lamby-grahamy

[lamby-grahamy]

This is about Sci-Hub. yeah we get it.. gatekeep knowledge and protect the interests of capital…

[lamby-grahamy]

love the quail :3

#what map is this little creature on #i must find it

[lamby-grahamy]

Since I’ve been asked this a couple of times here are some tips on how to tell if the media you’re watching/reading is credible and which way their bias leans. These are tips I came across via Katherine Brodsky on X and, ironically, a publication from NowThis a few years back (which is an outlet guilty of a lot of tactics they were calling out. But still, the tips are good). Employing these tactics when you are unsure about the media you’re consuming can help you determine on your own how trustworthy that source is or is not.

1. In the immediate aftermath, news outlets will get it wrong.

2. Don’t trust anonymous sources.

3. Don’t trust sources that cite other news outlets as the source of the information.

4. Pay attention to the language the media uses.

“We are getting reports” could mean anything.

“We are seeking confirmation” means they don’t have it.

“[News Outlet] has learned” means they have a scoop or are going out on a limb.

“Experts say/believe” who are these experts? How many were asked? How were they chosen? What are their credentials as they relate to this specific topic? Is there really a consensus?

5. Does the image chosen accurately represent the story?

6. Watch out for conflation. Media outlets will often try to conflate two things that have nothing to do with each other to try and make it seem like a certain thing/person is responsible for a failure or success.

7. Leading language. Whether a publication uses words like pro-choice or pro-abortion, gun rights or gun control, riots or protests, migrants or illegals, birthing person or woman will tell you a lot. This is a tactic that can often go unnoticed by people that is designed to persuade you to subconsciously accept a judgment or opinion of the journalist instead of just presenting the facts and allowing you to come to your own conclusions.

8. Bias by omission. A journalist can present facts in a way that appears to be neutral but in reality they have chosen to include some facts and exclude others, which creates an inaccurate picture and narrative and limits our understanding of the reality.

9. Another type of omission that can be very telling is news outlets simply choosing not to report certain stories at all.

10. Story placement. What makes the front page? What gets buried?

[lamby-grahamy]

if you enjoy it, it’s not a waste of time.

[lamby-grahamy]

[lamby-grahamy]

that chimera ain't right

#LMAO????? #i don’t go here but this is too good

[lamby-grahamy]

[lamby-grahamy]

[lamby-grahamy]

Combining my two biggest fixations atm <3

[lamby-grahamy]

[lamby-grahamy]

I must not mock Gen Alpha. Mocking Gen Alpha is the mind killer. Mocking Gen Alpha is the little-death that brings total generational solidarity obliteration. I will engage with Gen Alpha lovingly. I will permit them to be cringe. And when they grow up I will turn my eye to their accomplishments. Where mocking has gone there will be nothing. Only generational solidarity remains

#valid valid valid

[lamby-grahamy]

having collaborative ocs with friends will have you saying shit like "what if scimble was bumpus wouldnt that be funny" and then like two weeks later its one of the most important pieces of lore you have

#this is for my friends who developed benjaminimus #(was that his name??? i just remember he is very funny)

[lamby-grahamy]

the stuff going on at columbia campus rn is genuinely incredible

[lamby-grahamy]

can someone please be proud of me like fuck I’m trying

[lamby-grahamy]

"Guy" and "man" have different connotations with adjectival nouns. Like "tree guy" = arborist but "tree man" = he lives in a tree, or maybe he is a tree.

[lamby-grahamy]

[lamby-grahamy]

we are in dire need of some new media trend. we've done pirates, we've done cowboys; we've gone through two whole zombie revivals. aliens and space themes have basically been a constant since at least the 1950s, as have robots and evil AIs. we went pretty heavy on vampires for a while. we've also done dinosaurs, ninjas, musicals, wizards, sea creatures, ancient rome, ancient egypt, middle ages out the wazoo, entirely too much world war II, we're currently overdosing on our superhero phase, we've done monsters (misunderstood), monsters (radioactive), fake guy in the real world, real guy travels to fake world, caves & mining, vikings, what if you were really small, genre parody as a genre, sand, New York, time travel, something racist goes down in the jungle, neurodivergent detective, buddy cops, crooked cops, gangsters, bank heists in particular, kid has powers, revolt against the corporate world, portals, social insects, dragons, the British, global apocalypse, martial arts, roadtrip as self-discovery, Jesus, clones, clowns, babysitting goes wrong, demonic possession, ghosts of all kinds, talking animals, fucking with the stock market, restaurant ownership, dwarves, planes, and spies. where do we go from here. what's our next big thing

#zombies again hopefully #(my own project lmao)