#for you to claim that feminism always unilaterally agreed on the fact that men are also negatively affected by the patriarchy.

[essektheylyss]

you don't like the inability to go back through the reblog chain because it makes it harder to 'prev tags'; I don't like the inability to go back through the reblog chain because it makes it harder to reblog a version of the post without an annoying comment, especially when some of the blogs involved are deactivated; we are not the same

#not rebloggable cuz I am just whining. I do not actually care about your stance on prev tags. #I have used them on occasion. I find them useful for responding to applauding someone's tags when it's too small for a full convo. #and I am uninterested in my activity becoming a battleground against staff. #but also it does drive me nuts when I'm like 'man this whole chain is great except for the last comment #which is not emotionally wrong but is factually inaccurate on one minute point that I am nonetheless going to split hairs about' #anyway this one was giving terfs too much credit for having come up with radfem theory and like. #terfs/exclusionists as their contemporary movement are new (and more importantly louder and more effective). #but this is a new iteration of radfems who have been kicking since the 60s at least. #audre lorde and bell hooks were not writing against radfems in particular long before you were born #for you to claim that feminism always unilaterally agreed on the fact that men are also negatively affected by the patriarchy. #like it's FINE if you don't know that but. it is a minute point that is nonetheless important to me not to repeat. ANYWAY. #not me going through a whole bunch of wikipedia pages cuz I second guessed myself about facts. #and I couldn't just be WRONG if I was mad about people being minutely wrong now could I.