Visit Blog
Explore Tumblr blogs with no restrictions, modern design and the best experience.
#terf
aristocat98 · a day ago
Text
homophobes (both conservative and liberal ones) be like “lesbians are ok as long as they’re not actually gay <3″. “it’s ok to be a lesbian as long as you resist your sinful urges and date a man whose soul you love :)” “it’s ok to be a lesbian as long as you would accept a partner with a dick :)” fuck yourselves tbh 
178 notes · View notes
yooterus · 3 days ago
Text
Hi everyone. I know it has been a very long time since I've popped in. But I need to share this with you.
I know it's almost the holidays and money may be tight, but there is a butch lesbian in the middle east who seriously needs our help.
I can't say much out of her safety, but she is in a place where god only knows what could happen to her if anyone found out. She is a very good of mine and it would mean so much to me if you donated to her Go Fund Me to help. The goal is only 5k but I wanna see this go big. The GFM tells her entire story as well.
To vouch, @cowboyjen68 put it together for her.
Please, share and donate. She needs it.
163 notes · View notes
celibate-wizard · 2 days ago
Text
so its wrong to refer to women as women when discussing abortion rights, yeah? so you wanna call us womb-havers, mensturators, etc?
well what about the women like my mom, who had to get a full hysterectomy after i was born? she’s not a menstruator. she’s doesn’t have a uterus. so she isn’t affected by women’s rights laws anymore? 
it really just goes to show how performative trans activism is. if you really cared about giving women (yes, women) the right to control their own bodies, then you would be able to see past your own fragile identity and instead use your efforts to fight for the vulnerable women who are currently terrified as their rights continue to be taken away. 
look, i have no doubt that trans men and women are struggling in their own minds. but to shift the focus back to themselves in the midst of a women’s rights movement is just insanely narcissistic and shallow. 
73 notes · View notes
Text
hey libfems! daily reminder that most currently existing women are TERFs for your standards! if your feminism demands violence and abuse against an overwhelming majority of women then your "feminism" is no different than plain old misogyny dressed in progressivism! have a delightful day!
33 notes · View notes
scullyrf · 2 days ago
Text
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Just the usual TiM being a fucking creep. Tired of knowing that these motherfuckers are allowed to walk around with their dick and balls bundled up in a thong, but women can't go to a grocery store for vegetables without being afraid of being raped, kidnapped, or murdered.
34 notes · View notes
killedthecliffracers · 2 days ago
Text
When transwomen complain about the laws in certain countries that say you have to medically transition to have your legal gender changed. And say it's the peak oppression and "forced sterilization of trans people". Especially infuriating cause hot take but the ability to reproduce is not a human right plus you chose to transition now suck up the medical consequences luv
23 notes · View notes
Tumblr media
something something receipts anyway pick better insults or smth
19 notes · View notes
silurisanguine · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
And to those who say, but second hand books and read them, what about the one who buys a second hand book, reads it, thinks wow how awesome is this i need to find more and starts supporting JK not knowing what an terf asshole she is.
You are still perpetuating the fandom.
It does make me wonder if she was a homophobe, racist, facist etc whether her 'fans' would still be like - but you can support the art but not the artist' ( EDITED to be clearer. If she was as OUTWARDLY public about her racism, homophobia, anti Semitism etc) She isnt like Lovecraft who everyone knows he was a racist bigot. He is dead, his work is known for it's time but it's not affecting current policy, like JK Rowlings work IS.
Tumblr media
The UK anti trans bills that came in were also a direct result of HER LOBBYING PARLIMENT.
38K notes · View notes
aristocat98 · 21 hours ago
Text
I hate how manipulative the TRAs are with all that “we’re not saying you have to like penis, but you could examine the underlying reasons behind your repulsion (...)” or “why don’t cis gay men at least consider having sex with a trans man (...)” because it’s clear as day that there’s only one acceptable outcome of all this “examining” and “considering”. it’s to find out that actually you were being bigoted, or that you have trauma. then the only “right” action is to psyop yourself against it and start dating penises. it’s not allowed to come to other conclusions, i.e. that you have trauma but you feel comfortable not interacting with the kind of genitalia your rapist had ever again even after you process the trauma, or that you’re very paranoid about pregnancy and don’t want anything to do with dicks even with protection or without penetration etc, or that the way you need to stimulate them is piss annoying to you and you don’t take pleasure in that. not allowed to say you examined but found no logical reason and you just always found them gross and maybe you were born like that. no conclusion that isn’t transphobia and no response that includes maintaining the boundary is tolerated. you’re “not saying I have to like penises” except you’re saying I have to figure out that I’m bigoted and then naturally (for moral reasons) stop being so, and eventually like penises. you’re saying I have to like penises, you’re just allowing me to take extra steps or a little time. how generous of you
52 notes · View notes
tides-moon-wonder · 2 months ago
Text
two rules to live by:
1. if you create a sacred caste of men who cannot be questioned or accused, abusers will do whatever they can to join this caste
2. if you create a group of women it's acceptable to shit on, even when there are valid critiques to be made of said women, men will take that criticism and apply it as viciously as they can to as many women as they can get away with
2K notes · View notes
themanwhowouldbefruit · 21 days ago
Text
PSA cw transphobia
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
wtxch, who is a pretty popular painting/art curator blog, is also apparently a terf 😔 and decided to make a shitty little text post about it today 😔😔 saying that dating trans people is modern day conversion therapy and fucked up shit like that 💀💀💀calling everyone who protests in the comments a homophobe ect 💀 anyway i see a lot of art reblogs from them on my dash and i just wanted to make sure this got seen.
2K notes · View notes
trans--receipts · 5 months ago
Photo
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
WOMEN’S SPORTS ARE NOT A DUMPING GROUND FOR MEDIOCRE MEN
3K notes · View notes
vulva-lacking-losers · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
i do not want to hear men complaining about the lack of representation and support for fat men ever again.
her tiktok is literally two scrolls away from his tiktok, they both used the same sound and both tiktoks follow the same format.
bonus: the men in the first comment section are absolutely convinced that the women praising him are lying, furtherly proving that the biggest enemies of mens body positivity are men themselves
2K notes · View notes
generalchelseamayhem · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Absolutely ghoulish behaviour here from Sarah Ditum, who goes against the words of literally Terry Pratchett's own daughter Rhianna Pratchett, and Neil Gaiman, and Rob Wilkins, among numerous others, to say that we can't know for sure that Terry Pratchett would have supported trans people (even though he only died six years ago and made his views abundantly plain while he was still alive),
and just happens to conveniently ignore the side of the conversation where all the TERFs were saying "He would surely have been GC ('gender critical', i.e. TERF), given that he hated nonsense and I perceive all of this to be nonsense." Funny how their attempt to use a dead Terry Pratchett to prop up a failing philosophy gets absolutely no scrutiny, and instead it's all reserved for the people responding to that inital attempt, who actually knew Terry Pratchett in life, and could quote chapter-and-verse his very well-formed and clearly stated opinions on exactly this subject.
The truth is that no one, not even those who knew Pratchett best, can be certain what he would have thought, because the terms of the row taking place over his dead body were not in place when he was alive.
Yes they damn well were. He died 6 years ago, not 60. Trans people are not new. Monty Python formed an opinion on them which they pitched to moviegoing audiences in 1979. Pratchett had plenty more time than that to form an opinion of his own. And to write it down several times.
Plus, juxtapose THAT statement with THIS one:
Tumblr media
See, not only is she invalidating Rhianna Pratchett et al's opinions and references for what Terry would have thought, she's doing it twice by saying this random other person actually knew him the most.
To cap it all off, she doesn't actually address anything that people actually said about Terry's opinions, just says "weellll, who can say for SURE, you can't apply past standards to the present. Hey, look at this surgeon from the 19th Century (which is totally the same as six years ago btw). Were they trans? Nobody knows. Q.E.D."
Absolutely reprehensible.
2K notes · View notes
aristocat98 · 2 days ago
Text
you know what’s really misguided, harmful and “”unfeminist””? downplaying, questioning and denying coercion, including but not limited to financial, is rape. that not stopping upon learning the partner is unwilling or unwell is rape. that statutory rape, if the adult is more than 2-3 years older than the minor, is always rape. that abuse of a power imbalance is coercion, therefore rape. that abuse of a person incapable of real consent temporarily or constantly is rape. that rape by deception is, in fact, rape. that being subjected to sexual contact in absence of freely given, informed, enthusiastic consent, as long as the other party is old enough to know better, is rape. 
ironically, voices such as “well he didn’t hold you at gunpoint so it was consensual!” or “just because you were on drugs and he wasn’t it doesn’t mean it was rape!” or “she was old enough to know what sex is and she said yes so it’s not rape!” are typically backed up with arguments about downplaying or diluting the “real” rape and disrespecting “real” rape victims. what is “real rape”? 
“real rape” is something we see in media a lot. male, usually a stranger, brutally, painfully violating a woman who’s screaming and trying to fight. “real rape” of this sort  makes up for minority of rape cases. in reality, a good part of sexual assault victims “freeze” during and are unresponsive rather than protesting verbally or fighting back. only about 20% of rape on adult women is committed by strangers. 33% is committed by a romantic partner. at that, for juvenile victims, 34% were family members, only 7% being strangers! how does that relate to the “evil stranger pedophile from the park that your family will save you from” stereotype? it doesn’t. “real pedophilia”, much like “real rape”, is an invention of culture. indeed, a malicious and insidious invention. 
anyone would agree that there’s many kinds of murder. if you suffocate someone with your own bare hands, it’s murder. if you stab them to death while they scream and beg for their life, it’s murder. if you push them under the train or shoot them, it’s murder. if you illegally pull the plug on the machine that kept them alive, break the brakes in their car or purposefully hide their lifesaving drugs, it’s murder. if you purposefully change a number on the prescription so that they take too much of it or purposefully give them stronger heroine without telling them and they overdose, it’s murder. you can murder with a weapon or force. you can murder just with telling them a planned lie that you know will put them in danger. you can murder with changing a number with your pen, perhaps in some situations even by doing nothing when you could easily save someone. because all it takes to murder is to act on a planned intent to directly cause someone’s death and succeed. much like all it takes to rape is to perform sexual acts on a person who you know is unwilling or you can’t find out if they’re not unwilling, or have them perform those acts on you. 
obviously, not all murders are the same, and someone who killed for money or sexual satisfaction, or someone who killed in a sadistic, painful way, may receive a higher sentence than someone who killed for revenge or someone who killed in a way that was painless, but at the core, murder is murder is murder and the victim is dead and won’t come back. would you argue that “my mom was stabbed to death and that guy just switched his meds so it’s not REAL murder”? or “well, he didn’t stab or suffocate anyone, he just turned off their respirators/broke their car and then they died on their own, so it wasn’t really murder”? would you say calling pulling a plug or witholding crucial information from someone “murder” is in fact offensive and disrespectful towards victims who were brutally murdered with a knife?
you wouldn’t. why? because we all know the definition of murder (which affects men far more often than sexual violence) doesn’t have to be hyperspecific. that there are thousands of ways to kill someone. that a painless death isn’t less of a murder than a cruel, painful death. consider: there are reasons why we all know it, but somehow in case of rape or pedophilia, we have those hyperspecific images in our heads. that rape must be done by a stranger or near-stranger, with brute force. that pedophilia only “counts” if the perpetrator is a middle aged male and not the victim’s closest family and the child is prepubescent. do you know who benefits on these hyperspecific definitions? rapists and pedophiles. mainly those in power. because as I said in this post before, a good part if not majority of cases don’t fit those frameworks! so all it does is have the society excuse, downplay, ignore or even not notice those cases, and doubt and blame the victim.
so the next time, before you jump to “well, he was her boyfriend/he just nagged her a lot/she was just drunk and made bad decisions/she agreed at first/she only decided it was rape later” etc etc consider: if she says she was unwilling and the other person could tell and yet continued, it was rape. don’t help rapists, don’t take their side, don’t help them use the cliches created by the patriarchy to push their agenda. side with the victim. side with your sisters instead. 
47 notes · View notes