Why does it make you sad? Explain it. (If you don't mind. I know you're not obligated to answer. But I liked her character)
iâm sad about machi because sheâs built up to be a really intriguing character, but her development is completely halted and thrown out in order to satisfy her role as yukiâs love interest. sheâs an obvious parallel to yuki with her own set of issues that make her separate from him (how she deals with her relationships with kakeru, her mom, herself), but sheâs given absolutely none of the same care that yuki was given in order to actually grow with and through these issues. obviously she wouldnât have gone through the same amount of on-screen development as yuki, but the problem was that she was given zero development at all after she and yuki have their first real, in-depth conversation. while growing through trauma and working through these issues gradually is a core component of a lot of these charactersâ plotlines, with machi it feels very much like a âsheâs in love with yuki and heâs in love with her, the fallout of her trauma has been cured by love.â itâs absolutely maddening. she ends the story almost exactly as she enters it, which is with no friends, a strained relationship with her brother, and with nothing concrete to show that sheâs actually developed in trying to understand herself more as an individual. the only difference is that she leaves the story with a boyfriend, which was a premature decision for her character at best.  Â
from her character, i really, really wish we had gotten any significant growth between her and kakeru, considering their relationship is built to be something that is strained on both sides because of their separate issues coming at odds (which i wrote about a bit here). i also wish we had seen her and yuki have a more developed relationship, particularly in the sense that they have a strong parallel to how yukiâs relationship was with tohru in the beginning of the series -- yuki taking on a role similar to tohru, in which heâs able to reach out to machi and guide her to a place where she can start individualizing, would have been a really beautiful way to show his own growth, too. and we get a little bit of that, but their shoehorned romance cuts that development short, too, leaving them in just the unequal relationship that yuki said he didnât want, and a relationship that machi is completely not ready to have. Â
46 notes
¡
View notes
obviously ship what you want! but i do want to discuss one aspect of fruits basket that takaya wrote so well: itâs how, with tohru, yuki, and kyo, she fakes you out to think it's a love triangle. but once you get to the end of the story and have the full context, you realize you were only âtrickedâ by the structure of the text and never by the actual text itself.
by the structure, i mean that the first act in particular alternates pretty evenly between yuki-tohru scenes and kyoru scenes. this repeated flip-flop between the two âpairingsâ is typical of a love triangle set-up. it essentially tricks you into thinking that the whole point is âwhich boy will she choose,â but fruits basket actually ends up being very subversive in this regard. once all of the charactersâ feelings are revealed throughout the story (particularly after chapter 84, aka yukiâs realization and acceptance of his platonic love for tohru), it quickly becomes clear how different these scenes are that feature the two âpairings,â with regards to their tone, development, and overall meaning.
both relationships share so many meaningful scenes with great development, but they're meaningful in incredibly different ways. particularly, takaya absolutely nailed the tonal difference of platonic interactions vs romantic ones when writing yuki and tohruâs relationship vs kyo and tohruâs.
with yuki & tohru, there's an innate comfort and peacefulness in their scenes. they grow closer and get to know each other more and more throughout the series, but there's no romantic/sexual tension and thereâs no push from either person to have that be apart of their dynamic. (itâs particularly interesting to note that yuki eventually realizes that forcing himself to flirt with tohru and forcing romantic interactions with her early on felt wrong and uncomfortable, which reinforces how purely platonic their relationship is.) theirs is a very well-developed and touching portrayal of bonding with someone in a fulfilling, platonic way. their friendship is meaningful for them exactly as it is, with no underlying romance.
meanwhile, as early as the first rooftop scene, kyo and tohruâs scenes really capture the heart-racing, almost anxiety-inducing nature of talking to someone that you're attracted to or are developing feelings for. they're still comfortable with each other as friendsâthey spend almost the entire manga as just friendsâbut there's a still distinct underlying tension and attraction present in all of their scenes. itâs clear that thereâs something more there from the get-go. this only becomes more evident as they continually push those boundaries with each other and have very not platonic scenes. unlike with yuki and tohru, where yukiâs flirting felt uncomfortable and forced for him (and tohru never really flirted with him to begin with), with kyo and tohru thereâs a consistent sense that theyâre blurring the lines of their friendship as they bond, flirt with each other, and have more romantically charged scenes.
all this to say, takaya has done really well-done deconstruction of the love triangle trope, where that's what it looks like at firstâbut upon further inspection, these characters actually have two super different relationships. more than that, i think itâs very satisfying how your first reread of the early manga almost feels like an âaha!â moment. once all of this information clicks in your brain, itâs so clear that yuki and tohru were always going to have a life-changing platonic bond, and itâs so clear that kyo and tohru were meant for each other and were always going to fall in love from the startâeven if you were sure you were in for a typical love triangle.
more than the cleverness of how this was written, what i love most about this aspect of fruits basket is that, at the end of the day, both of these relationships (romantic and platonic) are presented as incredibly meaningful for tohruâs arc. it never was about âwho would win her loveâ or âwho she would choose.â it was about how two different relationships could be so special and life-changing for her in different waysâand also, for yuki and kyo, how meeting tohru was so important for both of them in, again, two different but incredibly meaningful ways. frankly, takaya went off with this one!
901 notes
¡
View notes
on tohru and feminism
i want to start by saying: almost every female character arc in fruits basket can be critiqued for not being very feminist, having a non-feminist conclusion, etc.âand you absolutely should critique those! iâm not talking about any of those in this post, especially because plenty of other people already have and i agree wholeheartedly with their critiques. iâm definitely not trying to cancel out what anyone else has said with regards to other characters, and i wouldnât even say this post is in response to those or an argument against themâbut rather, i wanted to gather my own thoughts on how tohru fits into all of this. even though i can acknowledge how tohruâs arc has surface-level similarities to the arcs that arenât feminist or have other problems, i really donât think that criticism applies to tohruâs arc itself at allâin fact, i think that tohru has the most feminist arc (not to mention one of the best arcs) in fruits basket.
one reason i feel pretty strongly about this is because i relate to tohru a great deal as a character. iâm very similar to her in personality, disposition, and what we struggle with, and as a result i have found reading her story incredibly empoweringânot just as a character i relate to, but specifically as an empowering female character because of the feminist themes within her storyline. obviously not everyone is going to relate to every character in a story, which is absolutely fine! but i sometimes feel like those who arenât naturally soft-spoken people pleasers, people who maybe donât struggle to be assertive or stand up for themselves or put their own needs above others, might not quite understand those parts of tohru as well as people who do have those things in common with her.
tohruâs story has many complex facets, but if i had to sum it up i would say it centers around breaking away from not only what is expected of you by others, but more so the internalized things you expect of yourself, and pursuing what you actually want. that struggle is intrinsic to what being a woman and being a feminist means to me. just like weâve come a long way in acknowledging that women should absolutely be able to pursue their happiness in ways that donât revolve around being someoneâs wife or mother, it doesnât make a woman any less feminist if those are the things she wants. itâs entirely about choosing what you want. tohruâs arc isnât absolutely perfect, and a lot of female characters in fruits basket got fucked over by poorly-written romantic arcs, but tohru is not one of them. there isnât anything inherently anti-feminist about tohruâs arc being resolved with a romance, and itâs actually one of the things that i think does make hers an example of a good feminist arc.
thereâs something to be said about how society places value on women being overly polite and always nice and never too assertive, and how thatâs not only harmful to women who donât fit that mold but also to women who do fit into that mold, who feel shackled by it and its expectations of them. tohru begins the story in a constant state of diminishing her own thoughts and feelings, ignoring her own needs because she thinks she needs to always prioritize others to feel like she has value. like i said, weâve come a long way in not forcing this idea onto women anymore (still have a ways to go). however, i know for me personally that this is still a belief that i have deeply internalized as a woman. whenever i donât make my thoughts and feelings below or subservient to those of others, especially men, and actually assert myself, i feel like iâm doing something evil or wrong, and i think tohru deals with the same thing. saying âfuck the patriarchyâ and easily rejecting it altogether is incredibly iconic, but struggling a lot with and working through those internalized feelings is common and valid, too, and itâs a facet of becoming a stronger feminist for many women.
and yes, tohruâs happy ending is ultimately love and a relationship with a man. but again, i donât think thereâs anything non-feminist about that, especially because itâs in line with tohru and what she values. yes, one of tohruâs biggest goals canonically is to achieve financial independence and support herself after high schoolâfirst of all heck yes! thatâs feminism babey. but tohru is also an incredibly relationally-motivated person; above all else, she values love and connection, and romance is included in that for her. could takaya have balanced this out by resolving other female character arcs without relationships, to show that romance isnât the end-all be-all for women? absolutely, that is an incredibly valid criticism. but that has nothing to do with feminism in tohruâs arc itself, and everything to do with fixing the other female character arcs and fruits basket as a whole.
for one thing, kyo is essential to tohruâs arc and the completion of it, but her arc doesnât revolve around him. itâs made very clear that his presence in her life inspires a lot of her growth, self-reflection, and increased autonomy, but her story is never framed as âiâm ignoring my own feelings and focusing on a manâs happiness by sacrificing my own.â that would be very bad and not feminist (also tbh, if anyone, iâd probably apply that description to rinâs arc with haru, in comparison). but instead, tohruâs arc is âby letting go of my mother and admitting that i want to save kyo for selfish reasons, i am finally acknowledging the importance of my own feelings and doing what i want.â maybe that seems like a small distinction, but thereâs a world of difference between those two. because the problem with the first one is that it centers around a man, yes, but at the expense of the female characterâs growth and feelings. the second one involves a man, but itâs still fully focused on tohruâs own happiness and sense of self.
typically when iâm dissatisfied with a female characterâs arc, itâs because sheâs 1) one-dimensional and never given considerable development or change to her character, 2) only developed to the point that she is able to do something for or impact a male character, or 3) what she wants is framed as less important or not even considered compared to a manâs feelings. looking at those points, though:
tohru is far from one-dimensional as the protagonist, and iâd say her arc is one of the more interesting and fully fleshed-out arcs in the story. who she is at the beginning is not who she is at the end, she has clear strengths and flaws, she goes through complex struggles and conflict, and she experiences a ton of change and growth.
while tohru does focus on what she can do for others, because that is her nature, the culmination of her arc is not as simple as what sheâs doing for kyo, or anyone else for that matterâitâs all about how her actions are coming from what she wants and nothing else. they are fueling her own growth and sense of what she wants in her life.
tohruâs story is definitely not framed this way; a huge part of tohruâs arc includes getting outside validation that her needs and feelings arenât less important than anyone elseâs (she gets this a lot from kyo, but also from yuki, momiji, uo, hana, and rin). i think the confession scene is also a great example of tohru really coming into her own. she doesnât stay silent but instead really asserts her feelings in that moment as being as important as kyoâs, even though heâs being shitty and not wanting to hear them
furthermore, i would say that tohru and kyo both have great arcs and are pretty equally developed, but if anything, i would say that at the end of the day kyo exists to further tohruâs story, more than the other way around. there are very few stories that i can say that about a heterosexual pairing, in that the manâs storyline is there to further the womanâs⌠so i do consider that to be another credit towards tohru having a strong feminist arc.
i think thereâs also an argument to be made about tohruâs involvement with the sohma family and what it says about feminism. tohru becomes deeply entrenched in the lives of the 13 zodiac members, who are all male except for four of them (ritsu, rin, kisa, and kagura), and she spends a lot of the first section of fruits basket learning about and helping them, which is good for herâbut also doing a lot of their emotional labor, if weâre being honest. throughout tohruâs arc, weâre shown that her taking care of them and fixing their problems while ignoring her own is not a healthy or sustainable way of living (which yes, is helped a lot by kyo showing her support and pointing out that she can focus on what she wants, too). after realizing this, after grappling with and fighting it, she finally gets to a place where she can put herself first at the conclusion of her arc. but putting herself firstâby wanting to break the curse for kyo because she doesnât want to lose him, not for particularly altruistic or entirely selfless reasonsâactually goes directly against the rest of the zodiac members. they have varied feelings about the curse breaking, but they all pretty openly donât care about kyo getting confined because thatâs just the catâs place (and honestly i would say that their indifference comes from a mixture of the curseâs influence on them as well as because thatâs just how they have been conditioned to view the cat for centuries). i think itâs incredibly interesting that tohruâs arc starts with her putting the sohmas (particularly the sohma men) above herself at every turn, but it ends with her going against them in what she wants.
i think this is tied up nicely as well by the fact that kyo and tohru move away from everyone at the end of the story. i know thatâs a plot point that some donât like (and thatâs completely valid! and i donât totally love how itâs handled in fruits basket another lmao) but personally i think it ties really nicely into the entire storyâs theme of moving forward, similarly to yuki planning to go to college and also moving forward. tohruâs time with the sohmas is very formative and positive, but i donât think itâs incorrect to say that it has also brought stressful and negative things into her life (the emotional labor, the hardship of breaking a centuryâs old curse on her own, etc.). not to mention the years of abuse kyo has both actively and more passively endured from all of them because of the scapegoating of the cat. having said all that, it makes perfect sense to me that, even though tohru loves the sohmas, she would want to distance herself from all of that at least to a certain degree as she embarks on her adult life with kyo and grows more as a more assertive, emotionally self-aware person. additionally, consider that the sohmas and the curse serve in a lot of ways as a metaphor for traditionalism, whereas the eventual breaking away from the clan and the curse represents the values of modernity and moving forward. looking at this aspect of the narrative from a feminist perspective, i rather like the symbolism of tohru going from putting all of the sohmas above herself to, in the end, breaking away from that (even while maintaining close personal bonds with them) and putting her own well-being, future goals, and life first after graduation.
one of my favorite parts of tohruâs arc is how the act of letting go of her mom can almost serve as a metaphor for letting go of the expectations that are placed on her, and on all women. as i mentioned towards the beginning of this essay, i find the idea of defying expectations in favor of what one personally wants to be intrinsic to both tohruâs arc and feminism as a whole. as many flaws as does fruits basket does have, tohruâs arc is not one of themâand itâs incredibly empowering to find such a fantastic feminist narrative in one of my favorite characters of all time.
316 notes
¡
View notes