i was being a completely sane person today (/s) and was creating a timeline tree for snm would anyone even be interested in that. and collecting my shipping thoughts (or specifics about them being a couple etc). know that i still consider my knowledge of the franchise as poor. its just tidying it up in my head so when i talk about something i can pinpoint a specific thing (i was too deep in fnaf theorizing so now i have to suffer thru a franchise that doesnt even have a canon)
in short/tldr the comics are the base that happened in every possible timeline and everything else is derived from that, happening after, except the cartoon, which shows some events the same way so that would be more intertwined; not everything is connected/within one timeline. and the cartoon is my most fav and where i see them as a true couple.
long rant ahead
on one hand i really like the time travel theory where its like comics -> ttg -> cartoon etc by them travelling back in time for that, however there are many holes especially thinking about their families and stuff so
i like the idea of things branching off. one branch is comics - htr - cartoon, as something more intertwined
second is comics -> ttg -> poker night 2 (since it references ttg events) (idk bout 1 i havent played/seen that)
third would be comics -> ttiv (or comics -> htr -> ttiv, i have no idea atm if bosco's is mentioned in the comics but it is in htr and mentioned in ttiv. ttiv is also set in the year it came out, so theres a huge gap inbetween ttiv and htr but i wouldnt say its where the ttg games happened!)
and i dont mean this in like a multiverse way, since the creator seems to dislike that, its simply just a very loose canon that differs with each installment (simply due to different people working on these imo. nothing too deep imo)
but the juicy part!! i even made brackets that im too lazy to remake digitally so i will just write it out for each bigger installment. im excluding poker night 1 as i havent played it nor watched much gameplay
M = married, BF = best friends (in all technically)
comics: M - unlikely; BF - yes absolutely
htr: M - possible; BF - yes
cartoons: M - i take it as canon here. BF - yes million percent
ttg all seasons: M - no; BF - yes.
poker night 2: M - not sure, implied dating, i take that as good enough; BF - yes
ttiv: M - absolutely not. not a couple at all. BF - they seem too tense, yes, but from my experience playing, their interactions were imo the worst in all of their media, so i wasnt buying it at some points
note - ttiv has to be like the straightest they ever were and i also see it in S.P.'s more recent work. im looking too deep into that, perhaps, but im just thinking were never gonna get anything similar to what we got from back in the 90s again, if theres any future projects
people are also saying they got married like 4 times and its making me a bit confused here. do people mean cartoon, htr dress up card, cake topper and tdph ring scene or am i missing something big?? because to me that is married once, other ones being just for jokes (first one as well but its less vague), and in the ttg games its so extremely vague i cant count that (being realistic here) that said its still fun to joke about them getting married several times, but in this case wouldnt it be more of a marriage per timeline?
and to end this, a personal tierlist
my most fave obviously is the cartoon. not only is it the easiest to work with for me, with the fast pacing and short watch time (but ofc i wish it was longer) i absolutely love how their relationship is depicted there, even if a lot of stuff there is just jokes, but if everything is a joke then its also fine to take everything as canon within this media, to me! like when haters say that people only take the wedding scene out of the intro and ignore the rest - as if the other stuff couldnt happen (isnt one of the shots them fighting a giant octopus, which they end up having an episode about too. like cmon. anything goes here) even if it was contained within this specific part of the franchise, im ok with calling them a couple here. and its S tier overall
another S tier is the comics. nothing else to say
HTR is like A tier to me, only taking off points because its soooo sloooowwww and playing it after watching the series took 3 years off my life immediately. otherwise gud game.
ttg is like A to B tier for me, because of some specifics and preferences but thats just me being nitpicky so, the games overall are good. A- it is. thats all
poker night 2 is fun, i watch the gameplay a lot lately when im too tired at midnight to do anything else, A tier
ttiv. oh how mixed i am about you. gameplay by itself and my first experience with the game - S tier. it made me so giddy more than one time and i kept wanting to come back until i finished the game fully. i dont mind the bugs, its just what i expect in VR games and even tho it made me a bit frustrated at times it wasnt all that bad. its also the only vr game i played for over an hour once and didnt get motion sick - the exception was the level at the store which seemed too bright and actually made me nauseous. which is a feeling that somehow comes back whenever i think about this game. what i dislike was the dialogue, while most of it was fun and fine, i had moments where i just burst out laughing, they (or max especially) were way too mean towards the player. i know its a joke and you could chalk it up to max being unhappy with us/jealous, but it got like, generally unpleasant very quickly. with stuff like good throw - "nice!" bad throw - *neverending insults* and the second was how painfully straight it was and like. the vibes i got from them two was like, oh theyre fed up with each other and my shipping self was just left quite disappointed. i did not get all lines during my gameplay which made it great but upon going thru every line manually after, i was just more and more uncomfortable with what they said in their banter. this drops the game to like C for me? maybe B if i squint. being generous. i also got sick of their talking animations over time... the models are fine just got to be too much. bonus points for max ragdoll physics tho. coming up with a conclusion that this is a completely separate timeline and has nothing to do with anything other than the comics and perhaps HTR. i talked so long about this one cause its the one thing that prompted all of this lol.
but its not that serious! i just knew this franchise for ages as "oh its the two animal guys that are married and its funny" and now that i got into it fully, i see a lot of the shippers are obviously daydreaming and taking things out of context - which is fun, i agree!! i also do that. but it just painted a completely different picture for me. so no. theyre not married, theyre not a couple, except for the cartoon, where its implied, which stays on top for me. but in ttg at least, they love each other, its not as romantic, but i can ship them there (so i ship them in the context of the cartoon and ttg basically)
anyway. nothing is canon for them, everything is canon for them, and everything they say or do is a joke so. its not that deep at all. they gay tho
23 notes
·
View notes
I think a lot about the canon interpretation of Jayce abandoning Viktor for Mel, and in the course of trying to write a one shot about the subject, I’ve realized it just kind of… isn’t true?
Like… if you look at the plot beat where Mel, Jayce, and Viktor’s relationship is on full display, the hexcore/sex scene, it’s late at night. Jayce hasn’t abandoned Viktor for Mel, he’s just having a romantic life outside of work. I would question anyone who would say that’s abandonment. And when he hears Viktor is hurt, he actually leaves Mel for Viktor! He leaves her alone without so much as a note, because his friend/brother/lover (depending on your interpretation) needs him.
And then later, when Jayce apologizes to Mel for leaving her, he says sorry… and then immediately segues into talking about Viktor. (Which, yknow, kind of a dick move.) His apology essentially amounts to “sorry, but let’s talk about Viktor now because I’m so worried about him.” Mel doesn’t really get her feelings in the spotlight in that scene, other than a veiled bitter remark, before she’s comforting Jayce.
idk. I think about the three of them a lot.
24 notes
·
View notes
Man, I really just wrote an entire essay in a discord server with a bunch of my friends about geology. I swear to shit. In all honesty, I'm kinda bummed that geology isn't a major in the college I plan on going to bc I feel like I would knock that shit out. I just love it so much. Like, don't even get me started. I just think it's amazing how not only have WE been able to create new minerals as well, but that we're able to study them. Whenever I go on a hike now, all I can do is look at the rocks around me. Geology, what have you done to me. I mean, it's not exactly something I can brag about because most people don't give a shit until I mention the fact that I have a rock collection. I have a few geodes, but they're ALL QUARTZ, which is nice, I guess, but it gets to a point where I'm literally begging for any geode I find to have anything BUT quartz in it. Quartz is nice, dont get me wrong, but I have SO MUCH of it. I remember one time I almost tossed away a chunk of diorite bc I thought it was quartz. Like come on, do better, Earth. Btw here's quartz and diorite.
I know they look super different but my dumbass brain sees white on a rock and then goes "Oh yeah, that's quartz I don't need more quartz" but I was WRONG and an IDIOT. I really like geology and rocks and minerals btw did I mention that
18 notes
·
View notes
random storytime bc im autistic about geneaology
family history on my dad's side of the family is weird. my (catholic) grandmother had a few customs that are like jewish mourning customs (shiva). there was another custom involving the red string that she had told me and my sister about when we were kids. her family is from germany, galway ireland, and moselle france. idk why she did it, but her sister said the mourning customs sound like something people "did in the past." mayhaps it's a whole anusim situation, since i did find a (unverified) connection on the french side to a tree on JewishGen.
then there's my grandfather, an only child who was orphaned (temporarily) as a child. his father was 9 years older than his mother, and seemed to have met her when she was a minor. they married when she was 19, and my grandpa was born when she was 20. she abandoned him and his father quickly after, and never got back in contact. he was taken care of by his aunt while his father was a soldier in WW2. his father remarried, so he had step siblings.
...but my dad has a half first cousin match on ancestry... meaning my grandfather has/had a half sibling out there somewhere (potentially, a brother who's 2 years younger than him and died in 2012). normal people would just go message my dad's cousin and ask about it. will i do that? not yet. i'm gonna sleuth on my own, cause this may actually be something i can figure out... unlike my grandmother's customs.
14 notes
·
View notes
Oh boy, here I go ranting again.
So I went in to play Cultic finally, and while it's a great game with awesome atmosphere, it has done the cardinal sin of having my pet peeve in it and so I must rant.
The game front-loads the "they used to have less colours" shaders, and it kinda made me overly negative on it for the first minutes until I realised that a lot of textures are just pixel art and what *is* stock textures that were crumpled down mostly look fine.
So, what's my beef with these two options?
Here's a screenshot of the game, without them:
And here's them turned on, with and without "dithering"
Note how, just how they are in the options menu, they are applied one after another - which makes dithering into little more than just a texture applied over top, you can still see the banding with perfect clarity.
I get that GPU dithering is... Difficult, to say the least. Here's a forum post by Lucas Pope describing how he arrived at making dithering in Obra Dinn work. And that's just black-and-white dithering.
You can do it by dithering the colour channels separately, but I digress.
Dithering is a tool that's supposed to help you get *rid* of these banding artefacts - by mixing together pixels where you can't have an intermediate value. A shader will still have bands, true, but you can make them look significantly smoother while still having the same limited palette.
Here's a kodak standard testing image of parrots.
Here it is, ran through a toy ditherer I have written, it's palette extracted and merged by distance, no dithering.
Here it is again, same toy ditherer, same palette, but with dithering enabled.
Looks quite a bit nicer, doesn't it? This kind of dithering lets you keep more image detail by trying to compensate for the error of down-sampling - in this case, literally picking nearest colour, checking what the error is, and then distributing it to the nearby pixels. This exact algorithm produces nice results, but is inherently linear so it can't be put into a shader.
You can still make a shader that represents the intermediates with a different mix of two nearest shades - like this cool demo demonstrates. But you can't do it if you first strip the colours out and *then* dither it.
So, what I want to rant about is - if you gonna go for a limited palette look with dynamic lighting, the part that does dithering should also be the part that does palette reduction.
3 notes
·
View notes
If I tell you 'I'm unhappy with my situation' and you tell me 'But you have so many blessings! Look at all the cool stuff you have nobody else has!' all that tells me is you don't give a shit about me and you just want me to shut the fuck up. Here is why.
When I come to you complaining about being unhappy with a situation, I am looking for one of two things. 1) advice or 2) support. I don't automatically think anybody who says this is dismissive and uncaring (though it feels like it at the time) because you may be well intentioned, but at that moment, I don't care about my blessings. this may make me sound ungrateful, but me complaining about my situation doesn't make me ungrateful. I am certainly very grateful for all the things I have that some others may not get-- online friends, sufficient food and shelter, television, a bed-- but that doesn't make me any less upset about the things bothering me. Just because I have food and toys doesn't mean I'm any less of a caged animal, and you trying to convince me I am, in my mind, equates you with the people who locked me there in the first place.
2 notes
·
View notes