Tumgik
#would that i
faerycross · 3 months
Text
someone said "hozier doesn't write about love, he writes about devotion" and i haven't slept peacefully since
1K notes · View notes
somequicknewmusic · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Wasteland, Baby! | March 1, 2019
"There is definitely a kind of wry smile to the work, but it takes place with a great shadow hanging over, I suppose, the end of the world kind of hanging over the album a little bit. But that is enjoyed in the best way possible."
523 notes · View notes
averyroundtoad · 2 months
Text
Must I have a career? Is it not enough to scroll Pinterest while listening to Hozier?
281 notes · View notes
apexdreadwolf · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
I swear this man gets more prettier every freaking day!! Like holy heck!
223 notes · View notes
edscuntyeyeshadow · 5 months
Text
it annoys me quite a bit when certain people reduce hozier’s music to ✨cottagecore vibes ✨like I’m begging you please listen to jackboot jump or but the wages or butchered tongue, not just would that i 💀💀
298 notes · View notes
joseph-plunkett · 4 months
Text
In the chorus of would that I I always imagine tiny hoziers singing the Oohs
Tumblr media
Hozier; and it's not tonight
Hoziettes; OH OH OHHH OH OH ooOH
165 notes · View notes
everdeenxmellark · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
i want to be loved like hozier song
154 notes · View notes
33misc · 6 months
Text
for the girlies who understand, I’m out here tying to turn a Almost (Sweet Music) situation into a Would that I situation, but failing and getting myself Francesca’d
195 notes · View notes
asoftepiloguemylove · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
on fire and desire
ana kennedy i know you're not the one i'm looking for, but i am so cold and a fire is a fire // Yves Olade Bloodsport (via @sorryforthebonyelbows) // unknown // Joan Crawford (via @samtastic) // unknown // Hozier Would That I // Federico García Lorca Blood Wedding and Yerma
259 notes · View notes
aestheteinreverie · 1 year
Text
how did hozier come up with “true that the sound of the saw must be known by the tree” as a metaphor of knowing of the relationship’s inevitable end, of knowing love is on the path of destruction. no seriously how the fuck do you come up with that
798 notes · View notes
thedustyshehnai · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
the hold this album has on me
721 notes · View notes
molotovc · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Loki // 𝘚𝘭𝘰𝘸 𝘚𝘩𝘰𝘸 The National // 𝘞𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘐 Hozier
68 notes · View notes
lovefromivy · 4 days
Text
metaphors in hozier's 'would that i'
the song doesn't make a lot of sense until you decode the metaphors he uses in it, but then it all clicks. the use of extended metaphors for his present and previous lovers is really important and significant because it tells the listener a lot about how he experiences these different loves in very different ways, and why his current love isn't 'just another date', but something entirely new that he values very highly and cherishes to the point that he 'worships' it.
hozier compares his past loves to plants - he describes his past lover as having 'hair like the branch of a tree' and calls her a 'willow', and, when talking about forgetting other loves in the wake of his current lover, he says that he watches 'still living roots' be destroyed. plants are beautiful, but they require a lot of care. there's a specificity to each type of plant, because different plants have different needs in terms of water, types of food, mineral content, soil pH, and the list goes on. it's easy to accidentally kill plants with just one misstep. they are delicate and difficult and progress is slow because it takes years and years for trees to grow and reach their full potential, start producing fruit, etc. hozier is saying that his past loves were a lot of work and they didn't give anything back easily, even though he had to give them everything to try and make them work.
by contrast, hozier calls his new love 'the fire', 'flames', and so on. fire is wild, all-consuming, and can be terrifying. but fire is also powerful and free. when we think about fire, we mostly think about destruction - wildfires or burning buildings or similar disasters - but fire is also life. before human ancestors had fire, they were cold and vulnerable and in the dark. but, after fire, their survival was completely revolutionised: it was an entirely new way of life. for the first time, they could control when it was light; they could keep warm in the winter; they could cook food, and, subsequently, their diets were transformed; they could protect themselves much better from predators. fire represented energy, innovation, life. yes, it was dangerous. but it was also majorly useful and ultimately it was something they needed, not just to stay alive, but to live. to call your love not just a fire but the fire - as in, the first fire, the only fire, the fire to rival all other fires - is to call it the introduction of warmth, protection, light, growth, energy, and power; it is to call it the biggest advancement possible in your lifetime; it is to call it the single root cause of a metamorphosis. the speaker is commenting that this newest love has entirely changed the way that he sees and experiences love.
the metaphors also allude to the speaker's own inner turmoil and problems with love and loving. when hozier talks about his prior trysts, he uses precise, controlling language: he's very specific when he talks about exactly what the relationship was and how it worked in his first verse, detailing what was 'under' him and what was 'over' him. then, in the next verse, he repeats the verb 'must', giving that verse a desperate, urgent tone. 'must' is a harsh verb and it doesn't leave much room for debate. the level of control that hozier is exerting (or, at the very least, trying to exert) over this relationship is made clear linguistically, but is also mimicked in that extended metaphor of the willow tree. taking care of them is long, hard, and mostly fruitless work, and maybe he even feels like it's his duty to take control of the relationship because he feels that his lover needs that control, maybe because she isn't giving him anything much back, just like that volatile, hard-to-care-for willow tree. that same verse sees an allusion to the time that he 'fretted fire', and, if the tree is control and stability, then surely fire is the opposite - anarchy and disorder? - except that he comes to see fire as freedom. he manages to let go of the need to be in control. he finds a relationship where he doesn't need to be the one doing everything: he doesn't address his past lover(s) at all (perhaps he knows it's pointless, since they won't respond?), instead talking about them passively, but he does talk a lot about what he does, relying heavily on first person singular pronouns. in the fourth verse, he addresses someone else for the first time - his 'flame' - personally, and the fifth verse is entirely directed at her. he talks about her actually taking action, actually doing things. when he says that she 'licked off the grain', i think that he is alluding to her taking all of his bad memories, all of his felled willow (and other?) trees, and simply taking away the rough, uneven parts (the grain), leaving him with the smooth wood, and that she is able to do this because he no longer has any reason to lament his past failures in love - he has his 'flame', and the trees of his past can't use their roots to trip him up or push their branches in his face any more, and so he is simply left with happy memories, the best of his ex-lovers, whatever is left that he can still appreciate and be thankful for. and that's significant because he's found a love who has helped him let go of the need for control. he doesn't need to control the relationship any more, for his sake or for his lover's, because she is here and she is willing to do things with him and for him and give back to him and help him to be free, and offer him warmth and protection and energy and all these things that fire is, and he doesn't need to do anything except love her back, because fire only needs one thing to stay alive, and everything else simply becomes fuel. if his love is her flames' version of oxygen, then everything else is just flammable material. nothing he does can make her stop loving him because fires aren't difficult to keep alive, they are difficult to put out. fires don't need food with specific mineral ratios or a certain volume of rainfall or the right soil pH. they just burn. she just loves him - that is what she does. and he watches 'in awe' because that kind of unconditional love is so far removed from his carefully-measured, carefully-controlled previous relationships.
and those last two lines of the last verse are so beautiful: "long as amber of ember glows/all the 'would that i'd loved' is long ago". he's saying that even when the flame burns out, even if she stops loving him, even if she is dead and gone and buried, the freedom that she gave him will remain in the 'amber', that beautiful colour linked to energy and the sun and wealth (because isn't that what love is?), of the last, residual 'ember', the dwindling remains of the love and freedom they shared. and as long as he can hold onto that freedom, even if it does dwindle down to embers and ashes - treasured memories and the fears that you'll forget what their smile looked like or the way they scrunched their nose when the disliked something or the cute expression they assumed when focussed - then he never has to go back to feeling like he needs to grip onto a half-hearted relationship, where he must always be responsible and in control and doing.
but yeah i just love that fire metaphor. can you tell??? probably not
23 notes · View notes
Would that I by Hozier but make it Merthur in the last episode
I didn’t have time to do line by line analysis so it’s more of an overview, but go look up the lyrics and you’ll see what I mean.
The song is about finding new love and old relationship troubles, as the trees in the song, are burned down by the new love, the fire. That’s literally Arthur learning about magic and what it is for Merlin. He learns about this huge thing and accepts it, then all the lies and every idiosyncratic thing he’s never understood about Merlin falls into place and it makes sense because of the magic, without disregarding every other aspect of his person.
-“That the sound of the saw must be known by the tree” when Arthur asks Merlin why he risked so much knowing that magic was punishable by death.
-“oh but you’re good to me” is Arthur realising how much Merlin has done for him.
-a lot of mentions of fire, Arthur seeing gold in Merlin’s eyes, “Amber of ember glows” do I really need to say anything more?
-“it’s not tonight where I’m set alight” Arthur being relieved or whatever you want to call it about Merlin still being Merlin, still drying his boots, helping him to eat. He’s still the same, just Merlin and magic now.
40 notes · View notes
faerycross · 4 months
Text
convinced hozier was a lesbian in a past life. and a willow the one before that.
43 notes · View notes
oolhan · 5 months
Text
my roman empire is how hozier's whole discography is too everlark-coded
32 notes · View notes