humbleservant24

[humbleservant24]

The definition of phobia is a fear of something. No one is afraid of homosexuals. It's just not their thing!! I wish people would get this through their thick skulls. Calling someone homophobic as an insult is moronic.

https://twitter.com/Jennahope616/status/1776273939708190731

We’ll see. The revival can’t not address it and they will get absolutely hammered if they try to pull a no homo. So. We’ll see.

So basically what Jenna is saying is that if they don't get dest*el ON SCREEN her and her cronies are going to be very hateful and vitriolic online and directly to everyone (probably mostly Jared because why not).

Also, even IF they address it, that doesn't mean it will go canon. And Dean saying "I don't feel that way about you I'm straight" is NOT A NO HOMO. HE HAS ALWAYS BEEN STRAIGHT. You can't call it "no homo" when its a character who has been portrayed and discussed by the people involved in the show as not just predominantly straight, but as 110% straight.

But this is about Jenna already pre-threatening to call everyone homophobic if she doesn't get her way.

Smh. This is why these asses are so despised.

[humbleservant24]

This is what pisses me off about the gay community. They demand straight people to turn gay so they can feel represented instead of representing themselves. What straight person in their right mind is going to do the things they demand just so "they're" included. Instead of hounding straight people, how about looking towards the gay entertainers, athletes, etc to represent y'all. If y'all can't accept the fact that NOT everyone is going to believe in your lifestyle choices and that's OKAY!! Here's a thought! How would y'all like it if someone shoved religion down your throat, hmm??? Well now you know how that feels!! Doesn't feel too good now does it??!!

https://x.com/kit_kathy_/status/1776269558623441268

he needs to kiss misha ON CAMERA or else

Or else… what? Or else you won’t support him anymore? Y’all barely do that as it is outside of talking about how hot he is and how much you want him to kiss a dude. Or else… you won’t support his future shows? We know y’all will literally watch him in Russian propaganda in the middle of the Ukraine invasion and praise him so forgive me if I don’t believe this one either. Also, y’all don’t really affect ratings very much even when you DO watch (TW… BS and TB getting zero ratings boost, BS still cancelled even after claiming Jensen would “save the show” just by being on it, etc).

Or else nothing. Y’all will continue to support every Russian propaganda promo and pedophilia joke no matter what as long as you can still claim he’s “hot and winning”

Oh they're not going anywhere. As long as Misha and Jensen are still around, those fools will be holding onto delusions lol.

#anti hellers #anti misha #anti aas #anti destiel

[humbleservant24]

I'm sorry but that just makes Jensen seem that he's okay with pedophilia and that he has something against Christian beliefs. Which is disgusting considering his own upbringing. Makes one wonder if he's a pedophile himself 🤔

Jensen's making pedophile jokes now. It didn't take long for him to stoop to Misha's level. Question is, how long before AAs scrub this video from the internet and pretend it never happened? (Part 2 has the full "joke", but not the context.)

Part 1: https://twitter.com/S13E06/status/1769525730352996660

Part 2: https://twitter.com/S13E06/status/1769526205446029371

What gets me the most is how AAs and hellers will just toss it aside like it's nothing, but if Jared said the same thing, those same 'fans' 'would make so much noise that I'm sure it would get picked up by some click-bait site, then spread, and Jared would have to issue an apology. But because it's Jensen, everything is automatically forgiven.

Well yeah because they want Jared to say stuff like that but if they don't....

#anti jensen #anti misha

[humbleservant24]

Well I'm gonna say it. It's been said that Halyna was supposed to be making a documentary on human trafficking. Personally I believe that the elite found a way to have live rounds on the set to be "accidentally" placed in certain guns. I'm sorry but Hollywood is known to keeping things hush hushed in regards to keeping their identity and agenda a secret. Keep in mind Epstein's list and who and what that entails! Politicians and entertainers as well. Call me conspiracy theorist all you want but the dots do connect.

“Rust”

I have been following the “Rust” Film Shooting Saga very closely, and have watched the entirety of Jensen Ackles’ police interview (lasting approximately 1 hour and 45 minutes). There were a few things which I found interesting…

1.) Although this is not surprising from an actor, Jensen really loves to hear himself talk. That being said, he *is* a very effective and intelligent communicator.

2.) He spent a lot of time carefully downplaying the actions and responsibilities of Alec Baldwin and Hannah Gutierrez-Reed (especially concerning Baldwin’s role as a producer). While this was arguably a politically sound move for his career, from a personal standpoint, I find it kind of gross. Other individuals who were on that set had no problem giving significant statements incriminating both defendants.

3.) He talked a *very* big game about his own gun safety training and how diligently he performs his own safety checks. He was downright boastful (even arrogant) about it. Yet we *know* that one of the live rounds found on that set was discovered IN Jensen’s gun, waiting to be used later.

4.) For whatever reason, he made sure to mention that Danneel “isn’t a big drinker.” Priceless.

#anti rust

[humbleservant24]

The terminology within the workplace have different meanings. For example terminated, fired and layoffs are have different meanings. Fired is a result of your own fault, (stealing, fighting, drugs, etc.), terminated is a more balanced term in regards to your next job application, layoff is involuntary and no fault of your own. Termination and layoffs allow you to sign up for unemployment benefits but being fired makes it harder to receive those benefits. Companies layoff all the time. Sometimes it's temporary, and sometimes it's permanent depending on what's going on with the company internally. These people need to get a grip and learn how the economy here works. A lot of it has to do with politics regarding the company as a whole. Example, higher tax bracket, change in laws etc. It's the main reason why a lot of small businesses fail or go under unless they become a chain.

I'm surprised that that brewer guy hasn't taken down his post only b/c the M.O. for AAs/hellers is to harass people until they take down their posts if the post isn't fawning over their fave. I say good on him for not backing down.

It was only a few AAs responding, not the typical barrage. Either the rest haven't found the post, or some of them actually understand people being fired isn't something they can defend.

[humbleservant24]

It seems the company was too busy using gimmicks in the form of the fictional instead of allowing the products sell itself. Gimmicks usually never workout because the general consumer will see straight through it. If the product is good and the marketing for the general consumer is good then success is more likely to happen, granted it also depends on how the company is managed. But put all of that aside, right now the economy here in the US is not in good shape as it is, so placing blame on a particular person is an uneducated statement. Especially looking at the bigger picture.

My friend worked out at the brewery but left a while back. Talking to them they had no real complaints but they weren’t surprised by the lay offs, though she did say they’d be surprised if Gino wasn’t apologetic. Then they said Jensen is pretty much just a mythical figure. Has no part in hiring or dealing with the staff and while he’s nice if you run into him, if you’ve been there last then a year he doesn’t know your name.

That sounds about right. And there are a lot of business owners out there who are very hands-off, so it's not unheard of. However, FBBC was built around Supernatural, Jensen (and Jared's) legacy and Jensen's most prominent role. They advertised it as such, they still use similar taglines, they banked on Jensen's popularity to bring in the fans. They did SPN trivia nights and Impala gatherings. You can't separate Jensen and SPN from FBBC. And yet, that's exactly what Jensen's done. Between the brewery and The Winchesters, Jensen's proven that the only concern he has towards his SPN role and legacy is how much money he can make while putting in the least amount of effort. If that's the kind of guy people want to stan, go right ahead, but I'd much rather follow someone who actually cares.

[humbleservant24]

It is so refreshing to hear some historical truths in regards to Israel ❤

You really support israhell? After everything they have done? The 75 years of brutal and inhumane colonization and oppression, the torture, the rape, the theft, the burning of hundreds of years old indigenous olive trees, everything? Don't you even see that they did to Palestinians exactly what Americans did to the natives? This is honestly really disappointing. I hope you at least just remember that Palestine was given by one white racist man to another white racist man to get rid of the "jewi

You really want to go there? Okay, lets go there! To use your own logic, the native American analogy you’re so found of also applies to the Jews in Israel.  Romans tried to expel all Jews and then rename the territory "Palestina" after the Philistines (enemy of the Jews), and Jerusalem "Aelia Capitolina" (after Hadrian and Jupiter) to erase the Jewish connection.  Except that did not work because some Jews remained and then others came back.  And they never stopped returning: from immigration in 200-500 AD, the eleventh century, until the movements in 1882, early 1900s, right up to 1948.

I'm sure you know the Ottoman Empire happened until it didn’t, and the territory switched to Britain who called the territory Mandatory Palestine, so the “Palestinians are those who live there, meaning Arabs AND Jews.  This is inconvenient historical facts for you, Jews were living there already!

Do you think the Ottomans would have tolerated state-building by Jews?  Neither the Ottomans nor the British would ever have tolerated an illegal or violent state-building attempt by Jews.  That is why until 1948, the future state of İsrael consisted of territory bought by the Jewish National Fund and empty lands accorded to the Jewish state under the UN partition plan.

Then the Arab world declared war in 1947 and got their asses roundly kicked by the Jews and end up occupying a number of territories originally intended to be part of the abortive Arab state of Transjordan. The furious butthurt Arab nations expelled 900,000 of their own Jewish citizens (those they didn’t kill) so the refugees made their way to Israel in 1948.  Judea and Samaria (aka the West bank) belong to Jordan, Gaza to the Egyptians, Golan Heights to Syria. Green line established as an armistice line.

The Arab world declared war again in 1967 and got their asses round kicked by the Jews.  Just before the war, Arabs left the area and figured they can come back after all the Jews are killed and take everything the Jews owned or had build, the farmlands they built out of swamps and desert…. Except that didn’t happen and they became sore losers. 

Jordan gave up their claim to Judea and Samaria in the 1990’s and Sinai was given back to Egypt, Israel immediately started negotiating with the PLO for peace. Oslo granted the Palestinians the first land that they could claim was theirs and no one else’s. Israel then moved on to direct negotiations with Arafat to give them a proper state with legal borders in exchange for peace. Arafat rejected it and launched the Intifada.  Israel tried again when Abbas took over, but he refused to even talk. In an attempt to buy peace, and as a test of the Palestinian’s intentions, Israel completely pulled out of Gaza, hoping that it could become something like Singapore or Monaco. Instead, Hamas took over, destroying the infrastructure that Israel left behind and launching terrorist attacks against Israel ever since.

Hamas could have rebuilt hospitals and schools with the millions of dollars given in previous conflicts in Gaza. They could have built bomb shelters for their citizens. But no, they built underground tunnels and bunkers, designed to breach Israel's boarders and protect their own. You cannot have peace with Gazans whose sole aim is to kill you and rape the women and then kill them.

Then October 7 happened.  Hamas gleefully opened fire on babies, children, families in their beds. They stabbed children kept the knives in them before killing their parents.  They didn’t spare family dogs.  They gang-raped women and paraded their dead bodies in the streets. Hamas exceeded the Nazis in brutality.  Any collateral damage to the innocent is unintentional on Israel's part as opposed to Hamas who surround their own soldiers with children.  Hamas is literally using their own children as meat shields. 

Gaza started a war. They are getting what they wanted. Why are you complaining?

Did you protest in 2006 when Gaza elected Hamas?

Did you protest in 2007 when Hamas declared war on Israel and said it would eagerly murder Israelies  - which is what caused the Israeli blockade and later the Egyptian blockade.

I bet my two houses you didn’t protest for the past sixteen years while Hanas fired at Israeli civilians, sometimes causing Israel to fire back.

You weren’t at all bothered that for 16 years the Hamas used their own citizens human meat shields and build military infrastructure beneath hospitals and schools

Meanwhile, 21 Arab countries would rather let Gazans die than admit them as refugees.  Where are your complaints about that?

In conclusion: Unlike all the countries in the Americas and Australasia, and many elsewhere, Israel actually is NOT on occupied land, illegal or otherwise. The fledgling state of Israel bought land fair and square from Ottoman landlords and was granted statehood by the UN.  Now, you could argue whether the Ottomans should have been able to sell that land, as they were absentee landords – but they did have legal titles to it and they legally sold the land to the Jews.  So Israel has much greater legitimacy than the U.S, Argentina, Australia, or New Zealand.  Go bitch about them, you cowardly hiding-behind-greyface-Anon.

Btw, I'm always hugely happy to disappoint pro-rapey-terrorists people like yourself.

[humbleservant24]

And don't forget that before the exile the 12 tribes of Israel occupied more of the surrounding territories compared to what it is now

You really support israhell? After everything they have done? The 75 years of brutal and inhumane colonization and oppression, the torture, the rape, the theft, the burning of hundreds of years old indigenous olive trees, everything? Don't you even see that they did to Palestinians exactly what Americans did to the natives? This is honestly really disappointing. I hope you at least just remember that Palestine was given by one white racist man to another white racist man to get rid of the "jewi

You really want to go there? Okay, lets go there! To use your own logic, the native American analogy you’re so found of also applies to the Jews in Israel.  Romans tried to expel all Jews and then rename the territory "Palestina" after the Philistines (enemy��of the Jews), and Jerusalem "Aelia Capitolina" (after Hadrian and Jupiter) to erase the Jewish connection.  Except that did not work because some Jews remained and then others came back.  And they never stopped returning: from immigration in 200-500 AD, the eleventh century, until the movements in 1882, early 1900s, right up to 1948.

I'm sure you know the Ottoman Empire happened until it didn’t, and the territory switched to Britain who called the territory Mandatory Palestine, so the “Palestinians are those who live there, meaning Arabs AND Jews.  This is inconvenient historical facts for you, Jews were living there already!

Do you think the Ottomans would have tolerated state-building by Jews?  Neither the Ottomans nor the British would ever have tolerated an illegal or violent state-building attempt by Jews.  That is why until 1948, the future state of İsrael consisted of territory bought by the Jewish National Fund and empty lands accorded to the Jewish state under the UN partition plan.

Then the Arab world declared war in 1947 and got their asses roundly kicked by the Jews and end up occupying a number of territories originally intended to be part of the abortive Arab state of Transjordan. The furious butthurt Arab nations expelled 900,000 of their own Jewish citizens (those they didn’t kill) so the refugees made their way to Israel in 1948.  Judea and Samaria (aka the West bank) belong to Jordan, Gaza to the Egyptians, Golan Heights to Syria. Green line established as an armistice line.

The Arab world declared war again in 1967 and got their asses round kicked by the Jews.  Just before the war, Arabs left the area and figured they can come back after all the Jews are killed and take everything the Jews owned or had build, the farmlands they built out of swamps and desert…. Except that didn’t happen and they became sore losers. 

Jordan gave up their claim to Judea and Samaria in the 1990’s and Sinai was given back to Egypt, Israel immediately started negotiating with the PLO for peace. Oslo granted the Palestinians the first land that they could claim was theirs and no one else’s. Israel then moved on to direct negotiations with Arafat to give them a proper state with legal borders in exchange for peace. Arafat rejected it and launched the Intifada.  Israel tried again when Abbas took over, but he refused to even talk. In an attempt to buy peace, and as a test of the Palestinian’s intentions, Israel completely pulled out of Gaza, hoping that it could become something like Singapore or Monaco. Instead, Hamas took over, destroying the infrastructure that Israel left behind and launching terrorist attacks against Israel ever since.

Hamas could have rebuilt hospitals and schools with the millions of dollars given in previous conflicts in Gaza. They could have built bomb shelters for their citizens. But no, they built underground tunnels and bunkers, designed to breach Israel's boarders and protect their own. You cannot have peace with Gazans whose sole aim is to kill you and rape the women and then kill them.

Then October 7 happened.  Hamas gleefully opened fire on babies, children, families in their beds. They stabbed children kept the knives in them before killing their parents.  They didn’t spare family dogs.  They gang-raped women and paraded their dead bodies in the streets. Hamas exceeded the Nazis in brutality.  Any collateral damage to the innocent is unintentional on Israel's part as opposed to Hamas who surround their own soldiers with children.  Hamas is literally using their own children as meat shields. 

Gaza started a war. They are getting what they wanted. Why are you complaining?

Did you protest in 2006 when Gaza elected Hamas?

Did you protest in 2007 when Hamas declared war on Israel and said it would eagerly murder Israelies  - which is what caused the Israeli blockade and later the Egyptian blockade.

I bet my two houses you didn’t protest for the past sixteen years while Hanas fired at Israeli civilians, sometimes causing Israel to fire back.

You weren’t at all bothered that for 16 years the Hamas used their own citizens human meat shields and build military infrastructure beneath hospitals and schools

Meanwhile, 21 Arab countries would rather let Gazans die than admit them as refugees.  Where are your complaints about that?

In conclusion: Unlike all the countries in the Americas and Australasia, and many elsewhere, Israel actually is NOT on occupied land, illegal or otherwise. The fledgling state of Israel bought land fair and square from Ottoman landlords and was granted statehood by the UN.  Now, you could argue whether the Ottomans should have been able to see that land, as they were absentee landords – but they did have legal titles to it and they legally sold the land to the Jews.  So Israel has much greater legitimacy than the U.S, Argentina, Australia, or New Zealand.  Go bitch about them, you cowardly hiding-behind-greyface-Anon.

Btw, I'm always hugely happy to disappoint pro-rapey-terrorists people like yourself.

[humbleservant24]

👎👎👎It's pure shallowness and unnecessary. Aging is a natural part of life, so yeah, I'm passing judgement!!!

Also, this whole Botox thing. He clearly hasn’t had Botox. Every little like and wrinkle is visible on his forehead and eyes. If that makes people think he’s had Botox, then I’d be requesting a refund, if I were him?

The botox thing is undeniable. He HAA 110%, not a doubt in my mind, had botox (and a few other things). This is the misconception about botox though - that if you have it, its really obvious and your face completely doesn't move. That is just BAD botox (see D for an example). In general, botox is just supposed to be subtle. I literally know a girl who does it for a living and have a bunch of friends and family who get it done and none of them look like they have obviously had work done, just look a little more youthful. You only get that frozen face look when you overdo it. Jensen still has wrinkles because the amount of botox it would take to fully freeze those lines would be way too much. His crows feet around his eyes are very long and deep and it takes more than a few shots to undo that (and you probably never fully could anyways, they're too deep and have been there for too long). Same thing with those deeper forehead lines - they won't always fully go away because he had them for a long time before he started getting work done, but they definitely don't move like they should. You can tell he's had it because when you look at pics of him smiling generally the top half of his face barely moves. He still gets some slight forehead movement when he does more exaggerated expressions but that's about it. I'll provide some examples:

Here is a very obvious one where you can see that the older pic on the left, the crows feet go down much much farther on his cheeks and in the newer pic on the right they stop just short around his eyes:

https://twitter.com/jensendeanackls/status/1627596112793071616

This one you can see that his forehead in still when it should have movement with that exaggerated expression:

https://www.instagram.com/p/CrquPoCODYT/

This one very obviously shows his forehead had it done. Laughing that hard should be a full face movement, his forehead doesn't move. You can actually see where the muscles are trying to pull together under his skin but they aren't truly moving.

https://twitter.com/DarkSun713/status/1673456506480599041

There are a LOT more pics out there that show it, but these 3 are pretty obvious examples.

And this is not a judgement on Jensen. Like I said, I know a lot of people who have done it (and do it professionally) and have even thought about doing it myself (but it's currently out of my budget at the moment). Plus its his face and body, he can do whatever he wants. But denying that he's had work done it just not logical at this point.

Well put, Anon, well put.

[humbleservant24]

Disney has become a joke 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️

Dear Disney,

The only good remake you ever made was Cinderella. You can stop now.

[humbleservant24]

My very long post about Natalie Fisher, wannabe journalist from hypable.

Let’s start. She came here from the Teen Wolf fandom where she spent much of her time trying to cozy up to writers and the showrunner, Jeff Davis, so she could insinuate Tyler Posey’s part be minimized and the show should concentrate on her ship.

Sound familiar? She actually had Jeff on her TW podcast a few times before she finally overstepped on the sterek shit and was cordially invited to fuck off by tptb. Bc that crew weren’t needy idiots who would sacrifice their show quality just bc a blogger was stroking their ego.

She jumped into our fandom and immediately cozied up to Meredith and Berens. From the start she was trying the same thing she did at TW. “No one cares about Sam. The brother bond is toxic. The show should focus on Dean and Cass.”

She wrote entire articles about what a shit character Sam is, how he’s arrogant and manipulative and no one better challenge her on that because she was getting her info right from her writer friends. 

She went after Jensen when he said destiel didn’t exist, comparing him to a corrupt Trump official and telling him someone needed to teach him how to see Dean as not straight. 

Gradually the show did go in the direction she wanted. Almost no focus on the brothers. An ensemble cast blandly recreating story arcs that were original back in earlier, better eras. Nat and her friends didn’t care. As long as Cass and Dean were there and Sam was sidelined.

The show’s ratings tanked. It was lucky to get a .3 most of the time.  Real critics and reviewers- as opposed to bloggers calling themselves “journalists”- took notice and pointed out the flaws. So what did Natalie do? She tried to manage and manipulate critics.

Well-respected critic @sheilakathleen -who’s a critic for the NY Times and Roger Ebert’s website- started pointing out the issues with Dabb’s version of the show. She’s been writing about SPN since the beginning so she knows her stuff and she has a large following. People listen to her. Apparently this worried Fisher.

So in rides Natalie hoping to “manage” Sheila. Sheila wasn’t having it and asked her to stop. Instead of heeding this, Natalie barged into Sheila’s DMs and sent her wall after wall of text blaming Jared for the show’s problems and trying to guilt her into shutting up.

Keep in mind, this is the first interaction Sheila ever had with Natalie and this all stemmed from a post where Sheila said that Sam’s character is the one suffering from the current writing. And she specifically asked Natalie not to DM her. Instead of listening she went on and on and ON to try and get Sheila to see that yes, the quality is down but it’s all Jared’s fault and Sheila should shut up about it. 

So what’s she’s doing here is attempting to quiet all criticism about current seasons by using the mental health struggles Jared’s been so open about to blame him and throw him under the bus. Why? Because she liked having Sam sidelined. Period. And she’s telling someone who’s a longtime industry professional that Jared can’t do his job. The entertainment world is a very small town. What if Sheila wasn’t as savvy and wonderful as she is and she took Natalie’s story at face value and told others about it? 

I mean, with people who would actually listen to this obsessive, deranged fangirl in charge of Sam and Dean, is it any wonder the guys lost their passion for the show? Is it any wonder that it’s been terrible since most of the good writers left when Dabb became showrunner and we’re left with Natalie’s buddies? 

KEEP IN MIND, I am not saying she’s responsible for how bad it all is or for her ship becoming a one-sided canon flop. I’m saying that she manipulated anyone she could hoping it would go in that direction and she didn’t care who she hurt in the process. If anyone ever writes a book about how a fandom can destroy a show, spn should be the first example. 

Anyway. It’s too late for our show. But considering this is the second fandom where she’s pulled a bunch of nonsense and tried to twist things to make a ship canon, pay close attention to where she goes next and shut her down if you see her heading towards any of your fandoms. 

And just for laughs, this is a me talking to one of Sheila’s non-fandom friends. It’s still cracking me up. 

[humbleservant24]

This is why I believe Jensen's IG account is run by AAs and Heller's because of the constant need of interacting with Misha's account and disregarding Jared's.

-e,g. Thé heller that became a PA and then a “writer” so they could attempt to influence the story— Wow, did that really happen? You’re joking, right? Please tell nobody was that desperate enough to do that for a crack ship.

I really wish I was. Meghan Fitzmartin was/is a heller, who got a job as a PA to Dabb, the episode where Sam became Justin Smith was originally written between Dean/Castiel, she, along with other “writers” such as Bobo the 🤡 interacted with hellers and got off on their praise to the point they wrote unprofessionally. Bobo (along with queerbaiter Misha) is responsible for the 3 “Destiel” ooc scenes in season 15, including 15:18 debacle.

That’s not even the worst. A “writer” on Riverdale wrote “ship it”, based on a real incident where Jensen shot down Destiel at a con. Their book had the teenage“heroine” call him out, get employed by the show for some reason, then push a romance between him and the Castiel character, both on the show and real life. This was a grown ass woman employed by the CW. You really can’t make this shit up if you tried.

[humbleservant24]

-e,g. Thé heller that became a PA and then a “writer” so they could attempt to influence the story— Wow, did that really happen? You’re joking, right? Please tell nobody was that desperate enough to do that for a crack ship.

I really wish I was. Meghan Fitzmartin was/is a heller, who got a job as a PA to Dabb, the episode where Sam became Justin Smith was originally written between Dean/Castiel, she, along with other “writers” such as Bobo the 🤡 interacted with hellers and got off on their praise to the point they wrote unprofessionally. Bobo (along with queerbaiter Misha) is responsible for the 3 “Destiel” ooc scenes in season 15, including 15:18 debacle.

That’s not even the worst. A “writer” on Riverdale wrote “ship it”, based on a real incident where Jensen shot down Destiel at a con. Their book had the teenage“heroine” call him out, get employed by the show for some reason, then push a romance between him and the Castiel character, both on the show and real life. This was a grown ass woman employed by the CW. You really can’t make this shit up if you tried.

[humbleservant24]

There's more important issues at hand than the gay lifestyle! Has no one ever paid attention to the child/human trafficking around the globe??? 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️ Tell me you're self-centered without telling me you're self-centered 🤬🤬🤬

This guy is so disgusting, as are his fans. The way they/he made a serious world issue about himself. He's managed to attract the bottom of the barrel. They all deserve getting queerbaited by him.

[humbleservant24]

#sound of freedom #anti human trafficking #anti pedophiles #jim caviezel #tim ballard

[humbleservant24]

#Sound of Freedom #anti human trafficking #anti pedophiles #God's children are NOT for sale!!

[humbleservant24]

His acting went downhill when Misha was added. Misha is a horrible actor. Ever since then Jensen stopped caring and became more about money. He started becoming more hump buddies with Misha. He lost his innocent nature which was the most attractive thing about him. Now he's biologically old enough to be a grandfather and clinging to his younger days. That's embarrassing 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️

It's like when a while back they were fancasting him for Red Hood, and I was cringing at the thought of him ruining my favorite DC character with his one note acting.

And when you look back and if I'm being honest he wasn't even great at playing Dean (a character he supposedly knew well) after the first few seasons.

So, no, there's no way he's good enough to play live action Batman.

Yeah I didn't like the way he played Dean especially when he went WAY over the top later ones. He overacted all the time and played him better earlier on when he cared. He lacks a lot range and is mediocre on his best day. There is nothing special about him at all.

#critical Jensen