Hey GTC, I have always been such a fan of your Tumblr and your engagement with the fandom. However I must say that as of late, the questions you’re being asked most often are essentially variants of “Will X happen?” or “Will Y character do Z like in the book?” or even, “I’m noticing Theme A, will it continue in future chapters?”
A significant element of the fun that you’ve created for Lionheart readers is that we don’t know which elements and events of the JKR texts you’ll preserve untouched and which you’ll turn into the sixth and seventh year Lionheart storylines. I adore making my guesses to which parts of canon you’ll play with and which parts you’ll completely and utterly upend. Unfortunately, questions that ask about canon events in books 5-7 ruin so much of the fun.
Historically, you’ve used the Ask box to provide us with analyses of your own work and characterizations, but I feel as if recently you are often indulging questions about books 5, 6, and 7. I hate to say it, but I even feel that your answers veer into spoiler territory. I used to lurk your Tumblr incessantly, but since I’ve started to see this influx in predictive questions these past couple weeks, I’ve been avoiding the app.
It’s such a gift that we get to engage with your work on such a vibrant epistolary and interactive space as your Tumblr. I know that you can’t control what fans ask, but I humbly request that you please consider refusing to answer questions that ask you to ponder future events. Thank you for your tender care to everyone in the fandom. ❤️🔥🦁🧡
Hey, what's up, dude. I hear you. Sorry about that.
The problem is that the line between spoilers and not spoilers is totally subjective, and the line between "spoilers that are fine" and "spoilers that bother me" is also totally subjective. I don't know where you are on it, but we probably don't line up, and that's okay. I just don't know how I'd begin to sort out questions that one person considers "too much" from what someone else just thinks is fun analysis. My hard rules are as follows: I don't answer any questions about future ships, events, or arcs (and I get a lot). I haven't revealed anything that I would be unhappy to discover in a Tumblr askbox instead of a fic itself. True, I've dropped teaser/trailer stuff for 6 and 7, but to be honest, even looking over the stuff I've posted recently — I hate to say it, but I disagree with you. It isn't spoilers. Not to me, anyway.
But that's just me! There's no right or wrong answer here, it's just a coordination problem of how we can both cultivate social media experiences that make us happy. For instance: I like answering questions about my fic. It makes me happy to talk to people who want to know what happens. It encourages me and gets me excited to write about it, and I don't believe that any of the content on my Tumblr spoils what's going to happen. I don't really want to stop doing that, so I'm not going to. If that means you and other readers whose spoiler thresholds are below mine can't engage with my Tumblr, that's a natural consequence of us having different attitudes about media, and it was bound to happen. I'm sorry that that's the case, but it would bring me much more grief for you to injure your reading experience than it would for you to avoid my (largely irrelevant) e-journal full of random metatext. I love my fic, and I love my readers, you most certainly included; I do not, candidly speaking, love my Tumblr account. And for what it's worth, I absolutely do not think anything I've written on here is worth diminishing your experience of a story you enjoy. It wouldn't jive with my philosophy of literature and art.
So here's what I got: I'll continue tagging spoilers about past and current events as [#lionheart spoilers], and if a question makes reference to events not published, I'll use the tag [#prognosticating]. That way you can block the tag, and other readers can enjoy content that fits under their threshold of non-spoilerism. If our thresholds still don't line up, then I think the only solution may really be to block the [#lionheart spoilers] tag altogether. That's probably not the answer you're looking for, but it's the best I can do.
32 notes
·
View notes
As someone in an interracial relationship, I fucking hate seeing most posts about them on this site. Because they're usual made by some liberal who saw people using "fetishism"/"cultural appropriation" incorrectly and assumed the issue was people of color being wary of interracial relationships and not the way people strip words of their meaning for (often times) petty internet drama.
And like every one of those posts are absolutely FILLED with white people giving their unnecessary ass opinions like "ugh not everything is racism" well sometimes it fucking IS and sometimes it takes more than just saying "I love you for YOU and I won't be racist, I prommy!" Sometimes you have to work to prove you care and that you will PERSONALLY work to unlearn the racist shit you were taught BY YOUR OWN CULTURE for someone you allegedly care about. AND THAT IS CONSTANT WORK. There is no point where you are no longer racist and when it comes to interracial relationships between poc (namely a Black/nonblack couple) sometimes you're gonna have to do your own goddamned research and come back later to talk about it.
And with the history of white/nonblack people regularly using Black bodies and relationships with Black people as a form of rebellion against their families/cultures (which is objectifying btw!) Black people in particular have every right to be wary of interracial relationships. Antiblackness is so pervasive we have to play a constant game of "Am I a fetish/teacher/object of rebellion?" with every person we date for fear that the person we chose to open up to doesn't actually see us as a person.
Like if you think people are using terms incorrectly-which I will not deny because some people ARE- then just fucking say that but these posts that make is seem like the reservations poc have when observing/being in interracial relationships is unfounded paranoia are fucking racist. And the white people fueling this shit are racist as well. It's not your fucking place to try and explain what is or isn't racism to us. Shut the fuck up FOR ONCE!
199 notes
·
View notes
it's so funny (read: sad) that if bigoted fuckheads didn't insist i was a woman simply by virtue of my body at birth, i'd probably be chill with she/her pronouns in addition to he/they. if my mom didn't insist i was her daughter, i'd probably let her call me that, and we could still have a relationship.
i'm nonbinary and 'gendered' words are hypothetically meaningless, but because there are so many people who are more interested in telling me who i am rather than lovingly and curiously letting me express my own sense of self, those words carry trauma.
there's no reason a nonbinary person like myself can't be a son and a child and a daughter. there's no reason a nonbinary person like me can't go by he, they, and she.
'she' is not a slur. 'daughter' is not derogatory. 'beautiful' 'pretty' 'gorgeous' 'feminine' are not insults.
to the contrary, they're parts of language that express certain facets of a multi-faceted human existence, like mine.
and i have this sad, mournful feeling that if it weren't for unloving, condescending people, i'd probably be down to be called any of those things alongside my usual masculine/neutral terminology.
but i'd rather die than let anyone tell me what i have to be called.
49 notes
·
View notes
What's the 'public domming' you got to do as a result of being good at school?
Maybe it would be better described as light public humiliation? My higher end classes would have us engage in informal and formal debate to better our understanding of the material and I while I was naturally good at making convincing, authoritative sounding arguments on the fly, I relished in making my opponents look stupid, I took excessive pleasure in the embarrassed faces and defensive backpedaling when they fell for verbal traps I'd lay out.
I don't remember exactly what I said, but I was once paired to debate this really cute girl and passively (but intentionally) coaxed her into making a really bad point, one that allowed me to insta-kill with a "so you're saying you think we should kill poor people hm" type reply and her face went shock -> confusion -> despair upon realizing that's exactly what she suggested -> embarrassed frustration. Stammering a bit before exploding "YES Mila I'm saying poor people should die!" before humphing back to her seat while the rest of the class hooted and hollered. Nothing felt as good.
Being good at school for me meant many opportunities to do this kind of thing, manipulating classmates and even teachers into saying the wrong thing so I could publicly own them. Weirdly enough, this did not make me unpopular.
23 notes
·
View notes
There is never an excuse to not use someone’s preferred name and pronouns. Unless they’re closeted around some people and ask you not to, there is literally no good reason to not just refer to them how they want to be. No one is being protected when you intentionally misgender a trans person, or when you insist on using a deadname— even if you “don’t agree” with the existence of trans people, or think that gender identity shouldn’t be treated the way it is in whatever way. You’re not standing up for yourself and you’re not standing up for others— you’re just being an asshole.
If your friend’s legal name was Katherine, and she told you “please don’t call me Katherine, I have negative associations with that name, call me Kathy instead,” then would you still insist on calling her Katherine because you don’t think it makes sense to use another name, even though you know it causes her significant emotional distress?
Intentionally deadnaming and misgendering someone because “it doesn’t make sense” or “you don’t agree” makes you just as much of an asshole as that. Changing the language you use to refer to someone hurts no one and helps them immensely. Intentionally misgendering someone just makes you look like an asshole and, quite frankly, stupid as well.
If you want to have an actual debate about the ethics of trans healthcare or whatever, the least you can do is actually respect your opponents. Fundamentally, respect for one another is key to proper debating. But no, you don’t want a debate, you just want to beat people down.
10 notes
·
View notes