the-land-of-women

[the-land-of-women]

come to think about it there's not much to celebrate about the deaths of people like OJ Simpson to me. good riddance and all but mostly, it's just depressing how people like him get to die surrounded by their loved ones at an old age, having lived a long life of luxury and success. sure he must have been in pain but still he had the privilege of dying knowing that he's loved and the privilege of having lived on the level only a few other people have lived. Nicole Brown had none of these privileges and died alone, stabbed by the man she married, at just 35. she lived her last months (years?) terrified of her husband, knowing he would murder her eventually, desperately looking for help but never finding it. everyone will die one day anyway, and the way he went was probably the best way to go. his victims never got any justice and now they never will, and at the end he never had to answer or suffer any punishment for anything that he's done.

[the-land-of-women]

it is soooo crazy how male friendships are always better because in female friendships girls just fight all the time but also there is a male loneliness epidemic because men dont talk about their feelings with their friends and they need to rely on women

[the-land-of-women]

Happy Lesbian Visibility Week! ⚢

[the-land-of-women]

#I’m not entirely convinced rishi sunak isn’t a robot in a skin suit #man does not act like a human being in any capacity #how and why does he think this is a good idea #complete lack of empathy for these people as humans beings plus just on a technical level it seems ridiculous #xenophobia

[the-land-of-women]

"I can't pretend you are a bunny, bunnies are a real thing"

... unlike women?

[the-land-of-women]

The argument that we should no longer have sports leagues for men and women, instead sort everyhing by height/weight/muscle mass is crazy because do you know what categories would be the most effective sorting system with the least amount of random outliers? Male and female sports

[the-land-of-women]

Why on earth is anyone taking this shoddy cass review seriously?

I'm sorry but it's baffling how an actual government is uncritically taking this review at face value. It literally only comes to the conclusion it does because it ignore literally all other evidence. They excluded a shit ton of studies because they didn't have enough controls, which sounds reasonable but in order to have those controls they'd have to unknowingly give patients placebos instead of the hormonal therapy and puberty blockers they asked for.

That would be an extremely unethical thing to do, and would achieve nothing because the effects of hormonal therapy and puberty blockers are extremely obvious.

Just let that sit with you for a moment. All that clinical evidence completely thrown out the window because they didn't do a horrific and unethical test on their patients. All that clinical evidence ignored because the study was ethical. This is an extreme oversight at BEST and deliberate misinformation at worst. Either way, it makes the review extremely unreliable.

That's just one issue. But the fact that the vast, VAST majority of research was completely ignored due to a ridiculous and unethical requirement should be enough for you to oppose anyone using this as evidence for anything other than why queer people need to be included in scientific discussions about our communities. Because this review is being used to roll back LGBT rights.

[the-land-of-women]

Why on earth is anyone taking this shoddy cass review seriously?

I'm sorry but it's baffling how an actual government is uncritically taking this review at face value. It literally only comes to the conclusion it does because it ignore literally all other evidence. They excluded a shit ton of studies because they didn't have enough controls, which sounds reasonable but in order to have those controls they'd have to unknowingly give patients placebos instead of the hormonal therapy and puberty blockers they asked for.

That would be an extremely unethical thing to do, and would achieve nothing because the effects of hormonal therapy and puberty blockers are extremely obvious.

Just let that sit with you for a moment. All that clinical evidence completely thrown out the window because they didn't do a horrific and unethical test on their patients. All that clinical evidence ignored because the study was ethical. This is an extreme oversight at BEST and deliberate misinformation at worst. Either way, it makes the review extremely unreliable.

That's just one issue. But the fact that the vast, VAST majority of research was completely ignored due to a ridiculous and unethical requirement should be enough for you to oppose anyone using this as evidence for anything other than why queer people need to be included in scientific discussions about our communities. Because this review is being used to roll back LGBT rights.

[the-land-of-women]

Not op deleting the reblog debunking their misinformation…

Why on earth is anyone taking this shoddy cass review seriously?

I'm sorry but it's baffling how an actual government is uncritically taking this review at face value. It literally only comes to the conclusion it does because it ignore literally all other evidence. They excluded a shit ton of studies because they didn't have enough controls, which sounds reasonable but in order to have those controls they'd have to unknowingly give patients placebos instead of the hormonal therapy and puberty blockers they asked for.

That would be an extremely unethical thing to do, and would achieve nothing because the effects of hormonal therapy and puberty blockers are extremely obvious.

Just let that sit with you for a moment. All that clinical evidence completely thrown out the window because they didn't do a horrific and unethical test on their patients. All that clinical evidence ignored because the study was ethical. This is an extreme oversight at BEST and deliberate misinformation at worst. Either way, it makes the review extremely unreliable.

That's just one issue. But the fact that the vast, VAST majority of research was completely ignored due to a ridiculous and unethical requirement should be enough for you to oppose anyone using this as evidence for anything other than why queer people need to be included in scientific discussions about our communities. Because this review is being used to roll back LGBT rights.

#it’s a bbc podcast it’s not terf radio #why would you assume it’s biased?

[the-land-of-women]

I’m begging of you even if you disagree with Israel (rightly so), do not fall into the enemy of my enemy is my friend mentality. Do not forget the atrocities that the Islamic Republic has committed and is committing against its own people, including children. Do not forget Mahsa Amini and Nika Shahkarami and the millions killed by the Islamic Republic.

Sincerely, an Iranian.

[the-land-of-women]

#newscast #bbc #bbc sounds #podcasts #Hilary cass #gids #puberty blockers #cass review #cass report #trans

[the-land-of-women]

Why on earth is anyone taking this shoddy cass review seriously?

I'm sorry but it's baffling how an actual government is uncritically taking this review at face value. It literally only comes to the conclusion it does because it ignore literally all other evidence. They excluded a shit ton of studies because they didn't have enough controls, which sounds reasonable but in order to have those controls they'd have to unknowingly give patients placebos instead of the hormonal therapy and puberty blockers they asked for.

That would be an extremely unethical thing to do, and would achieve nothing because the effects of hormonal therapy and puberty blockers are extremely obvious.

Just let that sit with you for a moment. All that clinical evidence completely thrown out the window because they didn't do a horrific and unethical test on their patients. All that clinical evidence ignored because the study was ethical. This is an extreme oversight at BEST and deliberate misinformation at worst. Either way, it makes the review extremely unreliable.

That's just one issue. But the fact that the vast, VAST majority of research was completely ignored due to a ridiculous and unethical requirement should be enough for you to oppose anyone using this as evidence for anything other than why queer people need to be included in scientific discussions about our communities. Because this review is being used to roll back LGBT rights.

[the-land-of-women]

Cosmetic surgeons go to hell. Not to sound like an old testament finger wagging hag right now but that entire profession is based on risking other people’s lives for the sake of vanity and narcissism and sexual appeal and profit. It’s wrong and I hate it.

[the-land-of-women]

Radical Take

Trans people can exist and the Cass Review can be in the best interest of children at the same time.

[the-land-of-women]

x

#cass review #cass report #Hilary cass #gender critical #gender #gids #puberty blockers #gender dysphoria

[the-land-of-women]

The Be Kind Brigade strikes again.

[the-land-of-women]

x

#hilary cass #cass review #cass report #gender critical #radfem safe #gender