Making a separate post for this post:
From the top down, command clones handle the punishment and oversight necessary to maintain unit/battalion cohesion. Their authority means their praise and critiques weigh more in general than that coming from a lower ranked clone (doesn't mean that your buddy calling you a good soldier is totally useless, obviously).
They can mandate interventions and reconciliations, and they approve/deny transfer requests. Command clones are just as much a brother of the battalion as every other clone, but in the way that a parent is part of a family.
Command clones also lead many of the chants, marching, mourning, and victory songs clones sing before, during, and after battle. Morale starts with the commanders the same way (most) orders start with them.
In this sense, they're keepers of the culture and cohesion because they lead the battalions. There's a general (unspoken) guideline about the standard practices of a clone battalion, and each commander might have their own take on it. The ones who win a lot will sing more victory and march songs. Battalions focused more on relief might sing less mourning songs. Some might follow the commander's lead/lack thereof regarding interacting with civilians.
The medics take a fundamentally similar position to the commanders in regards to keepers of the culture. However, in many ways theirs is a more narrowly-focused, intimate series of interactions due to the nature of their job. Medics are the first witnesses of death, culturally. They can determine who lives or dies, and they have to do so with a keen sense of practicality and impartiality. They have to be level headed, fast, and efficient the same way a command clone must be.
But also, the medics are sworn to secrecy (another unspoken understanding of their job). They hear the ramblings of delirious, injured, semi-conscious, and sleep-walking clones. Troopers confess fears to their squads and then their medics, if need be. Even if a clone doesn't explicitly say what's bothering them, it can be inferred: jitteriness, seeking pain medication for long-healed injuries, seeking sleep aids, avoiding certain qusetions about certain injuries, etc.
So medics maintain cohesion on a more physical, but also more emotional level than command clones. Both roles are equally important! But they're different. Clones will go to their squadmates, their sergeants, and the medic before they resort to a command clone, who necessarily has to take a formal and more clinical (for lack of a better word) approach to conflict resolution since they need to keep everyone in line.
58 notes
·
View notes
In Medstar II, Jedi Healer, the book opens with the following scene:
This is a memory Barriss is having of a prior mission, and it's a scene I can't get out of my head. Why? Well, first cause it's an amazing scene, and I love Barriss Offee so much, but second because I can't help but contrast it to her actions in "Brain Invaders"
Now, let's be real. OOC, her actions are absolutely because the writers didn't think that hard about it, and they wanted a cool parallel to Order 66. But I'm more interested in looking at this through an in-character perspective here. Specifically, how much her actions in "Brain Invaders" must have haunted her later.
See, that passage from Jedi Healer is essentially proof that Barriss normally would be expected not to kill Lt. Trap. And that's something I think Barriss would have been all too aware of after the whole Ord Cestus mission wrapped up.
Her actions here make sense. I doubt anyone would truly fault her for what happened here— again, Lt. Trap did pull a blaster on her, and he's absolutely got the size advantage in that fight as well. It makes sense that she did what she did, especially when you consider the fact that she's been fighting in a war.
But would Barriss blame herself? Personally, I think so. After all, she'd know very well that she could've done better. She'd know that this didn't have to end how it did. And— if we're bringing The Wrong Jedi into this— it wouldn't surprise me if canon Barriss ended up resenting the people around her for not blaming her as well.
(She killed one of Ahsoka's men— someone who Ahsoka said was a friend! She panicked, and instead of using the Force to push Trap off her, she used it to grab her lightsaber and gut him! Why is everyone acting like she didn't do anything wrong?)
(Yes, I am absolutely fucking grasping at straws right now for my post order 66 Barriss fic, I know that, shushhhhhh. Trying to make canon actually work is DIFFICULT OKAY. CANON IS COMPLETE AND TOTAL BULLSHIT. BARRISS DESERVED BETTER.)
52 notes
·
View notes
Debunking more myths in the GFFA: the Jedi and the clones.
I wrote a post debunking the various myths about how "the Jedi condone slavery", a while ago. Something I had omitted (because it's such a big topic) was the following two statements that concern the clone troopers' relations with the Jedi:
"The clones were genetically bred to have accelerated growth, so they're technically child soldiers."
"The clones were slaves of the Jedi."
Both the above statements are inaccurate, let's explore why.
"The clones were child soldiers"
Let's get the easy one out of the way first, because it's a logic that cuts both ways. If age is our only determination of the maturity of a Star Wars character, then Grogu is not a baby. He is aged 50, and is thus a middle-aged man.
Who cruelly eats the babies of a woman...
... and knowingly tortures animals for his own sadistic pleasure.
Of course, I'm kidding. Grogu's none of the above things.
The narrative frames him as a cute baby who does innocent baby stuff. Him eating the eggs is played off as comedic, as is him lifting with the frog. To this day, some fans still call him "Baby Yoda".
Conversely, despite the clones being 10/14-years-old, their actions, behaviors, way of thinking, sense of humor, morals etc, are all those of an adult.
Like, Ahsoka is technically older than Rex in this scene.
The scene doesn't portray them as peers, though. This isn't written as "a teen and a tween talking". No, Rex looks, acts and behaves like a grown-up and is thus framed as such by the narrative.
You can make the argument "they're child soldiers", but (unless you're doing so in bad faith) you'd also have to argue that "Grogu's an adult".
"The clones were the Jedi's slaves"
Nope. For all intents and purposes, they're in the same boat as the Jedi, who George Lucas stated multiple times had been drafted to fight in the war.
Again: both the Jedi (monk/diplomats untrained for fighting on a battlefield) and clones (literally bred en masse only to fight) are being forced to fight by Palpatine and the Senate.
Though, on paper, the clones were commissioned by Jedi Master Sifo-Dyas, it was actually done by the Sith (who either manipulated or assassinated Sifo-Dyas then stole his identity, depending on the continuity you choose to adhere to). The rest of the Jedi had no idea these clones were being created.
So while the clones are slaves... they're not owned by the Jedi.
They're the army of the Republic, they belong to the Senate. This isn't exactly a scoop, they refer to the clones as something to purchase...
... and manufacture.
As far as the Senate’s concerned, clones are property, like droids.
Like there's a whole subplot in The Bad Batch about this very point: after the war, the clones are decommissioned and left out to dry because they literally have no rights, they served their purpose.
The only trooper to ever canonically blame the Jedi for the clones' enslavement is Slick, who the narrative frames as having been bribed and manipulated by Asajj Ventress into betraying his comrades.
Also, the only canonical Jedi shown to ever be mean, dismissive or mistreating the clones in any way, is Pong Krell.
And it's eventually revealed he’s in fact a full-on traitor, hence why the story frames him as an antagonistic dick from the moment he's introduced. He doesn’t represent the Jedi in any way.
We know this because the other Jedi we’ve been shown are always prioritizing their clones’ lives over theirs, if given the chance.
Finally, if we wanna get even more specific... as Commander-in-Chief of the Grand Army of the Republic (GAR), the clones belong to Palpatine.
Palpatine who is a Sith Lord.
Palpatine who arranged for the creation of the clones and had them all injected with a chip that would activate upon hearing a code-word...
... and forced them to murder their Jedi without hesitation or remorse.
When you bear all that ⬆️ in mind and when you read this quote by George Lucas...
"The Jedi won't lead droids. Their whole basis is connecting with the life force. They'd just say, 'That's not the way we operate. We don't function with non-life-forms.” So if there is to be a Republic army, it would have to be an army of humans."
- The Star Wars Archives: 1999-2005, 2020
... narratively-speaking, everything falls into place.
Sidious knows that:
If he orchestrates a war designed to thin the Jedi's numbers, corrupt their values and plunge the galaxy into chaos...
If he wants to draft the Jedi - peace-keeping diplomats who’d never willingly join the fray - to fight in his war...
... then the only way they won't resist the draft and abstain from fighting is if they think joining the conflict will save lives.
So he creates a set of cruel, sadistic villains for them to face, opponents who will target innocent civilians at every turn...
... and instead of lifeless droids, he prepares for the Jedi an army of men... living, mortal people who, despite being well-trained, will be completely out of their league when facing the likes of Dooku...
... Ventress...
... Grievous...
... Savage Opress...
... or the defoliator, a tank that annihilates organic matter.
Thus, in order to save as many clone and civilian lives, the Jedi join the fray despite knowing that doing so will corrupt their values.
And as the war rages on, a bond of respect is formed between the two groups.
Clearly, the Jedi don't like the fact that the Republic is using the clones to fight a war, but for that matter, they don't like being in a war, in fact they advocated against it.
However, it's happening regardless of their issues with the idea or personal philosophies. Said The Clone Wars writer Henry Gilroy:
"I’d rather not get into the Jedi’s philosophical issues about an army of living beings created to fight, but the Jedi are in a tough spot themselves, being peacekeepers turned warriors trying to save the Republic."
And bear in mind, the Jedi are basically space psychics, the clones are living beings that they can individually feel in the Force...
... so the Jedi feel every death but need to move on, regardless, only being able to mourn the troopers at the end of every battle.
We see this in the Legends continuity too, by the way.
(that is, when the writers actually try to engage with the narrative)
Also, if you ask the clones, they’re grateful the Jedi have their backs.
When Depa Billaba voices her concerns about how the war is impacting the Jedi's principles, troopers Grey and Styles are quick to make it clear how grateful they all are for the Jedi's involvement:
So the clones aren't the Jedi's slaves. If anything, they're both slaves of the Republic (considering how low the Jedi's status actually is in the hierarchy).
Only I'd argue the clones have it much, much worse.
The Senate sees the Jedi as "ugh, the holier-than-thou space-monk lapdogs who work for us"... but a Jedi has the option to give up that responsibility. They can leave the Order, no fuss or stigma.
A clone trooper cannot leave the GAR! If they do, they’re marked for treason and execution. Again, they’re not perceived as “people”.
And it doesn’t help that the Kaminoans, the clones’ very creators, see the troopers as products/units/merchandise. A notion that the Jedi are quick to correct whenever they get the chance.
How The Clone Wars writers describe the clones' relationship with the Jedi.
George Lucas hasn’t spoken much about this subject aside from the quote from further up. But to be fair... the Prequels aren’t about the clones’ dynamic with the Jedi, so it makes sense that he wouldn’t talk on that subject so much.
He did mention that part of The Clone Wars’ perks is that he could:
“Do stories about some of the individual clones and get to know them.”
But that’s as far as it gets.
So for this part, I'm just gonna let Dave Filoni, showrunner of The Clone Wars and the upcoming series Ahsoka, and TCW writer Henry Gilroy - both of whom worked closely with Lucas - take the wheel. They make themselves pretty clear on how the clone/Jedi dynamic is meant to be viewed.
Here’s Henry Gilroy:
"In my mind, the Jedi see the clones as individuals, living beings that have the same right to life as any other being, but understand that they have a job to do."
"The clones see the Jedi as their commanding officers on one hand, but also, at least subconsciously, they look to them for clues to social/moral behavior."
"Some clones may find themselves getting philosophical leadership from the Jedi that helps them answer some of the deeper questions of life."
"We thought this was a great opportunity to show how the Jedi interact with clones. Specifically, Yoda in a teaching role of the clones, who were socially new, who kind of grew up— who were created to fight, and he really broadened their horizons and helped them realize there was a great big universe out there that was bigger than just fighting and killing."
And here’s Dave Filoni’s comments:
"I truly believe that the Jedi try to humanize their clones and make them more individual, as Henry says."
"I think we saw that in Revenge of the Sith, when the Clones were colorful and named under the Jedi Generals, and then in the final shots of the film with Palpatine and Vader near the new Death Star, the ships are grey, the color and life is sucked out. The Stormtroopers are only numbers and identified by black and white armor or uniforms in A New Hope."
"The soldiers have become disposable to the Emperor."
"That is something the Jedi would never do."
"Yoda teaching the clones much like he taught Luke. ‘Cause that was kind of natural for [the Jedi], a natural instinct to take to these clones like they’re students."
None of the above quotes from two different writers of The Clone Wars, who had many interactions with George Lucas, frame the Jedi and the clones’ relationship in a negative way.
How much more proof do we need that "the clones were slaves of the Jedi” isn’t the intended narrative?
My point being that while the clones' ordeal is indeed horrible, the Jedi have nothing to do with it. The narrative of The Clone Wars always frames it as the fault of the Sith, the Senate and the Kaminoans.
If you go by the intended narrative, the Jedi were the clones' teachers and brothers-in-arms. The clones and the Jedi were not just comrades.
They were friends.
2K notes
·
View notes