#There’ll be a clear and obvious controversy! VAR won’t end arguments | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

torentialtribute · 5 years

Text

There’ll be a clear and obvious controversy! VAR won’t end arguments, but will be mostly right

Coming Sunday at 3 p.m., a small dark room deep in the heart of a gigantic industrial estate, two miles north of Heathrow Airport, will be a become chaotic

& final game before their eyes

For the first time, the Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL) tries all 10 Premier League games in to keep track of the assessment for the arrival of VAR next season.

<img id = "i-1f456e218e3e7ba8" src = "https://dailym.ai/2Q20JAy. jpg "height =" 423 "width =" 634 "alt =" <img id = "i-1f456e218e3e7ba8" src = "https://dailym.ai/2vTCefq -7018859-image-a-11_1557609814433.jpg "height =" 423 "width =" 634 "alt =" The Mail on Sunday was invited to the IMG Studios in Stockley Park to test the technology "Sunday was invited to the IMG Studios in Stockley Park to test the technology "

The Mail on Sunday was invited to test at the IMG Studios in technology from Stockley Park

Some may notice a missed offside at Anfield, others could notice infringement in a Sergio Aguero winner at the Amex. All decisions that could have been made about which colors the Premier League trophy drape.

We have seen

PGMOL since September 2018, have tried VAR in FA Cup and Carabao Cup competitions and other non-live tests on Premier League- spell. it is in action in the Champions League, which excludes the place of Manchester City in the semi-finals in the most dramatic way, as well as in the world cup in the summer.

Now, whether you like it or not, it is coming to the Premier League.

The Mail on Sunday was invited to the IMG Studios in Stockley Park to test the technology prior to Sunday's action the head of the PGMOL Mike Riley revealed how VAR will help make more correct decisions take.

You are the video assistant referee. You sit at a table in the VAR bunker. In front of you are two television screens, one above the other. The top one shows the game live.

The screen below has been split into four. The top left corner shows the same feed but with a three-second delay. If you think you see an incident, you can check it there. The other three offer different angles.

Two large buttons

You are going to pay attention to four things – goals and whether they should stand, straight red cards, but no second yellow cards, penalties and wrong identity. lie on the table. A green one that you can use to add a bookmark to the passage of the piece you want to view and a red one that lets you speak to the referee's referee.

To your left is your assistant VAR. It has its own screen. He is your extra pair of eyes.

<img id = "i-d9b5b066b2696117" src = "https://dailym.ai/2PXbX9i image-a-3_1557608900373.jpg "height =" 453 "width =" 634 "alt =" <img id = "i-d9b5b066b2696117" src = "https://dailym.ai/2J2OwKp /11/22/13384606-7018859-image-a-3_1557608900373.jpg "height =" 453 "width =" 634 "alt =" They will check four things – goals, straight red cards, penalties and false identity four things – goals , straight red cards, punishments and wrong identity "

They will check four things – goals, straight red cards, punishments and wrong identity

There is a helpful person on your right young man from Hawk-Eye, the specialist in video technology, who has also had a number of referee training sessions.

He has his own two screens: one live, one touch screen.

For a Saturday 15.00 game hour stand e r 12 cameras in a game that show you more angles, speed things up, play slower, build tracks outside. For a match on TV this is a maximum of 24. For them you have an extra screen with an extra Hawk-Eye helper.

The referee to the right of the left side of the line, the field also has the option to use a video screen on the side of the field to review incidents themselves, although Riley says referees have been instructed to use them as sparingly as possible to avoid unnecessary delays.

theory, it all sounds simple enough. CLEAR AND CLEAR

If there is only one sentence on the couch next season, let it be this way: & # 39; clear and obvious & # 39 ;.

VAR will ask & # 39; should this be a red card? & # 39; Do not reply?

The distinction is subtle but crucial. Riley insists that PGMOL & # 39; wants to preserve the primacy of officiating with the referee on the field & # 39 ;. The referee is still in charge. They do not want the game to be re-fasted by a person in the box, even if they are elite competition officials themselves.

Another reason is because the question & # 39; should this be a red card & # 39; so is subjective. A ref is red, is again a strong yellow.

That in itself suggests a decision on the field was not clearly and clearly wrong. That of course will not prevent rival fans from raging about what they think is clear and obvious and what is not.

<img id = "i-2b20d8f892344b16" src = "https://dailym.ai/2vTCr2l image-a-5_1557609061525.jpg "height =" 440 "width =" 634 "alt =" VAR will intervene if the referee has made a & # 39; clear and obvious & # 39; error during the match & # 39 ; class = "blkBorder img-share" if the referee made a & # 39; clear and obvious & # 39; mistake during the match

VAR will intervene if the referee makes a & # 39; clear and obvious & # 39; mistake made during the match

RED CARDS

Was at the VAR stand, the first incident we have to tackle through Huddersfield defend Zanka at Crystal Palace forward Wilfried Zaha

In that match, in September, Zanka was shown a yellow card, after which Zaha complained that he must have broken his leg. and before referees penalized bad tackles on his way.

We must view the incident in real speed first. Riley cannot emphasize this enough. That way, VAR & # 39; s can achieve the actual & # 39; intensity & # 39; assess the challenge. Intensity is important when it comes to dangerous tackles. In short: did it make you falter?

Only when that intensity has been established is the incident viewed in slow motion. Slow motion always makes it look worse.

Just as by slowing down images of a handball, it seems that it appears more intentional, and poor equipment seems more dangerous. If you are the first to see this, check it in real time, your assessment will be skewed.

<img id = "i-7b665a95ab7fcfcc" src = "https://dailym.ai/2Q18t5S image-a-8_1557609236122.jpg "height =" 419 "width =" 634 "alt =" In slow-mo, Zanka's challenge on Wilfried Zaha should have been a straight red in September -mo, Zanka's challenge on Wilfried Zaha in September should have been straight red "

In slow-mo, Zanka & # 39; s challenge on Wilfried Zaha in September had to be a straight red

In real -time the equipment from Zanka looks late, but nothing more. In slow-mo, his stallions catch the ankle of Zaha, his joint curves and rocks.

I think it must be a straight red card. The man next to me from the Sunday Mirror is adamant, it's just a yellow. Split already. Good start.

Riley has done demonstrations like this with Premier League players and managers, who will ultimately decide where they want the lines to be drawn, and the consensus was that they were happy to be yellow.

The point is that referee Scott was not clear and clearly wrong to show a yellow. Again, that's the thing to remember.

OFFSIDE

These are the decisions that VAR should find easiest to clean up: inside, outside; ourselves, offside. Really wrong; Yes No; black and white.

Yet we know that through the scenes of Chelsea staff that a laptop with alternative angles pushed the miffed Maurizio Sarri after their defeat against Tottenham in the Carabao Cup, which is not always the case.

In the Champions League, border guards are instructed to keep their flags on marginal offside calls and allow the game to continue. If a goal is scored, VAR will check it.

By holding down the flag, you avoid the uncomfortable scenario of a linesman going offside, where the referee stops the game and ends the attacking team's chance of scoring, and then finds out that the player was heading in the right direction

Next season in the Premier League it will be something else. It is not the border judges who have to lower their flags, but the referees who are told to refrain from whistling until the attack is over.

Next season the referees will be told to refrain from blowing their flute until they get over his "blkBorder img-share" This is so unnatural for referees that they had to be retrained to do that.

Michael Oliver, the referee, in that Chelsea-Tottenham game did it correctly When Kane was played, the linesman signaled, but Oliver did not blow his whistle after the striker had been knocked down in the penalty area.

] & # 39; If he is not offside, then it is a penalty, & # 39; was Oliver & # 39; s

The moment the ball was played was actually between the frames on the video

so the V AR only use the ball if the ball had left the foot. When margins between us and outside games are so good, even the boundaries of technology could make a difference.

Leroy Sane descends into the box, appeals to a penalty, the referee waves but everyone stops, only for David

First check the build-up to it target. David Silva came back from the field to play the ball, so there was an offside to watch, but a quick zoom lens from Hawk-Eye showed that the game was over.

So no goal. Back to the criminal case. Numerous repetitions later and one of us thinks it should have been a penalty, while the other didn't.

It is ultimately decided that it is not a clear and obvious error (there is that sentence again) and we stick to the on-field decision of Jon Moss

<img id = "i-4dd389faf9434dbb" src = "https://dailym.ai/2vV8vCI" height = "364" width = "634" alt = "<img id =" i-4dd389faf9434dbb "src =" https://dailym.ai/2PXnMMR -a-10_1557609779276.jpg "height =" 364 "width =" 634 "alt =" One of the most complex incidents we saw was the goal of Bernardo Silva against Burnley "we got Bernardo Silva & # 39; s goal against Burnley to be seen "

One of the most complex incidents we saw was Bernardo Silva's goal against Burnley

Well done to us. We think you have it fast enough. In fact, there are three reasons for this: the fact that they are all out and probably have long since descended to the hall

In the 68 live VAR tests so far, there are on average eight checks per game, average on average 30 seconds each.

That usually doesn't cause any delay at all, but that is impossible to avoid, the average stopping time has been around 22 seconds.

[WAT WAT OVER DIE FANS?]

[WHAT OVERFANS]

That will change next season, even if it is not the same as that in the box. not much It is intended that fans in the stadium show fragments of the incidents on screens in the stadium, but only after the VAR decision has been made, in contrast to cricket and rugby, where the incidents are shown to supporters while the referee make its decision.

For lands that do not have large screens, such as Old Trafford and Anfield, the information can be relayed by PA announcements.

In contrast to other sports, the dialogue between the field officials and the VAR's will not be broadcast. Regardless of how much clearer it would be for fans to understand the reasoning behind the decisions, Ifab, the makers of the laws, simply won't allow it.

<img id = "i-639c24834c4a5179" src = "https://dailym.ai/2vOseEm -7018859-image-a-19_1557610215566.jpg "height =" 458 "width =" 634 "alt =" In tennis the incidents are shown to supporters while the referee makes the decision "class =" blkBorder img-share "shown to supporters while the referee makes the decision "

In tennis the incidents are shown to supporters while the referee makes the decision

HOW MUCH WILL IT GO?

Son Heung-min shot a shot in the top corner from 30 yards, meanwhile, on the center line, is Manuel Lanzini of West Ham wrinkled in.

West Ham believes that their husband is soiled, but the referee was not there Tottenham won the possession and less than a minute later the ball was in the net.

Prepare yourself for me there gray areas. There is no fixed timetable in which a VAR can go back to check for infringement.

Riley talks about the beginning of the attacking phase of the game.

In the example of Son, that would not allow the goal if VAR thought it was clearly and clearly a mistake on Lanzini. But just after that tackle, he played a bad pass to the left and behind Erik Lamela, who had to withdraw to collect it.

<img id = "i-2c81505aa1dada84" src = "https://dailym.ai/2PYmaCk -21_1557610349086.jpg "height =" 389 "width =" 634 "alt =" <img id = "i-2c81505aa1dada84" src = "https://dailym.ai/2Hf9XXn 22 / 13385238-7018859-image-a-21_1557610349086.jpg "height =" 389 "width =" 634 "alt ="

[Gehhunden]] Son Heung-min scored a few minutes after Manuel Lanzini believed he was soiled in the Carabao Cup "

Son Heung-min scored a few minutes after Manuel Lanzini thought he was soiled in the Carabao Cup

This gave West Ham the time to reset, even if the hammers argue that it would be Lanzini that would have been closed.

& # 39; It will not be perfect, & Riley admits. & # 39; There is a high level of subjectivity. The advice of the play side is to keep the window as narrow as possible. Do not go back and back because that destroys football. & # 39;

Many think that VAR does. It will not.

But neither.

But that won't be either. it removes the controversy. Decisions are far too subjective and people far too varied. That is clear and clear.

How it will work

VAR will be used in all 380 Premier League games next season.

The referees of the video assistant will judge all scored goals and potential challenges related to the red card, penalties and cases of false identity.

Here's how it works, using the example of a tackle from Huddersfield defender Zanka at Crystal Palace, ahead of Wilfried Zaha, earlier this season.

Step 1: Zanka stretches for the ball but catches Zaha on the ankle while he passes. Zaha descends and grabs his foot. Referee Lee Mason awarded an error and showed Zanka a yellow card.

Step 2: VAR informs the referee on the field that they want to revise the tackle for a possible red card infringement.

Step 3: The VAR first views the incident at full speed to determine the intensity of the tackle from as many available angles as they want.

Step 4: Only when the intensity has been determined, the VAR will evaluate the tackle in slow motion to determine the contact point.

Step 5: VAR judges whether the referee has a & # 39; clear and clear error & # 39; has made by showing Zanka yellow card. This is the crucial decision.

Step 6: If the VAR thinks he has them, they will let Mason know that he must withdraw the yellow card and show Zanka to the red card instead. If not, they will say & # 39; check completed & # 39 ;.

Step 7: The game continues.

Source link

#There’ll be a clear and obvious controversy! VAR won’t end arguments #but will be mostly right"

0 notes