Tumgik
umbrasna · 6 months
Text
Why is life easy without hope?
I am at a point in my life where I feel satisfied and have no desire to change my current routine. My daily life consists of waking up, working out, dancing to music, watching the series Dexter, playing Valorant, and occasionally watching content from the Sideman YouTube channel to boost my mood.
I live with my parents, and they have no particular expectations from me. After failing my first year of BTech, I decided to drop out and pursue a BBA degree through online distance education. I reside in India. The unnecessary degrees, books, and vast university buildings, along with exams designed to test human memory, never made sense to me from the beginning.
Over the years, I have engaged in various internships and jobs, although they have typically been performance-based and not permanent. When I finished high school, I held ambitious dreams of achieving immortality and exploring the universe with an invincible body. I wanted to make the world a better place by combating death and aging, but now I feel that life is too short to pursue these goals.
I have even reconsidered some of my basic personal hygiene habits, such as bathing and brushing, as I no longer believe them to be necessary. I believe today’s world often bestows conditional love, where one’s fair skin, physique, or wealth may invite affection. In this world of ever-changing conditions, I fear losing love, for if someone’s love hinges on a specific condition, its disappearance could lead to departure. When I open myself to dating and relationships, my expectations increase, and if these expectations aren’t met, I’m left with doubt, a lingering question of whether I failed to fulfill the expected condition. Rejection shatters these expectations, leaving behind profound sorrow. So, I have stopped expecting anything from anyone and have refrained from engaging in certain activities like dating and relationships, which I find to be emotionally sensitive.
I had recently contemplated starting a small company with my savings and my father’s support, but I decided against it. I believe that my natural instincts guide me to focus on working out, playing, and watching series as the primary elements of my life. While I acknowledge the importance of money in the world, I had once hoped it didn’t exist, which makes my goals seem challenging.
“Money, a fleeting breath I cannot clasp,
Its presence felt, a mirage in my grasp,
Too material, it slips through fingers fast,
In its elusive dance, my desires steadfast.”
I find happiness in doing things that will not help me achieve my goals. Nevertheless, I am content and happy with the way I am currently living my life.
0 notes
umbrasna · 3 years
Text
HELP THIS TIRED PARTICLES!
Tumblr media
"A real particle close to a massive Body has less energy than if it were far away because energy of particle will be used against the gravitational attraction of a massive Body"
6 notes · View notes
umbrasna · 3 years
Text
Black holes have a non-decreasing behaviour, it's Event Horizon edges will never meet each other. Hence, they will only increase or be parallel to each other.
3 notes · View notes
umbrasna · 3 years
Text
Tumblr media
Black Hole Behaviour
After gravitational collapse a black hole must settle down into a state in which it could be rotating.
1 note · View note
umbrasna · 3 years
Text
Tumblr media
Black Hole Phenomenon
Losing energy in star by the emission of gravitational waves is causing spiral movement of energy in a black hole.
2 notes · View notes
umbrasna · 3 years
Text
Black Hole on Tumblr!
“Why are black holes so different from all other objects in the macroscopic Universe? Why are they, and they alone, so elegantly simple? If I knew the answer, it would probably tell me something very deep about the nature of physical laws. But I don’t know.”
1 note · View note
umbrasna · 3 years
Text
Tumblr media
Is Oxygen really a sign of life ?
In our search for Earth like exoplanets, it would seem logical to look for planets that have similar atmosphere's to our own, and in particular, hold detectable Oxygen.
On Earth, Oxygen only really entered our atmosphere as a dominant gas around 2-3 Billion years ago, before that it was thought to be largely Nitrogen and Carbon Dioxide based.
So what changed ? The emergence en-mass of Bacteria, that converted much of that Carbon Dioxide into Oxygen, and created the possibility for much larger and more complex life to evolve.
So, finding Oxygen could mean finding life ??
A team of scientists at UC Santa Cruz have looked into the possibility of planets gaining oxygen from non-biological processes, and have modelled the evolution of such rocky planets to see if a similar atmosphere to Earth can be created without the bacteria.
The modelling came up with 3 scenarios where Oxygen could be created without the need for life.
1. An ocean world, with significantly more water than Earth, could over time have the H2O split into Hydrogen (which would escape) and Oxygen which would remain trapped. If enough water was present, it could shut down some of the geological processes that would otherwise remove it.
Tumblr media
2. A desert world, with very little water. Much of the water that did exist would be steam based and would slowly be converted to Oxygen.
Tumblr media
3. A planet with much higher concentrations of Carbon Dioxide to Nitrogen in the early mix, would over-heat, cause a runaway greenhouse effect, boil the oceans but in doing so, also increase the Oxygen that could be in the atmosphere.
Tumblr media
The good news is, most of these scenarios could be detected and ruled out. However, simply finding Oxygen in an atmosphere, may still not necessarily mean what we think it does, and the outcomes of this study are only as good as the models, there may be many possible reasons to how a planet gains Oxygen, yet has other components in the atmosphere that would be deadly to life or at the very least, life as it exists on planet Earth.
Source : https://astronomy.com/news/2021/04/are-exoplanets-with-oxygen-atmospheres-overrated
95 notes · View notes
umbrasna · 3 years
Text
Is Gravity made up of particles? Or it's just as imaginary as time? Hello there, this is Krishna, writer of this article. To understand the nature of gravity, we need to know our present knowledge about it. Therefore, The properties of the particles should be taken into consideration to call gravity one of them. So, Do particles carry any history to discover about them?
Tumblr media
According to non-quantum theory, a particle is not supposed to have a single history or path in space-time, instead, it is supposed to go from A to B by every possible path. But, do we have any other observations apart from its history? Yes! Through recent observations of the universe, we found that every particle has an antiparticle with which it can annihilate.
Tumblr media
Wow! This is one heck of a fictional discovery. However, Do these particles spread throughout the cosmos entertain us any further? Well, we already know, all known particles can be divided into two groups:- particles of spin 1/2, which makes the matter of the universe, and particles of spin 0,1, and 2, gives rise to forces between the matter particles. Particles are categorized based on their spin. So, does gravity have any kind of spin? Indirectly, In the quantum mechanics way, the gravitational force is the force between two matter particles carried by a particle of spin 2 called gravitons.
Tumblr media
So, we have a particle for gravity. But is this particle visible? Or is it just our assumption? Until the next article, bye...
0 notes
umbrasna · 3 years
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Our daily life is filled with electronic pianos, ring tones, the disembodied voice giving you your bank balance over the telephone. Even silence can be electronic, courtesy of sound-canceling headphones.
Buy Now>>>>>> Steel series Arctis 5 Gaming headset
0 notes
umbrasna · 3 years
Text
Tumblr media
“we are living on this planet as if we had another one to go to”  Everyone has the right to clean air. Don't let your future go up in smoke.
1 note · View note
umbrasna · 3 years
Text
Tumblr media
134 notes · View notes
umbrasna · 3 years
Text
"There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact. It is the absence of facts that frightens people: the gap you open, into which they pour their fears, fantasies, desires." I am filling this gap over instagram. Join me- Invicta_natura
1 note · View note
umbrasna · 3 years
Text
Tumblr media
Science fiction is any idea that occurs in the head and doesn't exist yet, but soon will, and will change everything for everybody, and nothing will ever be the same again...
2 notes · View notes
umbrasna · 3 years
Text
Is Big Bang the real beginning of the Universe?
Tumblr media
Is Big Bang the real beginning of the universe? Or even Big Bang has a past? Hello there, this is Krishna, writer of this article. To believe in the beginning, we come across a finite age of something. So, to question the big bang we need to understand the aging process and stars of the universe. Now, when we talk about the aging of anything, genes appear in our minds. But does even the universe have genes? Actually, not really. In the case of the universe, gravity plays the role of genes in aging. However, on our planet earth, if we throw a light, it goes against the earth's gravity and losses energy and frequency. Lowering in frequency leads to an increase in the length of time between the waves in frequency. Hence, time will appear slower near the earth and time will affect aging. Time is delayed near a massive body due to the bending of space-time by gravity. But does this lowering frequency of light work on a larger scale in the universe? Yes! The lowering of the frequency of light from any star means it is moving away from us. Hence, it is detected through the light spectrum (red to blue). This means, if we reverse the time, stars would come closer to each other! But can their position be found in a contracting phase? We can predict the past position of any Particle through light with the shortest wavelength. The more the energy of the particle will be, the more accurately the speed of the particle will be calculated than its position and vice-versa. Hence, By calculating its numbers of times, we can find its past positions.
Tumblr media
Coming back to the stars, As talked above about frequencies, will it be hard for light to get emitted at high frequencies of stars? Absolutely! We all know, light and other waves can only be emitted in form of quantum. Therefore, at high frequency, one quantum would require more energy than available for emission. Hence, radiation at high frequency would be reduced and stars would radiate a finite amount of energy. Congratulations! So finally we are not living inside an oven full of stars. But it conveys to us more about the beginning of the universe. They were turned on at some point in time. Recent observations show, there are even side-velocities to some objects in the universe. Maybe in past, all things weren't at a Singularity state according to the big bang but were very close and not collided. Hence, one cannot say the big bang was the beginning of our real universe. But then what caused this infinity loop of the universe? Or there was more than one big bang? Until the next article, bye...
2 notes · View notes
umbrasna · 3 years
Text
Is Sun affecting our Time in the Universe?
Is the sun more than just a sunbathing star? Or is even affecting our time in the universe? Hello there, this is Krishna, writer of this article. To question any further over our Mighty sun, we need to understand universe properties.do we need to get closer to the sun for observations? We already know, our observations of everything thing near the sun are from a telescope because we cannot get any near to its positions. We are a toast before opening our eyes near the sun. As talked about in a previous article, no object can reach the speed of light because to speed up the object would consume more and more energy which will add up to its mass. Hence, light and some waves are defining few properties of the universe. Does time also play any role? Time we feel today also adds to the properties as it is not separate and independent of space but is combined with it to form an object called space-time! It's four-dimensional in which everything moves in a straight path. Therefore, space-time has some surprising properties as discussed before. Understanding the traveling light in the universe discovers a lot of the properties of space-time. We need an even better grasp of light and space-time. Now, Does the prediction of events through light have any connection with space-time?  We even predict events through the spread of light in space-time. It is an interesting method in which there are two connected cones of lights (past and future light cones) and the present event in the middle. There is also an "elsewhere" place in this method that cannot affect the present event. Hence, only events from past light cones can predict or change the present and future events. Anyway, after knowing a good connection between light and space-time, we are now even closer to understanding our universe(space-time). And we also know that that time is not absolute in space-time as every observer has a different time for an event. So, now if we connect the basic data of space-time with the sun, we will get to know that the sun even affects time! Gravitational waves from the sun curve space-time! Making the path of the earth geodesic. Through the method mentioned above, we can predict the earth's present path through light cones. And as earth called a single observer, the non-absolute behavior of time can be counted out. Hence, bending the space-time properties through gravity. And bending will always look like a curved path in three-dimensional space-time. But do we feel the bending in space-time? Or it's just as imaginary as time? Until the next article, bye...
0 notes
umbrasna · 3 years
Text
Can a theory explain God's mind?
Can a theory explain God's mind? Or theories do not apply at all? Hello there, this is Krishna, writer of this article. An answer to a big question? We need to know exactly what the question is asking. From Galileo to Hawking's, a lot of scientists have given theories to understand how does our universe work. Although during this time incidents were reported about one theory taking over the other by some very small although important observations. Observations play as a protagonist in proving any theory correct. A perfect theory should always satisfy these two:
1.) It should describe numerous observations in an averagely accurate way...
2.) It should predict the results of observations held in the future...
If! These two circumstances meet your theory then no other theory can surpass your work until it's a mathematical equation. We all know Newton's theory, which works everywhere. Warning! Newton's theory doesn't work on mercury! Then why do we still accept it? See, it's an exception case and merely a small observation to cancel it. At present, one most priority work of science is to provide a single theory that describes the whole universe (the least observable universe). For decades, our universe has made progress through the two theories- general relativity and quantum mechanics. One providing the existence of gravity, another working on subatomic particles. If one could connect them then one will find the explanation of God's mind. Anyway, to prove any theory through space events becomes even harder. Because we can never say if the events occurring at different times were actually in the same position in the space due to the lack of absolute standard of rest. So, by now god is making it even harder for us to understand his puzzle. However, the same is the case with going closer to the observations because according to Einstein's equation (E=mc^2), the emptiness will always move faster than any object with mass in motion, due to which nothing but only light and some other waves can only travel to view these observations. Hence, we are now restricted in our naive boundaries to prove anything! Leaving us with no choice but to observe them with telescopes. Hence, God thinks that "No is the complete sentence". But do we need a theory to describe everything? Or are theories just another fraction of time? Until the next article, bye...
0 notes
umbrasna · 3 years
Text
Is there a God?
Can we feel the presence of God? Or is absence God's true nature? Hello there, this is Krishna, writer of this article. To discuss the ultimate question, one must understand what humans have already discovered. Humans from the very beginning of their existence are known to mostly believe in their observations. The early stages of humans believed running stars as heavenly events. Events that were known to be conducted by holy creatures. Nevertheless, by the evolution of beings, we got to know more about the sharp flashes of lightning in space and later named them stars. At present, we know that there are infinitely millions of stars in our universe. Hence, Due to which we cannot regard stars as our Gods until it's another sci-fiction idea! By our observations, every point in the universe can be named as the center of the universe because every point has an infinite number of stars on each of its sides. Therefore, we are surely not at the center of the universe or say we are on one of the centre of the universe. But why are these stars so calm? They are not. We can never have a static model of the infinite universe with stars because gravity is always attractive. Then why are these not falling into each other due to gravity? One can say that gravity can be attached to our universe for a particular time but not forever because of repulsive forces. These repulsive forces are those forces that are making our universe expand till now! As of now, Expanding the universe asks us a question about the beginning of everything by looking to expand back in time! But definitely, everything in the universe has a beginning otherwise stars would have shown their true colors by now. A shiny beautiful star is a deadly heater? Stars we look at today must have been turned on somewhere back in time because according to its properties, it is heating every matter around it through its deadly radiation. So, we have a beginning or say birthday date for our universe! From this information around, one can say that someone turned on our universe we look at today. But is it a god doing? Or is it just the genuine nature of the universe? Until the next article, bye...
1 note · View note