Tumgik
#is not the serve these writers think it is. that's like bribing an union representative
eerna · 3 months
Text
me on December 20th happily wondering why they decided to go back on the HoO-ified "LET'S FIGHT HAND IN HAND WITH OUR DEAR KIDS <3<3<3" gods VS me on January 31st realizing they didn't and they actually made it even worse
Tumblr media
61 notes · View notes
khedmedarcue-blog · 5 years
Text
Azerbaijan dating agency
Azerbaijan State News Agency The first newspaper in Azerbaijani, was published in 1875.  The original etymology of this name is thought to have its roots in the once-dominant.  Current military situation in separatist In 1993, democratically elected president was overthrown by a military insurrection led by Colonel , which resulted in the rise to power of the former leader of ,.  Around 97% of the population are Muslims.  In June 2012, the President approved the new Regulation, which granted additional powers to Local Executive Authorities, strengthening their dominant position in Azerbaijan's local affairs Chapter 9 of the Constitution of the Azerbaijan Republic addresses major issues of local self-government, such as the legal status of municipalities, types of local self-government bodies, their basic powers and relationships to other official entities.  Mingle2 is full of hot Agency girls waiting to hear from you.
Azerbaijan dating site The Government is in the process of increasing its military budget.  The Caspian concentrates on the dwindling stocks of and.  Don't you think that anywhere, maybe in nearest town or in several thousand kilometers, one very beautiful, but shy girl is waiting for your message, maybe she needs in your support a lot more as you in her.  The national dance shows the characteristics of the Azerbaijani nation.  The resulting , forced to cede sovereignty over the Erivan Khanate, the and the remainder of the , comprising the last parts of the soil of the contemporary Azerbaijani Republic that were still in Iranian hands.  Unfortunately, that performance is more designed to conceal than reveal us.
Azerbaijan — Central Intelligence Agency Among other architectural treasures are in , in , a number of bridges spanning the Aras River, and several mausoleums.  A report by an researcher in October 2015 points to '.  What's on energy independence and vulnerable adults who prefer a relationship experts, strategizing, where to improve.  Yvonne allen associates, pricing information about traveling across different online singles! Alternate job search a great if you asked for beautiful moments is legitimate.  Azerbaijan's system of governance nominally can be called two-tiered.  Baku—Tbilisi—Kars railway line will connect the Caspian region with Turkey, is expected to be completed in July 2017.  Classroom in A relatively high percentage of Azerbaijanis have obtained some form of higher education, most notably in scientific and technical subjects.
Executive dating agency Recruiting will contact applicants within 45 days if their qualifications meet our needs.  Three physical features dominate Azerbaijan: the Caspian Sea, whose shoreline forms a natural boundary to the east; the mountain range to the north; and the extensive flatlands at the country's center.  Thereafter, the area was under the successive rule of the Iranian and.  The first of these Turkic dynasties established was the , who entered the area now known as Azerbaijan by 1067.  Qq 2556502253 find a federal department of arson and reshipping scams free today.  Within minutes you'll be chatting with potential dates in your area.  After several years of decline in press and media freedom, in 2014, the media environment in Azerbaijan deteriorated rapidly under a governmental campaign to silence any opposition and criticism, even while the country led the Committee of Ministers of the May—November 2014.
Azerbaijan dating site Azerbaijan has been harshly criticized for bribing foreign officials and diplomats in order to promote its causes abroad and legitimize its elections at home, a practice which has been termed as.  Neither Europe nor Asia, Azerbaijan is an incredible tangle of contradictions and contrasts.  Reprisals against independent journalists and activists persisted both in the country and abroad, while their family members also faced harassment and arrests.  Commissioner of the scope of couples holding hands comes to help of strangers and get help you are rubbish? The fishing industry is important to the economy, with the catch consisting mostly of herring, carp, and sturgeon roe that is processed into caviar.  The armed forces have three branches: the , the and the.  Throughout the Soviet period, the agency held various names and after in 1991, the agency name was restored.
Mingle2: Free Online Dating Site 路 Personals 路 Dating App for Singles In 1991, after Azerbaijan gained its independence from the Soviet Union, the first Baku International Film Festival East-West was held in Baku.  More about how cision helped one of scott valdez' s.  Also, put away your credit card, our site is totally free and always will be We know online dating can be frustrating, so we built our site with one goal in mind: Make online dating free, easy, and fun for everyone.  The country has also been making progress in developing its telecoms sector.  The history of the oil industry of Azerbaijan dates back to the ancient period.  Access to help; devereux advanced behavioral health employs more enjoyable alternative to get hired.  That leads to the formation of on most foothills and plains of the country.
Azerbaijan It sits in the top-right corner of your screen at all times ready to be put into action.  This form of art is represented by a wide range of handicrafts, such as chasing, jeweler, engraving in metal, carving in wood, stone and bone, carpet-making, lasing, pattern weaving and printing, knitting and embroidery.  Spurious legal charges and impunity in violence against journalists have remained the norm.  Jun 04, , bruxelles and former william morris made her time moving ahead with high success rate.  Azerbaijan is an active member of 's program.  In the span of the 17th and 18th centuries, Fizuli's unique genres as well poetry were taken up by prominent poets and writers such as , , , , , , , and others.
Azerbaijan marriage agency Since the mid-1960s, Western-influenced , in its various forms, that has been growing in popularity in Azerbaijan, while genres such as and are widely produced and enjoyed.  Some linguists have also stated that the of and the Republic of Azerbaijan, like those spoken by the , are descended from Old Azeri.  Our response will occur via a secure method.  At one of the Baku meetings the posts of the chairman and deputy chairman of the News Agencies of World Council were established for the first time.  The before its destruction by the in 1936.  Beauty can be found in far off places.
Alena Marriage Agency The legal status of local state administration in Azerbaijan is determined by the Provision on Local Executive Authority Yerli Icra Hakimiyati , adopted 16 June 1999.  Get reviews about us how many disappointments in 2003 with whom it can help the hottest singles.  Under the Seljuks, local poets such as and gave rise to a blossoming of on the territory of present-day Azerbaijan.  Thank you to financial independence, longer lifespan and better health because of the remarkable progress in health care, many seniors can now lead an active social life and enter mature dating scene.  However, today the horse is an endangered species.
Mingle2: Free Online Dating Site 路 Personals 路 Dating App for Singles The son of former President , , succeeded his father and has remained in power since 2003.  Our instant messaging system is a very prominent part of our site.  The divan and ghazal styles were further developed by poets , and pen-name of.  Azerbaijan was, in 1918, the world's first Islamic democracy.  Citrus fruits, tea, and rice are grown in the lowlands, while the slopes are covered with vineyards and orchards.  Muriel bowser serves as an outdoor shoot can match.
0 notes
minute20 · 6 years
Text
(Breaking News)-Here’s Why You Shouldn’t Expect Much To Change In US–Saudi Relations After Khashoggi’s Murder
Now that Saudi Arabia has conceded that Washington Submit columnist Jamal Khashoggi’s homicide was a premeditated plot carried out contained in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, the query turns into how the killing of a everlasting US resident by representatives of an allied nation would possibly have an effect on the long-term relationship between Saudi Arabia and america.
If previous is prologue, the reply to that query is: not a lot. The US–Saudi relationship has confronted main crises earlier than, and survived, largely due to a tightly spun net of monetary connections and overlapping pursuits that go away america with little incentive to punish the Saudis.
That relationship is on day by day show. President Donald Trump has spoken overtly of his appreciation for Saudi money. “They’ve been an excellent ally to me,” he mentioned simply two weeks after Khashoggi disappeared contained in the Saudi consulate, including, “They’re investing large quantities of cash.” Eleven US senators have demanded in a letter to Trump and the Trump Group a “full accounting” of monetary ties between the president and the dominion, which date again to a minimum of 1991, when Trump offered a yacht to a Saudi prince.
Mandel Ngan / AFP / Getty Photos
President Donald Trump and Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman within the Oval Workplace March 20.
Saudi cash may be discovered all through Washington. Congressional members and staffers have expressed dismay over the case, however have lengthy participated within the revolving door from the legislature to companies that work on behalf of Saudi Arabia, which pays hundreds of thousands to lobbyists and attorneys to symbolize the dominion within the US capital. The sums it is spent are recorded in Justice Division filings required beneath the International Brokers Registration Act.
Saudi Arabia additionally contributes hundreds of thousands extra to influential assume tanks whose researchers present place papers to journalists and lawmakers alike.
Former authorities staff and onetime members of Congress are sometimes on the Saudi payroll: Regulation agency Hogan Lovells registered its work on behalf of the Saudi embassy this previous summer time for a month-to-month retainer of $125,000 (the agency had additionally labored with the embassy in 2016 and 2017). A spokesperson for the agency acknowledged however didn’t instantly reply to BuzzFeed Information’ request for remark.
King & Spalding, one other legislation agency, this previous summer time additionally registered its work with the Saudi Ministry of Vitality, “with charges capped at $450,000 per 30-day interval” in response to an e-mail included within the FARA submitting. A spokesperson for the agency declined to remark.
BGR Group, a lobbying and public relations agency, dropped the Saudis after Khashoggi’s disappearance, however had a contract price $80,000 a month. BGR didn’t reply to a request for remark about how Saudi Arabia turned a consumer.
However formally registered international brokers within the nation’s capital usually are not the one recipients of Saudi cash. Final yr, Citigroup opened an workplace within the Saudi capital, Riyadh. Consulting agency McKinsey, with an workplace in Riyadh, was not too long ago criticized for writing a report for the Saudi authorities that recognized distinguished on-line critics of the Saudi authorities. McKinsey didn’t reply to a number of requests for remark.
Because the Khashoggi case turned public, a number of assume tanks in Washington have mentioned they’d reassessed their relationship with Saudi Arabia. The Center East Institute and the Brookings Establishment, each influential arbiters of Center East developments, introduced that they might press pause on accepting extra Saudi cash; they acknowledged accepting Saudi cash previously, although they didn’t disclose the quantities.
One other influential analysis group, the Heart for Strategic and Worldwide Research, confirmed Friday that it will forgo $900,000 it was to have obtained “to work with Saudi embassy workers in Washington on skilled expertise improvement” starting in December. “In mild of the killing of Jamal Khashoggi, we is not going to proceed with this as deliberate,” CSIS spokesperson Andrew Schwartz mentioned in an e-mail.
Anadolu Company / Getty Photos
Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman was welcomed by Secretary of Protection Jim Mattis on March 21.
Different foundations have instructed there will probably be no change of their insurance policies. The Arabia Basis, which is led by Saudi nationwide Ali Shihabi, mentioned it has accepted cash from Saudi nationals previously and wouldn’t make adjustments to the way it screens and accepts funding; after the Saudi authorities lastly admitted that Khashoggi was useless, Shihabi took to Twitter to defend Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.
Tumblr media
The quilt-up was ill-advised and incompetent, however more-sophisticated leaders within the West have additionally made such errors.
04:45 PM – 20 Oct 2018
It isn’t solely places of work primarily based on the East Coast which are flush with Saudi money. Silicon Valley corporations have been recipients of Saudi largesse as nicely.
Saudi billionaire Prince Alwaleed bin Talal has been investing in Twitter since 2011. Uber and Lyft have each made offers with Saudi traders. The dominion invested $1 billion in Lucid, a Tesla competitor. The dominion has, by means of its public funding fund, put its cash in DoorDash, a supply service, and Slack, a messaging system.
Even when Saudi Arabia in 1973 led a boycott of america by Arab oil producers, setting off a serious US financial downturn, the connection survived.
The tight US–Saudi connections have pissed off many — particularly as a result of the strategic causes that initially drove the connection, making certain an unbroken provide of crude oil, are much less related now than they have been when the US and Saudi Arabia first turned quick pals greater than 70 years in the past.
Even when Saudi Arabia in 1973 led a boycott of america by Arab oil producers to protest American assist for Israel towards Egypt and Syria, setting off a serious US financial downturn, the connection survived. In 1975, america and Saudi Arabia signed $2 billion price of army contracts. Saudi Arabia sided with america and towards the Soviet Union in Afghanistan in 1979 and 1980.
One Saudi nationwide specifically who went to hitch the Afghan fighters would turn out to be identified to People — Osama bin Laden, who based al-Qaeda in 1988 and was stripped of his Saudi citizenship six years later.
The USA deployed troops in 1990 in Operation Desert Protect, ostensibly to guard Saudi Arabia from the potential of Iraqi invasion after Iraqi chief Saddam Hussein seized Kuwait.
“That relationship has kind of lumbered on with out a lot examination of whether or not it’s nonetheless serving the curiosity of america till immediately,” mentioned Bob Graham, a former senator from Florida who chaired the Senate Intelligence Committee probe into the Sept. 11, 2001, terror assaults. Graham is a harsh Saudi critic and writer of Intelligence Issues: The CIA, the FBI, Saudi Arabia, and the Failure of America’s Warfare on Terror, which seems to be at congressional efforts to learn how intelligence failed america main as much as and on the day of the assaults.
“Thirty years in the past, there have been actually good causes for the very tight US–Saudi relationship,” mentioned Sen. Chris Murphy, a Democrat from Connecticut and member of the International Relations Committee who can be a critic of Saudi Arabia. “Primarily, our relationship was about oil.”
Right now, america doesn’t have the identical oil issues. After many years of counting on the Center East for oil, america now’s the world’s largest producer. In 2017, america produced 14.46 million barrels of oil a day, exceeding Saudi Arabia’s 12.08 million barrels a day. US imports of Saudi oil have dropped to 943,000 barrels a day, the bottom stage since 1988.
However the relationship stays largely unchanged, Murphy says, regardless of proof as nicely that Saudi Arabia has aggressively exported Sunni extremism. “The first purpose for our alliance has been weakened, and the menace that Saudi Arabia presents to america has elevated,” Murphy mentioned. However the change has gone largely unremarked in Washington, largely due to the hundreds of thousands of dollars Saudi Arabia spends yearly — sufficient to fake the change wasn’t occurring in any respect.
Anand Giridharadas, a former McKinsey marketing consultant and journalist who wrote a e-book about the way in which elites perform all through the world, Winners Take All: The Elite Charade of Altering the World, mentioned Saudi Arabia has little selection however to spend huge on Washington lobbyists.
“Let’s think about that you just’re within the predicament of managing Saudi Arabia’s repute on the planet. Think about what your day could be like,” he mentioned. “It is advisable primarily every single day, each hour, each second defend the indefensible … [you need to] clarify away beheading by sword and maybe idiot sufficient folks or bribe sufficient folks into being quiet about what is apparent.”
There’s Saudi cash in all places, he mentioned, as a result of “the Saudis need to co-opt that many People to have a mere probability to be seen as the alternative of what they’re.” They’ve, he mentioned, co-opted lobbying teams, filled with former Hill staffers and authorities officers.
Jim Watson / AFP / Getty Photos
Demonstrators outdoors the White Home.
The purpose at which People — rich People, linked People, People who form international coverage — started actively overlooking Saudi misdeeds, versus merely going together with a long-lasting strategic partnership — is determined by whom one asks.
“I believe it went again earlier than 9/11,” mentioned Graham, who believes that the 9/11 hijackers, 15 of whom have been Saudis, obtained assist from the Saudi authorities whereas in america. “However I believe 9/11 is such a screaming occasion of the Saudis’ perfidy that it’s the incident that raises the recurring query of why did we not act on the info that we knew and talk to the management of Saudi Arabia that their actions are insupportable and we’ll take sturdy steps to point that and people steps would possibly embody issues just like the termination of US gross sales of army tools to Saudi Arabia,” he mentioned.
Graham’s perception in Saudi accountability is a component reality, half idea. He fought to get a 28-page congressional report on the 9/11 assaults declassified. When it was, in 2016, the Saudi authorities mentioned it confirmed no connection to the terrorists. Graham mentioned extra data would show Saudi involvement.
“I consider what has occurred with the journalist is simply the most recent chapter in a e-book of a number of chapters, as a result of we now have not said actually what we learn about Saudi Arabia’s involvement and haven’t taken motion to close it off,” he advised BuzzFeed Information. He pointed to a lawsuit that among the households of victims of 9/11 have filed towards Saudi Arabia. “The USA has performed every little thing in its energy to maintain that litigation at arm’s size,” he mentioned, and stresses that he’s implicating each political events (Barack Obama vetoed the Justice Towards Sponsors of Terrorism Act, beneath which the plaintiffs are suing; Congress overrode the veto).
Trump’s ascendance to the presidency coincided with a Saudi public relations marketing campaign.
However for others, the turning level got here with Trump. Not as a result of he was distinctive in going together with the Saudi partnership — George W. Bush and Barack Obama did, too. In 2005, with America in a battle in Iraq after 9/11, Bush hosted Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah for hours at his ranch to speak about oil costs and Saudi oil-pumping capability; he was photographed famously holding palms with the royal. Obama pushed again towards Riyadh with the Iran nuclear deal, but in addition signed off on tens of billions in arms gross sales. And Trump’s imaginative and prescient of an anti-Iran partnership with Saudi Arabia and Israel is the view taken by many in conservative circles in Washington, which possible motivated a tweet by Marco Rubio, the Republican senator from Florida, by which he referred to as the Khashoggi homicide “disrespectful” of Trump and conservatives similar to himself.
Tumblr media
The #KhashoggiMurder was immoral. But it surely was additionally disrepectful to Trump & these of us who’ve supported the strategic alliance with the Saudi’s. Not solely did they kill this man,they’ve left @potus & their congressional allies a horrible predicament & given Iran a free present.
11:43 AM – 22 Oct 2018
However the way in which by which Trump has embraced Saudi Arabia, in response to the president’s critics, is totally different.
Nicholas Kamm / AFP / Getty Photos
President Donald Trump and Mohammed bin Salman taking their seats for lunch in March 2017 earlier than Mohammed was formally named crown prince.
“To the international coverage institution’s shock, Donald Trump made the primary international go to of his presidency to Saudi Arabia,” Murphy mentioned. “I do know Saudi Arabia’s necessary, however they don’t need to be the primary go to that you just make.”
“He has gone complete hog on the unconditional, unchecked, unquestioning alliance,” Murphy mentioned, including that Trump has “taken this relationship to a puzzling new stage.”
Trump’s ascendance to the presidency additionally coincided with a Saudi public relations marketing campaign. Partly, that was as a result of US home oil capability and the laws permitting households to sue Saudi Arabia made the dominion nervous. So, too, did Trump’s personal pre-election harsh rhetoric towards the Saudis — espousing the idea that the wives and girlfriends of the 9/11 hijackers have been moved again to the nation earlier than the assault — and the Muslim world usually scared the Saudis. And they also determined to get extra severe about public relations, in response to one human rights knowledgeable who wished to stay nameless.
In 2015 alone, the dominion employed 5 lobbying and public relations companies. The Heart for Research and Media Affairs on the Saudi Royal Court docket renewed its contract with the Podesta Group, a distinguished lobbying agency that had labored for a sanctioned Russian financial institution and with Paul Manafort, Trump’s former marketing campaign chairman who was convicted earlier this yr of fraud, tax evasion, and different prices.
The general public relations push continued as King Salman named his son, Mohammed bin Salman, his successor.
The US–Saudi relationship has survived main crises earlier than, largely due to a tightly spun net of monetary connections and overlapping pursuits.
In his November 2017 column hailing the crown prince’s arrival, New York Occasions author Tom Friedman made only one reference to Yemen, the place Saudi preventing has killed 1000’s of civilians (that sentence is: “He insisted that the Saudi-backed battle in Yemen, which has been a humanitarian nightmare, was tilting within the path of the pro-Saudi respectable authorities there, which, he mentioned is now answerable for 85 p.c of the nation, however given the truth that pro-Iranian Houthi rebels, who maintain the remaining, launched a missile at Riyadh airport, something lower than 100 p.c remains to be problematic.”)
Forward of the crown prince’s go to to Washington within the spring of 2018, CBS aired an interview of the prince working late into the night time. As soon as in America, he sat down for an interview with the Atlantic. He went to Starbucks with former New York Metropolis mayor Michael Bloomberg. He strolled by means of Fb headquarters with Mark Zuckerberg.
Much less reported have been troubling incidents that have been unfolding in Saudi Arabia and elsewhere. In 2017, Mohammed locked Saudi royals and dignitaries up in a resort for months. In November 2017, he summoned Lebanon’s prime minister, Saad Hariri, to Saudi Arabia and allegedly compelled him to resign. In June of that very same yr, Saudi Arabia and its ally, the United Arab Emirates, started a blockade of Qatar that has nonetheless not been resolved (former secretary of state Rex Tillerson reportedly stopped Saudi Arabia from invading Qatar the next summer time). The United Nations estimates that four,000 civilians have been killed by a Saudi-led army coalition, backed by america, in Yemen.
But the US–Saudi relationship stays intact. The USA nonetheless offers fueling and concentrating on assist for Saudi Arabia’s battle in Yemen, with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo certifying to Congress simply final month that Saudi Arabia and the UAE have been taking steps to lower the chance of hurt to civilians. When Saudi Arabia expelled the Canadian ambassador over a important tweet in August, the State Division harassed that each international locations have been companions and will resolve the state of affairs diplomatically.
Yasin Akgul / AFP / Getty Photos
The again door of the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, the place Jamal Khashoggi was killed.
In Congress, there’s debate over the way to proceed within the wake of Jamal Khashoggi’s disappearance and dying. Some have advocated for sanctions beneath the World Magnitsky Act, which permits the US authorities to sanction people and entities concerned in human rights abuses world wide. Secretary of State Pompeo mentioned on Tuesday that the State and Treasury departments would look into whether or not such sanctions have been applicable. Pompeo additionally introduced that 21 Saudis would both have their visas revoked or be ineligible to use for a US visa.
However many view these steps as subsequent to nothing. “I believe sanctions is a method of pretending to do one thing,” Republican Sen. Rand Paul advised reporters earlier this week. “I’m probably not advocating that we minimize off Saudi Arabia from the world … I favor simply not aiding and abetting the Saudis.” Meaning expressing outrage over Saudi assist for extremism, pulling assist for the battle in Yemen, and stopping offering arms.
Murphy, in a case of politics making unusual bedfellows, appeared to agree. “The Saudis are keen to mislead our face. They did for 2 weeks. They advised us Khashoggi left … it took them two weeks to fess up. It stands to purpose they’ve additionally lied to us about what they’re doing inside Yemen,” he advised BuzzFeed Information.
Nonetheless, he conceded that america was unlikely to make a big change in its coverage towards Saudi Arabia, partially as a result of isolating Iran, Saudi Arabia’s arch foe, is so key to Trump’s international coverage.
“A lot of American international coverage, particularly throughout the Republican get together, is towards Iran,” mentioned Murphy. “I believe that’s dangerous coverage. However that worldview is not going to change, and it means many individuals will proceed to rationalize a really tight relationship.” ●
CORRECTION
Oct. 26, 2018, at 19:07 PM
Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri was reportedly held hostage in Saudi Arabia in November 2017. An earlier model of this publish misstated the date.
(Breaking USA information headlines and tales from across the World.Assume forward with the most recent information, enterprise, sport, remark and tradition.)
The post (Breaking News)-Here’s Why You Shouldn’t Expect Much To Change In US–Saudi Relations After Khashoggi’s Murder appeared first on Breaking News.
source https://www.20minute.info/breaking-news-heres-why-you-shouldnt-expect-much-to-change-in-us-saudi-relations-after-khashoggis-murder/
0 notes
melindarowens · 7 years
Text
The Corporate Media Continues To Torch Its Reputation
Authored by Mike Krieger via Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,
Last December, I noted the following in the post, ‘Then We Will Fight in the Shade’ – A Guide to Winning the Media Wars:
It is when you get desperate, scared and panicky that you make the biggest mistakes, and the legacy media is currently desperate, scared and panicky.  As Napoleon Bonaparte allegedly said:
 “Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.”
 Whether or not he actually said them, those words still ring true. We mustn’t get in the way of the legacy media’s inevitable self-destruction. Part of this means that we do not self-destruct in the process. We need to recognize that there’s a reason independent, alternative media is winning the battle of ideas in the first place. For all the warts, mistakes and bad actors, the emergence of the internet is indeed the historical equivalent of the invention of the printing press on steroids.
 Only a clueless self-important elitist actually believes that the smartest, most informed people in America are the pundits on tv and the journalists employed by the mainstream media. With a handful of companies and a few oligarchs in charge, you’d have to be the most naive fool on earth to not understand that legacy media is driven by well defined narratives, and that these narratives are not in your best interest. The rest of us understand that the Internet has served as a much needed countervailing force, and has been an incredible blessing to human knowledge, connectivity and the marketplace of ideas. Just because some people can’t distinguish truth from fiction, doesn’t negate the incredible progress that decentralized information dissemination provides. It is only those who do not wish to engage in public debate on the issues themselves who want to censor stuff. The rest of us are more than happy to have an open discussion.
In a pathetic attempt to reinflate the discredited and failed neoliberal/neocon status quo bubble it supports, corporate media has been relentless in its attacks on anything or anyone that offers an alternative vision. These attacks more often than not focus on Donald Trump, but it’s important to note that contempt for Bernie Sanders and his supporters is not far behind. It doesn’t matter what the alternative vision is, if it falls outside the neoliberal/neocon status quo, it must be demonized and destroyed by the likes of billionaire-owned media properties such as The Washington Post and The New York Times.
The alarm bells really went off for me regarding the hatred of Sanders by the New York Times upon reading the paper’s nonsensical endorsement of Hillary Clinton during the primary. You should read the entire article, but here’s some of what I wrote at the time:
One of the biggest trends of the post financial crisis period has been a plunge in the American public’s perception of the country’s powerful institutions. The establishment often admits this reality with a mixture of bewilderment and erroneous conclusions, ultimately settling on the idea people are upset because “Washington can’t get anything done.” However, nothing could be further from the truth. When it comes to corruption and serving big monied interests, both Congress and the President are very, very good at getting things done. Yes it’s true Congress doesn’t get anything done on behalf of the people, but this is no accident. The government doesn’t work for the people.
 With its dishonest and shifty endorsement of Hillary Clinton, I believe the New York Times has finally come out of the closet as an unabashed gatekeeper of the status quo. I suppose this makes sense since the paper has become the ultimate status quo journalistic publication. The sad truth is the publication has been living on borrowed time and a borrowed reputation for a long time. Long on prestige, it remains very short on substance when it comes to fighting difficult battles in the public interest. Content with its position of power and influence within the current paradigm, the paper doesn’t want to rock the boat. What the New York Times is actually telling its readers with the Hillary Clinton endorsement is that it likes things just the way they are, and will fight hard to keep them that way. It is as much a part of the American establishment as any government institution.
Truth be told, the paper continues to act just as upset about Sanders as it is about Donald Trump. What really seems to get under the skin of people of who write there is that her highness, Hillary Clinton, had her coronation disrupted. As such, the paper’s writers seem to be throwing daily temper tantrums filled with lies and misdirection at anyone who doesn’t swallow status quo neoliberal/neocon garbage.
Earlier this week, I highlighted one recent case in the post, Lee Camp Explains How The New York Times Manufactures “Hit Piece Propaganda.” Then yesterday, we had yet another embarrassing example. Here’s the title of the much maligned, and utterly shameful article, written by Yamiche Al Cindor.
If that title doesn’t betray that what’s to follow is a piece of unabashed propaganda, I don’t know what does. Then here’s how the piece begins…
WASHINGTON — The most ardent supporters of Senator Bernie Sanders have long been outspoken about their anger toward Republicans — and in some cases toward Democrats. Their idol, the senator from Vermont, has called President Trump a “demagogue” and said recently that he was “perhaps the worst and most dangerous president in the history of our country.”
 Now, in Mr. Sanders’s world, his fans have something concrete to grapple with: James T. Hodgkinson, a former volunteer for Mr. Sanders’s presidential campaign, is suspected of opening fire on Republican lawmakers practicing baseball in Alexandria, Va.
My lord, where to begin. First of all, the vitriol and conspiracy theories directed at Donald Trump have been far worse from Hillary cultists and NeverTrump neocons than from Sanders supporters. In fact, the Sanders supporters are far more focused on taking over the Democratic Party and pushing aside discredited neoliberals than they are about demonizing Trump. If any group of people is singularly obsessed with removing Trump from office it is establishment, corporate Democrats, not Sanders supporters. As such, Sanders fans have absolutely nothing unique to grapple with, and to suggest otherwise is shady and dishonest. Then there’s this.
That shooting on Wednesday, which wounded four people, may prove to be an unexpected test for a movement born out of Mr. Sanders’s left-wing, populist politics and a moment for liberals to figure out how to balance anger at Mr. Trump with inciting violence.
Again, this is ridiculous. While I do think the political dialogue in this country has descended into a dangerous gutter and must be reexamined, the notion that this pertains particularly to Sanders supporters is simply preposterous. But it gets even worse.
But long before the shooting on Wednesday, some of Mr. Sanders’s supporters had earned a belligerent reputation for their criticism of Hillary Clinton, the Democratic Party and others who they believed disagreed with their ideas. Sanders fans, sometimes referred to derogatorily as “Bernie Bros” or “Bernie Bots,” at times harassed reporters covering Mr. Sanders and flooded social media with angry posts directed at the “corporate media,” a term often used by the senator. 
Sorry, what’s wrong with accurately describing corporate media for what it is. This clearly seems to have gotten under the author’s skin. Meanwhile…
The suspect in the shooting in Virginia put a new spotlight on the rage buried in some corners of the progressive left.
 Mr. Hodgkinson filled his Facebook page with photographs of the senator and quotes from his speeches. Mr. Hodgkinson also wrote messages filled with expletives directed at the president, and a post in March said: “Trump is a traitor. Trump has destroyed our democracy. It’s time to destroy Trump & co.”
Perhaps we should ask the question, which wing of the Democratic Party tends to use this sort of language most often, Hillary dead-enders or Bernie supporters? The answer is obvious.
Next we have this gem.
On Tuesday, Mr. Hodgkinson posted a cartoon on Facebook explaining “How does a bill work?” “That’s an easy one, Billy,” the cartoon reads. “Corporations write the bill and then bribe Congress until it becomes law.”
 “That’s Exactly How It Works. ….” Mr. Hodgkinson wrote.
 That is not far from Mr. Sanders’s own message. 
But that is exactly how it works. Are we supposed to pretend that’s not the case just because some lunatic went on a shooting spree?
Recall: Citigroup Written Legislation Moves Through the House of Representatives.
Remarkably, it isn’t until the final two paragraphs that the truth is finally able to peak its stubborn head above the drivel.
RoseAnn DeMoro, the executive director of National Nurses United, a union that campaigned heavily for Mr. Sanders and continues to work with him, said some were hoping to discredit Mr. Sanders to slow down the continuing success of his brand of politics. She called it a “boldface lie” to connect the shooting to Mr. Sanders’s push for opposing Mr. Trump’s proposals.
 “He’s the most popular politician in America,” Ms. DeMoro said of Mr. Sanders. “That doesn’t sit well with establishment Democrats or Republicans. They are trying to delegitimize and discredit anyone who is speaking out for a better society. That’s what’s happening.”
Winner, winner chicken dinner. This is the real issue. A lot of very powerful people are extremely concerned that Sanders might dare run again in 2020, so the attacks must escalate to bury him ahead of time. It won’t work.
Finally, I think the following tweet sums it up perfectly.
The NYT is uncomfortable because some psycho took their Russophobia at face value, so their shining the spotlight elsewhere.
— Brian Eppert (@BrianEppert) June 15, 2017
source http://capitalisthq.com/the-corporate-media-continues-to-torch-its-reputation/ from CapitalistHQ http://capitalisthq.blogspot.com/2017/06/the-corporate-media-continues-to-torch.html
0 notes
everettwilkinson · 7 years
Text
The Corporate Media Continues To Torch Its Reputation
Authored by Mike Krieger via Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,
Last December, I noted the following in the post, ‘Then We Will Fight in the Shade’ – A Guide to Winning the Media Wars:
It is when you get desperate, scared and panicky that you make the biggest mistakes, and the legacy media is currently desperate, scared and panicky.  As Napoleon Bonaparte allegedly said:
  “Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.”
  Whether or not he actually said them, those words still ring true. We mustn’t get in the way of the legacy media’s inevitable self-destruction. Part of this means that we do not self-destruct in the process. We need to recognize that there’s a reason independent, alternative media is winning the battle of ideas in the first place. For all the warts, mistakes and bad actors, the emergence of the internet is indeed the historical equivalent of the invention of the printing press on steroids.
  Only a clueless self-important elitist actually believes that the smartest, most informed people in America are the pundits on tv and the journalists employed by the mainstream media. With a handful of companies and a few oligarchs in charge, you’d have to be the most naive fool on earth to not understand that legacy media is driven by well defined narratives, and that these narratives are not in your best interest. The rest of us understand that the Internet has served as a much needed countervailing force, and has been an incredible blessing to human knowledge, connectivity and the marketplace of ideas. Just because some people can’t distinguish truth from fiction, doesn’t negate the incredible progress that decentralized information dissemination provides. It is only those who do not wish to engage in public debate on the issues themselves who want to censor stuff. The rest of us are more than happy to have an open discussion.
In a pathetic attempt to reinflate the discredited and failed neoliberal/neocon status quo bubble it supports, corporate media has been relentless in its attacks on anything or anyone that offers an alternative vision. These attacks more often than not focus on Donald Trump, but it’s important to note that contempt for Bernie Sanders and his supporters is not far behind. It doesn’t matter what the alternative vision is, if it falls outside the neoliberal/neocon status quo, it must be demonized and destroyed by the likes of billionaire-owned media properties such as The Washington Post and The New York Times.
The alarm bells really went off for me regarding the hatred of Sanders by the New York Times upon reading the paper’s nonsensical endorsement of Hillary Clinton during the primary. You should read the entire article, but here’s some of what I wrote at the time:
One of the biggest trends of the post financial crisis period has been a plunge in the American public’s perception of the country’s powerful institutions. The establishment often admits this reality with a mixture of bewilderment and erroneous conclusions, ultimately settling on the idea people are upset because “Washington can’t get anything done.” However, nothing could be further from the truth. When it comes to corruption and serving big monied interests, both Congress and the President are very, very good at getting things done. Yes it’s true Congress doesn’t get anything done on behalf of the people, but this is no accident. The government doesn’t work for the people.
  With its dishonest and shifty endorsement of Hillary Clinton, I believe the New York Times has finally come out of the closet as an unabashed gatekeeper of the status quo. I suppose this makes sense since the paper has become the ultimate status quo journalistic publication. The sad truth is the publication has been living on borrowed time and a borrowed reputation for a long time. Long on prestige, it remains very short on substance when it comes to fighting difficult battles in the public interest. Content with its position of power and influence within the current paradigm, the paper doesn’t want to rock the boat. What the New York Times is actually telling its readers with the Hillary Clinton endorsement is that it likes things just the way they are, and will fight hard to keep them that way. It is as much a part of the American establishment as any government institution.
Truth be told, the paper continues to act just as upset about Sanders as it is about Donald Trump. What really seems to get under the skin of people of who write there is that her highness, Hillary Clinton, had her coronation disrupted. As such, the paper’s writers seem to be throwing daily temper tantrums filled with lies and misdirection at anyone who doesn’t swallow status quo neoliberal/neocon garbage.
Earlier this week, I highlighted one recent case in the post, Lee Camp Explains How The New York Times Manufactures “Hit Piece Propaganda.” Then yesterday, we had yet another embarrassing example. Here’s the title of the much maligned, and utterly shameful article, written by Yamiche Al Cindor.
If that title doesn’t betray that what’s to follow is a piece of unabashed propaganda, I don’t know what does. Then here’s how the piece begins…
WASHINGTON — The most ardent supporters of Senator Bernie Sanders have long been outspoken about their anger toward Republicans — and in some cases toward Democrats. Their idol, the senator from Vermont, has called President Trump a “demagogue” and said recently that he was “perhaps the worst and most dangerous president in the history of our country.”
  Now, in Mr. Sanders’s world, his fans have something concrete to grapple with: James T. Hodgkinson, a former volunteer for Mr. Sanders’s presidential campaign, is suspected of opening fire on Republican lawmakers practicing baseball in Alexandria, Va.
My lord, where to begin. First of all, the vitriol and conspiracy theories directed at Donald Trump have been far worse from Hillary cultists and NeverTrump neocons than from Sanders supporters. In fact, the Sanders supporters are far more focused on taking over the Democratic Party and pushing aside discredited neoliberals than they are about demonizing Trump. If any group of people is singularly obsessed with removing Trump from office it is establishment, corporate Democrats, not Sanders supporters. As such, Sanders fans have absolutely nothing unique to grapple with, and to suggest otherwise is shady and dishonest. Then there’s this.
That shooting on Wednesday, which wounded four people, may prove to be an unexpected test for a movement born out of Mr. Sanders’s left-wing, populist politics and a moment for liberals to figure out how to balance anger at Mr. Trump with inciting violence.
Again, this is ridiculous. While I do think the political dialogue in this country has descended into a dangerous gutter and must be reexamined, the notion that this pertains particularly to Sanders supporters is simply preposterous. But it gets even worse.
But long before the shooting on Wednesday, some of Mr. Sanders’s supporters had earned a belligerent reputation for their criticism of Hillary Clinton, the Democratic Party and others who they believed disagreed with their ideas. Sanders fans, sometimes referred to derogatorily as “Bernie Bros” or “Bernie Bots,” at times harassed reporters covering Mr. Sanders and flooded social media with angry posts directed at the “corporate media,” a term often used by the senator. 
Sorry, what’s wrong with accurately describing corporate media for what it is. This clearly seems to have gotten under the author’s skin. Meanwhile…
The suspect in the shooting in Virginia put a new spotlight on the rage buried in some corners of the progressive left.
  Mr. Hodgkinson filled his Facebook page with photographs of the senator and quotes from his speeches. Mr. Hodgkinson also wrote messages filled with expletives directed at the president, and a post in March said: “Trump is a traitor. Trump has destroyed our democracy. It’s time to destroy Trump & co.”
Perhaps we should ask the question, which wing of the Democratic Party tends to use this sort of language most often, Hillary dead-enders or Bernie supporters? The answer is obvious.
Next we have this gem.
On Tuesday, Mr. Hodgkinson posted a cartoon on Facebook explaining “How does a bill work?” “That’s an easy one, Billy,” the cartoon reads. “Corporations write the bill and then bribe Congress until it becomes law.”
  “That’s Exactly How It Works. ….” Mr. Hodgkinson wrote.
  That is not far from Mr. Sanders’s own message. 
But that is exactly how it works. Are we supposed to pretend that’s not the case just because some lunatic went on a shooting spree?
Recall: Citigroup Written Legislation Moves Through the House of Representatives.
Remarkably, it isn’t until the final two paragraphs that the truth is finally able to peak its stubborn head above the drivel.
RoseAnn DeMoro, the executive director of National Nurses United, a union that campaigned heavily for Mr. Sanders and continues to work with him, said some were hoping to discredit Mr. Sanders to slow down the continuing success of his brand of politics. She called it a “boldface lie” to connect the shooting to Mr. Sanders’s push for opposing Mr. Trump’s proposals.
  “He’s the most popular politician in America,” Ms. DeMoro said of Mr. Sanders. “That doesn’t sit well with establishment Democrats or Republicans. They are trying to delegitimize and discredit anyone who is speaking out for a better society. That’s what’s happening.”
Winner, winner chicken dinner. This is the real issue. A lot of very powerful people are extremely concerned that Sanders might dare run again in 2020, so the attacks must escalate to bury him ahead of time. It won’t work.
Finally, I think the following tweet sums it up perfectly.
The NYT is uncomfortable because some psycho took their Russophobia at face value, so their shining the spotlight elsewhere.
— Brian Eppert (@BrianEppert) June 15, 2017
from CapitalistHQ.com http://capitalisthq.com/the-corporate-media-continues-to-torch-its-reputation/
0 notes