intersectionalradicalfeminist

[intersectionalradicalfeminist]

One of the things that makes arguing with men so much more draining than arguing with women is the unequal distribution of credibility and contribution.

Somehow, whenever I argue with men, it always falls upon me to both prove my own claims, and to disprove his, while he does neither; his only obligation seemingly to dole out whatever ungrounded assertions he conjures up on the spot. Somehow, it is always wordlessly established that anything I say is false until proven true, while anything he says is true until proven false.

This same dynamic happened again over on tiktok, when a man claimed women are just as violent as men. Automatically, almost as if by muscle memory, I offered up the usual statistics on male depravity: men constituting 99% of rapists, 99% of mass shooters, 98% of killers, 95% of serious domestic abusers. And his only response was to say those statistics were wrong. No elaboration; wrong simply because he said so.

I already knew how the entire conversation would pan out: I’d give him my source, he’d find a reason to discredit the source, then I’d scour the internet to find a source that suited his standards, which he’d inevitably find a reason to discredit too.

So instead I simply said, “Prove the statistics are wrong.” And that was the only thing I responded with henceforth: prove it, prove I’m wrong, prove you’re right. Thus reversing the dynamics and positing that anything I said was true unless he demonstrated otherwise; unduly putting all the onus on him while I did nothing other than decide whether he was convincing me of claims thoroughly enough—and if he wasn’t, it just meant I was winning, of course.

He blocked me, and so far so have all the other men I’ve used this approach on. I don’t know whether it’s because they couldn’t actually disprove my claims or because they couldn’t stand to be treated the same way they treat women in debates. But I think more women should do this. Stop wasting energy proving your points to men, and start making them prove theirs to you.

[intersectionalradicalfeminist]

I am crying for countless Pakistani teenage girls who are coerced into underage marriages because of the romanticized show of clothes, jewelry and everything shiny without any consciousness of how these marriages are actually a legalized form of prostitution, sex and domestic slavery which will hurt them for their whole lives, and they will still be asked to happily suffer it so that the existence of Pakistani m3n is not threatened

[intersectionalradicalfeminist]

“Every society honors its live conformists and its dead troublemakers.” — Mignon McLaughlin

[intersectionalradicalfeminist]

I genuinely don't understand why are some Congo and pro- P@l activists making rape as a crime against all people. When in reality rape is a systemic misogynist crime committed by m3n against women. Now the same m3n raping their enemy m3n can't be equated with the specific toll faced by female victims of rape during wars. Moreover, majority of you have more sympathy for m@le victims of rape while everyone comfortably degrades female victims of rape. Rape is not a people's dilemma. It's brutal patriarchal subjugation of women

[intersectionalradicalfeminist]

Just thinking about how years of medical misogyny has done extensive harm to women's health and continues to hurt us systemically. It makes us more vulnerable to every disease as compared to m@les because scientific research screams m@le supremacy. Despite of this massive discrimination, women are still thriving in a system which isn't designed for our relief. And people still deny sex based oppression subjected to us. Medical misogyny is enough reason for me as a radfem to never ever validate equality / liberal feminism. Every single m@le is my and my sisters' oppressor

[intersectionalradicalfeminist]

There are so many cosplayers in the radfem community, so I am going to put up basic radfem beliefs which are followed by all genuine radfems

1. Radical feminism only fight for women's / females' rights - which is the real feminism

2. Radical feminism doesn't include males

3. It is anti prostitution, pornography, sex work, marriage, religion, cosmetic / makeup industries

4. It is gender critical i-e we radfems don't accept misogynist social notions of femininity and masculinity

5. It is pro-abortion and pro-female separatism

6. It is critical of popular heterosexual sex

7. It recognizes women as an oppressed sex class and that our oppression is systemic. Only women are victims of patriarchy, no m@le is or can be

8. It is intersectional meaning that it considers women of colour, disabled, lower class and caste women as the most oppressed female groups

9. It stands against medical misogyny which most feminists of other branches don't

10. It is against both modesty and hyeprsexualized cultures

11. Radical feminism is also critical of choice feminism as it believes that women's choices are influenced by patriarchy, are a result of social conditioning and years of misogynist coercion. Any woman's choice which harms her but benefits m@les is not feminist

12. It fights for absolute liberation of women from patriarchy by eradicating it from the root. It doesn't believe in equality of sexes because we radfems regard all m@les as women's oppressors

Radical feminism is not a cool misandrist aesthetic which can be confused with any other feminist ideology. It has specific beliefs and brings forward exclusive brutalities faced by women / females.

[intersectionalradicalfeminist]

Are women actually attracted to shah rukh khan or is this a gigantic psyop like...

There isn't more than a handful of actors in entire of India yes including kollywood, tollywood, Bollywood etc who is actually handsome imo

Maybe I'm just a lesbian lmao

[intersectionalradicalfeminist]

I stand with Angelina Jolie.

[intersectionalradicalfeminist]

When a M7slim m@le is about to get married to a woman, he thinks of his future wife as his slave given to him by the patriarchal divine. He's the owner and she's obligated to serve him, if she doesn't then she's a sinner. He will beat and rape her and M7slim society will call her abuse his right. Privileged M7slims try so hard to paint I$l@mic marriages as feminist, when it's just a legalized form of prostitution and mass enslavement of women

[intersectionalradicalfeminist]

The most high level form of radical feminism is women practicing female separatism and decentering m3n from our lives. See, there is still no bloody urges or ideas of violence against m3n as actions of revenge for thousands of years of misogyny. There's still no radical feminist actually wanting to k!ll, rape or lynch m3n. It's just anger driven feelings of helplessness which eventually lead us into standing and fighting for our sisters in oppression. We just don't want to do anything with m3n but we are always labelled the ugly misandrist witches

[intersectionalradicalfeminist]

All a woman needs to do is speak up about her rights and be open about her opinions for her to be lumped with the worst society has to offer and be compared to sexual traffickers and rapists...

[intersectionalradicalfeminist]

Rape is not a defined or plotted scenario. A woman can spend years in a relationship with her husband or boyfriend and she can still be coerced into performing or engaging in a sexual act which she is not comfortable with, but was emotionally manipulated to do by her m@le partner. COERCED CONSENT IS RAPE!!! COERCED CONSENT IS M@LE VIOLENCE!!!

[intersectionalradicalfeminist]

''Who Trolled Amber'' podcast

The highlights of each episode from the podcast. You can listen to it on Spotify, Youtube etc. EPISODE 1.

The outcome of the trial definitely damaged #METOO movement;

There were 80k of anti Amber Heard tweets, more than anti JD tweets even though AH was the one who accused him of abuse;

There's no way it was all organic, they either bought bots or those were real people pretending to be JD's supporters;

According to Jennifer Robinson, one of AH lawyers from the UK trial, Amber'd never wanted to relieve what had happened to her during the relationship;

Jennifer thought it'd be easier to win the US than in the UK;

The information about bots were thrown out way before the trial hence Ron Shnell couldn't talk about in the courtroom; EPISODE 2.

According to Ron Shnell there was a bot campaign against AH but he wasn't 100% sure because the judge struck out that research;

Kathryn Arnold shared that AH wasn't allowed to be a part of Aquaman 2 promotion tour and was banned from posting anything Aquaman related;

KA also said that AH couldn't audition, no one would hire her and that the agents were told not to touch her[AH]; EPISODE 3

The podcast creators asked experts(Kai-Cheng Yang) to check the date that was given by Ron Shnell;

According to the data: many accounts with no followers had tweets with more than 5k retweets/likes; hundreds of identical tweets were posted in one day; many accounts liked 400k tweets; 10k of identical comments were left under AH youtube videos; many accounts change their tune(from right wing Chile politics) and out of nowhere started to post pro JD tweets; half oh the data/accounts/tweets were generated by inauthentic accounts and then the real accounts started to engage with those tweets etc. it all started in November 2020 when JD lost the UK case and was fired from Fantastic Beasts; EPISODE 4

Cameron Herrin case was mentioned, more specifically the sudden interest and pro CH posts on TikTok asking to reduce his sentence and that he is innocent. Most of the accounts that were spreading those posts were from Middle East; EPISODE 5

Some Arabic twitter accounts suddenly started to tweet Pro JD tweets in English during and after the US trial;

The friendship betweet Johnny Depp and prince Mohammed was mentioned(him financing JD directorial movie Modi); EPISODE 6

Adam Waldman worked for Lavrov as a consultant for years(2010-2017);

During the deposition Adam Waldman refused to answer more than 70 questions;

Alexi Mostrous tried contacting ''the internet journalists'' aka TUG and ThatBrianFella but they didn't answer; he also pointed out that the audios that were posted by ThatBrianFella were clearly edited(we know);

Mostrous also tried to call Adam Waldman but he didn't pick up the phone and 25 minutes later posted a tweet:

“He[Adam Waldman] attacked witnesses, he attacked us (legal team)..unlike anything I have ever seen from a lawyer” said Jennifer Robinson. ''Amber Heard wrote an Op-ed for Washington Post which is a very respected publication and Johnny Depp's name isn't in it. It told to survivors if this can be done to a woman whose actually well-known and well-established person in the industry, it's gonna be even worse for you.'' All-in-All, it's clear as day that Waldman was behind the bot campaign against Amber. We've known that but it's good that a popular podcast researched about it and shed a light on it. Plus it's always great to see JD fans being nervous and panicky.

[intersectionalradicalfeminist]

Lola Glaudini shared a new story about Johnny Depp from the set of the 2001 film ''Blow'' on an episode of the Powerful Truth Angels podcast in January. The actress says the experience was brought back to her mind while watching news footage of the Depp/Amber Heard trial.

Johnny Depp… comes up to me, sticks his finger in my face. And I’m in a bikini, on the ground, like this. And he comes over and he goes, ‘Who the fuck do you think you are? Who the fuck do you think you are? Shut the fuck up. I’m out here, and I’m trying to fuckin’ say my lines, and you’re fuckin’ pulling focus, you fucking idiot! …Oh, now? Oh now it’s not so funny? Now you can shut up? Now you can fuckin’ shut the fuck up? Oh it’s not funny now? Okay, the quiet that you are right now, that’s how you fuckin’ stay.’ First day on the set. I’d never met him. This is my first studio movie, I’ve just done indies until then. And I have the star who I have idolized, who I’m so excited to work with, reamed me in my face. The only thing going through my head was, ‘Don’t cry, don’t cry, don’t cry, don’t cry, don’t cry.’”

Demme didn’t intervene on Glaudini’s behalf, and over the next “five, six more hours” she was treated by everyone on set as a “pariah.” “Like, no one wanted to fucking talk to me, because I’m the bitch who he railed at,” the actor recalls. Afterward, she went to her trailer and sobbed, then spoke to her father, who said she could either choose to walk away or “don’t let them see you sweat.” Resolved to stay on the film, she left her trailer and was confronted by Depp again. Looking down on her from the doorframe of her own trailer, the star gave her “a non-apology apology,” giving excuses that he was “really in [his] head” and that the Boston accent he was doing was “really fucking with [him].” When he said he wanted to make sure the pair was “cool,” “I just looked at him and I was like, ‘I don’t even know what you’re talking about. Of course. Totally cool,” Glaudini says. “’Cause I was just like, don’t let them see you sweat. And so that was that. And then we had six weeks in Acapulco.”

[intersectionalradicalfeminist]

If you're a man upset at being lumped in with rapists, pedos and abusers because of your gender, maybe take it up with the men who give yall a bad image and name instead of us women who have to be on guard 24/7 because of YOU. It may not be all men (and it is!) but it's ALWAYS a MAN.

[intersectionalradicalfeminist]

Women being forced to pretend fasting during menstruation and working as domestic slaves, so that Muslim m3n can conveniently fast during Ramadan is a patriarchal religious abuse in the name of Islam. Western liberal Muslims have no right to whitewash and deny the real life experiences of women in Muslim countries. Your modern and reformist version of religion is not the standard. Majority of women have no choice to practice it. So saying that misogyny is culture not religion is misogynist at it's core

[intersectionalradicalfeminist]

feminism is a female-only space