Tumgik
#the gay manifesto
nel-mp3 · 1 year
Text
suck dick, do crimes
0 notes
actually-a-dyke · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
Alternatives to Marriage in A Gay Manifesto by Carl Wittman, 1970
0 notes
soup-mother · 5 months
Text
Chris Dorner proves that the phrase "reasonable people pushed to do unreasonable things" needs the addition of "won't have any coherent ideological backing for any of it and end up defending the structural power that got us here in the first place because they're really just disgruntled centre right moderates with guns"
32 notes · View notes
androgynealienfemme · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
"DYKE MANIFESTO" from The Lesbian Avengers (1992) sourced from Burn It Down! Feminist Manifestos for the Revolution.
66 notes · View notes
gooferdusted · 11 months
Text
samruby is a secret lesbian relationship and if u get it u get it and if u don't u don't. sorry.
80 notes · View notes
paragal · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
Day 7: 30-Day SMP Jack my evil little communist dictator
43 notes · View notes
grozen · 1 year
Text
Fellas. Cosmologically speaking, what the fuck is Martin Septim?
[puts on tinfoil hat]
In Morrowind, Vivec says, that when he dies in the world of time, Mundus, he goes to what he calls "the god place": somewhere where everything happens all at once, but where time does not pass at all. He mentions that when he dies, it feels like he's asleep, but may chose to wake up at any time; however, no matter how long he waits, any time he wakes up, no time has passed in the world of time. This is one of the core concepts of aedric godhood in the TES universe, existing outside of physical time. That does not mean that time stops whenever you ascend to godhood - rather, Mundus is like an MP4 player which a god can put on pause, while already having seen the entire movie and knowing it's plot, and go do something else. Said god may return and unpause the player and come back to reality, or they may travel to another part of the timeline.
Things complicate when you consider that this is a mortal creature that's merging with not just the god of time, but TIME HIMSELF. Akatosh is the grandfahther clock very literally - a very old lizard whose existence as an entity in or outside of Mundus insures the existence of time. So, if one becomes Akatosh, when and how does this merging take effect?
1. Are you de-facto an aspect of Akatosh since your birth until you are "reunited" with the rest of your self? (reunited is a strong word; since everything happens at the same time in the god place and nothing may change, it's as if you have not left)
2. A core concept to Aedric worship in TES is "as above, so below," meaning gods may influence the realm of Mundus, and mortals influence gods. Talos, for example, is a very real divine entity which is undeniable, and Thalmor seek to root out Talos worship, because once a deity is gone from the thoughts of mortals, they pretty much cease to exist. Similarly, Aedric pantheons vary wildly between different races, but all are equally canon and every legend the people tell and believe existed and is just as real as others. Shezarr did find the battlemages in Cyrodill, while also being Shor, who created Sovngarde and worked alongside Akatosh, while also being trickster god Lorkhan, who tricked the gods into giving their power to create Mundus and was shot down by Auri-El, while also being Sep, who was a serpent created by Tall Papa in order to control the overpopulating spirits. Does that mean if, hypothetically speaking, Martin was regarded as a divine same as Tiber Septim was, Akatosh would take on Martin's appearance?
3. Blessing of the dragon blood is given by time himself, and many Dragonborn have the gift of Sight - they can see into the future, and also into the past. In fact, Uriel VII, Martin's father, was one such Dragonborn.
4. Literally what the fuck was inside the Chim-El Adabal (the big red crystal in the Amulet of Kings) that can make a Dragonborn take on the appearance of Akatosh? Can we just talk about that for a second: there are many theories about what it may be, from an Ayelid soul gem (WHO IS INSIDE THE SOUL GEM??), to a droplet of Lorkhan's blood, to the blood of Akatosh, and the fact that there is no consensus terrifies me.
In conclusion, Martin Septim may or may not have been Akatosh himself, charading as a mortal either a) because the old reptile got bored in his terrarium, or b) nobody else was competent enough to solve the Oblivion crisis, and the God of Time foresaw everything and had to step in. This is now my headcanon. I'm now friends with Akatosh. Fuck you Mehrunes he was actually a really cool guy.
I'm gonna lie down.
84 notes · View notes
a-gay-a-day · 10 months
Text
The Asexual Manifesto
Tumblr media Tumblr media
The first misconception that many people have is that the asexual manifesto discussed asexuality as we might today. This is not so.  During the late 1960s- early 1970s, the feminist community was experiencing the rise of radical feminism and political lesbianism, and the asexual manifesto was tied closely to the emergence of these philosophies. While radical feminists at that time believed that having sex with men was degrading, and thus they would choose to be lesbians (political lesbianism), another school of thought emerged, from which the asexual manifesto was born. 
In the asexual manifesto (Which you can read here, and I would greatly encourage reading, as it is fairly short) Lisa Orlando, the writer, says that “interpersonal sex is not an instinctive behavior pattern; it is a behavior pattern we have learned to use for the satisfaction of a need...,” which speaks of sex with anyone the same way that radical feminists were speaking of men in that time period.
The most commonly quoted line from the asexual manifesto is “ We chose the term “asexual” to describe ourselves because both “celibate” and “anti-sexual” have connotations we wished to avoid: the first implies that one has sacrificed sexuality for some higher good, the second that sexuality is degrading or somehow inherently bad.” 
Though this is a longer post, I want to get across the idea that the asexual manifesto is complicated. It may have been written by an asexual person who was attempting to understand herself, or it may have been written by a political asexual, similar to political lesbians. Furthermore, it is important to note that this cannot be dismissed due to the fact that it was written by a radical feminist. A radical feminist in the 1960s had different views than a TERF does now, and though some of those views are still ones we would consider outdated today, they are nonetheless an important part of queer history. (There will be another post later on about political queerness and second wave feminism, as well as a post centering on Lisa Orlando.) 
Regardless of whether the asexual manifesto was intended to be wholly political or if it represented the thoughts of an asexual woman, it struck a chord with many people. Greg Turner, a gay rights activist, read it and reported that it shed light on his own feelings about sexuality- he considered himself “gay, but not homosexual.” 
For a nuanced view of asexual history, I would recommend this episode by @queerasfact​ . They do a much better job of delving into the nuance of the asexual manifesto, presumably because they have an hour and not six paragraphs, which is already twice as long as most of my posts. This post is also less sourced, because the academic sphere is woefully devoid of asexual history.
15 notes · View notes
hiraeth-daydreams · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
RIP "Sniper"/Kaname Hagiri the twinks and lesbians of tumblr would have loved you
6 notes · View notes
daeluin · 9 months
Text
ok but really the part that always gets me the most about miss missing you is the second verse:
"now you're gone, but I'll be okay / your hot whiskey eyes have fanned the flame / maybe I'll burn a little brighter tonight / let the fire breath me back to life"
and the idea of patrick of working on this song during the hiatus and shelving it because it's not *his* solo song. of the imaginery of meeting someone else when you're a kid and them igniting a passion in you just by being there and believing in you so fiercely. of drifting apart of that person but that passion, that fire remains and maybe it's enough to keep you going on your own. because they may have feed the sparks inside you enough to turn them into a wildfire that can sustain itself without them. you don't need them anymore, you never did (except you did, maybe) because that fire is all yours but you miss them. and you miss missing them. and you hope maybe you can burn bright enough to keep yourself alive
and then in a funny twist of fate or a well constructed story you can't finish your song because it's not yours. not really. it's not finished until you get back together. and finally it's that burning passion that gets you back together and it's only when you're with your band that finally you can burn as bright
13 notes · View notes
actually-a-dyke · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
"Marriage" from A Gay Manifesto by Carl Wittman, 1970
1 note · View note
ghosts-of-love · 10 months
Text
excuse the pisspoor photo quality but these were some of my favourite parts of The Faggots & Their Friends Between The Revolutions (Larry Mitchell, 1977)
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
11 notes · View notes
professuntothelord · 7 days
Text
i really would 250k word a post finale fix it with doom patrol. i truly would
2 notes · View notes
parkitaco · 8 months
Note
it is in fact looping plausible deniability o’ clock
Tumblr media
THIS IS THE CAT I WAS TALKING ABOUT YEEESSSSAASS okay. that’s going to be me (positive connotation)
HELPPP i looked approximately exactly like this cat while writing it glad we're on the same page
6 notes · View notes
androgynealienfemme · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
“The Woman Identified Woman” from Radicallesbians (1971) sourced from Burn It Down! Feminist Manifestos for the Revolution.
14 notes · View notes
villainanders · 2 years
Text
I think when people try to set hard and fast rules about how to write representation it falls apart really quickly. For the longest time (and still currently) I’ve see “It’s fine for people not in X group to write characters in X group, but as long as they don’t try to write about being in X group” being passed around like it’s an uncontroversial golden rule, but almost just as frequently you’ll see other members of those groups pointing out that if a privileged author writes a marginalized character and doesn’t consider how living with that marginalization would affect the character, you’ve often written pretty shallow, shitty representation. It’s very much more a YMMV issue than these discussions give it credit for because gay people and trans people and people of color and disabled people and any other marginalized group are not a monolith
24 notes · View notes