itchybra

[itchybra]

[itchybra]

they should make a moby dick anime that has barely anything to do with the actual plot. new whale every week. and it should go as hard as gurren lagann

[itchybra]

labia yankers anonymous

[itchybra]

Labia hair yankers anonymous

labia yankers anonymous

#not me sitting cross-legged at home in my shorts pulling and twirling my bush

[itchybra]

[itchybra]

[itchybra]

is it rude to look through people's medicine cabinet when you do not intend to take anything? what is everyone's take on this

#extremely rude wtf #I’d kick that person out of my house immediately #violation of privacy

[itchybra]

you know what? the fact that so many people dont „get“ how lesbians have sex - and sometimes even ask women who have sex with women intrusive questions about it - is actually so telling. it really reflects how neglected female anatomy is, how out of touch many women are with their own desires and sexuality, how everything sex is about penetration with a penis (thats why people dont wonder how gay men have sex), that people who only have sex with the opposite sex center male desire to a point that they cant even imagine how a woman would satisfy another woman since there is no penis involved… it‘s sad.

[itchybra]

You will NOT be missed

#finally

[itchybra]

“blue hair” this, “pronouns” that. find someone with flowing silver hair and spells

[itchybra]

uh oh this pronunciation of polycules is gonna stick in my head for a long while

[itchybra]

Edit: sensory issues can be counted under "otherwise medically unable to" if you feel that to be appropriate

[itchybra]

It's what's inside the clothes that counts. And I think beauty does come from within. And I know it sounds cliché, but I love clichés. I'm so corny.

PAMELA ANDERSON Vogue France (October 3, 2023)

[itchybra]

[itchybra]

That was still craftsmanship

[itchybra]

how would u feel if the government implemented a law banning women from receiving treatments for any illnesses? it’s inaction, since the act of not treating somebody isn’t forcing something on them. however, it would be misogynistic and would kill millions of women.

your “inaction” argument is invalid and lazy.

The difference is that banning women from getting treatment would kill them. Banning abortions for non-life-threatening pregnancies does not kill anyone. Abortion, however, is itself an action that always kills a person, as opposed to letting the pregnancy carry out and letting both the child and mother live.

You misunderstood that half of the argument and took it for whole.

[itchybra]

Pregnancy is one of my greatest fears. If you are against abortion, I see you as an active threat to the safety, sanity, and well-being of every woman I've ever known or will know.

Women's bodies are not sacrifices for your god or the "greater good". We are not collateral damage.

Pregnancies should only be carried to term when the pregnant woman wants them to be. Full stop.

Abortion on demand, for any reason, at any point.

If you cannot agree to that, then you are declaring women's time, energy, and bodies to be collateral damage to suit your agenda. And therefore you support the subjugation of women and are not a feminist.