loudlytransparenttrash

[loudlytransparenttrash]

Following the SCOTUS leak of an early draft of a majority decision that would overturn Roe v. Wade, we haven’t seen such panic since Bubba Wallace spotted a piece of string.

The pro-abortion reaction to the leak revealed how utterly confusing it is to be a liberal these days. Late last year, the AP revised its stylebook to instruct its writers that the term “pregnant woman” is “non-inclusive” because it ignores “pregnant men.” Journalists were ordered to only use “pregnant people,” “pregnant individuals,” and “those who are pregnant.”

But now there’s a problem: With Roe on the line, they need to present abortion as a women’s issue and only a women’s issue. As the TERF transphobe Gavin Newsom recently told a crowd of pro-abortionists last week, “If men could get pregnant, this wouldn’t even be a conversation.”

But… men can get pregnant, right?

Not so fast! The AP is here to dispel your confusion. The stylebook was updated yet again, this time instructing reporters to never dare say “men can get pregnant” only in relation to abortion. When it comes to other situations, yes, men can get pregnant. But when it comes to news stories about abortion, no, men cannot get pregnant. Got it?

If that doesn’t make sense to you, it’s because you're a bigot. Your superiors understand that uttering the word “abortion” erases male pregnancy, while the word “healthcare” brings it back. Magic! 

[loudlytransparenttrash]

Two female inmates in New Jersey have found themselves pregnant. How could this be? Every inmate is a woman, and none had any interactions with outsiders or male guards. Turns out, it’s thanks to the ACLU forcing the state’s only all-women’s prison to house male inmates who say they are women. Now the prison houses 27 delightful men in wigs. The baby daddy of the knocked up duo is serving 30 years for the manslaughter of his foster father. Another of the trans-fers, “Sonia Doe,” not only won the right to impregnate women in his cell, he also received a $125,000 settlement from the state for initially being refused a transfer to a women’s prison.

No word on why prison admins didn’t foresee that pregnancy would be the inevitable result of caging men with women. As for the ACLU, which apparently now considers it a “constitutional right” for men to be locked in cells with women, the reaction has been euphoric, declaring men in women's prisons is part of “New Jersey's commitment to keeping people in this prison safe." 

[loudlytransparenttrash]

Why are we accepting the term “people of color"? Especially in higher education, one would expect to strive for more precision in language and social analysis. First, are there really people with, and people without color? It creates a peculiar distinction. No longer are we diverse people, there are just two different types of people and that’s it?

One basic problem is identifying on which side of the line to place people. How do we label Greeks, Serbians, and blue-eyed Puerto Ricans? What if Koreans have lighter skin than Italians? Where do biracial people fit in? Do they, or do they not have “color"? 

The second problem is that this faux-identity group suggests a common character or experience that doesn’t exist. “People of color” come from countless different cultural, religious, linguistic, economic, political, and ethnic backgrounds. What important characteristics or experiences do Nigerians and Japanese individuals share? Within the United States, what is the shared experience of the son of wealthy Pakistani immigrants and the daughter of a black mechanic in Detroit? If there is no common identity and experience of “people of color”, then why is this phrase used at all?

It is lazy overgeneralizing, used only in the deeply flawed narrative of race relations. It suggests that all “POC” share the common trait of having faced unjust discrimination and bigotry by white people. Thus, America is made up of the people of no-color and everybody else are their victims.

While white hegemony has been real in America, an educated person should also know that members of dominant ethnic groups have routinely oppressed members of different groups around the world. There isn’t a single racial group that is more innocent or guilty than the other. Whether they choose to ignore it or they haven’t been taught it, students and “POC”-pushers desperately need to understand this about our world and its history.

But of course, as usual, there’s much to be gained by being a victim today. We find and demand a great deal of special treatments and privileges for the victim, and embrace new forms of discriminations against the victimizer. When the son of an Albanian refugee is cast in the oppressor class, while the daughter of a Korean stockbroker receives benefits for having “color,” we have a problem. How about let’s drop the “POC” category altogether and strive for more precision in our language, perspective in our history, and overcoming of the tribalism that separates us.

[loudlytransparenttrash]

If you ever come back, can you give an explanation as to why women choose different majors then men. And do you believe that women are brainwashed into femininity like radical feminists believe?

Some will say society or "the patriarchy" dictates the majors and professions we choose, but it's hard to ignore the innate biological differences between men and women and how these differences impact the decisions we make.

Studies into 55 different cultures from across the world, researching how gender and personality norms vary from society to society, found regardless of environment, women across all 55 cultures are more nurturing, risk-averse and emotionally expressive while men are more competitive, risk taking and emotionally flat.

Females are more inclined to be social, they want to form bonds and friendships, they want to work with people and living things. This could explain why women are flourishing in law, education, pharmacy, veterinary medicine, biology, childcare, humanities and social sciences. Males tend to be happier tinkering with machines, using tools, fixing stuff, working alone, longer hours and within more competitive environments. This could explain why men dominate in mechanical and electrical engineering, automotive and plumbing.

This study also showed the more prosperous and progressive the country, the greater these differences are. When we are given the freedom to choose whatever we want to do, in most cases, we go after what we naturally enjoy doing and what we are good at. Our career paths, behavioral patterns, preferences and ambitions stem from our biological differences and freedom, not the make-believe, invisible "patriarchy".

[loudlytransparenttrash]

Hello, are you okay? I really like your blog and haven’t seen you in a while

I'm back :)

[loudlytransparenttrash]

I saw the <3 health banner and I thought tumblr was about to give actually important information about how to take care of your heart (proper diet, exercise, etc)

Unfortunately not, so here's your reminder to take care of your heart

I’m not sure what banner you mean sorry, this was from a few weeks ago but yes, I’ll still share your PSA xx 

[loudlytransparenttrash]

A fair trial might have come to the same conclusion as we saw yesterday, but we’ll never know. There’s never been a greater campaign of jury intimidation and pressure from mob rule than this trial. It was made perfectly clear that the nation would be engulfed in flames and violence if the jurors expressed reasonable doubt. The jurors had everything but their names released publicly, including age, race, location and profession, knowing they would be exposed and forced into witness protection if they came to the wrong verdict. A severed pig’s head and blood was splattered over the house where a witness earlier lived and his former employer, a local police department, disavowed him over his testimony, a warning for anyone involved in the trial. The riots related to this case have already cost dozens of people their lives and the most damage in U.S. history, costing billions of dollars in damage, could you imagine what would happen if the jurors didn’t do what was expected of them? Minneapolis police put up razor wire and boards around their offices, so did cities all across the nation. National Guard troops were deployed all over in anticipation of the verdict announcement. The jurors knew that the media covering the trial were looking at their faces every day for three weeks and knew who they are, if the mobs found out too, if they came to the wrong verdict, their lives would be over. Every day they walked into a building fortified like a military compound. Officials from local mayors all the way up to the president of the United States made it clear that the only verdict they would accept was “guilty.” Politicians openly called for violence if the jury did not concede to mob rule. This case has been held up as a social justice torch to give politicians an excuse to pass almost anything and the mob an excuse to influence every future trial they can racialize. The pride that’s being taken in “this is just the beginning” of deciding the outcomes of trials before due process has run its course and making sure jurors follow through is a dangerous precedent being hailed as “justice.”

[loudlytransparenttrash]

Broke: Copaganda is a problem. Woke: Pressaganda is a problem. The press reporters and Hollywood deceive the public into thinking the Press Reporters are honorable, honest heroes when in reality they are sociopathic, division-making, bullying, lying, lap-dog charlatans who either do good by sheer accident, on orders from their masters, or take credit from REAL journalists who did good. Even in Mark Twain’s time, they are like that, as Mark said “If you read the newspaper, you're misinformed.”.

Our news media is completely broken. Its ideological bias and blatant corruption is either creating and worsening practically every single one of our country’s problems. Their stranglehold on information must end. Stop thinking of them as our mainstream news source when they don’t reflect or represent the majority of people and there’s nothing normal or conventional about what they are doing. Treat them just as they demand their enemies be treated: Lying and guilty until proven otherwise. Look beyond what’s constantly being smacked in our faces everywhere we turn and take pride in challenging the narrative. Otherwise, get out of the bubble altogether and find happiness in the real world.

[loudlytransparenttrash]

hey, what’s your opinion on hookup culture? it makes me think about how feminists focus a lot on female objectification and ignore that women can objectify men too. i’ve seen women who engage in hookup culture refer to men as pieces of meat and things like that, and i just don’t understand how they can’t see what men do to them is what they’re doing to men back.

Hookup culture is gross. As for the double standards in objectification, you’re right, both sexes “objectify” each other, it’s called nature and sexuality, we even objectify ourselves, as women there’s great power in wielding our sexuality. Yes, men are more likely to have sexual thoughts when looking at a woman they find attractive but that’s because men respond greater to visual sexual stimuli than women, this isn’t a product of misogyny or the patriarchy, it’s a natural difference between the sexes. Men are also routinely depicted as “eye candy” in sexual or objectified manners, on our screens, advertisements and personal conversations, but we’re told it’s not the same thing because there’s more male CEOs therefore there’s a power imbalance... so it can’t be objectifying to men... or something... We are also told that body image, beauty standards and expectations are all one-sided, that men aren’t affected at all by it, they’re instead exclusively the perpetrators of it. We already know women bully, criticize and shame each other far more than men, why don’t we ever talk about that when discussing women’s self-esteem disorders, it seems much more important than the “male gaze.” The objectification and over-sexualization in our culture isn’t even particularly male-driven. It’s a legacy of the feminist sexual revolution in which women are encouraged to unleash their sexuality through promiscuity, sex and nudity. Now it’s become empowering and justly to be a whore and abandon all values and morals, of course there will be increased sexual objectification and sexualization, how couldn’t there be? The solution isn’t toxic masculinity indoctrination, men and women simply need to start respecting ourselves and each other again and live our lives with morals and standards. 

[loudlytransparenttrash]

myself and some others who are conservative do not "back the blue" because of how police officers have been dealing with COVID. They have been giving COVID tickets to small businesses, backing what we see as unconstitutional mandates, forcefully removing people from their homes because of COVID restrictions and the like. I do not think you have everything talked about mandates that much so I wanted to bring in a different perspective

That’s fair, but the only places where these tyrannical, unconstitutional crackdowns are happening, are in cities run by tyrannical, unconstitutional politicians. The actions of police officers are a direct reflection of those in charge, cops follow orders. It would be nice if the cops in these cities wouldn’t follow their orders, but I don’t think they’re willing to give up their careers and pensions. We can absolutely condemn the examples of abuses and violations, especially those ordering them, while still generally being pro-police. 

[loudlytransparenttrash]

It's sad to think about how far these good children's shows have fallen. I remember when no one cared about the race of a character because it was a good show.

Japanese media seems to be doing representation better because they write great characters of any race, gender, or sexuality. Boku No Hero Academia managed to work in very well written black and trans characters without focussing on their race or orientation. None of the themes feel forced or overbearing. And they are relevant themes.

Yeah, no one has an issue with diversity or representation, although they jam it down our throats too often, thinking they’re sticking it to imaginary Nazis, so every token character is some over the top, banal, walking talking political statement, and when people aren’t impressed, boom, “we told you Nazis exist!”

[loudlytransparenttrash]

That Seasame Street is somehow patronizing even to its target audience. "I don't think the kids will understand that when we call people brown we mean the color of their skin so be sure to show more example of color so that the kids know that when we say color we mean color."

Right. Also, I didn’t mention it in my post, but notice their whole lecture on “melanin.” Listen to a minute of any black nationalist speak and it’s melanin this, melanin that, "melanin theory” is big in black supremacist/Afrocentrism doctrine, and now it's being normalized on Sesame Street.

[loudlytransparenttrash]

Can we talk about the gaslighting the left does about pronouns? They say that having to state/having pronouns in your signature title is not political and that everyone has them and we conservatives are making a big deal out of nothing. Yet they bully celebrities like Gina Carino into putting them in her bio. And, if you can't tell the difference in sex between me and my little sister, y'know, male and female, pronouns should be obvious just by looking, then yes it is political

Of course it’s political. Displaying “preferred pronouns” is a public declaration of your belief and support in gender theory - radical left dogma. Oops, sorry, did you know, it’s now transphobic or something to say “preferred pronouns,” according to University of Michigan’s Language Police. Georgia State University didn’t get the memo, they’re still asking students if they prefer to be called coself, emself, yoself, ze, xie, vis, eir, ey or ve. See the problem? It’s all made up babble. There’s no consistency and can be changed daily, depending on how we feel. Which leads to the next problem. We are told to forget about biology, don’t use sex and focus only on what’s in our mind. Thought is much easier to manipulate and control, after all. 

We are told it’s no big deal and you must be a conspiracy theorist if you think it’s political, yet courts have already started to force professors to use the preferred pronouns of students or else join others being fired. California’s SB 219 bill also fines or jails employees of long-term or intermediate care facilities who choose not to use preferred gender pronouns. It’s not political. There’s almost no school or company in the country which won’t reprimand or get rid of you for ignoring their preferred pronoun requirements, but if you’re worried about that, you must be transphobic.

Even taking sex and biology out of the picture, it’s incredibly stupid and grammatically incorrect to use first and second-person gender pronouns. It’s only the third-person pronoun in English that conveys gender, when you’re referring to somebody or something else, not yourself. A normal, courteous exchange about names might go like this: “Hi, my name is Jessica, but I go by Jess” “Hi, Jess, pleased to meet you.” What proud gender pronoun enforcers are demanding manifests as follows: “Hi, I’m Jessica. I identify as gender non-conforming. When you talk about me to someone else in the future, I want you to identify me as Xe, because that will indicate that you accept and go along with me thinking of myself as a non-binary individual, and if you don’t, I’ll get you fired.” Could you get any more egotistic? 

This is not asking people to be polite, it’s thought policing. It’s no different to holding up four fingers and demand you say “five!” There is no place in a free and open society to punish people who do not think or speak the correct way that some edgy teenager demands. It’s about power. I can almost guarantee every one of us have either censored ourselves or gone along with it from fear of offending the politically correct. We are expected to apologize and beg for forgiveness for "mistaking” pronouns that are otherwise biologically and grammatically correct, and go around asking everyone if they like to be referred in third-person conversations by the pronoun that matches their sex or by a different one that they have made up with Scrabble pieces. 

The gap between reality and language should be as narrow as possible so our speech makes sense and reflects reality, yet gender ideology requires to obliterate both language and reality. Asking me to be considerate is not the same thing as asking me to play along with what’s in your head or else face punishment. But that’s the whole point of these pronoun games. Do as I say or don’t say anything at all. The perfect recipe for conformity. 

[loudlytransparenttrash]

Sesame Street recently introduced two new black puppets, father and son, Elijah and Wes. In the promo, Elmo asks why Wes’s skin is brown. His dad Elijah explains how “the color of our skin is an important part of who we are.”

“They see color: Two new Black ‘Sesame Street’ characters explain racial difference to children,” exclaimed CNN in a celebratory headline lauding the push in children’s entertainment to force kids to “see color” (because not seeing color and evaluating people based on anything other than race is racist).

According to the official Sesame Street “racial justice” webpage (yes, that’s a real thing), “All kids need a strong individual and group identity, but racism hurts the healthy development of both.” We of course know they don’t mean “all kids” when it comes to encouraging a strong group identity and making their race an important part to who they are. We can’t be having “white nationalist” kids running around Sesame Street, right?

Elijah goes on to inform Elmo, “Things on the outside, like our skin color, our hair texture, our noses, our mouths and eyes, make us who we are.” Yes, teaching kids immutable features based on race define us sure is a good idea. Elmo picks up a dead leaf from the ground and says, “This leaf is brown like Wes’ skin!” Yep, that’s exactly what black people love hearing: “Your skin looks like this dried-up dead leaf!” 

The weirdest part of the introductory “Elijah and Wes” video is the fact that Elmo and the other Muppets appear to have no idea what black people are. They ask the father and son, “What are you? Why are you brown?” as if this is the first time they’ve ever seen a person of color. Over the decades, there have been dozens of black characters. For over 40 years, the Muppets have been staring at all the black characters, puppets and children going, “What are you? What’s the deal with these dead leaf skinned people?”

[loudlytransparenttrash]

Can you give your opinion on this? Whenever there's people saying "so much for the tolerant left" they always say things like "we are not obligated to be tolerant of intolerance" but isn't that what being tolerant is? Or that being tolerant covers? Being tolerant of supposed "intolerance" (I quoted intolerance this because they call everything intolerant)

Either you’re on board with the reigning PC orthodoxy (tolerance) or you find it questionable (intolerance). Any disagreement, offensiveness or association with dissent becomes “intolerance” and thereby antithetical to their vision for a “tolerant” society. You need to be tolerant of everything they demand you to be tolerant of, otherwise you are intolerant, and your intolerance can’t be tolerated, so when they shut you up, they’re not being intolerant, you are and that’s why they won’t tolerate you. 

[loudlytransparenttrash]

Check your privilege. You are not on the side of Asians, only the whites who have been supposedly the most affected by this. Says a lot that THAT is what you're worried about.

Yes, I’m sorry, the media, politicians and activists widely condemning an entire race and pinning the racist attacks on them is no big deal and should not be discussed, you are right. You may have a point. In my last post, I did not bring enough attention to the severity and often savagery of these recent attacks against Asian Americans, usually elderly. The victims deserve to be heard and their violent, racist attackers condemned to the fullest. So let’s do that.

On January 28th, 84-year-old Vicha Ratanapakdee was walking in his driveway in San Francisco. A 19-year-old male barreled into him, knocking him to the ground. The male, Antoine Watson, was accompanied by a 20-year-old female. Two days later, Ratanapakdee died of his injuries. In March, an elderly woman was beaten during a robbery in broad daylight in Daly City. The attacker stripped her of her belongings and started to leave, before returning to club her again. In San Jose, on February 5th, a 64-year-old Vietnamese grandmother was getting into her car after withdrawing $1000 in cash in advance of the Lunar New Year. Two males yanked open the car door, grabbed the woman’s purse, keys, and phone and fled.

On January 31st, a 91-year-old man was walking along an Oakland sidewalk when a young male came up behind and pushed him to the ground. As the man’s head hung over the curb into the street, the assailant calmly continued walking off. A 60-year-old man and a 55-year-old woman were attacked in Oakland’s Chinatown by the same assailant. Seventy-five-year-old Pak Ho was robbed and killed while taking his morning walk near Oakland’s Lake Merritt in March. He hit his head on the sidewalk and was taken off life support for brain trauma shortly after. On February 3rd, a 71-year-old grandmother was walking across an Oakland sidewalk towards her apartment when a young man dashed up and knocked her to the ground. A second male ran up and danced around as the first pulled the woman’s purse from her body, breaking the strap. Both males then ran off with the purse.

On February 23rd, two 19-year-olds and a 20-year-old walked into a San Francisco laundromat where a 67-year-old man was sitting. They kicked him to the ground, dangled him upside down by his legs, twisted him back and forth and beat him while they rifled through his pockets. Finally, they found his wallet and walked out the door. An 88-year-old great-grandmother, Yik Oi Huang, went missing. When her son searched the park next to her home, he saw what he thought was a pile of old clothes next to a recycling bin. It was his mother, beaten so brutally as to be unrecognizable and choking on her own blood. Her pants were down and her belly exposed. The 18-year-old suspect had gone on to burglarize her home, stealing jewelry and house keys before fleeing the area. Huang died. On March 18th, a man yelled “you motherf**king Asian!” as he knocked a 68-year-old Sri Lankan unconscious on a New York subway. The man remains in a critical condition. On March 21st, a 37-year-old woman attending a rally in lower Manhattan against anti-Asian violence was punched twice in the face by a man who took her protest sign and stuffed it in a trash can. In March 2020, four teenage girls assaulted a 51-year-old woman on a bus in the Bronx, hitting her with an umbrella and accusing her of spreading the coronavirus.

On March 30th, a man assaulted a mother on a train heading to Times Square, New York, and began yelling anti-Asian slurs at her and her three children. He then knocked the woman’s phone to the floor and kicked it off the train. On March 27th, a man beat and choked an Asian man unconscious aboard a Manhattan-bound train. The attacker repeatedly punched the man down to the subway seat, he then wrapped his arm around the other man’s neck, putting him in a chokehold for nearly 15 seconds, before the victim’s body falls to the train floor, his head flopping back unconsciously. Also on March 27th, a 37-year-old woman was at a NYC station when she was approached by a man who struck the woman in the face and made anti-Asian statements to her. On March 24th, a 35-year-old woman was riding on a NYC train when a man on board started making racist slurs her. When the victim started recording him on her cellphone, police say he smacked it out of her hand, picked it up, and smashed it on the ground. 

On April 3rd, an elderly couple were attacked in Tacoma, Washington by a 15-year-old male, who ran up to them, swinging punches at the man as the woman cries out while others record it and cheer. Another video shows the victim being further verbally abused and assaulted. On April 7th, a 25-year-old female was sitting, talking to a friend, when an individual made anti-Asian statements and slapped her in the face. On April 11th, a 57-year-old man was brutally assaulted on an Oakland street. The perpetrator sat on top of the victim, holding him down physically and landed blows to his face and chest as the victim struggled, screaming for help. On April 13th, a man was walking through the streets of the Upper East Side, ranting about Asians and white people, when he followed after a man who walked into the street to get away before the suspect followed him and body slammed him into a glass storefront. The victim tried to run away, but the suspect chased him until someone intervened. On April 14th, a convicted sex offender was arrested after following a woman into her garage, shouting race-based insults at her and spitting in her face.

How do I show I’m on “Asian’s side”? I’m allowed to condemn these violent, racist attacks, but I can’t condemn the violent, racist attackers because every single one of them is also black, and I can’t condemn the media and politicians for not only hiding the truth about these violent, racist attacks, but putting all blame and condemnation on an entire unrelated race in order to advance a radical agenda? Since I apparently can’t be “on Asians side” while at the same time condemning the corrupt and distorted reporting and narrative of these attacks, I will not pay attention at all to those who are committing the attacks or those who are using them for profit and gain. That’s how this works, right? Thank you for making me woke like you xx 

[loudlytransparenttrash]

Can you help me understand this, why do leftist students destroy or steal property of signs and sign ups of groups they don't like. This has happened twice to my conservative college group on campus. One instance was when we put up signs saying "if you live in the west, you are not oppressed" within thirty minutes the signs were stolen. Our abortion memorial was stomped on by a group too. Why they can't just ignore if they don't like it, or even debate with us?

Because they are entitled brats who have been convinced that they must never be “triggered” (their word, not mine) or made to think about things that challenge their view of themselves and their noble quest for social justice. All over America they’re removing signs and posters they don’t like, statues, art, books, mascots, shutting down speaking events, student organizations and getting professors fired. Conformity is the goal. In their minds, you are a baddie for having different opinions and they are heroes “fighting for justice” so every violent and conniving act they carry out against you can be justified as doing it for the “greater good,” you have brought violence and crime against yourself for being a “hateful” person. They have a grossly unearned sense of moral superiority and they will always use it to crush dissent in any form they find. They know they can’t argue their point, so they will just tear yours down. If they don’t shut you up instantly by any means necessary, they might feel obligated to consider what you have to say, or even worse, other students might get to listen to what you have to say, and that's the ultimate disaster for them.