safety.
[Feel free to contact me or comment on this post if you would like to add your opinion! I'm just a random person voicing my thoughts :) ]
6 notes · View notes
thewilytouchstone · 7 years
Text
Repeal the 2nd Amendment
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
This amendment was written at a time when the United States did not have the standing Army we have today. Local militia were the best solution for a rapid response to foreign aggression. The reliance on citizen-soldiers to act in the nation's defense was understood as the only reason this ammendment was ratified.
We do not live in that world anymore. The United States fields the most powerful, largest, most technologically-advanced military in the world. We have no need for common citizens having easy access to weapons; and those who do wish to serve their country without being full-time soldiers can join the Military Reserve or National Guard.
The 2nd Ammendment serves no practical purpose in the modern world. The only people who cling to it are arms dealers and their supportive organizations seeking to profit from the public's fear and paranoia, militant extremists or war-mongering nationalists who are delusional enough to think small groups of armed civilians could possibly stand against any modern military force, and fear-mongering politicians seeking to sway voters through political terrorism.
I am absolutely not saying we should ban and confiscate all guns, because most people who use them for subsistence hunting and athletics (like target shootng) are highly-responsible and respect the inherent dangers of these weapons. Markspanship can be a fun, empowering exercise that promotes mental agility and boosts self-confidence. But we should never forget that brief adrenaline rush comes from holding the power of God in your hand and the ability to decide who lives and who dies on a whim.
The fact of the matter is that private ownership of firearms of any type has increased the number of domestic shootings (accidents, suicide, etc.) while simply failing to prevent the assults and home invasions the pro-gun lobby insists they are the only solution to. Also, there is absolutely no practical reason for a private citizen to own a weapon that's sole purpose in its design is to murder as many people in as short a time as mechanically possible. The brutal efficiency of assault weapons cannot be understated, and the mass shootings of late are enabled by the ability to legally aquire some of the most brutally-efficietly weapons ever produced.
What I am saying is that it is time we dismantle the "gun culture" that pervades the United States, and striking down the cornerstone of virtually every pro-gun argument would go a long way towards that end. It would be the most hard-fought political battle of our country's modern era, but by no means is it the only step we should take. Reviving the assult weapons ban, increasing the scrutiny and categories of red flags in background checks, establishing a national database of legal weapons holders and licenced arms dealers, and making weapon training and certification more extensive and mandatory nation-wide (because it shouldn't be easier to get a gun and permit than it is to get a driver's liscence) will go a long way to making our nation safer.
My family has a long history of civil service, including generations in law enforcement and the armed forces. Many in my family own guns and are taught how to use them from young ages. However, we are also taught this simple truth: "Guns are designed to kill quickly and efficiently, and that is their only real purpose. Everything else you do with it serves to reinforce that truth." If we insist people be allowed unrestricted access to a death machine for any purpose, then as a responsible society we owe it to the peace and security of our citizens to find a better, safer solution to that purpose.
2 notes · View notes
stephenmcelroy · 5 years
Text
16 States that support your 2nd Ammendment Right.
View this post on Instagram
🇺🇸Swipe left to see the @nationalrifleassociation list of 16 Constitutional Carry states!🇺🇸 When Gov. Matt Bevin (R) @govmattbevin signed legislation Monday to eliminate Kentucky’s concealed carry permit requirement he brought the number of constitutional carry states to 16. Constitutional carry, or permitless carry, as it is also…
View On WordPress
0 notes
kidsviral-blog · 6 years
Text
‘Just joined the NRA': Musket Morgan, other gun-grabbers inspire new memberships
New Post has been published on https://kidsviral.info/just-joined-the-nra-musket-morgan-other-gun-grabbers-inspire-new-memberships/
‘Just joined the NRA': Musket Morgan, other gun-grabbers inspire new memberships
http://twitter.com/#!/txgril/status/281613822526124032
Whoops! Despite the best efforts of ghoulish gun-grabbers like Michael Moore, Joyce Carol Oates, Marg Helgenberger and Piers “Musket” Morgan to demonize gun ownership, the NRA reports a significant surge in membership.
The National Rifle Association, while staying mostly quiet in the immediate aftermath of the mass shooting in Connecticut, has registered an average of 8,000 new members a day since the tragedy, an NRA source told Fox News.
Not surprising. The Obama administration announced its new focus on gun control and senators were quick to crank up the anti-gun heat after the shooting massacre in Newtown, Conn. The result? An Obama stimulus that finally works as gun store shelves empty and lines stretch out the door.
Citizens take self-defense seriously, and some say they were inspired to join the NRA this week after anti-gun zealots threatened their Second Amendment rights.
@joycecaroloates due to morons like you, I joined the #NRA yesterday
— Ron Looker (@ronlooker) December 18, 2012
I have been putting it off for years. no longerI just joined the @nra and so should you!!! FUCK YOU!!! @piersmorgan membership.nrahq.org/forms/signup.a…
— Political Smackdown (@PCsmackdown) December 20, 2012
@piersmorgan today I bought a new gun, and joined the #nra
— Parker (@sweetbeardbro) December 19, 2012
@piersmorgan Joined the #NRA because of your #DUMB A$$! Life member now!Join the #NRA now!
— Garrett (@GarrettUSA) December 20, 2012
Well done, Joyce! Kudos, Musket Morgan! We’re sure the NRA appreciates your fine work. And those new NRA members are far from alone:
I Just joined the NRA. They are working to protect our 2nd Amendment rights.Please join if you have not already done so.
— Tamara Hughes (@tamarasrbc) December 20, 2012
Joined the NRA as life time member.
— MC (D – Lawndale) (@moderncomments) December 20, 2012
Today I joined the NRA. Why? Because I found my 2nd amendment rights coming under increasing fire.
— Melv (@therealmelv) December 20, 2012
I am re-joining, I let it lapse after death of husband.“@minerjp: I just now joined the NRA, which shows you what kind of mood I am in.”
— Sylvia (@BamaLady10) December 20, 2012
Joined the #NRA today! #tcot #ISupportTheSecondAmendment
— Kevin A. Henry(@KevinAllenHenry) December 19, 2012
Joined the #NRA today, gotta contribute to a group standing up for common sense and the 2nd ammendment.
— Erik Knudsen (@erkknudsen) December 19, 2012
Been putting it off, but seems like now’s the right time. Just joined the #NRA.
— Harbs (@cgharbison) December 20, 2012
I just joined the NRA. Join by phone special, $25 for 1 yr. Help in the fight for2nd Amendment rights. Call 1-877-NRA-2000 now.
— tanalee (@tanalee) December 19, 2012
ICYMI: Why I joined the #NRA in the wake of #Newtown.tinyurl.com/cruafra@nra #tcot @erikrush @michellemalkin
— Christine Whitton (@1Strawberrygirl) December 20, 2012
Yay me!! I just got a promotion & joined the @nra.Good day.
— ….. (@MzInvestigator) December 19, 2012
Gladly joined the #NRA this morning! I’m sick of Moronic ppl saying horrible things/wishing death on law abiding citizens!@nra @erikrush
— Christine Whitton (@1Strawberrygirl) December 19, 2012
I believe in protecting the constitution.That’s why I joined the #NRA today; to protect against the hippies trying to trample our rights.
— Nick Seal (@donkey5) December 19, 2012
Yeah I joined the NRA today! They are the only ones trying to protect our rights! Guns don’t kill, people do!
— Twangville (@ToddCaster) December 19, 2012
Just joined the #NRA in solidarity with the 10s of millions of law-abiding gun owners who DID NOTHING WRONG.
— Bobby T. (@Briganto) December 18, 2012
@kurtschlichter I’m a gun owner but not a “gun nut”. But this gun control hysteria pisses me off, so yesterday I joined the #NRA.
— Gumby (@gumbysteve) December 18, 2012
Just joined the #NRA for the first time in my life. Woop!
— Leah(@gopfirecracker) December 17, 2012
Even people who don’t own firearms bristled at the attacks on gun owners and were inspired to join the NRA in support of liberty.
I have never owned or even fired a gun in my life, but I just joined the #NRA. This isn’t about guns. It’s about freedom on so many levels.
— Brian Lerch (@bdlerch) December 19, 2012
Today, I joined the #NRA – I have never fired a gun, nor do I own one nor strive to own one. I do, however, love our Constitution. #tcot
— Kyle (@kps427) December 20, 2012
The message is loud and clear: Americans won’t stand for freedom-stomping gun-grabbers using a horrific tragedy to advance their anti-liberty agenda. And they won’t sit idly by while those who defend freedom are threatened and demonized by holier-than-thou politicians and celebs.
Related:
Celebri-ghoul Michael Ian Black jabs Coulter, ‘Founding Father fetishization’; swoons over Musket Morgan
Bette Midler asks how much more death we’ll have at the hands of House Republicans
Post-Newtown, Cher calls for Walmart boycott over gun sales
Musket Morgan: ‘Can buy AR-15s at supermarket’; Loesch, happy warriors dole out well-deserved drubbing
Foster the People front man preaches on guns: ‘Wild West mentality was over 100 years ago’ and stuff
Self-serving ghoul Bloomberg: ‘Make gun control Obama’s top agenda,’ absurdly claims ‘only happens in America’
Joyce Carol Oates: My hope for violence against NRA members wasn’t ‘ironic’; ‘I meant this seriously’
Actress Marg Helgenberger: ‘One can only hope’ NRA members get shot
Joyce Carol Oates: If enough NRA members get shot, ‘maybe hope for legislation of firearms?’
If you teach your kids to use guns, celebri-ghoul Vince Neil doesn’t want you at his shows
Post-Newtown witch hunt: NRA president and members bombarded with death threats
Anti-gun vulture Michael Moore swoops in, says NRA hates freedom, wants children dead
Disgusting: Lefty celebs crawl out to politicize Newtown, Conn., tragedy
Execrable ghoul David Frum mocks victims of Conn. school shooting; Update: Eric Boehlert, Piers Morgan join in; Update: Michael Moore swoops in
Read more: http://twitchy.com/2012/12/20/i-just-joined-the-nra-musket-morgan-and-other-gun-grabbers-inspire-new-memberships/
0 notes