hipowered761

[hipowered761]

[hipowered761]

DO THE CORRECT THING AND VOTE ALL THROUGH AND THROUGH BLUE, AND RIDE THE BIG BLUE BIDEN TIDALWAVE IN NOREPUBLIKKKANVEMBER, SURFS UP DUDES AND AWESOME DUDETTES LETS ALL CATCH THIS WAVE TOGETHER AND DROWN FASCISM FOREVER, FUCK TRAITOR TRASH AND ALL HIS REPUBLIKKKANT FLUNKYS.

#tumblr #tumblrlife #tumblrphoto #tumblrphotos #tumblrlove #tumblrpic #tumblrpics #tumblrposts #tumblrpost #tumblrpicture #tumblrpictures #tumblrthings #tumblrstuff #pictures #pictureoftheday

[hipowered761]

STEP 1 REDUCE GOVERNMENT WASTE THROW OUT ALL REPUBLICAN TRAITOR TRASH AND NEVER VOTE FOR IT EVER AGAIN

STEP 2 ELIMINATE ALL GREEDFLATION FLUNKEYS THAT SUPPORT REPUBLICANT TRASH .

STEP 3 DO AWAY WITH TRAITOR TRASH AND HIS BOUGHT OUT BRIBED SUPPOSEDLY SUPREME CUNTS(OOPS WANNABE COURT).

STEP 4 AND ABOVE ALL ELSE MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN. VOTE ALL BLUE BY REFERRING BACK TO STEP ONE.

REFERENCE POINT: ON ELECTION DAY IN NOREPUBLIKKKANVEMBER. REMEMBER

RED YOUR DEAD, BLUE YOUR COOL

AND NOT TRAITOR TRASHS FOOL.

FUCK TRAITOR TRASH AND EVERYONE OF HIS REPUBLIKKKANT FLUNKYS.

#tumblr #tumblrlife #tumblrphoto #tumblrphotos #tumblrlove #tumblrpic #tumblrpics #tumblrposts #tumblrpost #tumblrpicture #tumblrpictures #tumblrthings #tumblrstuff #pictures #pictureoftheday

[hipowered761]

#tumblr #tumblrlife #tumblrphoto #tumblrphotos #tumblrlove #tumblrpic #tumblrpics #tumblrposts #tumblrpost #tumblrpicture #tumblrpictures #tumblrthings #tumblrstuff #pictures #pictureoftheday

[hipowered761]

[hipowered761]

Three questions I wish had been asked in the Trump immunity arguments before SCOTUS:

If the President could hypothetically order assassinations for political purposes but still be immune from prosecution as commanding troops is an official act, couldn’t Biden order the assassination of Trump?

As above, could not a president order the assassination of one or more Supreme Court justices to get more judicial appointments, since both commanding troops and making judicial appointments are official acts?

As above, and if impeachment and conviction are first required to permit prosecution of a former president, could not the president order the assassination of one or more members of Congress to prevent a conviction in the Senate, thus using crimes to immunize himself for life?

[hipowered761]

[hipowered761]

[hipowered761]

[hipowered761]

HEY DONNY, JUST ACT LIKE IT'S ALL THAT DICK YOUR GOING TO SUCK IN PRISON BITCH AND FINISH ALL OF YOUR ENFIMIL LIKE A GOOD LITTLE BITCH AND GET BACK IN YOUR CELL.

[hipowered761]

HEY,HEY,HEY, CAN SUMBODY PLEASE PUT A NOOSE AROUND MY TREASONOUS NECK.

[hipowered761]

FUCK SCOTUS, FUCK TRAITOR TRASH, FUCK ALL REPUBLIKKKANS RIGHT OUT OF GOVERNMENT, OVERTHROW THEM ALL AT THE POLLS IN NOREPUBLIKKKANVEMBER AND SHOW THESE FUCKERS WHAT TRUE AMERICANS ARE ALL ABOUT, AND IT SURE AS FUCK AIN'T THIER WORTHLESS LOSER ASSES GETTING RE-ELECTED FOR ANYTHING.

Joan McCarter at Daily Kos:

The U.S. Supreme Court heard Donald Trump’s immunity claim in his federal criminal trial for trying to overturn the 2020 election Thursday, and the conservative majority is likely going to give Donald Trump what he wants: a delay of the trial until after the election. If Trump wins again, the conservatives have essentially signaled that they would be open to blanket immunity for him against any future criminal charges.   The fact that Supreme Court justices are suggesting that the president is above the law proves why the court must be reformed. Four of the justices—Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, and Neil Gorsuch—even went so far as to suggest that special counsel Jack Smith’s entire prosecution is unconstitutional, and they reinforced Trump’s argument that the president is immune. Kavanaugh even told Michael Dreeben, a lawyer from Smith’s office, that it’s a “serious constitutional question whether a criminal statute can apply to the president’s criminal acts.”

That would be the ultimate get-out-of-jail-free card for the chief executive, rubber stamped by the highest court of the land. It’s worth remembering that Thomas refused to recuse himself from this—and most of the Trump election interference cases—despite the fact that his wife, Ginni Thomas, was deeply involved in Trump’s coup attempt. When she testified to the Jan. 6 special congressional committee, she maintained that the election was stolen.  His failure to recuse himself comes after a new ethics code has supposedly been enforced, saying that “a Justice should disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the Justice’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, that is, where an unbiased and reasonable person who is aware of all relevant circumstances would doubt that the Justice could fairly discharge his or her duties.” So much for that suggestion from Chief Justice John Roberts. His code has no teeth, which is yet another reason why ethics reform—and indeed court reform and expansion—is essential. 

Joan McCarter writes in Daily Kos that the Trump v. United States "immunity" case is a good reason to reform and expand SCOTUS.

[hipowered761]

SCOTUS= OVERRIGHTOUS BRIBED BOUGHT OUT TRAITOR TRASH PILES OF RUSSIAN WANNABE SHIT.

Joan McCarter at Daily Kos:

The U.S. Supreme Court heard Donald Trump’s immunity claim in his federal criminal trial for trying to overturn the 2020 election Thursday, and the conservative majority is likely going to give Donald Trump what he wants: a delay of the trial until after the election. If Trump wins again, the conservatives have essentially signaled that they would be open to blanket immunity for him against any future criminal charges.   The fact that Supreme Court justices are suggesting that the president is above the law proves why the court must be reformed. Four of the justices—Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, and Neil Gorsuch—even went so far as to suggest that special counsel Jack Smith’s entire prosecution is unconstitutional, and they reinforced Trump’s argument that the president is immune. Kavanaugh even told Michael Dreeben, a lawyer from Smith’s office, that it’s a “serious constitutional question whether a criminal statute can apply to the president’s criminal acts.”

That would be the ultimate get-out-of-jail-free card for the chief executive, rubber stamped by the highest court of the land. It’s worth remembering that Thomas refused to recuse himself from this—and most of the Trump election interference cases—despite the fact that his wife, Ginni Thomas, was deeply involved in Trump’s coup attempt. When she testified to the Jan. 6 special congressional committee, she maintained that the election was stolen.  His failure to recuse himself comes after a new ethics code has supposedly been enforced, saying that “a Justice should disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the Justice’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, that is, where an unbiased and reasonable person who is aware of all relevant circumstances would doubt that the Justice could fairly discharge his or her duties.” So much for that suggestion from Chief Justice John Roberts. His code has no teeth, which is yet another reason why ethics reform—and indeed court reform and expansion—is essential. 

Joan McCarter writes in Daily Kos that the Trump v. United States "immunity" case is a good reason to reform and expand SCOTUS.

[hipowered761]

🎯🏆

[NRA-backed = all Republicans]

[hipowered761]

BURN IT TO THE GROUND WITH TRAITOR TRASH IN IT, SERVE JUSTICE HOT AND FAST THE WAY ITS SUPPOSED TO BE GIVEN. NOT DELAYED AND BRIBED AND BOUGHT OUT LIKE TODAYS SUPPOSEDLY SUPREME FLUNKYS.

[hipowered761]

[hipowered761]