Tumgik
#indexremoteviewing
ylespar · 6 months
Text
"I did a remote viewing in early 1980s, 82 or 83, where a UFO target was mixed in with other targets so I had no idea it was a UFO target. It was very general – the targeting material was a newspaper clipping from 1952 referring to a sighting in Tacoma WA, a pattern of lights dancing on the horizon, people getting out of their cars and watching for a few minutes. It was double-wrapped in a thick envelope. My actual remote viewing was unique in that it was not the dissociative kind of RM, it was an automatic out-of-body experience. I found myself inside a white cube. That had never happened and has not happened since. Finding myself in this cube, I started to look for windows, doors, some kind of ingress-egress, and while I was looking, an apparition of my father appeared. He had died three years earlier. The apparition was very angry and told me to leave, that I had no business being where I was, which was not my father’s nature. He would never have done that. So I knew it was a projection of some kind. My response was to continue to look for an ingress-egress point. The apparition seemed to be confused for a minute and then vanished, to be replaced by a light being that folded into two of itself, it seemed to be arguing with itself in some strange language. My first perception was to be concerned, my second was that I was supposed to be concerned, so I wasn’t going to be, which confused the light being. I was then threatened with a light being which I thought was ridiculous, I almost said it out loud. The entity argued with itself some more then folded up and disappeared. I had a sense that something reached inside my being and strummed a nerve ending that instantly made me ill. I felt I was going to projectile vomit and found myself slam bang back in my body sitting bold upright and I collided heads with my monitor. Both of us were walking around the room holding our heads in pain. I explained to him what had happened and it turned out I had gone almost comatose, slipped backwards on the chair, and he became concerned. He figured things were out of control and we terminated the remote viewing. We recorded the material and opened the envelope and discovered that the target was the UFO target. Now, here’s the fascinating part: the length of the remote viewing session was almost identical to the length of the UFO event. In the newspaper report, they said the lights just winked out at the end of the UFO event. The particular physicist who had given us the target said, jeez, I wonder if you’re the reason why the lights winked out. Or are you the reason why there were lights in 1952?"
— Joe McMoneagle, 2021 interview with Richard Thieme [Ref.]
3 notes · View notes
ylespar · 9 months
Text
youtube
0 notes
ylespar · 10 months
Text
Coordinate Remote Viewing Stages I–VI
The following is a reproduction of content from "Coordinate Remote Viewing Stages I–VI and Beyond" (SG1 Project Officer, 1985, pp. 6–7), a declassified document (CIA-RDP96-00788R001000400001-7) released by the Central Intelligence Agency under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) on June 18, 1998.
Stage I Major Gestalt: In Stage I the viewer is trained to provide a quick-reaction response to the reading of geographic coordinates by the interviewer. The coordinates are expressed in degrees, minutes, and seconds when possible. The response takes the form of an immediate, primitive "squiggle" on paper. This "squiggle" is known as an ideogram. The ideogram captures the overall feeling/motion of the gestalt of the site (e.g., fluid/wavy for water). This response is kinesthetic and not visual. In Stage I visual images are noted and labeled as AOL [Analytical Overlay].
Stage II Sensory Contact: In Stage II the viewer is trained to become sensitive to sensations associated with the site. These sensations concern sounds, smells, tastes, textures, temperatures, and energies at the site. Although colors are perceivable, Stage II signals are essentially nonvisual in nature. As in Stage I, visual images are noted and declared as AOL.
Stage III Dimension, Motion, and Mobility: In Stages I and II, data typically appear to emerge as fragmented data bits. In Stage III we observe the emergence of a broader concept of the site. With Stage I and II data forming a foundation, more detailed data and dimensional aspects such as length, height, and distances, begin to appear. This increased contact is known as a "widening of the aperture". At this point contact with the site appears sufficiently strengthened that the viewer begins to have an overall appreciation of the site as a whole. This is known as an "aesthetic impact". After the viewer experiences an "aesthetic impact" the urge to draw the site begins. These drawings are expressed in the form of sketches, trackers (outlines of the general configuration of the site), and additional spontaneous ideograms. The final product of Stage I through Stage III training is the recognition of the overall gestalt and physical configuration of the site.
Stage IV General Qualitative Analytical Aspects: Because of the increased site contact that occurs in Stage III, in Stage IV data of an analytical nature begin to emerge. Contained in Stage IV data are elements that go beyond normal observational concepts. The ambience of the site such as military, religious, technical, or educational, can be expressed in Stage IV. Cultural factors such as Soviet, Muslim, or Arabic, and functional indicators such as power generation, BW research, or human research, can also be reported accurately in Stage IV. Stage IV is therefore the point where the viewer begins to become operational.
Stage V Specific Analytical Aspects by Interrogating the Signal Line: Many complex bits of data are produced during Stage IV. If during Stage IV the viewer attempts to probe or question the significance of this data it usually results in the production of AOL. The analytic functions of the viewer "try too hard" and fill in with logical but incorrect data. In Stage V however, special techniques are used to produce the more detailed information without triggering AOL.
Stage VI Three Dimensional Contact and Modeling: In Stage VI the viewer uses various materials to produce three dimensional representations of the site or specific elements at the site location. Materials such as clay, cardboard, and poster paper can be used to produce models of the specific structure at the site as well as the general configuration of the surrounding area. This construction is done with "feeling". The use of these materials is not simply an attempt to render a more exact representation of the site than can be done verbally, or by means of drawing. The kinesthetic activity appears to both quench AOL formation associated with purely cerebral processes, and to act as a trigger to produce further analytical content of the site, even concerning aspects not being specifically addressed by the modeling.
0 notes
ylespar · 11 months
Text
"Remote Viewing is a tool—not a be-all and end-all. Used properly, it provides answers or a piece of the puzzle that cannot or might not be gleaned by any other means. Despite the claims of some former members of the military RV team, Remote Viewing was not developed because the rest of the intelligence community was failing in its tasks. In truth, it was developed only to provide partial answers, fragments of information, to the analytic side of the U.S. intelligence community. It was brought into the intelligence community to augment existing collection methodologies. This is the calling of Remote Viewing in the future as well: to augment existing strategies in law enforcement, medicine, research and development, and more. Remote Viewing will never replace anything in conventional or nonconventional quests for information."
David Morehouse, Remote Viewing: The Complete User's Manual for Coordinate Remote Viewing (Boulder: Sounds True, 2008), 15.
1 note · View note
ylespar · 11 months
Text
Hobbard, G. Scott, and Langford, Gary O. 1986. A Suggested Remote Viewing Training Procedure. Menlo Park: SRI International. Accessed June 2, 2023. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00789R002200070001-0.pdf. Declassified document released by the Central Intelligence Agency under the Freedom of Information Act on May 17, 2000.
0 notes
ylespar · 11 months
Text
"In remote viewing theory, everything in the universe exists as a pattern of information within the collective unconscious, or what is sometimes referred to as the 'Matrix.' Remote viewing simply allows you to tap into this phenomenon and to transfer a particular pattern to your conscious awareness."
How Does Remote Viewing Work? (n.d.). Learn Remote Viewing. Retrieved August 30, 2021, from http://www.learnrv.com/faqs.cfm#rvwork
0 notes
ylespar · 11 months
Text
"Remote viewing is a perceptual technique whereby a person can describe places, events, or people that are perceived mentally, but separated from the viewer by distance, shielding, and even time. It's, if you'd like, a trained intuitive ability."
— Mike Webster
0 notes