pobopolybius

[pobopolybius]

[pobopolybius]

if a nonchalant teenager lived in skeleton world they would probably sometimes say something like "uhhh... *scoff* what the skull?"

[pobopolybius]

how c.ai works and why it's unethical

Okay, since the AI discourse is happening again, I want to make this very clear, because a few weeks ago I had to explain to a (well meaning) person in the community how AI works. I'm going to be addressing people who are maybe younger or aren't familiar with the latest type of "AI", not people who purposely devalue the work of creatives and/or are shills.

The name "Artificial Intelligence" is a bit misleading when it comes to things like AI chatbots. When you think of AI, you think of a robot, and you might think that by making a chatbot you're simply programming a robot to talk about something you want them to talk about, and it's similar to an rp partner. But with current technology, that's not how AI works. For a breakdown on how AI is programmed, CGP grey made a great video about this several years ago (he updated the title and thumbnail recently)

I HIGHLY HIGHLY recommend you watch this because CGP Grey is good at explaining, but the tl;dr for this post is this: bots are made with a metric shit-ton of data. In C.AI's case, the data is writing. Stolen writing, usually scraped fanfiction.

How do we know chatbots are stealing from fanfiction writers? It knows what omegaverse is [SOURCE] (it's a Wired article, put it in incognito mode if it won't let you read it), and when a Reddit user asked a chatbot to write a story about "Steve", it automatically wrote about characters named "Bucky" and "Tony" [SOURCE].

I also said this in the tags of a previous reblog, but when you're talking to C.AI bots, it's also taking your writing and using it in its algorithm: which seems fine until you realize 1. They're using your work uncredited 2. It's not staying private, they're using your work to make their service better, a service they're trying to make money off of.

"But Bucca," you might say. "Human writers work like that too. We read books and other fanfictions and that's how we come up with material for roleplay or fanfiction."

Well, what's the difference between plagiarism and original writing? The answer is that plagiarism is taking what someone else has made and simply editing it or mixing it up to look original. You didn't do any thinking yourself. C.AI doesn't "think" because it's not a brain, it takes all the fanfiction it was taught on, mixes it up with whatever topic you've given it, and generates a response like in old-timey mysteries where somebody cuts a bunch of letters out of magazines and pastes them together to write a letter.

(And might I remind you, people can't monetize their fanfiction the way C.AI is trying to monetize itself. Authors are very lax about fanfiction nowadays: we've come a long way since the Anne Rice days of terror. But this issue is cropping back up again with BookTok complaining that they can't pay someone else for bound copies of fanfiction. Don't do that either.)

Bottom line, here are the problems with using things like C.AI:

It is using material it doesn't have permission to use and doesn't credit anybody. Not only is it ethically wrong, but AI is already beginning to contend with copyright issues.

C.AI sucks at its job anyway. It's not good at basic story structure like building tension, and can't even remember things you've told it. I've also seen many instances of bots saying triggering or disgusting things that deeply upset the user. You don't get that with properly trigger tagged fanworks.

Your work and your time put into the app can be taken away from you at any moment and used to make money for someone else. I can't tell you how many times I've seen people who use AI panic about accidentally deleting a bot that they spent hours conversing with. Your time and effort is so much more stable and well-preserved if you wrote a fanfiction or roleplayed with someone and saved the chatlogs. The company that owns and runs C.AI can not only use whatever you've written as they see fit, they can take your shit away on a whim, either on purpose or by accident due to the nature of the Internet.

DON'T USE C.AI, OR AT THE VERY BARE MINIMUM DO NOT DO THE AI'S WORK FOR IT BY STEALING OTHER PEOPLES' WORK TO PUT INTO IT. Writing fanfiction is a communal labor of love. We share it with each other for free for the love of the original work and ideas we share. Not only can AI not replicate this, but it shouldn't.

(also, this goes without saying, but this entire post also applies to ai art)

[pobopolybius]

THEN WHO'S JESUS YAOING IT UP WITH. WHO

[pobopolybius]

oh yeah I think I should show my Der Freischütz plush I've made some time ago. his cloak isn't indigo because I didn't have such fabric and I didn't want to buy more when I had so much of purple lmao.

he's like, one of the best plushies I've sewn so far. he's quite dear to me.

[pobopolybius]

traditional art of clouded monk. I really like this guy

I'm generally surprised and disappointed people don't draw him much, I can barely find any fanart online. it's odd to me becuz he's one of the More Humanoid Abnormalities, and ppl love those (take into notes: Little Red, Der Frei, Butterfly man, The magical girls, I'd even dare to say Army in Pink). but this guy? everybody forgot about him even though I believe he's genuinely intriguing and good-looking. I know I'm rambling but I'm quite sad, I feel like I'm the only one who's kinda obsessed with him. bro even made me learn what śarīra means lmao.

[pobopolybius]

When people get a little too gung-ho about-

wait. cancel post. gung-ho cannot be English. where did that phrase come from? China?

ok, yes. gōnghé, which is…an abbreviation for “industrial cooperative”? Like it was just a term for a worker-run organization? A specific U.S. marine stationed in China interpreted it as a motivational slogan about teamwork, and as a commander he got his whole battalion using it, and other U.S. marines found those guys so exhausting that it migrated into English slang with the meaning “overly enthusiastic”.

That’s…wild. What was I talking about?

[pobopolybius]

[pobopolybius]

so regarding my last post with clouded monk, ppl reblogged with the reasons he's not as popular. I suppose his breaching form IS kinda repulsive but come on.... give him a break lmao/j

and to everybody who agreed in some way or got excited; hi hello, I drew him again. and I will do that more.

also I require everyone to tag me under posts with this man, I'd appreciate it a lot thank you:>

#wwhkoowahuuh #woahh #hey #helllo mx monk #do you like men

[pobopolybius]

Hey y'all, this fundraiser only has 8% of its goal, please please help them out. I'll do a drawing via mail (US/Can only) if you do!!!

https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/FamilyRasha?utm_term=QJbJMJrJW

[pobopolybius]

I think more people have to be aware that outing someone's kinks to the public is sexual harassment, especially if someone keeps a low profile about it or doesn't want others to know. Using someone's sexual tastes to demean them and hurt them is incredibly degrading in a bad way. And yes this applies to "icky and gross" fetishes and niche ones that maybe only one person likes too.

Making a huge post mocking and berating someone for liking something that is causing harm to no one is not going to help anyone. You are just sexually traumatising someone else for the sake of looking morally better. Adding someone's kinks to a post warning about predatory behaviour, ie fetish mining from minors, is understandable to contextualise the harm done to kids. However, adding that someone is into, idk, let's say vore, to a callout for no reason other than to mock, point fingers at, and sexually berate a person IS sexual harassment!

If you deliberately target someone's sexual life and air it all out in the open for the sake of hurting them, that is sexual harassment! You are violating someone's sexual privacy deliberately. You are invading their personal space and flaunting them sexually to the public without consent. That's harassment, not "helping victims". All you are doing is treating someone like filth for being into something that causes no harm. Instead of focusing on people who are hurting others in real life, you are focusing on dedicating your platform to sexually exposing someone for indulging in "what if" scenarios in their mind and consensually in private. It's stupid. You're not helping people, you're creating victims.

[pobopolybius]

i wanna slit your throat and eat 'till i get sick dun dun dunnnnn the slaughters onnnnnnn

#WAUHSAHUWAUAUUWAUAHHHUUEUEUAHAAAAA #SAVE

[pobopolybius]

So we all know that Tumblr is US-centric. But to what degree? (and can we skew the results of this poll by posting it at a time where they should be asleep?)

Reblog to increase sample size!

#no wonder most posts in this website consist of the most uncaring people alive who can't see past their own ass

[pobopolybius]

Horniness is not intrinsically less pure than any other human motivation

[pobopolybius]

Well you see minors under 25 years old should not be allowed to get gender reassignment surgery because what if they go to the clinic but instead of giving them a normal penis the nurses mess up and give them the evil penis. That's irreversible

[pobopolybius]

?

#Costa Concordia incident #literally

[pobopolybius]