Moodboard Tag Game
Thanks for the tag, @ameerawrites!
colour of your phone background+ aesthetic || favourite animal+ aesthetic || name+ core || movie you rewatched multiple times as a child+ aesthetic || favourite time of the day+ aesthetic || first word of your favourite song+ aesthetic
No pressure tags: @widowkills @elialys @tessaservopoulos @wreckedtodeathandback @writerxwren
9 notes
·
View notes
the way she has his eyes and nose
the way their colour schemes are almost exactly the same
the shorthalt family sideburns
2K notes
·
View notes
Heartbreaking! Girl finally goes to a small church study group trying to engage more with her church and is immediately frustrated but may just be being dramatic!
1. There was a lot of talk about how Judas was rotten to the core and he was clearly so good at hiding how EVIL and TWISTED he was compared to the other disciples look at this man he's such a LIAR and I hate that kind of talk because it's so dangerous! Because low-key the point is that we're all like Judas we all betray Jesus constantly like? He wasn't some evil being? Like I get their point he did do a worse thing but that doesn't mean he was like more sinful like idk I hate that separation.
2. We were talking about Mary using her hair to dry Jesus's feet and how it seems a seperate different woman was described doing something similar in Luke. We have this discussion about why she might use her hair entirely removed from cultural contexts. I ask if there were perhaps any cultural contexts surrounding hair given it seems like quite a ritual act. The temperature of the room drops and I get a lot of "not that I know of" in a tone that indicates I am a fool for wanting to read the Bible rooted in the history that it is literally part of.
3. One man, who actually is trying, tells me about how women's hair was their glory and usually tied up. I ask then if we think there's a gendered aspect to Mary's act because it's literally her using something inherent to her femininity. I am informed no, the only reason men didn't do it was because they had shorter hair. The conversation moves on before I can point out that the only reason men had shorter hair and women longer was cultural reasons, meaning that Mary's act WAS inherently culturally gendered and maybe it would be interesting to look at it in the context of Jesus's treatment of women within an oppressive society. I fume for the rest of the evening.
132 notes
·
View notes
i love holding all my favorite NPCs close while one of them talks about destiny over the shots <33
360 notes
·
View notes
“If you don’t wanna let her down anymore, then don’t.”
“Sounds easy.”
“It’s not, but nothing worth it ever is.”
169 notes
·
View notes
funny seeing people be like "uh why is Kaylie being mean to Scanlan for no reason!" and I'm just like....laughing because not only are there reasons but the previous episode gave a pretty good parallel for the reasons lmaooo
162 notes
·
View notes
i want to fucking KISS the entire team for giving us so many amazing wonderful Scanlan moments. Like these motherfuckers were like "hey! We can actually do foreshadowing properly! Let's make Scanlan the saddest motherfucking bastard on the show"
113 notes
·
View notes
"So, I'll leave you with this Burden"
I'm not too informed on Critical Role but-- if the weapon is named Burden, I think that'd be interesting to know as an addition to Scanlan finding out that Kaylie is his daughter-- if it is true. Also the scar being there on his chest now? Over his heart??? That's got to be a symbolism of something. I can smell it.
85 notes
·
View notes
nine people you would like to know better (tagged by @annatorv; thanks, lovely!)
3 ships: Peter/Olivia (Fringe), Tess/Joel (TLOU), Jamie/Claire (Outlander)
first ever ship: Probably Castle and Beckett from Castle
last song: anything from Taylor Acorn's new EP (it's so sick holy shit)
last movie: I think the new Indiana Jones??
currently reading: 100 Days of Sunlight by Abbie Emmons and In The Time We Lost by Carrie Hope Fletcher
currently watching: Only Murders in the Building
currently consuming: Food wise? I just ate tacos, I guess
currently craving: nothing because I'm too full from the tacos
tagging: @wardenannie, @seethesunny, @melusine0811, @elialys, @bumblepony, @bignosebushybrows, @hypnotisedfireflies, @tessaservopoulos, @b99peraltiago
10 notes
·
View notes
the holy trinity of niche athlete james
contemporary dancer!james — gymnast!james
\ /
acrobat!james
LUNE!!! thank you for sending these i’m watching them over and over… for research…
7 notes
·
View notes
I love making posts which aren't targeted at a specific mutual but I know they'll relate to it as a tangential perk of posting.
27 notes
·
View notes
Some off-the-cuff thoughts on overspiritualizing patterns in science
I remember watching a talk in middle school youth group about laminin, the "molecule that holds your whole body together" which was supposedly shaped like a cross. The suggestion, basically, was that the cross's image was integral to our molecular makeup and that this was part of God's design in a very Significant way. I was a burgeoning STEM girl, so I taped a diagram of a laminin up next to my bed for a while.
(As I would later find out, the whole laminin thing had/has some reach among Christians. There are T-shirts and everything)
Fast forever to spring of my freshman year as a microbiology student. I take my first course in cell bio, and I learn that laminins are actually one of many families of ECM glycoproteins. They aren't really any more significant in "holding the body together" than collagens, elastins, or fibronectins. They're very important, yes, but ultimately just one type of adhesive protein among many. And! They also do a bunch of other stuff that's way cooler than just. Adhesive.
While some laminins do bear resemblance to a cross when diagramed, it's really only because they have three subchains. Some are t-shaped, but others are y-shaped, and those don't look anything like a cross. Also, when they're in situ rather than in a nice, neat diagram, they tend to be all floppy and then they look even less cross-like.
Source
And when I learned about this I was oddly relieved. It felt like I was right about something that I couldn't even put into words, and that somehow the field of what I could call glorious had grown wider.
Christians are called to see and marvel at the presence of God in creation. I love doing that! I see God left and right through my scientific studies. Yet I also know that the human brain is pattern-seeking and that we are prone to pareidolia. I honestly don't know that there's a substantive difference between seeing the cross in some laminins and seeing Jesus on a piece of toast. It's all just seeing patterns that arise from something else (in the case of laminins, being able to bind three different molecules at once) and attributing spiritual significance. God is sovereign and maybe in the grand scope of his vision for creation it means something, but in terms of seeing God's hand in science I just find it so... small?
You could spin so many four-chain or four-domain proteins or goodness knows how many other molecules into images of the cross if you pick the right diagram. You could take every pattern of three in nature (and there are many!) as an image of the Trinity. If you really, really wanted to, you could take every six in organic chemistry as a sign of the beast, which would be hilarious in its misguidedness. It just becomes so literalistic and dull so very fast.
Look! Wouldn't you rather talk about the fact that laminins begin to appear along the edge of a developing lung at just ten weeks of human embryonic development, suggesting that they play a role in alveolar morphogenesis? That they're present in the neural stem-cell niche, which makes them an attractive candidate for helping to treat degenerative neurological conditions? I want to go back to whoever gave that talk that I watched in youth group and shake him and say, "God did that, and you're still hung up on the fact that laminins have three subchains?"
42 notes
·
View notes
Now that the big flaming button has been pushed, I wonder will this lead to a reverse-Bard’s Lament; wherein the party yells at each other but grows closer as opposed to losing someone for a while
16 notes
·
View notes
first poll i’m making is nothing exciting, but i wanted to make one asap and this is what came to mind!! plus i’m curious what people think :)
39 notes
·
View notes