an interesting lens to analyze pathologic would be through the ways it references commedia dell'arte. part of it is that the conventions of commedia have left a lasting imprint on theatre, puppetry, and performance in general, but i think there are some very specific nods as well.
for an obvious point, farcical character archetypes represented by masks were an essential aspect of the art form. pathologic not only uses that concept in mark immortell's masked plays, it also uses the same two types of masks: a flat mask that covers the face with holes for eyes and mouth (also comparable to ancient greek theatre masks), and a mask featuring an exaggerated, beak-like nose.
i'd say there are also references to the commedia archetypes in the actual characters themselves. for example, i'd be surprised if "vulgar comedies" wasn't an intentional reference:
(i don't have a clear translation of "площадных комедий", the term that clara uses for "vulgar comedies" in russian, but the russian wikipedia page for commedia dell'arte is the first thing to come up when I google it.)
that's not to say i think the game is trying to completely frame dankovsky as il dottore, the laughable caricature of a psuedointellectual. but clara certainly sees him as one! and arguably his characterization is closer to this archetype in her route, as well as in the pathologic 2 haruspex route (mister "i was blessed with a naturally high intelligence", among other hits). these differences are possibly an indication of unreliable narrator.
after all, changeling's route is from the POV of a religiously-fixated teenager who sees the world in terms of stark good and evil, and whose character is bifurcated between pure good and pure evil herself. arguably the NPCs in her route act as elevated, exaggerated versions of themselves due to her perspective. and pathologic 2 leans harder on the "it's all a play" framing device than the original game did, giving the player a role to embody and making NPCs feel more like characters who exist for the purpose of the play (and for artemy as the protagonist) than as fully realized people. hence how in p2!artemy's first and last confrontation with the bachelor, you find him staged dramatically in a room cast in mood lighting as though his sole purpose is to wait there for you to enter. (well, either that or it's just that he's a drama queen.)
at least, that's one interpretation of why he comes off as more of a pompous twit depending on the route. another aspect of commedia dell'arte is that the protagonists often go unmasked, and relatively unexaggerated, compared to the masked villains and comic relief characters. bachelor is the protagonist of his own story, and arguably the deuteragonist of the haruspex route. but in changeling route and p2 his role is more of a bit player among many, cranked up into the role of learned fool.
153 notes
·
View notes
The difference between
"What am I going to do with you, Whumpee?" — Caretaker sighed tiredly.
and
"What am I going to do with you, Whumpee?" — Whumper mused sinisterly.
313 notes
·
View notes
It's Laurel.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but in my quest to collect character trivia, it seems like Yonny is the only Rescue Officer whose reason for joining isn't really explored.
This is just another odd job for Collin.
Shepherd was born into it.
Russ joined out of curiosity.
Dingo was inspired by the Rescue Officer (Shepherd's dad) that rescued him.
Bernard was recruited by Shepherd.
I don't recall any other officer talking about why Yonny joined. Maybe it just goes without saying that a doctor would be an essential member of a rescue team, so there doesn't need to be further elaboration, but I feel like it sticks out since everyone else has a stated reason for joining the Corps, even if it's minimal.
In general, I think Yonny gets the least extra information about him from the other officers. It might be to add a more "mysterious" aura to him to make him a little more threatening/off-putting, because the things that the others do mention about him mostly relate to his dubiously unethical methods of experimentation and odd personality.
Pre-Publish Edit: I recently learned that in Yonny & Dingo's Japanese profiles, it's revealed that they're childhood friends, so I suppose that could be the reason he joined the Corps (and why he experiments on Dingo the most). That said, I haven't found any evidence of this in the English script, so I wonder if there's a piece of unused dialogue in the game about it, or if a line got translated a little differently to omit that information.
There is an End of Day dialogue where Dingo vaguely remembers one of Yonny's experiments on him, causing him to glow, but (as I remember it) there's no indication of when this event might have occurred. Given that the result was him glowing, it would be easy to assume that said experiment was related to the glow sap and thus occurred recently rather than the far past. However, it's possible that this is a childhood memory that's resurfacing.
Post-Publish Edit: That End of Day dialogue does clarify that this event occurred "back home," but whether this meant Giya (the Rescue Corps' planet) or Ohri (Yonny & Dingo's home planet) is not clear.
43 notes
·
View notes
Y'all, I think I've figured it out. Operating on the assumption that the finale is indeed an alternate timeline from the manga, then someone could have written on a page of the Book to rewrite reality to lead to the events of the finale sometime during season 5's events. In other words, this would explain the INCONSISTENCIES with things that were established or at least heavily implied/assumed prior and in the manga: Chuuya being a real vampire and not in control, nothing being planned, Dazai giving sincere speeches, Dazai really being shot and saying his "last words", Fyodor's hand not being injured, soukoku not killing Fyodor while in Meursault because they literally couldn't and Dazai needing Sigma to discover Fyodor's secrets because of that, Fukuchi's goal not being one that relied on Fukuzawa being alive since he clearly intended to kill him, etc etc too many more to count
Events and explanations in the finale feeling so contradictory and out of place, and characters feeling so ooc and not acknowledging any discrepancies, makes perfect sense if you consider that, up until a certain point, this was our canon timeline — until someone rewrote the ending of the arc with the Book, starting with Fyodor injuring his hand...! We only have one example of the Book being used to majorly rewrite reality in the manga, and when that happened, the main players — the ADA members — were aware that reality was changed, even though they did have memories of the new rewritten reality. BUT, Nikolai was unaware of this during that scene, and so also were all law enforcement because of the clause written on the page accounting for that, so what if the same thing could happen in this instance, to prevent all our characters in the finale from being aware that things had changed? We literally saw someone writing Nikolai's dialogue for him; imagine someone doing that during Dazai's final speech in the episode, and during all the rest of it! I don't know who this would be, but possibly a mysterious third party who got a hold of a different page from the Book somewhere and wrote things to turn out this way, because they wanted the ADA to win against Fukuchi and Fyodor? Maybe even because... this is the only way they can win?
Remember Atsushi asserting this plan, and how silly and too simple it sounded? What if someone else ended up doing just that, writing their own simple outcome for the ADA to win (as a narrative of course, which is probably why it had to start with the major catalyst of, again, Fyodor injuring his hand)? Additionally, if that's what happened, maybe the ending of the finale is a sort of side effect to the Book being used improperly in this way, leading to a destabilization of the timeline or a mishmash of other timelines into the anime one, leading to the alternate Fukuchi and Akutagawa we see there?
25 notes
·
View notes