Tumgik
#worldpolitics
theotherjourney7 · 2 years
Text
“Putin's spokesman said Russia “have suffered significant losses of troops". BBC was able to verify identities of the 1,083 Russian servicemen killed in Ukraine (they were reported by local officials or media in Russia). So what do we see and know? …
Even if we talk about confirmed losses only - there is evidence that Russia has lost some of its best specialists, incl. elite spec. forces operators, highly skilled fighter pilots and some experienced commanders.
217 out of 1083 confirmed losses - ie over 20% - are officers. This includes 10 colonels, 20 lieutenant colonels, 31 majors and 155 junior officers (ranging from second lieutenant to captain).
It takes 5 years and at least 10.000 USD to prepare an infantry lieutenant in Russia. For other specialties prices rise up to 60.000 USD per one young officer. It costs from 4 to 14 mln USD (and up to 14 years) to prepare a skillful fighter pilot.
I underline that a high number of officers in the list of established losses doesn't mean that every 5th Russian killed on the battlefield was an officer. Fallen commanders are usually given a special treatment in the Russian army, so they can be sent home earlier than others
We also noticed another trend. About 15% of all confirmed losses are paratroopers from units, which are considered elite of the Russian army. And preparation of a paratrooper in Russia demands more money and time compared to an infantryman. So these are sensitive losses.
Some servicemen were very experienced. E.g. fighter pilot Sergey Volynets (captain) fought in Georgia and Syria, he had several medals
Tumblr media
There are at least 15 GRU special forces operators (including 5officers) and 3 maroon berets (краповые береты) in the confirmed losses list.These take months or even years to train and educate.Test to get a maroon beret is considered to be one of the hardest in the military world
Tumblr media
But there are also people of unexpected specialties in the list. On March 28 the death of the military orchestra sergeant Alexander Karpeyev was reported. He played the trumpet. Publications do not say what tasks he performed in Ukraine.
Tumblr media
From the official reports we see that usually it takes at least 2 weeks for bodies to be delivered home. Sometimes it takes more than a month. Some bodies require a DNA test to establish an identity
MoD last updated their figures on March 25 - just 4 days after first BBC publication about Russian losses (they were silent for 23 days before). MoD states there are 1351 Russian servicemen killed in Ukraine. It’s unclear whether Rosgvardia losses are included in this figure…….”-Olga Ivshina
3 notes · View notes
ccnegus · 6 days
Text
0 notes
taqato-alim · 16 days
Text
Analysis of: "The 2023/24 Human Development Report - Breaking the gridlock: Reimagining cooperation in a polarized world" (UNDP)
Tumblr media
PDF-Download: https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/global-report-document/hdr2023-24reporten.pdf
Summary of the key points discussed:
The document provides a balanced assessment of persistent global ties and ongoing challenges of global interdependence.
It argues economic, digital, cultural, climate and other ties ensure interdependence remains a defining feature despite some slowed integration.
Concentrated risks, socio-political polarization, slowed cooperation and planetary pressures pose challenges.
Better cooperation is needed to manage interdependence through global public goods, reframing issues, and renovating institutions.
Climate change is framed as an opportunity for cooperation through its technological and developmental implications.
Geopolitical tensions complicate cooperation required to collectively manage interconnected challenges.
Beyond GDP metrics and planetary perspectives are needed given Anthropocene dynamics.
The document demonstrates principled and evidence-based reasoning while accounting for multiple perspectives.
Ideas centered on pragmatic solutions, nuance, long-term thinking and global collaboration.
Widespread acceptance could foster an adaptive, holistic, cooperative and responsible global culture.
Genre of the document
Based on the content and style of writing, this document appears to be an analytical piece intended to inform and analyze a topic, rather than to simply report facts or tell a story. Key indicators that point to this genre include:
The use of an objective, somewhat detached tone without much emotive language.
Presenting arguments and reasoning to support key points, rather than just narrating events.
Referencing other research and literature to support the analysis and arguments being made.
Explaining concepts and framing issues for consideration, rather than just listing details.
Drawing conclusions and implications from the analysis presented.
Discussing macro-level trends and forces rather than just recounting specific events.
Therefore, I would classify the genre of this document as analytical. The purpose seems to be to examine and explain the dynamics of global interdependence in a reasoned, evidence-based manner, rather than just to report facts or tell a story.
Summary of the key points
Global interdependence persists despite a slowdown in economic integration. Hyperconnectivity through flows of information, people, ideas, and culture linking vast geographic distances is a defining feature of our time.
Planetary changes of the Anthropocene - pandemics, climate change, biodiversity loss - transcend borders, as do advances in digital technologies which shift economic structures.
While policy choices shape certain flows, the Anthropocene reality is that impacts like climate change cannot be managed through controlling at-border flows. We must embrace managing interdependence.
Digitalization links vast distances, enabling real-time collaboration and information sharing among billions. Digital services exports account for over half of commercial services trade.
The persistence of global ties comes despite concerns over concentrated global value chains increasing vulnerabilities to disruptions. Risks arose from liberalizing without effective safeguards.
If interdependence is inevitable, choices center on harnessing it or retreating behind borders. Neither fully avoids reshaped interdependence like climate change. managing interdependence better is key.
Anthropocene epoch
According to the document, the Anthropocene is:
A proposed new geological epoch characterized by unprecedented human impact on Earth systems.
Humans have become geological-scale drivers of planetary changes through activities like greenhouse gas emissions, land use change, etc. that alter the climate, biosphere, etc. at a planetary scale.
This ushers a new set of planetary challenges in addition to economic globalization, including pandemics, climate change, biodiversity loss that transcend borders and cannot be contained or directly managed by curbing flows at borders.
Under the Anthropocene the connections between social, economic and ecological spheres have been made inseparable, requiring a joint framing of issues.
Technological development and choices, like digital technologies and efforts to decarbonize, are profoundly reshaping interdependence in multiple ways that will persist far into the future.
So the Anthropocene provides a planetary lens to understand deeply interlinked human-nature interdependence that continues to evolve through human activities on a shared planet, demanding new approaches to global cooperation.
Persistent global ties
According to the document, despite a slowdown in the pace of economic integration, several key types of global ties remain at historically unprecedented levels of interdependence, making it an ongoing characteristic of the current era:
Economic interdependence: While trade in goods as a share of GDP appears to have plateaued, total trade (goods and services) remains at very high absolute levels. Financial interdependence also remains historically high, though is a smaller share of GDP than pre-2008 levels.
Cross-border flows of people, finance, information: Migration levels continue setting records, remittances approach the scale of foreign direct investment, and digital connectivity enabled huge growth in cross-border data flows despite plateaus in goods trade.
Planetary interdependence: Challenges like climate change and future pandemics cannot be circumscribed or escaped through restricting flows given their planetary scale impacts that transcend borders.
Technological drivers: Digitalization, clean energy shifts, continuing innovation ensure new forms of interdependence persist and intensify existing connections between economies.
Conceptual infrastructure: Ideas, knowledge, cultural influences spread globally almost instantaneously through digital communication networks.
In summary, despite slowed economic integration, multiple established and emergent drivers still characterize the world as one of unprecedented sustained overall interdependence well into the future.
Destabilizing dynamics
The document identifies several destabilizing dynamics that are reshaping global interdependence in problematic ways:
Concentration in global value chains and markets increases vulnerabilities, as disruptions can propagate through integrated systems. This was highlighted by COVID-19 supply chain disruptions.
Policy preferences regarding globalization have become more polarized in many countries, fueling the discontent that feeds populism and challenges international cooperation.
Societal polarization is on the rise, complicating collective action on shared challenges like climate change that transcend borders.
Geopolitical tensions among major powers are escalating for the first time since WWII, complicating multilateral cooperation.
Loss of control over economic flows that underpin populist discontent, as seen in heightened profit shifting to tax havens by multinationals.
Planetary changes like climate change intensify inequalities in human development impacts between societies.
Economic shifts tied to digitization may disrupt labor markets and development prospects without adequate policies.
Pandemics and conflicts spill over borders, surging amid gridlock in collectively managing interdependence.
In summary, changes in the scale and speed of interdependence alongside societal polarization and geopolitical tensions are destabilizing in multiple ways that complexity collective action.
Societal polarization
Here are the key points the document makes about the effects of societal polarization:
Rising populism and polarization of views on globalization in many countries complicates the ability to take collective action on issues requiring international cooperation.
When domestic public opinions are at opposite ends of the spectrum on global challenges, it fuels discontent and makes consensus difficult within and between nations.
This polarization of policy preferences regarding economic integration and the costs/benefits of interdependence clouds opportunities for partnership.
Issues like climate change that require a global response become more politically contentious as tensions rise within societies.
Divided publics are harder to unite behind joint efforts and make collective sacrifices or changes in behavior needed to tackle planetary-scale problems.
Polarization challenges the framing of shared global issues as opportunities rather than just obligations or risks.
So in essence, growing societal divisions hamper multilateral progress by fueling the "globalization of discontent" and limiting political will for internationally coordinated solutions.
Geopolitical tensions among major powers
According to the document, geopolitical tensions among major powers have been rising for the first time since the end of the Cold War:
Large-scale conflicts involving major powers such as the US, China, Russia are escalating, reversing the decline in conflicts between states witnessed after the Cold War ended.
The involvement of major powers in the wars in Ukraine, Yemen, Syria, etc. indicates how geopolitical interdependence is playing out through aligned military and funding support for combatants.
While countries depend on each other to break out of conflicts, it is not evident that external involvement helps achieve solutions more quickly or ends wars.
The document notes major powers' competing interests make cooperation limited on specific policy issues, evidenced in failures at international institutions where certain proposals have been tabled over the years to reform governance arrangements.
Growing strategic competition/distrust between the US, China and Russia complicates addressing shared global challenges through international cooperation including for providing global public goods.
So in summary, rising tensions among major powers are seen as complicating international collective action needed to manage global interdependence.
Managing interdependence
The document argues that fully retreating from or unwinding interdependence is not really an option, given the drivers that will persist well into the future, like:
The planetary challenges of the Anthropocene (climate change, pandemics, biodiversity loss) which transcend borders and require global cooperation.
Digital technologies and their intensifying global flows of data/information, reconfiguring economies.
Instead, the document emphasizes the need to embrace and manage interdependence better through:
Addressing drivers of the "globalization of discontent" like unequal distribution of costs/benefits.
Framing shared global challenges like climate change as opportunities for cooperation.
Providing global public goods to cooperatively manage interdependence in an equitable way.
Considering planetary public goods to navigate dangerous planetary changes.
Harnessing interdependence through digital technologies in ways benefiting all.
Renovating multilateral institutions and governance to better address 21st century challenges.
The focus is on managing interdependence positively through globally coordinated approaches and institutions, rather than attempting to withdraw from or contain interdependence through border controls.
Digitalization
The document does not provide extensive details on the effects of digitalization, but it does mention a few key points:
Digital technologies are reshaping global interdependence and economic flows in deep and ongoing ways that will persist far into the future.
They are intensifying existing cross-border flows of data, connectivity, and information in unprecedented ways that reconfigure economies.
If harnessed appropriately with policies supporting societies, digitalization has potential to help decarbonize economies and shift interdependence toward more sustainable patterns.
However, digitization may also disrupt labor markets and development prospects without adequate policies to manage the changes and ensure widespread benefits.
New forms of global connection and economic interaction enabled by digital technologies will persist and further embed global interdependence, requiring governance of issues like data and AI.
So in summary, while not the core focus, the document recognizes digitalization as a defining driver that is both intensifying interdependence but also could help transition relationships in a positive direction if harnessed cooperatively through globally coordinated efforts.
Global public goods
According to the document, global public goods are characterized as:
Anything - an object, action, inaction, idea - that when provided, everyone around the world can enjoy.
Non-exclusive, in that one person's use does not reduce availability to others.
Non-rival, meaning use by one does not reduce use by others.
Hard to exclude people from access and enjoyment.
Diverse - include both tangible outputs as well as intangibles like knowledge.
Can be provided fully with contributions from one country (best-shot) or cumulatively from multiple countries (summation).
Weakest-link type depends on the contribution of the least able country.
Examples discussed include climate change mitigation, pandemic control, open knowledge/ideas.
Providing them goes beyond making something available to devising ways for universal access and enjoyment.
Can be determined once provided, or purposefully established and made available by countries through coordination.
The document frames global public goods as pertaining to challenges of shared interest where approaches are needed to manage cross-border spillovers and interdependence.
Climate change as opportunity for cooperation
The document frames climate change as both a profound global challenge stemming from mismanaged interdependence, but also as an opportunity for cooperation. Some key points made:
Positive framing: Climate change mitigation reframed from an obligation to a technological opportunity, through clean energy innovation. This could help crowd in support.
Accelerating clean technologies shifts interdependence in a potentially positive direction, toward more digital, less emissions-intensive economies.
Very high and high HDI countries have made improvements to their HDI without increasing planetary pressures, showing decoupling is possible.
Framing climate action as providing best-shot global public goods like transformative clean technologies could mobilize cooperative ambition.
Emphasizing mutual benefits of climate solutions could help build support beyond those directly impacted.
Renewable energy "moonshots" have potential to inspire global cooperation the way Apollo program inspired collective will in 1960s.
The document suggests a positive vision highlighting shared interests and mutual benefits has potential to build momentum and catalyze collective action to scale, where a focus only on obligations fails. However, it acknowledges ongoing political challenges and uncertainties remain. Overall the assessment is that climate change can be repositioned from primarily an obligation to additionally an area of cooperative opportunity.
Renovating the multilateral institutions and governance
The document argues that renovating multilateral institutions and global governance is important to better manage evolving global interdependence in the 21st century. Some key points:
Current institutions reflect post-WWII power dynamics and global context, but the world has changed substantially.
Governance arrangements remain unrepresentative and face legitimacy challenges restricting cooperation.
Achieving development requires institutions aligned with expanding what we value in human development (beyond GDP/outcomes to include agency/freedoms).
Institutions have tools to foster cooperation (frame issues, aggregate actions, distribute burdens/benefits fairly).
Weak capacity to deliver planetary public goods for navigating the Anthropocene is a governance gap.
Financial architecture requires complement to traditional aid, supporting global public goods provision.
Digital technologies require discussion of appropriate governance for AI, data flows and new challenges.
Focus is shifting to "Beyond GDP" metrics and planetary/intergenerational thinking versus short-term growth.
The document argues reshaping multilateral cooperation based on an analysis of how interdependence is evolving could better promote managing global challenges through collective action.
"Beyond GDP" metrics and planetary/intergenerational thinking
According to the document:
"Beyond GDP" metrics refer to expanding what is valued in development beyond just economic growth indicators like GDP, to also include well-being achievements and other aspects like agency and freedoms.
This recognizes limitations of GDP/outcomes metrics alone in fully describing development progress in the 21st century context.
Planetary/intergenerational thinking acknowledges the interdependence between human societies and the planet, requiring consideration of longer term impacts on future generations from current actions.
It represents a shift from short-term growth priorities to accounting for effects on the biosphere that sustains all life and on what will be inherited by coming generations.
The document argues expanding metrics and perspectives in this way is important given:
Intensifying planetary challenges from human impacts like climate change in the Anthropocene epoch.
Recognition that development should increase capabilities, beyond production to well-being aspects like agency.
Emerging limitations of existing metrics to address new inequalities and uncertainties.
This framing helps reorient institutions to better reflect what humans truly value in development and guides transitioning to sustainability given global interdependence.
Key stakeholders affected
Policymakers and governments: The document evaluates how governments can better manage interdependence through global cooperation and public goods. It aims to inform policy approaches.
Researchers and analysts: The analysis advances understanding of evolving global interdependence and options to manage associated challenges.
Citizens globally: All people are affected by how global interdependence is shaped, through its impacts on things like conflicts, forced migration, climate change and pandemics.
Businesses: Firms are profoundly affected by policies governing global economic integration, flows of information, and sustainability transitions.
Evaluation:
The document takes a global perspective, seeking to understand interdependence comprehensively rather than privileging some stakeholders.
It identifies both opportunities and risks of interdependence, considering implications for well-being, agency and human security across groups.
By framing shared challenges rather than differences, it aims to inform cooperation among stakeholders with diverse interests and preferences.
However, it does not engage stakeholders directly, making the arguments and analysis but not consulting those affected.
On balance, while taking a balanced view, the analytical nature of the document means it informs but does not directly engage the range of stakeholders affected by choices on managing interdependence.
Evaluation of the situation
The document provides a generally positive evaluation of the current situation of global interdependence, while also highlighting some ongoing challenges:
Positive aspects:
Global interconnectedness through information, digital, economic and movement links remains high overall, despite slower trade/financial integration. This reflects the deep roots and persistence of global ties.
Economic interdependence remains at historically unprecedented levels, stabilizing after hyperglobalization, indicating integration is not unraveling.
Digital connectivity in particular continues intense growth, shrinking distances between places through real-time online collaboration and communication.
Challenging aspects:
Concentration in global supply chains increases vulnerabilities to disruptions from any one actor/region.
Anti-elite populism exploits discontent with uneven distribution of globalization gains.
Slowed trade and potential trade barriers may curb economic opportunities in some places.
Planetary changes like climate change intensify cross-border interdependencies and risks through pandemics, displacement and market/financial volatility.
Overall, while the deep roots and persistence of global ties are acknowledged, the document points to challenges from concentrated global risks and slow policy adaptation to emerging drivers of interdependence like the Anthropocene. On balance it depicts the situation as a complex mix of persistent global ties alongside destabilizing dynamics warranting better cooperation to manage.
Type of culture that would result from widespread adoption of the ideas
Globally cooperative/interdependent: By emphasizing shared global challenges and opportunities for partnership, it would foster a culture of cooperation between nations accustomed to seeing issues through an interdependent lens.
Forward-thinking and adaptive: Focusing on long-term sustainability, emerging trends and modernizing institutions promotes flexibility, innovation and preparedness for future changes.
Holistically prosperous: Broader view of development prioritizing well-being, freedoms and responsibility to future generations encourages fulfilling lives on a preserved planet.
Evidence-based and pragmatic: Relying on fact-driven analysis to find workable solutions rather than ideology encourages realism balanced with hope.
Collaborative problem-solving: Emphasis on managing interdependence cooperatively rather than confrontation fosters partnership on complex issues.
Respectful of complexity: Appreciation for multiple valid viewpoints and uncertainties reflects tolerance rather than simplistic thinking.
Responsible stewardship: Recognition of humanity's planetary impacts motivates ethical restraint and caretaking of shared natural resources.
Overall, this culture would be globally-minded, future-oriented, solutions-focused, empirically-grounded and driven more by cooperation than competition or unilateralism. It prioritizes sustainable prosperity through nuanced, collaborative problem-solving.
Key wisdoms reflected
Complex interdependence persists - Recognizing interdependence is multifaceted and not subject to simple containment reflects wisdom in understanding connectivity cannot be simplified.
Balance opportunities and risks - Weighing both positive and negative dynamics of globalization shows balanced, nuanced perspective over optimism or alarmism.
Frame shared interest not just obligations - Framing climate change cooperative opportunity, not just threat, recognizes appeal encouraging collective will.
Consider long-term and indirect impacts - Accounting for future generations and biosphere impacts displays forward-thinking about consequences beyond immediate horizon.
Innovate cooperative solutions - Solutions-focused angle on managing interdependence through cooperation rather than conflict reflects practical problem-solving approach.
Represent multiplicity of human development - Holistic perspective on development beyond GDP acknowledges diversity of what progress means.
Embrace change and evolution - Recognizing dynamics evolve and institutions require renovation to remain relevant rather than resist all change.
Overall, the document demonstrates practical wisdom through its balanced, nuanced and adaptive understanding of globalization - recognizing complexity rather than oversimplification, considering multiple perspectives and long-term impacts, and seeking cooperative solutions through principled yet flexible representation of shared challenges.
Quality of reason
The document presents a logical and evidence-based argument for its main conclusions regarding the nature and drivers of global interdependence. Some strengths in the quality of reasoning include:
It clearly outlines the empirical evidence supporting key claims about the persistence of various dimensions of global ties despite a slowdown in some aspects of economic integration. References credible data sources.
Provides theoretical framing around concepts like the Anthropocene to help contextualize evidence and root conclusions in a deeper understanding of dynamics.
Uses multiple examples and case studies to illustrate broader arguments, giving a sense of concrete real-world impacts.
Qualifies some conclusions by noting uncertainty in aspects or acknowledging contradictory evidence, showing nuanced consideration of different perspectives.
Logically draws out implications of evidence presented for how global challenges should be approached going forward.
References other research and literature to supplement analysis and situate within peer-reviewed discourse.
Potential weaknesses are relatively minor, such as not always explicitly stating assumptions underlying some conclusions. But on the whole the quality of reasoning is strong, leveraging empirical observations and logical argumentation to build and support its primary thesis. While individual claims could spur constructive debate, the overall case presented is evidence-based and cogently argued.
Evaluation of potential biases
Ideological/country bias: The analysis takes a relatively impartial, global perspective without undue focus on any one nation, ideology or set of interests.
Confirmation bias: Multiple forms of evidence and perspectives are considered. While certainly aiming to support its central thesis, the assessment does not ignore contradictory evidence.
Financial bias: No direct financial interests are apparent that could bias shaping of arguments. The analysis is presented in academic/informative tone.
Selection bias: A wide range of perspectives on globalization are discussed, not just those fitting a certain viewpoint. The framing acknowledges both opportunities and risks of interdependence.
Anthropic bias: Planetary impacts are given due considerations alongside human-centric factors like economics, showing no bias ignoring environmental dimensions.
Optimism bias: Both positive and negative dynamics of interdependence trends are weighed without just optimism or pessimism about the future state of global ties.
Overall, while any analysis inevitably reflects some viewpoints, I did not find strong evidence of systematic biases skewing the framing, fact-selection or conclusions in ways that would seriously undermine the credibility of the arguments presented. The analysis takes a balanced, evidence-based approach.
Key criteria for evaluating analytical genres and assessment of how this document meets each criterion
Thesis/central argument: The document clearly establishes its central argument that global interdependence persists despite a slowdown in economic integration, and is being reshaped by planetary change and digital technologies.
Evidence/reasoning: The analysis provides empirical evidence and logical reasoning to substantiate its claims about the persistence and reshaping of interdependence.
Objectivity: The tone is reasonably objective without emotive language, focusing on presenting arguments over narrative.
Contextualization: Issues are framed within discussion of macro trends and drivers like the Anthropocene and Digital Revolution.
Implications: The chapter draws implications about better managing interdependence through a global public goods lens.
Referencing: Arguments build on cited research, statistics, concepts from other sources to support points.
Overall, the document performs well against standard evaluation criteria for analytical genres. Its clear thesis, evidence-based reasoning, objective tone and contextual framing, implications drawn, and references used suggest it achieves its aim of analytically examining and explaining dynamics of global interdependence.
0 notes
frontpageinsights · 15 days
Text
Stay Informed on World Events! These are Headlines You Can't Miss! Explore the Latest Developments and Stay Connected with important News!
0 notes
defensenow · 1 month
Text
youtube
0 notes
allaroundworld · 2 months
Text
Global Leaders: Presidents and Prime Ministers of the World 🌐👥
Explore the profiles of the current Presidents and Prime Ministers shaping the course of nations across the globe. From diplomatic decisions to economic policies, get insights into the leadership that influences our world. Stay informed about the individuals at the helm of global affairs. 🌍🤝 #GlobalLeaders #WorldPolitics #LeadershipInsights
For more information visit our website:- https://www.allaroundworlds.com/presidents-and-prime-ministers-of-the-world/
0 notes
sarasbooksonline · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
Understanding the European Union, A Concise Introduction, Palgrave; 3rd edition (22 July 2005)
DM for Order sarasbooksonline.com
Contact : 099584 91228
0 notes
bigdatadept · 3 months
Text
In-Depth Analysis of 2024's Looming Challenges
Exploring 2024's potential global crises, this article delves into 100 key issues, from geopolitical tensions to economic shifts, seeking informed, proactive strategies for future challenges.
In-Depth Analysis of 2024’s Looming Challenges Welcome to an earnest exploration of what 2024 might hold for us on a global scale. This blog post delves into a comprehensive analysis of 100 pivotal issues that could shape the forthcoming year. Drawing from a multitude of sources across the web, I dissect geopolitical tensions, military escalations, economic fluctuations, and technological…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
newssails1 · 7 months
Text
The Geopolitical Game: How Russia's Financial Power Shapes Global Relations
Tumblr media
Russia's financial power plays a pivotal role in shaping global relations. In this blog, we'll explore how Russia wields its financial influence on the world stage, impacting geopolitics and international dynamics.
**1. Energy Dominance: Russia is a major energy exporter, particularly in the form of oil and natural gas. Its energy resources give it significant leverage over energy-dependent nations and play a crucial role in its foreign policy.
**2. Energy as a Political Tool: Russia has not hesitated to use its energy resources as a political tool. Gas disputes with Ukraine and Europe have highlighted the geopolitical dimension of Russia's energy exports.
**3. Economic Interdependence: Russia's economic interdependence with Europe and Asia has far-reaching consequences. Trade relationships, investment ties, and energy partnerships have deepened its influence in these regions.
**4. Military Expansion: Russia's financial power enables it to invest in military modernization and expansion. This has implications for its geopolitical influence, particularly in regions like Eastern Europe and the Arctic.
**5. Sanctions and Countermeasures: Western countries have imposed economic sanctions on Russia in response to its actions in Ukraine and other geopolitical disputes. In turn, Russia has sought to develop alternative financial systems and partnerships to mitigate the impact of sanctions.
**6. Currency and Financial Alliances: Russia has pursued alliances with countries seeking alternatives to the U.S. dollar-dominated financial system. These efforts include currency swaps and agreements to settle trade in national currencies.
**7. Influence in Multilateral Organizations: Russia is a member of various multilateral organizations, such as the United Nations and BRICS. Its financial power allows it to influence global policy debates and negotiations.
**8. Soft Power and Cultural Diplomacy: Russia uses cultural diplomacy and soft power initiatives to enhance its global image and strengthen its influence. These efforts include media outlets like RT (formerly Russia Today) and cultural exchanges.
Conclusion: Russia's financial power is a significant driver of its geopolitical influence.
Its energy dominance, economic interdependence, military capabilities, and responses to sanctions all contribute to its role in shaping global relations.
As Russia continues to navigate the geopolitical game, its financial strategies and alliances remain central to its pursuit of influence on the world stage.
0 notes
recklessfuture001 · 7 months
Text
More About the Situation in Africa!
Here’s a video from a YouTube Channel that I watch a good bit. If you are interested in learning more about the situation in Africa, here is an expert being interviewed – Milton Allimadi. He seems quite knowledgeable to me on the subject. He also mentions ECOWAS. Isn’t learning new things fun? Below is the video. Enjoy! https://www.youtube.com/live/dNHJizzutuc?si=W0lYsYsm_grKmbY6
View On WordPress
0 notes
hogemonic · 1 year
Text
Mass shootings in America have become a chronic issue, claiming countless lives. Every day, we were faced with fear. Losing friends, family, or loved ones can happen anytime. Something needed to be done to prevent future tragedies.
The government is a joke. How come they are more worried about tiktok than about more important issues like banning or tightening gun ownership regulations and making mental health facilities better?
They're just sitting there watching us be killed while planning the next election. Even the pope is addressing wrongs. Our government doesn't ever admit wrongs. We can only protest and watch the world burn over and over again without something changing. Put an end to gun violence!
Tumblr media
1 note · View note
maqsoodyamani · 2 years
Text
سیاستِ عالم: نظر کو خِیرہ کرتی ہے چمک تہذیبِ حاضر کی
سیاستِ عالم: نظر کو خِیرہ کرتی ہے چمک تہذیبِ حاضر کی
سیاستِ عالم: نظر کو خِیرہ کرتی ہے چمک تہذیبِ حاضر کی   ———– ازقلم:ڈاکٹر سلیم خان ———–       عالم اسلام کے بجائے آج کل قتل و غارتگری ، جنگ و جدال اور تختہ پلٹ کی خبریں دیگر ممالک سے آرہی ہیں ۔گزشتہ ایک میں غیر مسلم دنیا سے آنے والی اس قسم کی مختلف خبریں ذرائع ابلاغ پر چھائی رہیں مثلاً امریکہ کے ہائی لینڈ پارک سے فریڈم پریڈ یعنی جشن آزادی کے جلوس پر گولیاں برسانے کا اندوہناک واقعہ منظرِ عام پر…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
piyushmehra1 · 2 years
Video
#politics #polititions #worldpolitics #geopolitics https://www.instagram.com/p/Cf4DKz4ojP6/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=
0 notes
theotherjourney7 · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
عاجل: بريطانيا‬⁩🇬🇧..رئيس لجنة النواب المحافظين في البرلمان: رئيس الوزراء ⁧‫بوريس جونسون‬⁩ سيخضع لسحب الثقة اليوم
Breaking: No confidence vote in UK 🇬🇧 Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s leadership among Conservative MPs to be held *today* in the evening.
0 notes
Photo
Tumblr media
Kwara APC lagos icon , Baba Elderstateman Gbadamosi Adisa Alago #kwarapolitics #thepolitician #politicians #politicsnews #politicstoday #worldpolitics #poweruponpower #power #powerofpositivity #poweruponpower #kwarastate #kwarastatememes #kwarastategovernor #adedoyin https://www.instagram.com/p/Cds1LD2tPfa/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=
0 notes
kajmasterclass · 3 months
Text
youtube
0 notes