Tumgik
#this is like not even considering art theft as an involved concept to this situation
Note
JSYK that in the club video with the statues was made by a TERF (OP of your reblog reposted it and isn't the TERF in question)
this gave me something to mull over last night.
at first its like,, usually if it’s like a random meme or fandom reference (as opposed to regular-degular terf rhetoric stuffed under a ‘funnie joak’ coat) and the deplatforming is done, it’s basically any average post. which is the function of reposting. but.
i dont really like thinking too hard these days if im being honest. but that video in particular, while neat, is her actual artwork. i suppose because it’s not some random post or benign tweet and its like, her actual work,, i dont think the ‘my post now’ gag works as intended in the situation where it’s the person’s actual artwork that they created. i cant articulate why because my brain is made of cranberries rn but thats my vibe. so im deleting it cuz i dont want it anymore.
anyways i appreciate these messages, as always.
30 notes · View notes
legionofpotatoes · 3 years
Text
alright here’s ma thoughts on that flick I mentioned
we hatewatched a*my of the dead because we were CONVINCED “zombies in las vegas” would be an impossible concept to screw up, but in so assuming we obviously invoked a holy wager with the universe and got reminded, once again, that hoping for improvement from someone who’s dependably put out bad art is never a wise choice 😐
but we were honestly kinda roped in by the marketing??? and expected a goofy fast-paced flick with the odd traditional undead metaphor thrown in, framing some sort of relationship drama maybe or hell even nothing at all! we’d have taken pure indulgent storytelling, idk italian job with zombies in las vegas, I don’t know fucking anything but??? whatever this was???? spoilers below for it is time for One Of My Rants
I mean the main reason I really want to write all this and complain. this film here probably has the most unappealing cinematography I have ever experienced in my life and that is saying something. who the fuck signed off on that CONSTANT shallow-ass depth of field that imprisons your eyeline and turns every shot into bokeh paste???? and I mean every shot almost!!!! I promise if you think I am overreacting just throw a dart at the seek bar and watch twenty seconds from wherever it lands. it is horrifying to look at. at least it gave my girlfriend a good visual shorthand for what it’s like when I lose my glasses
why was sean spicer in this movie. did they pay him to be here. was sean spicer paid hollywood money for his scene in this film because fuck everyone who was involved in that decision
the legitimately baffling hints at the extraterrestrial origins of the infection that went absolutely nowhere and had no dramatic or plot-level bearing. we love to see the franchise sprouts fellas
yet another big budget waste of everything hiroyuki sanada has to offer. and bautista too I guess? I like him but man was this an odd career move
what was the crux of his conflict/resolution with his daughter btw. I understand it was rooted in miscommunication over their forms of grief irt mom but uhh… it was all rather clunky and didn’t land for me. I tried I really tried to buy in but something was wrong fundamentally with the groundwork there, it did not click and their catharsis felt unearned. I know there’s massive amounts of tragic baggage being projected there from the author so I’m not slapping any judgment down really;
but again it would be an easy thing to wave off if they just had a vibrant cast of lovable simpletons with good chemistry and the kinetic sense of plotting the trailers promised (and this premise never discounts good drama, either). but instead it was just two and a half (!) hours of meandering into situations the filmmaking instincts had no idea how to flow in and out of
to wit. I know talking about “bad pacing” is associated with armchair bullshit but consider the example of the scene were dieter does an out of nowhere little dance after childishly screaming but then still-killing a zombie, with the film framing this as a micro character triumph, and not a second later the bg soundtrack instantly fades into an orchestral score dramatizing a nearby mcguffin reveal, completely 180 degreeing the tone without a semblance of deft insert shot stitching or even I dont know a fucking jump cut maybe. now imagine this whiplash for 2.5 hrs uninterrupted
I will keep complaining about the length yeah because this was not a story requiring this much real estate to be told. Uhh in my humble and personal opinion, of course
[man sees zombie tiger] “this is crossing the line!” you can in fact write dialogue that is not utter nonsense that falls apart once you drill down its single fickle layer of referential meta winking. what line are you talking about. you have rules in this insane situation you’re in? total nitpick moment I know but it got burned in my brain for some reason. like a microcosm of the mismanaged dramatic instincts paired with weird writing that dots this movie. I am sure the director calls this either satire or genre deconstruction. I am SO sure
tumblr domino meme that goes from “dude getting sucked off while driving” to “entire las vegas literally nuked”
tig notaro is always great to see but once you know she’s been filmed as a separate greenscreen plate months after photography wrapped - cause she had to apparently replace some abusive asshole but that’s a whole other pig not worth fucking - it becomes impossible to unsee her odd detachment from everyone else in the movie lmao. it doesn’t really “ruin” anything on its lonesome but it is hard to unsee
why. was. sean. spicer. in. this. movie
a very simple key ingredient missing from fully turning lip service sympathy for main uruk hai dude into actual empathy that would generate meaningful conflict with hero family would be to spend a bit more time articulating what he internally wanted the most. because he was obviously trying to do something here with pointed agenda. a family, to have kids, build a caste system, save his wife’s head, return to his planet??? all of these could represent the bigger context in his psychology that spurred his vengeance but none of them are dramatically emphasized long enough for you to cheer him on. I’m not asking too much I promise. Articulating interiority of a mute character is pretty doable with deft cinema language, just gotta linger and hold a shot here and there for a few seconds, frame as his POV, donezo. I know this is also one of those like. “who cares” moments but the movie does, very evidently so, in making this guy an actual character. you can kinda piece it together and create a framework of sympathy for him, sure, but then again he ultimately becomes a foil to be killed and not defeated, so. Ehh whatever
quarantine zone stuff was not a wildly childish covid allegory quarantine zone stuff was not a wildly childish covid allegory quarantine zone stuff was n
the rooftop helicopter fakout at the end was such an ass-backwards, manufactured moment of what could be a simple setup/payoff it just pissed me off??? you gain nothing by giving sad dad five seconds of pointless crisis that flips right back to previous status quo ANYWAY, except for a weaksauce waste of runtime, which could be used instead to get inside notaro’s head and actually SHOW the remorse form as she took off, literally maybe even a frown playing on her face as she’s headed for safety right before we cut back to drax and the kid. just a simple-ass, minimal, momentary setup for what is the most basic filmmaking trick of creating macro catharsis moments. Just???? g o d if you can’t even land that shit why are you even doing any of this
that lil run final pam did was very very charming and super choreographed in a way that was the tiiiniest bit overdone
the whole intro with the simul-backstories and posing with family photos was just… oddly motivated. what was the goal? “here’s what we’re fighting for” vignettes? why? it’s not a functional setup in that vein. what was all that
also I am sorry if this is insensitive but the reasons most characters end up articulating to justify going back into the hell that destroyed their lives makes them sound seriously insane
I dont like complaining about CGI (honestly) but so much of it in modern movies can achieve higher fidelity if the animation is simply subdued. Do not overengineer and over-apply 2D cell methodologies and kinematics to each tiny twitch and movement in a hyper 3D model and I promise you. it will look a thousand times more natural. look at thanos in those last two movies. your rendering and detail are absolutely perfect with the tiger you just have to let stuff sit instead of constantly simulating swaying hair strands and firing off all facial muscles at once. great moment at one point where makeup zombie horse and CG zombie tiger are both in one shot together and just by unnecessary amounts of movement alone you can tell who doesn’t belong. again; detail, rendering, compositing, lighting, all picture-perfect; but y’all just gotta let the animation breathe sometimes, and chill it out
plot holes don’t really matter to me but it was kinda funny how lilly decided not to mention the enormous wrinkle in intel pertaining to an actual territorial tribe of intelligent zombies that require human offerings to let you pass, just so that reveal could play out in real time through the joyous punishment of the cartoonishly misogynistic dude
total chad move for mister uruk hai and final pam to rule from a rusted swimming pool complex
the ending with vanderohe oh my god. with the. cash stacks at the airport register. and specifically them working in his favor. that is literally something you do to get arrested under suspicion of theft. it was almost played for laughs and I respect that. coulda been goofier. make these movies goofy ya dorks
anyway, weird, weird movie. bad marketing. message unclear (something something sins of the father???), baffling editing instincts, literal worst-looking cinematography I ever laid eyes upon. Confidently dying on that last hill
9 notes · View notes
bloody-cute-yandere · 3 years
Text
Hello I have written a dissertation about a phrase I hate
Two Wrongs Don’t Make a Right?
 So I guess to start off this train of thought, I should explain what started it. I love listening to commentary channels on YouTube. They ARE my reality TV, except they seem to cover more important topics. One of the commentary channels I follow is CreepShow Art. I have listened to her videos for quite some time, and while she doesn’t show as much by way of scientific or empirical evidence in her videos, I do feel she is a pretty credible source because she does reference public posts as evidence for her claims, and a lot of what she talks about is readily fact-checkable. Over the past few weeks Creepshow has made a few videos about another youtuber Without A Crystal Ball (who I will abbreviate to WACB for brevity), who is another commentary channel that allegedly has questionable research tactics and reporting skills. She also is prone to being defensive and seems to have the mindset of “any criticism is hate”. Creepshow made a video first about how WACB had dug around in an inappropriate way to gain information about Tati Westbrook and then reported her findings in a more skewed way, which ended up painting Tati in potentially an unfairly negative light. WACB responded….. badly to the criticism she received from Creepshow and other channels that criticized her. She, among other things, went onto a livestream of another channel and doxed Creepshow in the chat. Also, potentially unrelated but someone has allegedly been repeatedly attempting to hack Creepshow’s social media platforms, along with several others that criticized WACB’s behavior. WACB also sent an email to Creepshow where she insinuated that Youtube itself was pushing the entire conflict between the two of them to be handled privately, but were watching the issue at hand. Creepshow responded by showing the email to her audience, which did include showing the email WACB used to reach out to Creepshow. WACB became upset that she had been “doxed” by Creepshow (though it is worth noting that the exposed email address in question happens to be attached to all of her social medias, and not any private information).
               During WACB’s most recent response to being “doxed” she used the idiom “Two wrongs don’t make a right”, and I have been stewing on that particular idiom ever since. I’m sure that isn’t an unfamiliar phrase for most people reading this, but for those that haven’t heard it before, it runs akin to the idea of not stooping to someone else’s level when in an argument. The idea is that if someone hurts you then you should be the bigger person and not react in a bad way, because that won’t help the situation become resolved. To a certain extent I believe this idea is absolutely correct; if you want to resolve a situation with another person, you don’t want to make the situation worse by lashing out if they’ve done something to you that is hurtful, because then you just have more hurt feelings you have to resolve in the process of moving forward. However, this idea also hinges upon two crucial truths that must exist in order for it to apply. One: that the two people involved in a disagreement must or want to resolve the conflict at all, and two: that the first offense is not an act done with malicious or cold-hearted intent. It also depends on a moral compass that is entirely determined by outside influences as opposed to an internal value system.
               The first assumption “two wrongs don’t make a right” depends on is the idea that both party members do actually want to resolve their current disagreement. If the two people in the middle of an argument are emotionally close (or tied together in other ways) and no one in the situation wants to (or can’t) cut ties with the other person, I would say that this assumption is valid. In the case of Creepshow and WACB, however, this is not the case. According to Creepshow they don’t know eachother. Speaking frankly, this means that there is no relationship that needs to be protected. One could argue a necessity for professional courtesy seeing as how they share the same platform and roughly the same content ideas, however the Youtube platform is so vast already that two single small to moderately sized channels having a feud shouldn’t in any real sense have any effect on the other’s job. In a more general sense, if person A cases a fight with a person they don’t know very well or don’t interact with much, there is no social consequence if person B stoops down to person A’s level (whether or not there are legal repercussions is a separate issue). Neither person A nor person B will have any sort of ripples in their own separate circles as a direct result of the negative exchange because their individual social groups will be biased to agree with their persons’ interpretation of the events. The social distance will also save person A and person B from any future unpleasantness through the mere virtue of anonymity.
A similar argument can be made for people who have no interest in maintaining a relationship they had previously had with each other; even people who had been previously close to eachother can decide to break contact with each other over egregious offenses. In these cases, there is less care about whether you’re behaving in a “good” way because you have no investment in the relationship progressing. In either scenario, it doesn’t matter if you stoop low in an argument if you’re willing to accept the consequences of that behavior, or if there won’t be any appreciable consequences for that behavior.
               The second truth that “two wrongs don’t make a right” depends on is that the first offense is not a heinous vindictive one. For example, Doxing. Doxing is the illegal spread of personal information to the public. The act of doxing can leave the victim severely vulnerable to more violent crimes such as stalking, theft/ mugging, rape and murder because their location or other personal information is now known to people that may be willing to cause them physical harm. It’s a dangerous and illegal act. Other potential heinous actions from person A include any other illegal activity (such as assault or other forms of violence, theft) or can be something that technically isn’t illegal but is a severe breaching of boundaries or someone’s own comfort level. If you know someone personally you probably know things that would really upset them, and the act of going through and performing those actions KNOWING that they will be upsetting to your victim is cold-hearted and cruel. At that point in a disagreement, person A isn’t trying to resolve a problem, they are simply lashing out with the sole purpose of destruction. That is not constructive, nor is it ok. In these cases such as these there’s a high likelihood that person B will no longer want to associate with person A if they originally did. example: I knew a person a long time ago that was TERRIFIED of gnomes. They hated them. So, what would happen if at some point this person and I got into a disagreement and I decided to give her a garden gnome as a present? It wouldn’t be illegal by any stretch; it’s a gift. However, it’s a gift that the person would have HATED, and I would have known that. Between them and I it would have been a declaration of war, not a peace-making offer. Furthermore, it would have been proof that I was willing to use this person’s personal deep fears that they confided in me out of trust against them; even if our relationship survived the original disagreement it would probably never be the same. Who, in that case, could really blame this person if they responded in kind? It would be a human response and, in a way, I would absolutely have deserved it because I had breached her trust in an unforgivable way.
               At risk of this becoming a dissertation, I happen to especially dislike the idea of the person who committed sleight A being the person to scream “two wrongs don’t make a right” after person B responds to them in the way that WACB responded to Creepshow. To me, that seems like person A is trying to put themselves on a pedestal of superiority, despite the fact that they hurt person B first. “I know what I did was wrong, but you’re not supposed to hurt me back! Two wrongs don’t make a right!” Person A is just trying to avoid consequences for their actions at that point. Because really, what happened to “treat others the way you want to be treated?” I know this begins to sound victim-blamey, but what right does a person have to be upset for (not really) being doxed after they knowingly decided to dox someone else? They’ve already shown that doxing is definitely something they’re ok with, so if they’re going to argue that the original doxing wasn’t a big deal, why is it suddenly a big enough deal to them now that they are the victim of it? I hate hypocrisy like that.
My final note on “two wrongs don’t make a right” is that the entire phrase depends on each person in the disagreement depending on an external source for their moral compass as opposed to having their own internal value system. Morality is, overall, an incredibly gray concept in any society. It is informed by each person’s individual moral ideals which can come from religion, family values, upbringing, influences from social idols and more. Even universal truths like “murder is wrong” become smudged quickly when ideas about self-defense are considered (which becomes even murkier when you begin to question what sorts of actions require “self-defense”). This means that there can be vastly different views about what is and is not ok about any particular topic within one society. There will also be some people that have a very strong internal moral compass within that society, and some people that depend more on the community to act as their compass. If a person who uses an internal moral compass to guide themselves, then they will behave in a manner that falls in line with that compass regardless of how their peers may respond. If, however, a person does not have a strong internal moral compass, their behavior will be largely influenced by those around them because they depend on that social structure to guide their behavior. For someone that has a strong internal compass that they rely on, the idea that “two wrongs don’t make a right” probably won’t have much value to them, because their morality is already determined regardless of what the people around them may say. If person A does x to them, then person B’s moral sense will determine what is and is not ok to respond with, and whether others say that response is right or wrong is irrelevant because they already believed they are justified in whatever response they had. For a person that relies more heavily on their peers for their moral compass, however, “two wrongs don’t make a right” might sort of work as an appropriate guide because it comes from an external place to encourage what socially would be considered “good” behavior, though that itself then depends on what is considered “right” and “wrong” by the surrounding populace, which has already been established to be a bit of a crap shoot.
Overall (and I cannot stress this enough), I don’t believe that a disagreement of any sort should come with responses like doxing or assault or theft or a breach of trust like the examples I gave above. I believe that all people should strive to be better and act with dignity. I always try to act as though everything I do will be posted online for the world to see, and if I wouldn’t want to receive the backlash I could get for a particular action then I tend to not do that thing in the first place. I also believe that hypocrisy is one of the more disgusting personality traits someone can have. If someone doxes another person, clearly they believe that doxing is a justifiable action, and to then have that person be upset when someone behaved in the same “correct” way (As far as person A has shown of their moral values), that is just plain gross. Don’t do to other people what you wouldn’t want done to you, and also don’t be surprised if you’re not the only person willing and capable of lashing out at your level if you decide to stoop low. If you don’t want to give someone else a pass, then don’t deign to believe that you deserve some kind of special allowance to stomp all over others.
2 notes · View notes
dragonmaiden79 · 4 years
Text
Sir Knight, Taj
Introducing, Madame Tajira
People left Vesuvia in droves after the horrendous situation involving the palace and word spread like wildfire, traveling with the survivers and bystanders alike, plummetting the country into poor conditions. Abandoned businesses and homes meant suffering economy, with land becoming cheaper and cheaper to encourage people to move back or stay; It had become destitute and were it not for the Magician, the Lovers, and the Fool's constant support and efforts, nothing would have remained. The Countess had no supporters left.
"Serves her right, doing this to me..." Said the bitter, homeless former Count as he read a discarded news paper in an alley. He crumpled it up and tossed it away, ducking behind a few trash cans to avoid the royal guard as they marched by.
He had been lurking in the shadows since begging wasn't feeding him enough, turning to petty theft. The shop and store owners became fed up in a matter of weeks, and had reported his worthless ass without a second thought. He scratched at his patchy beard and looked at his worn, dingy clothes. Suddenly the concept of wearing all white became incredibly overrated. "No one in all the history of mankind..." he grumbled to himself, slinking from back alley to back alley like common trash. He slipped in a puddle of Lord-knows-what and screeched indignantly. "Has ever suffered as I am now!!!" He growled, gritting his teeth as the cool, foul smelling liquid seeped into his pants.
"Hey, wasn't that-"
"Oh, that was definitely him."
It's too bad Lucio was so horrible at being inconspicuous. The rapid clang of metal approaching didn't allow him time to dwell on his miserable fate and he quickly staggered to his feet, trying to find a place to hide. It was at this moment that the worn leather heels that he had refused to give up upon his banishment broke, sending him careening to the ground. The last thing he remembered was the feel of cold cobblestone against his face and the metal clang from the knights armor as they surrounded him.
A splash of ice water snatched him from his unconscious state. He looked around frantically, realizing that he was flanked by a knight on both sides, each holding onto a chain that was coiled around his body. He immediately began to rant and struggle. "What the hell is this!? I can take you both--"
"Settle down, Count Lucio." Said a smooth, sultry female voice.
He followed the sound of the voice upwards to a dais, where a petite woman clad in armor stood looking down at him. More careful inspection made him realize that she wasn't alone too; There was a semicircle of about 11 chairs a behind her, all except 1 occupied by very regal and well dressed individuals with decorated faces masks, and head pieces.
"...Or I should say, former Count." The woman continued speaking. "Yes... The former Count of a bastardization of a country. It's a shame what you have been reduced to."
Lucio growled.
"Judgement will be enacted here, today, on you, dear Lucio. You are charged with several counts of theft, threats, harassment, and even a couple of physical assaults due to your behavior involving my lovely citizens. Your testimony begins now. My council will then take a vote based off of your word and your word alone, leaving me to consider their opinions before I make the final decision. How do you plea?"
"Not guilty!" He shouted, "Your townspeople are so stingy and selfish! You'd think they'd help me out, but no!"
The woman laughed shrewdly, glancing over her shoulder at the council members. "Okay, Lucio. While you do seem adamant in your stance, there are a few specific charges that I must ask you about. Did you steal food from any of the local vendors?"
"I would hardly call such gruel 'food'!"
"Did you get into a fight with a man whom you claimed to be 'being greedy' because he bought what you considered an excess amount of fruit and refused to share with you?
"Who eats THAT much fruit?"
"Did you threaten or menace at any children for teasing you on the streets?"
"Those brats were asking for it! They're lucky I didn't tan their hides!"
The woman fell silent for a brief moment. "Is there anything else you would like me to know, Count?"
"Your backstreets are filthy, these chains are awful, and --"
"About your case, Lucio."
"Nope. Clearly I've done nothing wrong. So whaddya say? I'm done now, right?"
She laughed shortly again. "Very well then. Regarding the testimony of the accused, Grand Council, how say you?"
One by one each elaborately decorated Noble rose and stated their verdict, which turned out to be unanimous. "Guilty."
"Mmhmm. Duly noted." She nodded. "Count Lucio, if you'll look to your left you'll see that carved into the white stone walls of this arena is a lion. On the opposite side, to your right is a bull. These are permanent symbols of the two houses that came together to build this country and comprise it's nobility. As such, I am to adhere to the laws set by each house in my position as acting Princess of Pierreblanc."
She leapt elegantly from the dais and landed a perfect summersault in the center of the arena, approaching Lucio slowly until she stood before him. "You have a stunning lack of discipline and are completely irresponsible, which means that the short-comings that riddle your life are rooted in your childhood. Therefore, where other people have failed you, I shall succeed. You will be properly trained and imparted with the skills and knowledge to function as a productive member of my society."
She gestured to the lion carving. "Through the dignity and authority on my left side," and then raised the other hand to point to the bull. "Partnered with the magnanimity and valor of my right... This is true justice, for the ignorant cannot be properly tried." Her voice echoed throughout the arena. "Have you any legitimate way or reason to contest my judgement?"
His eyes widened in a mix of fear and shock. "What are you on about? You aren't going to let me go!?"
She laughed, far too amused by Lucio's attitude to correct his manners. "Then I shall make my ruling immediately. I, Princess Tajira of Branch Et Serpentium, declare that you, former Count of Vesuvia 'Lucio' Montag Morgasson, be sentenced to indefinite full-time etiquette training with Most High advisor and royal tutor, Giles Christophe. Guards, that will be all."
***
The Guards escorted Lucio all the way from the arena to the fantastic display of architecture that was the Pierreblanc Palace. The stones that composed the building were bright white and perfectly polished, making them reflect every color of the rainbow and giving the entire thing an ethereal quality. There were many slick curves and perfect arches that gave it a unique silhouette and the gates were twinkling gold. Even Lucio was stunned into silence.
Awaiting him there was a clean cut purple haired man and a team of six maids.
"You may release him." He said to the guards that held Lucio's chains. "Quickly now, he desperately needs to be bathed and fed." They wasted no time in heeding the orders, finally removing the biting metal from the former Count's wrists and neck.
"I am Giles Christophe and by royal decree you are my responsibility from this moment on. I will ensure that Madame Tajira is satisfied with your reformation, but for now we will escort you to your personal quarters and attempt to make you presentable at once. Understood?"
"Great! Finally some proper treatment around here."
Giles merely frowned his disapproval. The Princess told him that he'd have his work cut out for him in even before her officers had made the arrest.
**
"He's kind of a bimbo, but if anyone can fix him, it's you."
"If you don't mind my asking Madame, why not one of our traditional corrections facilities?"
"Ah, yes." She had said, lounging in her tub full of sweet smelling bubbles, a bath girl feeding her small slices of fruit. "It's gotten very stuffy around here, so he will be a breath of fresh air- A ray of sunshine even! Just fix him up a bit." She said, waving her hand dismissively. "He is nothing to be concerned about."
**
Giles shook his thoughts away as he lead Lucio to his quarters, the maids in tow. "Her Majesty has personally selected and furnished this room for you." He said as he opened the door and gestured in.
The room was gorgeous; the farthest wall of it was made entirely of sliding glass doors, which opened up to huge balcony tiled in sparkling opal. The bed was a magnificent piece of art and the centerpiece of the room. It was low sitting and round with a blue chiffon canopy that extended from the ceiling to veil it. Much bigger than a king sized bed, it had no defined head or foot board but instead carved polyhedron railings to stand in their places.
Lucio didn't have much time to admire though, as he was then led out of a pair of double doors within the room. Exiting, he noted that suddenly he was two maids short. It went outside to a tall stone staircase that led down to a what appeared to be an empty pool. There were towering white and gold marble lion statues on each side of it. "Her taste isn't half bad! Much better than her attitude." He said to no one in particular.
Giles exhaled with annoyance, "Ladies, if you'd please." He said to the maids as he moved to a bench that sat near the pool, sending them into perfectly practiced action. They all disrobed to reveal different variations of soft, elegant curvature that could only be described as uniquely female and split into teams of two. One set used magic to get themselves atop the lion heads; Completely synchronized, they put their hands together as if meditating and water began to flow down from the mouths of the lions, and into the pool. In conjunction with them, the others began quickly undressing Lucio, leaving him bared from his rags in a matter of moments. "My, my ladies, one at a time..." He remarked, as if he wasn't in desperate need of care.
Little to no maintenance had been done to him since his eviction from Vesuvia so his skin was sunburnt and dirty, not to mention his overgrown facial hair and chipped nails. Even his golden arm had lost all of its luster and most of its magic, making it hard for it to function. His stench was wretched to the noses of everyone within arms reach as well. Certainly he needed to be cleansed as soon as possible. "This water is freezing!" He cried out, as the girls pulled him down few stairs that led into the pool. "I can't bathe like this! Back in MY palace there was hot water!"
"Give them a moment." Giles said sharply, having had his fill of Lucio's commentary.
He winced at the harshness of Giles' tone but, remained silent as the girls in the bath with him hovered their hands over the water, transferring heat into it. Goosebumps began to spread across his skin as the water warmed considerably. Before long, the pool was filled and the other duo had climbed down from the Lions. They moved to the statues' mounts which had hidden compartments that held towels, sponges, soaps, and an assortment of crystals. Each grabbed their own selections, placing them in decorative woven baskets and joined the others in the water.
Yellow and blue crystals were placed about the water, giving it a mysterious green glow with the relaxing energy blanketing the space. As soon as the soothing aura touched every corner of the water, the same girls who had undressed Lucio, grabbed soap and sponges from the baskets now afloat and went to work.
As they scrubbed his skin, layers of caked up dirt and sweat mixed with the suds and permeated the water. He moaned as they went further down, switching to a soft cloth to clean his dick and balls. They were thorough and gentle, massaging and caressing his sack until he was at full attention. A small crystal chair was synthesized with stone magic for him to be seated, so that his hair could be washed. It was so greasy that the shampoo wouldn't lather when the girl- the one Lucio thought the cutest, massaged it into his scalp.
She had olive skin and green eyes, with freckles and black hair. Her fingers felt like magic as they danced across his head, scrubbing diligently until finally, on the third go, the shampoo lathered into a nice foam. He relaxed into the touches of her and her tall, slender partner who had just finished washing his chest and was now seated on his lap, massaging his shoulders. "Ohhh, this is more like it..." He moaned, "Hey, what're your names?"
"I see you're enjoying my girls, Lucio." Came the Princess' voice from the long stairwell. "The one who washes your hair is called Ariella. Zafira is on your lap." She stepped directly into the pool without regard for the thin, loosely tied white robe she wore, carrying a long decorative case.
As the two maidens that prepared the baskets made the glowing water circulate around them, Tajira approached, giving a kiss each to Ariella and Zafira. Slowly, she trailed her fingers down Lucio's golden arm. "Mmm...What magnificent piece this was in your glory days, Wasn't it Count?" He frowned but otherwise made no comment as she let her fingers carefully trace over every detail and intricacy of the arm. "Beautiful, beautiful, beautiful..." She whispered, free hand coming to rest on his shoulder. "Can you feel my touches, Lucio?" He widened his eyes, unprepared for the question.
"O-Of course I can feel it!" He shouted. She raised an eyebrow. "I mean...Well, mostly... Somewhat." He conceded, blushing. "It doesn't exactly work like it used to."
"I didn't think so." Taj said, her own magic bleeding into his shoulder, making it tingle.
"Hey, what are you--!" He began to protest. Suddenly, the golden prosthetic popped off, falling into the water and sinking to the bottom of the pool. "Why did you do that!?!" He cried out in alarm, girls still draped over him. Without a word, she popped open the fancy case that she was carrying to reveal perhaps the most sumptuous piece of work that Lucio had ever laid eyes on.
An arm. Crafted of diamond-- the purest blue diamond. With perfectly sized gold scales and 4 mounted red andesine going up it's shoulder. "I know red is your preferred color, but as you assimilate into the House, I would like you to look the part. I hope it still within the parameters of your taste. Will you accept my gift?"
He ran his fingers over the smooth finish of the diamond underside, to the perfect ridges of the golden scales, and then finally, over the bright red stones that decorated the piece. It even had tiny, fine-line etchings on it. "Yes!" He said with childlike enthusiasm, "I can really have it?"
"Certainly." She said with a glimmer of a smirk. "We will have it attached for you as soon as you're settled."
"Well Tajira, was it?" he said seductive smile tugging on his lips.
"Taj, please." She said. Giles’ small gasp could be heard in the background.
"Taj, then. I am very, very thankful for your present. You know, if there's anything that you want me to do to repay you, I'll do it." He batted his long blonde lashes at her. With his erect cock out and two beautiful women clinging to him, pouting and writhing in place it was incredibly hard to deny...
"Not yet." Taj reminded herself in her head. She bristled in place, eyes having gone slightly hooded and dark as she slowly closed the case for the arm. She loathed denying the throbbing of her nether regions. "No..." She said out loud. "You won't ever have to pay me back."
"What? You're sure?" He asked in disbelief.
"No, no, it doesn't work like that. This my pleasure. Giles, hold onto it for him." She said, exiting the water. The white fabric, now see through clung to her as she approached him, accentuating her thick thighs, toned calves, and perky rump. "Bring him to dinner after you're done in here. I want the Council and House Advisors to see him up close and groomed before you begin the discipline process.
"Yes, Madame." Giles nodded slowly. "You-- You're certain of this choice? To have him before the Nobles without any training?"
"It's not as if they can tell me not to." She shrugged casually. "And it's not as if I will allow them to question your advisory skills, If that's what you are concerned about." She kissed his cheek, patting his shoulder lightly. "Now, I must go dress myself." She continued with a nod. "I shall see you all tonight." And with that, she swept out of the room.
Ch.1 End.
Hope you enjoyed! There will be another part!
5 notes · View notes
yanderedev · 7 years
Text
Art “Theft”
Have you ever heard of Andy Warhol? He was an artist in the 50s~80s. Among other things, he was known for editing portraits of celebrities with different color palettes and arranging those portraits on 3x3 grids:
Tumblr media
Andy didn't take that photograph of John Lennon. All he did was trace over someone else’s photograph with different colors and then duplicated it a few times. Is this "art theft"? No, it's "fair use". Andy significantly changed the original work. By altering the colors, duplicating it, and arranging the duplicates, Andy created something new, something that can no longer be considered the property of the original photographer. It doesn’t matter whether or not he had the photographer’s permission, and the original photographer has no right to claim that his work was “stolen” by Andy. In one of my recent videos, I wanted to quickly communicate the idea that I might add DLC rivals to the game one day. I googled some images, turned them into silhouettes, and put them into the video. Some people have chosen to describe this as “art theft”. I maintain that my use of those silhouettes is "fair use", and now I'm going to explain why. "Fair Use" is judged by five factors: "Purpose and character of use" - The silhouettes appeared for 17 seconds of a 1,040 second long video (1.6% of the length of the entire video) to convey a point about what types of characters might appear in the future as "DLC". Like Andy Warhol, I created something new when I turned the images into silhouettes, arranged them on the screen, and and added voice-over narration discussing the prospect of DLC. My usage of the silhouettes is completely separate from the purpose and character of the original artwork. Because I gave the images an entirely different purpose/character by turning them into silhouettes, arranging them on a screen, and adding voice-over, it is very likely that a judge would rule this "fair use". "Nature of the work used" - A judge would consider whether the images were private (hidden from the world) or public (available to the world). All of the images I used were publicly available images. One was an "adoptable", two were non-profit fan art, and another was promotional artwork for a video game. Because all of these images were public, this increases the likelihood that a judge would rule this "fair use". "The amount of the portion used in relation to the work as a whole." - What "amount" of the artwork did I use? Silhouettes. Not color, not linework, not shading, not facial expression, nothing that makes up the “heart” of the image...I only used one thing - general shape. Furthermore, these are not famous silhouettes (like the shape of Mickey Mouse's head). I doubt that anyone immediately identified any of those images from memory. I am fairly certain that people had to do some degree of research in order to find these images. As I said above, the images appeared for 17 seconds in a video that was 17:20 minutes long. Because I used incomplete replicas of images very briefly in a video that was about a completely different topic altogether, it is very likely that a judge would rule this "fair use". "The future market value of the used work." - 2 of the 4 illustrations were non-profit fan art. Thus, the effect on the market value of those images is zero. The Ace Attorney image was promotional artwork for a game from 15 years ago, and the way that I used the illustration does not prevent anybody from buying the game. The silhouette of the “adoptable” was an incomplete replica and thus its value was not harmed by being featured in a video. Thus, the effect on market value for all 4 images is zero. It is very likely that a judge would rule this "fair use". "Malicious intent." - Is the use of these images malicious? No. I had no intent to cause harm by using these images. I was low on time, I wanted to get the video out quickly, there wasn't enough time to ask one of my artists for illustrations, so I just googled things like "anime policewoman" and then stuck some silhouettes into the video. There is no judge alive that would consider this “malicious”. Let me tell you about a real court case that actually happened. A photographer watched a film and noticed his own photographs in the background of one of the scenes. He tried to sue the film studio for copyright infringement. The judge ruled it "fair use", because the images were so fleeting that you couldn't even identify them unless you made it your mission to identify them. That is exactly what my current situation is (and it’s even harder to identify the original work in my case, because I used silhouettes - “incomplete replicas” - instead of the actual artwork). In short: To call this "art theft", you'd need to have an overly simplistic, black-and-white view of the world, and completely ignore the concepts of "transformative works" and “fair use”. Everyone who is freaking out about this is starting drama just for the sake of having some drama to talk about. This is not a big deal. This is a trivial matter. This is a non-issue. The only reason that anyone is discussing this in the first place is because there's a group of creepy weirdos who scrutinize everything I do and try to portray me as an evil monster. They do not think rationally; their mission is to characterize everything I do as an evil, immoral act. I could sneeze, and they would find some reason to crucify me for it. It’s very unfortunate that there are a lot of gullible people who blindly believe every single piece of propaganda that appears on the Internet. Any rationally-thinking person can plainly tell that the use of the silhouettes is not “art theft”. If I actually do feel that I've done something wrong, then I announce it, I apologize to the person involved, and I rectify the problem. That's what I did in the Nemesis situation: https://yanderedev.wordpress.com/2016/12/30/a-new-nemesis-for-2017/ I'm not going to do the same thing regarding the silhouettes, because I haven't actually done anything wrong in this case. The people who hate me will continue to do mental gymnastics to convince themselves that everything I do is an unforgivable, evil crime. Young children on Tumblr will continue to start drama over trivial, unimportant issues. Every week, there will be a new “nontroversy” that people will get up in arms about. And the world will keep on turning.
2K notes · View notes
katiewattsart · 4 years
Text
03/12/19 : NOTHIN IS ORIGINAL (AND THAT’S OK)
RECAP 
who watches the watchmen?
Ever tried, ever failed
Teddy boys and haul girls
Utopia and dystopia
Nothing is original and thats okay
AIMS FOR TODAY
to begin to think about the concept of originality
to begin to think about the concepts of the cope and how this might impact your practice
To begin to think about the terms pastiche and appropriation 
THE OVERVIEW
1) INTRODUCE
2) THE OPENING ‘HOOK’
3) JUSTIFYING YOUR TOPIC
4) THEORY - WALTER BENJAMIN
5) CASE STUDY- ARTIST SHERRY LEVINE AND RICHARD RAUSCHENBERG
6) WE WILL FINISH WITH A HIGHLY ACCESSIBLE TED TALK BY AUSTIN KLEON ENTITLED
   ‘STEAL LIKE AN ARTIST’ TO PUT ALL OUR MINDS AT REST!
7) THE CONCLUSION WILL BE UP TO YOU!
The ‘HOOK’
PALIMPSEST 
The earliest definition of palimpsest dates from he 17th century, a literal description of a physical object: ‘paper, parchment, or other writing material designed to be reusable after any writing on it has been erased.’
By the 19th century, the definition had tightened to refer to ‘a manuscript in which later writing has been superimposed on earlier (effaced) writing.’
During the 1800s, the word also evolved into a metaphor, as in ‘a think likened to such a writing surface, esp. in having been reused or altered while still retaining traces of its earlier form; a multi-layered record.’ (Jeffery a Kroessler. The City as Palimpsest. John Jay College of Criminal Justice.) 
What is Originality?
How would you define originality?
Should we try and pursue originality?
Does originality exist?
If so, what does it look like?
The Artist as Conman
youtube
‘Even in literature and art, no man who bothers about originality will ever be original: whereas if you simply try to tell the truth (without caring twopence how often it has been told before) you will, nine times out of ten, become original without ever having noticed it.’ C.S.Lewis
So why does this matter?
Where am I going?
Why should you listen?
Or
‘The Justification”
Tumblr media
Angst. (Portrait of the Artist) (1971) Arnolf Rainer.  
A Quotation
Appropriation, pastiche, quotation - these methods can now be seen to extend to visually every aspect of our culture, from the most calculated products of the fashion entertainment industries to the most committed critical activities of artists.’ (Crimp, Douglas. Appropriating Appropriation, in Hertz, Richard (ed) Theories of Contemporary Art, Prentice Hall Inc. USA, 1985.
Tumblr media
Greyson Perry. Red Carpet.
But to be clear…or ‘to quantify’
Appropriation Art VS Forgery
FORGERY MEANING : the action of forging a copy of imitations of a document, signature, banknote, or work of art.
forger copy in close detail the makings on the back of the canvases, and made the frames appear to be decades old.
The art dealers also issued fake ‘certificates of authenticity’ for the forgeries. (New York Times) (on Ely Sakhai)
Historical Context
APPRENTICSHIP
the practice of copying existing artworks was seen as a necessary formation of an apprentice artist.
To copy old masters has traditionally been a key part of the artists training 
HISTORICAL CONTEXT 2
The practice can be traced back to Cubist collage.
I.e. the construction of Picasso and Braque (1912)
Tumblr media
PABLO PICASSO, NUDE IN AN ARMCHAIR, HORTA DE EBRO (PRESENT-DAY HORTA DE SANT JOAN), SUMMER 1909.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT 3
Surrealism
I.E. Salvador Dali Lobster Telephone
Jasper Johns
Robert Rauschenberg
Tumblr media
Salvador Dalí Lobster Telephone 1936
HISTORICAL CONTEXT 4
Ready mades i.e. Marchel Duchamp
Fountain - men’s urinal signed, titles and presented on a pedestal
Tumblr media
Marcel Duchamp. In Advance of the Brocken Arm. August 1964 (fourth version, after lost original of November 1915) 
TO CONTEXTUALISE: TO DEFINE
APPROPRIATION WITHIN ART PRACTICES 
The deliberate reproduction of (elements of) another artists work
Artists ‘copying’ artworks for their own artistic expression
It involves adopting intellectual property from elsewhere
It borrows images, styles, or forms from art history or popular culture
This ‘movement’ evolved in the 1960’s and peaked in the 80’s
Tumblr media
APPROPRIATION : or making artworks using already existing artworks
a significant post modern theory 
Response to what Barthes called the Death of the Author - that nothin is original
It can feel shameless
Pastiche/Collage/deliberate reworking of other people’s works
Key historical art practice
Artist using an existing form/image/sound in new ways
It is the ‘selection and manipulation of found materials’
The end result: strangely familiar yet altogether new
Tumblr media
Jeff Coons
The readymade
Pastiche
Rephotograph
Recombination 
Simulation
Parody
Scavenging
Replicating
Remixing
‘Stealing’
Tumblr media
Bicycle Wheel. Marcel Duchamp. 1913
Tumblr media
Them. Danny Treacy
Pastiche, Parody, and the Remake
Postmodernism has been characterized by a kind of fatigue with the new and the sense that everything has been done before.
Postmodernism asks: Can there ever be new ideas and images, things that have not been thought of or done before? Does it matter?
The world of images today consists of a huge variety of remakes, copies, parodies, replicas, reproductions, and remixes. In the arenas of art and architecture, as well as popular culture, the idea of an original image or form seems to have been thoroughly subverted.
One of the key terms used to describe this culture of imitation, remake, and parody is pastiche. Film theorist Richard Dyer has written that the primary way to understand pastiche is as an imitation that announces itself as such and that involves combining elements from other sources.
The term pastiche is derived from the Italian word pasticcio, which refers to a combination of elements that evokes, - according to Dyer, assemblage, collage, montage, capriccio (a style of composing that combines elements from different places), medley forms, and hip-hop forms of sampling, scratching, and riffing. Dyer thus points to the fact that pastiche has a long history in image making. Within the realm of imitation and quoting that constitutes pastiche, we can find different kinds of combinations and relationships to the original texts-from ironic quoting to parody to remakes to mashups. 
Pastiche has a very particular relationship to history. As a strategy it can often involve pilfering from history and combining historical elements in ways that have little historical meaning but are rather a kind of play.
Tumblr media
John Stezaker
Tumblr media
John Stezaker. The Trial 1978
Tumblr media
Jeff Wall. A Sudden Gust of Wind (After Hokusai) 1993
Sherry Levine 
‘The world is filled to suffocating. Man has placed his token on every stone. Every word, every image, is leased and mortgaged. We know that a picture is but a space in which a variety of images, none of them original, blend and clash.’ 
‘WE CAN ONLY IMITATE A GESTURE THAT IS ALWAYS ANTERIOR, NEVER ORIGINAL.’ (Appropriation. Ed David Evans. 2009)
Artist Sherrie Levine made a series of works in the 1980s that are emblematic of this kind of postmodernism pilfering and borrowing that questions ownership and the original. Levine simply rephotographed famous images-in blatant violation of their copyright, the signifier of authorship and authenticity-and displayed them as her own. In After Edward Weston (#2), Levine rephotographed Weston's famous image of his son, Neil, enti- tled Torso of Neil {1925). Weston's image is situated in a long history of male nudes, which Levine's "theft" disrupts precisely because it is explicitly presented as copied, rather than concealing its status as a copy.
Tumblr media
Robert Rauchenberg. The White Painting
ONE THEORETICAL POSITION
Walter…
Tumblr media
1936 essay The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. 
Our fine arts were developed, their types and uses were established, in times very different from the present, by men whose power of action upon things was insignificant in comparison with ours. But the amazing growth of our techniques, the adaptability and precision they have attained, the ideas and habits they are creating, make it a certainty that profound changes are impending in the ancient craft of the Beautiful. In all the arts there is a physical component which can no longer be considered or treated as it used to be, which cannot remain unaffected by our modern knowledge and power. For the last twenty years neither matter nor space nor time has been what it was from time immemorial. We must expect great innovations to transform the entire technique of the arts, thereby affecting artistic invention itself and perhaps even bringing about an amazing change in our very notion of art.[5]
‘the action of mechanical reproduction effectively dimities the concepts of originality’
‘the mass, mechanised reproducibility of art has reduced its authenticity’
‘mass production removes what he calls the aura - a sort of unique authority - from the work’
‘ Even the most perfect reproduction of a work of art is lacking in one element: its presence in time and space, its unique existence at the place where it happens to be.’
‘The presence of the original is prerequisite to the. Concept of authenticity,’ and, thus, ‘the whole sphere of authenticity is outside of the technical…reproducibility.’
Walter Benjamin, ‘The Work of Art…’
The Death of the Author 
Barthes extended this concept of ‘The Death of the Author’ to question the very possibility of originality and authenticity, he staged that any text (or image) rather than emitting a fixed meaning from a singular voice, was but a tissue of quotations that were themselves references to yet other texts, and so on.
PART THREE 
MY OWN PRACTICE 
youtube
PART FOUR
CONCLUSION
Recapping
Evaluate/ deciding 
Any more for later?
The finishing touches 
What do you make?
Is there an original?
Or do you make copies?
Does your work have acratic qualities?
What do you look for in your discipline?
Form? Content? Expression? Representation?
What gives you work originality?
TASK
"Based on today's lecture, find examples of relevant work in your discipline and apply this to your reflection; consider how you would explore some of these themes in your own work"
References:
https://artlogic-res.cloudinary.com/w_1200,h_1200,c_limit,f_auto,fl_lossy,f_auto,fl_lossy/artlogicstorage/victoriamiro/images/view/31c340c550c02bc143c73bb75ed329fbj.jpg 
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02532/nude-woman-picasso_2532876b.jpg
https://www.tate.org.uk/art/images/work/T/T03/T03257_9.jpg 
http://www.moma.org/wp/moma_learning/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Duchamp.-In-advance-of-a-Broken-Arm-295x395.jpg 
https://mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/9780262550703.jpg 
http://malba.s3-website-sa-east-1.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/14181116/PH_Guyot-750x1124.jpg 
http://www.dannytreacy.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Them_1.jpg 
http://uploads3.wikiart.org/images/marcel-duchamp/bicycle-wheel-1913.jpg 
http://www.tate.org.uk/art/images/work/T/T12/T12342_10.jpg 
https://s3.amazonaws.com/files.collageplatform.com.prod/image_cache/472x472_fit/5761760584184e24248b4568/a1672f549c38afb4ae0413fd8ef7be76.jpeg 
http://imageobjecttext.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/wall-a-sudden-gust-of-wind-after-hokusai-1993.jpeg 
https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/sfmomamedia/media/research-projects/downloads/WHIT_98.308.jpg 
http://img1.imagesbn.com/p/9781453722480_p0_v1_s260x420.JPG 
0 notes
shsl-seinen · 7 years
Text
45 questions...now that endgame has commenced
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Does your character have siblings or family members in their age group? Which one are they closest with?
Nope! She has no siblings and her mother’s gone up and left when she was young, so the closest she’s with is her father, whom of which she regrets not cherishing him enough before getting trapped in VR hell, so whoops! Sucks for you, Ai! (EDIT: I MISREAD THIS SLIGHTLY SO YOU GET EXTRA INFO ON AI’S THOUGHTS ABT HER DAD LOL) Speaking of mom…
What is/was your character’s relationship with their mother like?
Uhh not too well NOWADAYS, considering she left when Ai was young, but they spent time together watching TVs dramas and comedies and playing with Ai’s toys together and such, as Naoko (her mum’s name) was a stay-at-home mom. Nowadays Ai wonders how she is (in a bit of a more spiteful sense but…maybe it’s in a different sense now.) since she KNOWS her dad’s pretty lonely and a bit distraught for being left with her daughter (that resembles her a little too well, down to appearance, acrid tongue and drama love). …perhaps she’s forgotten about Ai and Yosuke by now. Speaking of THAAAT…
What is/was your character’s relationship with their father like?
Well, pretty distant and a bit one-sided, unfortunately. They were like any other cute father-daughter pair up until Naoko left, then Yosuke (dad’s name) became a bit distraught with being left a single dad. (He works as a nurse at a hospital!) Still, he took care of her nonetheless–then Ai started to become distant by middle school. Her working on her drawings and getting bullied and developing a bit of a sleazy, drama-loving personality and all–it REALLY started to hit by high school. Even if Ai was raking in cash with her manga and giving a portion of it to dad to help financially, she basically kept cooped up in her room and their interactions were mere greetings. Heck, she mostly ate meals in her room! A shame, really.
Edit: Regret. She…she feels regret.
Has your character ever witnessed something that fundamentally changed them? If so, does anyone else know?
THIS was a toughie. Perhaps one major thing was seeing Shoko Yazawa, the girl she indirectly gossiped about being a compensated dater, commit social suicide and basically disappear from Kameoka. She just…doesn’t feel comfy thinking about how she might actually be dead and how something that might have not even been true at ALL possibly cost her her social life. She may like drama, but she feels lies makes it…complicated? I can’t find the right word. Everything’s more authentic when it’s true and real, Ai feels.
EDIT: Cody’s deletion. It gave her the feeling that they very well may just be erased off the face of the Earth without feeling anything, in the blink of an eye. Mostly because, spoiler spoiler, Ai glitched out in the hospital space just like Cody but got spawned in a different area rather than deleted. So. Yeah. Scary.
EDIT 2: I GUESS DYING AND WHAT FOLLOWED AFTERWARD WAS AN EYE OPENER
On an average day, what can be found in your character’s pockets?
Out of game: strawberry gum/various candies, her phone, a spare pen/pencil or two just in case~! Not like she’d need to carry stuff in her pockets–she’s mostly a shut-in anyway!
In Telos Hell: Her ID, and…er, that’d…probably be it. I didn’t think this very through. In the case of what she often CARRIES (like, in her hands) it’d be snacks like pudding or candy and her sketchbook, I suppose.
Does your character have recurring themes in their dreams?
Erm…this took a while to answer since I never thought that Ai would have dreams–I lowkey imagined her to be one of those dreamless sleepers. Y’know, granted she doesn’t get much shut-eye in the first place? But I suppose her dreams often involve her being a shadow or a ghost of some sorts in a bit of a beat-up town, just watching the town go on (robberies, theft, murder, or just…regular things like a couple arguing or girls gossiping) as no one notices her.
Does your character have recurring themes in their nightmares?
This goes just as above, but I’ll list it out anyway: I feel something along the lines of all eyes and blinding lights always being on her wherever she tries to run, and all mouths (her classmates, her fans, her patrons her dad, her mom, Shoko) always speaking of her, revealing her gross nature in contrast to the mysterious but ladylike (??? I guess?) mangaka alias she pretends to be online. Maybe hands would be holding her down so she can’t run and has to face all the lights and all the people.
I figure she doesn’t have nightmares often, since, again, she doesn’t get much shuteye, but…ha
EDIT: Glitchy erasure has probably haunted her a few times nowadays.
Has your character ever fired a gun? If so, what was their first target?
Nope.
Is your character’s current socioeconomic status different than it was when they were growing up?
Pretty much! She didn’t grow up POOR but things were probably pretty tight at one point in her life, considering Yosuke soon became a single working dad in the middle of Ai’s childhood. As soon as she started raking in that Sweet Sweet Manga Cash, however, she was happy to set out a portion of her money for her dad, so they ended up okay and a little well off! (Not rich but u get what i mean, hopefully)
Does your character feel more comfortable with more clothing, or with less clothing?
More clothing–she just feels better that way.
In what situation was your character the most afraid they’ve ever been?
Hoo-wee. It’s…a liiittle hard to say.
Tora chapter 2 was a doozy, but she wasn’t as scared then as she was, say...witnessing Cody getting erased, or glitching out HERSELF way back in ch7 when she was in the hospital space. She just felt...terrified, feeling like she’d suddenly disappear without another word, AND without feeling anything.
In what situation was your character the most calm they’ve ever been?
Whenever she’s in her room, not disturbed by anyone, just browsing through social media idly with snacks on standby. Or asleep, considering … help this girl
Is your character bothered by the sight of blood? If so, in what way?
She really isn’t…at least, she thought she wasn’t. She’s gotten pretty used to the sight of blood as a kid, when she’d gotten the occasional bloody nose from bullying back in her school days, and ofc with her job revolving around illustrating violence and sometimes GORE, you get immune to it!
At least, you think you do. As quoted from what I put on that FE AU spreadsheet a longass while ago “Gore looks much…mushier than on paper.”
Ryouji’s dead corpse was a nice ‘ol REVELATION for Ai. Since the closest thing to shit like that was descriptions of shit from the hospital (thanks nurse dad) and anatomy charts and guro art she’s browsed, seeing a REAL corpse in such a situation was…a game changer.
At this point, Ai’s a bit immune to it lol. So many bodies, yanno? She’s now…scarily used to it. Of course, the nature and customization of the executions are…unnerving to her, sometimes. I’m talking to you, Ryouji, lmao (She’ll probably still be pretty unnerved if she…ever…wants to go back to drawing manga tho…I don’t think she will. She’ll take a longass break.)
Does your character remember names or faces easier?
Depends, I would think. Ingame: faces, but out of game, since she doesn’t really care for her classmates and real people and shit, she remembers names more. The internet is a far more vast place, after all.
Is your character preoccupied with money or material possession? Why or why not?
This is hard because I don’t think about this often myself
I guess she IS? She enjoys having things like snacks and desserts and tech around her, but she’s mostly just preoccupied with drama, relationships, fights and…people, I guess. I don’t have a good answer for this.
Which does your character idealize most: happiness or success?
I was about to say neither and point at “enjoyment”, but I guess…that could…sort of align with happiness? You can’t be a mangaka forever, and WHAT ELSE is she good for? Ha. She’d rather sit back and simply be able to enjoy a show rather than idealize shit like that. Life’s a show you can’t waste a minute to wake in!
…mm.
What was your character’s favorite toy as a child?
Dolls, probably. Y’know, er…the equivalent of Barbie dolls, I guess? I can’t go too into depth since I haven’t fleshed out her childhood all too much, but…dolls seem accurate for her. She’d like dressing them up, decorating the houses (if that was a thing…?) and sometimes even playing pretend with them, I’d imagine–and Naoko would honestly play along with her, I’d think!
Is your character more likely to admire wisdom, or ambition in others?
She admires the pettiness ambition of people around her, really. Just…seeing the lengths people would go for their goals, good or bad.
What is your character’s biggest relationship flaw? Has this flaw destroyed relationships for them before?
Like I said, she was literally alienated at the concept of people caring about her and her wellbeing.
Said alienation, initial refusal to accept praise of her, AND general nasty/careless/joking attitude, as well as her constant self-deprecation is a pretty fuckin’ big downer in relationships. Hell, part of her attitude already drives people away, she knows–might as well show she’s self-aware of it right?
…it’s definitely cost her potential friendships. Lots of ‘em.
In what ways does your character compare themselves to others? Do they do this for the sake of self-validation, or self-criticism?
Depends. …mostly the latter though. She knows she’s a piece of shit but occasionally she sees some people and goes “ok at least I’m not them tho lol”. Sorry Senji, Ryouji, some others I probably forgot to mention here. I still love you.
If something tragic or negative happens to your character, do they believe they may have caused or deserved it, or are they quick to blame others?
Oh hell yeah she thinks she deserves it. Karma, baby! Gotta love it.
What does your character like in other people?
Pettiness, wittiness, cunning, the ability to take a joke and make a joke–people who are laidback and careless enough to not be easily brought down. ok look masashi “hee-haw” oichi is a special case here, she thinks hee-haw is annoying but ill be damned if she doesnt eventually get used to it and admires masashi’s directness
What does your character dislike in other people?
Pettiness done WRONG to look like absolute immaturity…and on that note, people acting like loud immature brats in general, people who hold huge grudges over small and/or past events, haughtiness, tryhards (ok yes she can be a tad hypocritical but she’ll swear there’s a difference), people who (in her words, probs) have “sticks up their asses”…you surely get the gist.
How quick is your character to trust someone else?
LMAO NOT QUICK @ ALL (especially in a game like this) she can drop trust pretty quickly tho ;0
…once you do end up gaining her trust, though, it’s strong with just a liiitle bit of doubt. As soon as you break it tho, her trust in you AND others plummet down the fucking toilet so lol
EDIT: ok so i’ll be honest now that it’s endgame, the reason she seems more willing to believe lies in others than she probs should is that she believes in predictability and also me myself, the mun, am Fucking Dumbass and fall for the lies myself, so if i can’t see past them even if Ai in-characterly Can, then im sorry my dudes im Fucking Dumb :’O
How quick is your character to suspect someone else? Does this change if they are close with that person?
Pretty quick, but she won’t necessarily voice it until she has a good opportunity. If they’re close to her, and she trusts them, she won’t suspect them unless shit seriously starts pointing to them, then it starts getting 👀👀👀
How does your character behave around children?
[ai voice] i think the fuck not, goodbye
She doesn’t…handle children well.
How does your character normally deal with confrontation?
haha……………..she doesn’t (usually)
She literally watches drama from afar, you think she wanna get involved in shit?
…when she does deal with it, she replies as bluntly and honestly as possible so she can get it over with. confrontation? no thanks lol
…maybe she’ll add some sass when she finds a good opportunity if she wants to make the confronter feel like a dumbass or smth, or if it starts to piss her off.
How quick or slow is your character to resort to physical violence in a confrontation?
Ai…knows that violence in a losing battle for her. She’s weak. (….listen ryouji was already down in that one trial, ok) If a punch is thrown, she’ll either dodge and run, or take it and scuttle, tbh.
What did your character dream of being or doing as a child? Did that dream come true?
She didn’t really have those types of dreams as a kid, really?? But maybe her drawings as she grew up started to make her think of being an artist. And…well, it DID come true, right? …with, y’know, the cost of tons of potential friendships. And other shit. ha
What does your character find repulsive or disgusting?
Well, ONE thing is wasted opportunity, which is why, as you saw, Ai was PISSED at Ryouji when he was the chapter 6 culprit.
…okay, that’s very exaggerated for being listed and something “repulsive” to her, but…disgusting? ye.
Describe a scenario in which your character feels most comfortable.
Same spiel as the calm one, if you scroll up: in her room back at Kameoka, no one bothering her, the sound of rain and muffled thunder rumbles outside as she scrolls through the internet, snacks at her side while feeling cozy af in warm clothing/probably a blanket over her.
Describe a scenario in which your character feels most uncomfortable.
I can list a few, actually! A certain text conversation between Andrew and Ai during Chapter 6, CHPT4 MONOTHEATER IN TORA AND CHPT5 MONOTHEATER? IN TELOS I BELIEVE? Because there was a very down, depressed vibe goin’ on–mostly the reaction of the deaths and all that, and the feeling that…everyone’s in despair. And tense. It’s infectious, unfortunately.
…and also, er, tora chpt2 trial. You Know,
EDIT: Cody’s erasure lol
In the face of criticism, is your character defensive, self-deprecating, or willing to improve?
SELF-DEPRECATION, BABY ;0
Nowadays, thanks to the magic of Character Development, she’s starting to see that she can improve. So she does the third one more, now.
Is your character more likely to keep trying a solution/method that didn’t work the first time, or immediately move on to a different solution/method?
She’s definitely the type to keep trying a certain method a few times before moving on in frustration.
How does your character behave around people they like?
Laidback, and more open, with banter all around! If you’re someone she likes who has…made an impact on her (like Holly acting like a big sis for her, thanks holly ily) then she’ll still make jokes but not be as biting! She’ll try to be more lightheartedly jokey rather than have each joke be a diss.
How does your character behave around people they dislike?
Prepare for disses, eye rolls and snappy attitudes…or, er, just straight up disrespect and igonring.
Is your character more concerned with defending their honor, or protecting their status?
Protecting their status, most likely. She…has no honor, really.
Is your character more likely to remove a problem/threat, or remove themselves from a problem/threat?
*ahem*
abscond
Has your character ever been bitten by an animal? How were they affected (or unaffected)?
Nope! Never been bitten, and she certainly doesn’t plan to!
How does your character treat people in service jobs?
General respect and decency whenever she DOES go out for, say, groceries at 7/11 or something. She’d generally like to leave asap when she goes out though, so she does sometimes ask to, like, quicken the pace. What did the service job people ever do to her, anyhow, besides like, possibly make her wait? No disses here, thank god
Does your character feel that they deserve to have what they want, whether it be material or abstract, or do they feel they must earn it first?
Ai feels she doesn’t…deserve a lot of things she has, and definitely thinks that a lot of kids in Telos don’t deserve the shit they get thrown at them either (but, yes, there are some who she thinks do get what’s coming for them, but not many), so it’d be the latter, I suppose.
Has your character ever had a parental figure who was not related to them?
Nope. Easy answer.
Has your character ever had a dependent figure who was not related to them?
…not dependent, but…there’s one person who does a pretty good job trying to be one for her. (Spoiler alert it’s Holly, god bless this water polo player I love her so much get better soon athena ur great ily)
How easy or difficult is it for your character to say “I love you?” Can they say it without meaning it?
Pretty goddamn difficult. She thinks of it as a bit of a hard thing to say herself, but agrees it’s something thrown around way too much nowadays–which is, in part, why it’s hard for her to say. (Also she’s never really gotten it from anyone except her parents ha) Ai doesn’t and wouldn’t say it in general (unless it’s joking with friends but even THEN its rare bc Got Damn can’t have too much hypocricy) since it’s a bit overused in society and seems like a throwaway term w/o meaning. When she DOES wanna say it MEANINGFULLY, she’d really want to MEAN it, which is hard with…the kind of mindset she has on the word.
What does your character believe will happen to them after they die? Does this belief scare them?
She doesn’t know!
Which is exactly what scares her.
Not like she thinks about it often, though! (er…well…maybe she does now.)
Nor does she want to. :)
EDIT: this still goes unchanged but it goes to show, uh...what she might’ve thought when she was “dying” at the time.
2 notes · View notes
maritzaerwin · 4 years
Text
How to Earn a Living in Stock Photography?
In today’s current climate, interest in starting your own business has never been higher. For many of you, the dream is to be able to own and operate a company that’s based on your hobbies or interests. For others amongst you, the ability to work from anywhere in the world is the draw.
Regardless of your underlying reason, starting your own business – or even just making some extra money on the side – is something that is in reach more now than ever in this day and age of worldwide connectivity and online commerce.
Whatever your own reason is for starting a business, launching a stock photography business is a great way to both make money from an interest you love and work anywhere in the world. But what do we mean precisely when we say stock photography as opposed to regular photography?  
What, exactly, is stock photography? 
It might surprise you to find out that stock photography is everywhere. You just might not have noticed it. 
You may not be aware, but the concept of stock photography wasn’t born in the internet age – even though it did help to popularize the idea and allow for increasingly intuitive ways to keep track of photography copyrights and artist remuneration methods. The idea that having stock photos would be useful first came up in the 1880s, with the invention of the halftone and its use in the printing press industry. 
Retrofile — one of the first major stock photography libraries — was founded in the 1920s, primarily because photography production started to ramp up after the First World War. The availability of cameras had become more widespread, and they were no longer viewed as exotic or luxurious apparatus.
Stock photography was born out of the desire to gain access to beautiful, universally useful photos without the need to hire photographers for expensive photoshoots. Further down the road, it also started to help businesses of all kinds not to have to keep track of a number of pressing copyright issues. Nowadays, you can use a stock photo without restrictions by merely paying a one-time fee to a royalty-free stock image licensor such as Dreamstime.
Stock photos are photographs for which the artist has licensed their photo’s use to another party for commercial purposes. Publishers and advertisers began to consider using them during the 1920s, and now they represent an essential part of most businesses. Whether it’s journalists, advertisers, marketers, web designers, bloggers, influencers, or TV anchors, they all crave stock photographs for the low cost and how easy they are to acquire.
Why? Because stock photography is the art of taking high-quality shots that will endure the passing of time – as in, their innate value for all kinds of companies won’t diminish. Using them is also convenient and cost-effective for the businesses and individuals that need them. If that sounds like something you could produce in return for payment, then you’re probably wondering how or where to get started. 
How to Start a Stock Photography Business? 
Whether you’re a person with a greater or lesser level of photographic experience, if you call yourself a photographer, you undoubtedly have the passion for capturing what you see around you.
You’re continually striving to increase the quality of your shots – whether by using a better camera, learning advanced shooting techniques or by learning how to better post-produce the photos you’ve already taken. You’re posting them on all kinds of online social platforms, hundreds of people start to like them – and what’s not to like? You already know your photos are fantastic! 
Furthermore, a great deal of online content nowadays is strictly visual. It’s what catches your eye and makes you want to delve into more of the same. Perhaps you’ve even made some friends with the same passion already, and you’re all constantly evolving and adapting to new photography trends. So, is that all there is to the life of a photographer?
In short, no. If the above description sounds a lot like you, it’s time to take your passion for photography to a whole new, and profitable, level by launching your own career as a stock photographer.
By working diligently to produce jaw-dropping photos, you can net a consistent, and in some cases, considerable income by becoming a contributor to a stock photography platform. Those photos you’ve already been selling to your friends, family, and customers? Suddenly you can open them up to literally millions of potential customers who can access and purchase them with just a few clicks. Better yet, there’s no more underhanded theft of your hard work, with stringent copyright laws in place to protect what is rightfully yours. 
All you have to do is put in the necessary work to make sure that your photos reflect the high-quality standards of the thousands of stock photographers who’ve gone before you. The more images you produce, the better you will become, and the larger your catalog of images – your potential for income – will become as well.
What’s more, you have the flexibility to change the licensing rights for each photo, giving you better deals on what you feel is your best work. Lastly, you can continue to use or edit your photos since what you are selling is the license for their use, not the images themselves.  
How Does the Stock Photography Business Model Work?
While there is a multitude of different ways of running stock photography businesses, there are two primary models that dominate the market — macro stock and microstock. 
Macro stock photography is often referred to as the more traditional of the two models. Sites and agencies using this method will sell high-priced and exclusive images. These agencies license the individual images directly to the end customer, and prices range from as low as $30 to as high as $3,000 per year. Photographers choosing to work in this manner receive remuneration in the form of royalty payments. 
Microstock, on the other hand, focuses on selling images for as little as 20¢ per photo on a royalty-free basis. Instead of the photographer receiving royalties, they receive a direct share of the revenue of each image download. With this revenue-sharing model, photographers working with microstock sites usually receive one payment every month, which is based on the number of downloads their images have received. 
Although there are still several companies that focus exclusively on one model or the other, the vast majority of leading stock photography websites and agencies now use a mix of both.   
What About Photos of Other People? 
Most stock photos are meant to feel alive – and that goes beyond merely choosing the right color palette for your capture. For a great deal of your stock photographs, you will be working with real people in real situations. This involves getting your head wrapped around some legal aspects of stock photography, namely MRs, or “Model Releases.”
A model release (also known as a liability waiver) is a form of legal release that has to be signed by the human subject(s) of your photographs. It permits you to both use and publishes those photos. A model release is not necessary for most of the photographs due to legal protections under freedom of speech rights.
However, it is required to publish photos whereby personal or privacy rights could risk being infringed upon. In most instances, this is where someone is recognizable, and, therefore, you need their permission to use their appearance in your photo. 
No model release is required to publish a photo of an identifiable person if they are in a public space unless the intended image use is for trade or commercial purposes. In this case, without a signed model release, you can risk being held civilly liable. A model release is not necessary for the act of taking a photo itself. Instead, it’s required for when you’re thinking about using it to make yourself some money.
Every stock photography company has slight variations on their requirements, so you’ll have to look that up in the terms and conditions on each site. 
Here at Dreamstime, we usually require just one model release for each model, with the number of uploaded shooting sessions being irrelevant. The only time you need to pay attention is when the model you used for your shoot moves into a different age group. For example, our advanced search engine has an in-built age parameter.
If your model moves from the 21-30 years old category to the 31-45 years old category through the natural process of aging, you’ll be notified that you need to include a new model release to continue to earn money from that image legally.
Stock Photography Requires You to Understand E-commerce 
As a potential stock photographer, you’ll be well aware of what photography is. After all, you’re probably taking pictures every day. But how is your understanding of e-commerce? It’s something you’ll need to spend time studying up on because it’s what you’ll be relying on to earn revenue from your collection of photographs. 
Simply put, e-commerce is selling something (such as the right to sell your picture) through an online medium. Since the first-ever online sale that took place on August 11, 1994, companies have been offering a growing number of products and services online. The events of 2020 related to the COVID-19 pandemic have only accelerated that trend with more and more people having to endure restrictions and limitations on where they can physically go, and even traditional physical businesses such as gyms have had to offer their services online.    
As an increasing number of products and services start to shift towards online payment methods, the more your products and services need to stand out from the others. It’s imperative to find ways to attract and retain customers.
Since most of the online content nowadays is sustained by imagery, stock photography is the perfect solution for many businesses that need to stir emotion in people. Some even refer to it as generating micro-content, small individual pieces of content that can be consumed by users and monetized by those who produce it.
With that in mind, you need to be thinking about how you can tweak your photographic offering to meet the needs of growing businesses. Furthermore, you’ll need to decide if you want to set up your own e-commerce website, work with several stock photography websites, or if you’re going to dedicate yourself exclusively to one specific platform. The choice is yours, but the method you choose can have a significant impact on the earning potential of your new stock photography business.  
If you’re still sitting on the fence and don’t know whether launching a stock photography business is going to be for you or not, it can be helpful to read about the experiences of others. For example, reading this story about stock photographer Edi Swinford which details how she went from making just 25¢ to over $100,000 from stock photography, is sure to get you fired up and inspired.
Or Dreamstime user Wisconsinart’s similar tale of reaching a $60,000 milestone might encourage you to get started.  Better still, those stories aren’t anomalies. Plenty of stock photographers make more than $700 per month in predominantly passive income.    
Of course, there’s a ton of upfront work that goes into these success stories. You need to gradually build a portfolio of thousands of photos before you can even think about earning that kind of money, particularly if you opt for the microstock business model. Moreover, you need to continually evolve your technique and your subject matter to keep up with the ever-shifting demands of the industry. But while it may be challenging, it’s certainly rewarding when you start to see that money trickling in.
So, what are you waiting for?
Start going through the hundreds or thousands of photos you probably already have on your hard drive to see which ones might just be able to make you some money, grab your camera and start shooting, and start earning your slice of the stock photography pie!   
The post How to Earn a Living in Stock Photography? appeared first on CareerMetis.com.
How to Earn a Living in Stock Photography? published first on https://skillsireweb.tumblr.com/
0 notes
Text
The Enjoyable Behind Automobile Parking Games
The free games with Nintendo ds games can be downloaded free from the site. They add to the excitement of the Nintendo games. Nintendo is a Japan based company expertizing in video games. The games by Nintendo are highly popular internationally. Especially kids and young children are addicted to it. These games are highly innovative and of exceptionally high quality. The Nintendo games are extremely creative and children are glued to them while playing. In the present times, video games have acquired a core position in kids' lives. They make them creative and innovative. There are Nintendo wIi games also that are in vogue around the world. There are free games with ds consoles on offer. The Nintendo ds games include Mario Kart DS, Mario Party, Guitar Rock Tour to name a few. There are a lot of gaming accessories available that are of excellent quality. The most stunning and peak feature of free games with Nintendo ds games is their customization feature. It has the unique ability to adjust the game according to the player. To elaborate, the game alters according to the personal style of the player. To begin with, it it has a simple story or plot that comes with the game. But when a player starts playing, the game turns in accordance with or as a consequence of the player's action. This causes new situation and environments for the players to enhance their gaming skills. Thus, the player can try his hand under different and exciting situations, thus increasing creativity in children. These games have 3D effects for enhanced visual and ultimate gaming experience These games have multi player ability. These games consoles help in developing innovation in the player. These games are on offer online. There are Nintendo wii games such as carnival games, Sonic at Olympic games, Need for street Carbon, Tony's Hawk and Downhill Jam etc. also that can be downloaded from the sites. These games are highly highly enthralling and exciting.
youtube
This gaming is excellent to participate in as shoppers get so that you can smash that many unhealthy cars in the form of you can, to build up stars. You is designed to find a range of websites and the are to give these space of truck games. When your own personal shoot in and build up funding in which to upgrade your incredible weaponry that can the quite artillery yourself can find the money. You have need of to stress when playing to win, since customers will try to be steering per huge car. Most kids as okay as individuals find trucks, the wider the enhanced - tremendously interesting and as well very mouthwatering. The three most considerable aspects created by human our life are- educational services and resources. If you are seeming for virtually any new in addition to challenging special type of via the internet game up to play, give out them a great try. Rip Rage: As an name imply you will certainly rip your ultimate way with master the entire art of the long jump, the space spin, additionally destruction to allow them to amass troubles. Taking part in car online is each entertaining best way to commit to your recreational. You have can compete in wonderful speed nonetheless , without the type of fetid and as well tiredness, not just to mention you most likely will start earlier mentioned once you will fail because crash. It research for the and check out a variety of of services which supply you this facility so as to play most games within the internet or uniform download items. This imparts the guitar players the freedom to make your mind up the the ones they are almost always most snug with. One love Mario games, from the antique fashion animation, some devotion car racing, no point what typically the graphics be like for the reason that long even as it's racing. Playing top monster truck games is a lot different in watching some other play these kind games. Most meaningful thing is going to be that your business can indulge in them when considering free. Solitary can succeed points at the time of saving the cargo. Here in this casino game you direct the colossal truck along with destroy every item in your actual path. Here the can experience a phone number of blogs and service providers that offer car exercises to determine the a good they will definitely have limit fun at. Furthermore, it is becoming more luring to the game them now that these online game never warrant any computer programs programs when order in order to really be started. One could get to have an understanding of their man or women personal grit and courage as properly. While shoppers can have a lot of pleasant playing regarding games, however, there is just it problem. These virtues would get to ideal aid even in your later one's life as your entire family often have a need for them. Towards many families car speed is this special top passion but life has one that only a some get to enjoy the specific thrill extremely hand. Established your is declared the winner high in addition don't failure and get rid of! Somebody can need a great time in the form of there are a total of blogs where you can take part in these tremendous games meant for free. Street racing games are particularly appealing to youngsters because they permit the player to perform car tricks that defy the laws of physics without risking any injury. Innovation of various types of video games and electronic gaming consoles, youngsters who are passionate about racing and driving need not go for real life gaming because they can enjoy all the thrills that come with roaring engines, screeching breaks and winning a car race in the privacy of your own room on your own PC. From the very first trials of car online games, these games had undergone several modifications from very simple layout and concept to a highly competitive activity with modern technique. The highly improved and outstanding graphics can create the illusion that you are actually inside the real life game. You an experience the real life fun on the run, driving through different landscapes, participating in competitions and competing with other online users. You can even enter virtual races and take part in all sorts of rallies, or even action driving games in which you drive and get involved in other activities such as shooting foes and many more. There are also some online car games that involve some strategy and thinking. You can try them as they are no less in entertainment and fun than other driving games. These online car racing games are all available for free and guarantees to entertain you as long as you play. Among the different mind blowing racing games the NASCAR 2005 is one of the popular racing games on PS2 that pulls a large crowd. Gran Turismo 3 is another PS3 racing game which is considered as the most fabulous racing game for its superlative features. Full of fun and frolic, Burnout 3 is also popular and is available most of the racing game downloading sites. Among the most popular Xbox racing and driving games, Grand Theft Auto Double Pack, Forza Motorsport, Need for Speed Most Wanted or RalliSport Challenge 2 and the legendary Simpsons Hit and Run falls under the common preference among the players. You can also come across some of the advanced car races and innumerable portions for customization in games like Midnight Club 3 the DUB edition Xbox racing games. Universally acclaimed online car racing games are becoming more interactive and handy giving hours of driving pleasure to the players. Though players do not physically need to race on ground or water but they can experience the real life playing online.
0 notes
maritzaerwin · 4 years
Text
How to Earn a Living in Stock Photography?
In today’s current climate, interest in starting your own business has never been higher. For many of you, the dream is to be able to own and operate a company that’s based on your hobbies or interests. For others amongst you, the ability to work from anywhere in the world is the draw.
Regardless of your underlying reason, starting your own business – or even just making some extra money on the side – is something that is in reach more now than ever in this day and age of worldwide connectivity and online commerce.
Whatever your own reason is for starting a business, launching a stock photography business is a great way to both make money from an interest you love and work anywhere in the world. But what do we mean precisely when we say stock photography as opposed to regular photography?  
What, exactly, is stock photography? 
It might surprise you to find out that stock photography is everywhere. You just might not have noticed it. 
You may not be aware, but the concept of stock photography wasn’t born in the internet age – even though it did help to popularize the idea and allow for increasingly intuitive ways to keep track of photography copyrights and artist remuneration methods. The idea that having stock photos would be useful first came up in the 1880s, with the invention of the halftone and its use in the printing press industry. 
Retrofile — one of the first major stock photography libraries — was founded in the 1920s, primarily because photography production started to ramp up after the First World War. The availability of cameras had become more widespread, and they were no longer viewed as exotic or luxurious apparatus.
Stock photography was born out of the desire to gain access to beautiful, universally useful photos without the need to hire photographers for expensive photoshoots. Further down the road, it also started to help businesses of all kinds not to have to keep track of a number of pressing copyright issues. Nowadays, you can use a stock photo without restrictions by merely paying a one-time fee to a royalty-free stock image licensor such as Dreamstime.
Stock photos are photographs for which the artist has licensed their photo’s use to another party for commercial purposes. Publishers and advertisers began to consider using them during the 1920s, and now they represent an essential part of most businesses. Whether it’s journalists, advertisers, marketers, web designers, bloggers, influencers, or TV anchors, they all crave stock photographs for the low cost and how easy they are to acquire.
Why? Because stock photography is the art of taking high-quality shots that will endure the passing of time – as in, their innate value for all kinds of companies won’t diminish. Using them is also convenient and cost-effective for the businesses and individuals that need them. If that sounds like something you could produce in return for payment, then you’re probably wondering how or where to get started. 
How to Start a Stock Photography Business? 
Whether you’re a person with a greater or lesser level of photographic experience, if you call yourself a photographer, you undoubtedly have the passion for capturing what you see around you.
You’re continually striving to increase the quality of your shots – whether by using a better camera, learning advanced shooting techniques or by learning how to better post-produce the photos you’ve already taken. You’re posting them on all kinds of online social platforms, hundreds of people start to like them – and what’s not to like? You already know your photos are fantastic! 
Furthermore, a great deal of online content nowadays is strictly visual. It’s what catches your eye and makes you want to delve into more of the same. Perhaps you’ve even made some friends with the same passion already, and you’re all constantly evolving and adapting to new photography trends. So, is that all there is to the life of a photographer?
In short, no. If the above description sounds a lot like you, it’s time to take your passion for photography to a whole new, and profitable, level by launching your own career as a stock photographer.
By working diligently to produce jaw-dropping photos, you can net a consistent, and in some cases, considerable income by becoming a contributor to a stock photography platform. Those photos you’ve already been selling to your friends, family, and customers? Suddenly you can open them up to literally millions of potential customers who can access and purchase them with just a few clicks. Better yet, there’s no more underhanded theft of your hard work, with stringent copyright laws in place to protect what is rightfully yours. 
All you have to do is put in the necessary work to make sure that your photos reflect the high-quality standards of the thousands of stock photographers who’ve gone before you. The more images you produce, the better you will become, and the larger your catalog of images – your potential for income – will become as well.
What’s more, you have the flexibility to change the licensing rights for each photo, giving you better deals on what you feel is your best work. Lastly, you can continue to use or edit your photos since what you are selling is the license for their use, not the images themselves.  
How Does the Stock Photography Business Model Work?
While there is a multitude of different ways of running stock photography businesses, there are two primary models that dominate the market — macro stock and microstock. 
Macro stock photography is often referred to as the more traditional of the two models. Sites and agencies using this method will sell high-priced and exclusive images. These agencies license the individual images directly to the end customer, and prices range from as low as $30 to as high as $3,000 per year. Photographers choosing to work in this manner receive remuneration in the form of royalty payments. 
Microstock, on the other hand, focuses on selling images for as little as 20¢ per photo on a royalty-free basis. Instead of the photographer receiving royalties, they receive a direct share of the revenue of each image download. With this revenue-sharing model, photographers working with microstock sites usually receive one payment every month, which is based on the number of downloads their images have received. 
Although there are still several companies that focus exclusively on one model or the other, the vast majority of leading stock photography websites and agencies now use a mix of both.   
What About Photos of Other People? 
Most stock photos are meant to feel alive – and that goes beyond merely choosing the right color palette for your capture. For a great deal of your stock photographs, you will be working with real people in real situations. This involves getting your head wrapped around some legal aspects of stock photography, namely MRs, or “Model Releases.”
A model release (also known as a liability waiver) is a form of legal release that has to be signed by the human subject(s) of your photographs. It permits you to both use and publishes those photos. A model release is not necessary for most of the photographs due to legal protections under freedom of speech rights.
However, it is required to publish photos whereby personal or privacy rights could risk being infringed upon. In most instances, this is where someone is recognizable, and, therefore, you need their permission to use their appearance in your photo. 
No model release is required to publish a photo of an identifiable person if they are in a public space unless the intended image use is for trade or commercial purposes. In this case, without a signed model release, you can risk being held civilly liable. A model release is not necessary for the act of taking a photo itself. Instead, it’s required for when you’re thinking about using it to make yourself some money.
Every stock photography company has slight variations on their requirements, so you’ll have to look that up in the terms and conditions on each site. 
Here at Dreamstime, we usually require just one model release for each model, with the number of uploaded shooting sessions being irrelevant. The only time you need to pay attention is when the model you used for your shoot moves into a different age group. For example, our advanced search engine has an in-built age parameter.
If your model moves from the 21-30 years old category to the 31-45 years old category through the natural process of aging, you’ll be notified that you need to include a new model release to continue to earn money from that image legally.
Stock Photography Requires You to Understand E-commerce 
As a potential stock photographer, you’ll be well aware of what photography is. After all, you’re probably taking pictures every day. But how is your understanding of e-commerce? It’s something you’ll need to spend time studying up on because it’s what you’ll be relying on to earn revenue from your collection of photographs. 
Simply put, e-commerce is selling something (such as the right to sell your picture) through an online medium. Since the first-ever online sale that took place on August 11, 1994, companies have been offering a growing number of products and services online. The events of 2020 related to the COVID-19 pandemic have only accelerated that trend with more and more people having to endure restrictions and limitations on where they can physically go, and even traditional physical businesses such as gyms have had to offer their services online.    
As an increasing number of products and services start to shift towards online payment methods, the more your products and services need to stand out from the others. It’s imperative to find ways to attract and retain customers.
Since most of the online content nowadays is sustained by imagery, stock photography is the perfect solution for many businesses that need to stir emotion in people. Some even refer to it as generating micro-content, small individual pieces of content that can be consumed by users and monetized by those who produce it.
With that in mind, you need to be thinking about how you can tweak your photographic offering to meet the needs of growing businesses. Furthermore, you’ll need to decide if you want to set up your own e-commerce website, work with several stock photography websites, or if you’re going to dedicate yourself exclusively to one specific platform. The choice is yours, but the method you choose can have a significant impact on the earning potential of your new stock photography business.  
If you’re still sitting on the fence and don’t know whether launching a stock photography business is going to be for you or not, it can be helpful to read about the experiences of others. For example, reading this story about stock photographer Edi Swinford which details how she went from making just 25¢ to over $100,000 from stock photography, is sure to get you fired up and inspired.
Or Dreamstime user Wisconsinart’s similar tale of reaching a $60,000 milestone might encourage you to get started.  Better still, those stories aren’t anomalies. Plenty of stock photographers make more than $700 per month in predominantly passive income.    
Of course, there’s a ton of upfront work that goes into these success stories. You need to gradually build a portfolio of thousands of photos before you can even think about earning that kind of money, particularly if you opt for the microstock business model. Moreover, you need to continually evolve your technique and your subject matter to keep up with the ever-shifting demands of the industry. But while it may be challenging, it’s certainly rewarding when you start to see that money trickling in.
So, what are you waiting for?
Start going through the hundreds or thousands of photos you probably already have on your hard drive to see which ones might just be able to make you some money, grab your camera and start shooting, and start earning your slice of the stock photography pie!   
The post How to Earn a Living in Stock Photography? appeared first on CareerMetis.com.
How to Earn a Living in Stock Photography? published first on https://skillsireweb.tumblr.com/
0 notes