I posted on Black Lives Matter and immediately lost about 30 followers. No debate, no pissing match, no controversial opinion has ever lost me that many followers. The problem here is that this wasnât a debate, a pissing match, or a controversial opinion. It was a post about a social necessity. I responded to the âall lives matterâ crowd. And I was naive to think that the stereotypes about atheists werenât true. Atheists are cis, white males with neck beards and fedoras they say. This I thought was attempt at insult, a distraction from our challenges to religion. Unfortunately, I found out that the stereotype contains a truth: atheists are predominantly white males.Â
Given that, Iâm suggesting something controversial, but this doesnât make it any less true. White atheists are not sympathetic to minority social movements. I am not saying youâre racist. Neither am I saying that you help proliferate prejudice and discrimination of minorities. What I am saying is that youâre disconnected from the reality Black Americans face; youâre disconnected from the realities Latino Americans face. I am a Latino American. I suggested in the post that perhaps thatâs why I can identify with BLM. I get it. Police donât racially profile you. You donât have glass ceilings. Your name canât disqualify you from getting a job. But some things atheists should be better than the average religious person at are relating to people, empathy, and a capacity to sympathize with the hardships of other people. Just because you donât understand BLM doesnât mean itâs wrong.
Or maybe the issue is that you think so called social justice has no place in atheism. Again, you show that youâre disconnected. Itâs easier for some of you to break away from your own traditions. Itâs much harder for minorities to part ways with the masters. In other words, itâs harder for us to break away from literal centuries of discrimination and oppression stemming from âthe white manâs religion.â Our cultures were infiltrated, erased, and reconstructed in accordance to the colonialistâs image. We were given a suitable identity; we were given a system of morals, which stemmed from a religion they handed down to us. This religion was, to their minds, truer than our religions; their god realer than any of ours; their rituals more potent, their book better written, and their way of life more valid. A lot of us risk being disowned by our own family; we risk becoming homeless; we risk being physically threatened.Â
So thereâs no doubt in my mind that social issues have a place in atheism. Feminism likewise has its place. The notion that atheism has a woman problem is very real, but this mass unfollowing showed me that atheism also has a minority problem. Atheismâs identity, like philosophyâs and like religionâs, is Eurocentric. Its face is a white manâs face; its voice a white manâs voice. One look at the Four Horsemen or any of the prominent atheists that followed themâMichael Shermer, Lawrence Krauss, Sean Carroll, Jerry A. Coyne, A.C. Grayling, Stephen Lawâshows this to be true. The Black voice, the Latino voice, the voice of any non-white is secondary or entirely nonexistent. Atheism should not have taken in the dirty laundry of the religions it primarily opposes. We should not have adopted Christianityâs colonialism, Judaismâs group identity, Hinduismâs class hierarchy, or Islamâs patriarchy. Yet here we are!
If any more of you want to unfollow, feel free to do so. Iâm a minority; Iâm an atheist. I have proven myself as capable, if not, more capable than some of my white male counterparts. I do not need your validation. I donât need your recognition or seal of approval. In short, if you donât recognize the social ills adopted by atheists, I donât need you.
I was once a Christian, and although I was young I remember that the best part was of Christianity was that it gave me a clear reason to live. It made me believe that there is something devine out there that makes life into something beyond what it is.
As an atheist finding reason to live when you know that the world is clean cut can be hard. There are no rewards waiting for you. There are no spirits, ghosts, monsters, etc.
Instead of living for a god, I live for making life better. I throw myself into feminism, speciesism, homophobia, etc. These causes are my reasons to live. Perhaps that is why I am so adamant about defending my beliefs.
I've been following one of your discussions with another here (or, rather, an argument). He stated that you don't have any facts to prove that a god does not exist. Why didn't you respond that you don't have to prove that a god doesn't exist? The burden of proof is on the person making a positive assertion. From reading, I understand that you believe there is no, but isn't it unnecessary to argue this point as your opponent has failed to provide any foundation for the existence of a deity?
The burden of proof response is, to my mind, a lazy response. Itâs not simply that thereâs no evidence for the Christian view or more generally, the theist view. Itâs not as easy as pointing out that none of their arguments are convincing, that the Ontological, Fine Tuning, Transcendental, Moral, Kalam and Leibnizian Cosmological, and Teleological Arguments donât hold water. Itâs not as simple as saying that the absence or lack of evidence for a deity implies the nonexistence of a deity. All of that is true! There is, however, more that can be said.Â
Can we account for the origin of the universe without a god? Can we account for the origin of life without a god? Can we explain the formation of the Earth without a god? If we can, then why not offer those explanations? Why allow the believer to think they have a narrative monopoly, that they, in other words, have a monopoly on how these stories are told? It is imperative that atheists start telling stories, stories rooted in truth and fact rather than myth, embellishment and falsehoods. Iâm not going to stand idly by while theists continue to preach their myths as truth. Iâm going to replace those myths with stories that are more fulfilling, but more importantly, true.Â
So though itâs true that my opponent has failed to provide a foundation for the existence of a god, that doesnât mean that I must also fail to provide grounds for coming to the conclusion that there are no gods. The onus does belong to him, but after five years of debating theists, Iâve found that it is better to take their burden and send it crashing onto them. Nothing is more convincing, more capable of inspiring doubt than facts presented in way that completely debases the beliefs oneâs opponent holds dear. Couple that with style, sound argumentation, and wit, and youâre sure to keep them awake at night wondering if theyâre wrong. Iâm pretty sure it has crossed his mind because in my experience, the olâ âyou canât shake my faithâ proclamation is only made by someone trying to convince themselves that theyâre faith hasnât met a challenge.
Are you still the only Australian atheist who has ever been anti-Christianity, anti-conservatism, and therefore a stalker that will definitely get sued and put in jail for three years and not have the case against you laughed out of court?
What youâre saying is completely ignoring the fact that religions, eg, christianity, have a book that defines what people are supposed to believe, how theyâre supposed to act and the things theyâre supposed to say. This book that dictates these things has a huge claim of being âultimate truthâ around it. Like the bible genuinely says hateful and hurtful things and dictates that people who believe the bible to be divine truth, need to agree with these hateful and hurtful things.
Over the years, yes society has evolved in way that has forced theology to progress. Eg, society is accepting of homosexuality, and along with that evolution people have manipulated classic theology to be interpreted so christianity can justify also being accepting of gays. But the bible itself hasnât changed, the hateful and harmful ideologies are still there.
My logic didnât say anything about all chrisitans ascribing to the same theologies, youâve made that up. I said that when christians express hateful sentiments based on their belief system, they do so under the pretense that what they believe is absolute, divinely inspired truth. Thereâs no atheists out there saying âwomen are not as good at science as men because the atheist book of ultimate truth says soâ why? Because we have no belief system, we have no solidarity in what we do, believe, say. Weâre all just people who donât believe in god. Thatâs a pretty massive distinction. Do you have any blanket opinions on people who donât believe in the tooth fairy? Does that sound silly to ask? Thatâs what it sounds like when you group atheists together. But people who all believe the same thing and ascribe to the same book of rules? That you can group together. It groups itself together. Thatâs what holiness is all about (being set apart with others who cling to the same path).
But yeah your line about âall scientistsâ makes no sense in terms of what I was saying.
Also, I am a woman...I donât know what misogyny has to do with any of this.
And yes generalisation is the only option, especially with Christianity. How is âonly talking about things I know about/understandâ a better option? How does that even make sense? I know and understand Christianity, I know it and understand it so will that I understand that it is so divided and varied (over 42,000 unique types of christianity, all claiming to be correct and true) that to attempt to talk about âchrisitanityâ as one belief system is impossible. What the hell does misogyny have to do with it? That is just one issue among hundreds that atheists take issue with in regards to christianity. I care about criticising religion because religion, when taken bake to the source material, eg: the bible, IS FUCKING MISOGYNISTIC!!! You expect me to be all like âoh well the universalists, they donât believe in the bad parts of the bible so theyâre coolâ or âOh this guy is salvation army, but heâs in a secret facebook group that promoted inclusivity so yeah the SA church is bad, but this guy is goodâ - yeah no. Thatâs riduculous. You have to generalise. And generally speaking, Christianity, is hateful, hurtful and yes, misogynistic to boot.
And finally another thing you said that makes zero sense is âif youâre an exited christian/secular christian/christian atheist, why donât you just talk about christianity, since you have experience with it?â .....well uh, I do only talk about christianity....have you even looked at my blog? Jesus Christ!
like, okay. imagine if i compiled every misogynistic thing an atheist has ever said, and i said âlook! this is what atheists believe! atheists are misogynists and atheism is inherently misogynistic!â atheists would be literally foaming at the mouth to say âthatâs not true!â ânot all atheists!â âdonât generalize!â so why is it okay for you to do to religious people? you have no idea what an individual member of any religion believes, you donât know what the widely accepted interpretation of certain texts is, you donât even know if that text is in use. have members of that religion talked about misogynistic elements of that religion? almost certainly, yes. are you listening to them? almost certainly not.Â
Because when religious people do and say bad things they do so while claiming itâs absolute truth, divine truth. Some atheists are idiots, and idiots say shitty things. But even the most educated religious people say horrible hateful things because, in spite of their intelligence, they are bound to this âtruthâ that requires hate from them.
Ps. It's also not an atheists job to investigate every individual theists personal interpretation of their belief system. There are tens of thousands of variations. Generalisation is the only option.
like, okay. imagine if i compiled every misogynistic thing an atheist has ever said, and i said âlook! this is what atheists believe! atheists are misogynists and atheism is inherently misogynistic!â atheists would be literally foaming at the mouth to say âthatâs not true!â ânot all atheists!â âdonât generalize!â so why is it okay for you to do to religious people? you have no idea what an individual member of any religion believes, you donât know what the widely accepted interpretation of certain texts is, you donât even know if that text is in use. have members of that religion talked about misogynistic elements of that religion? almost certainly, yes. are you listening to them? almost certainly not.Â
So another blog, which is obsessed with atheists and making us out to be terrible people has created a list of the worst things Atheists have said to/about Christians. You can check it out here. It wont take you long to realise the list is basically a compilation of superficial, trite interactions between theists and atheists. One of their examples is a poem written by an atheist and how they feel about christiansâŚyes, really, a poem. A fucking poem. OMG!!!!!! HOW DARE US ATHEISTS WRITE POEMS!!!
AnyhowâŚI thought the list was a cute idea and I thought it would be fun to compare their list to some of the things christians have done to atheists over the years. Turns out they prefer to murder and abuse atheists rather than just write poems or simply âsay stuffâ about us. Nope, they go a whole lot furtherâŚ.
1. Christian murders atheist roommateâŚ.because heâs an atheistâŚ
âOn October 18, 2004, Arthur Shelton, a self described Christian and Eagle Scout, murdered his friend and roommate, Larry Hooper, because Hooper didnât believe in God. â
(Source)
2. Christian kid murders atheist friend.
âFriends and family described Nadler as âdeeply religiousâ and prone to loud discussions when faced with people who didnât share his beliefs. Doyle likewise was said to be argumentative, they said, but the two boys remained close.â
(Source)
3. Christian beats up disabled man because heâs an atheist.
âLaura Reid, 49, was visiting the victim in his home, and at one point she asked him if he believed in God, police told the station. The man jokingly replied he didnât. Reid became so enraged by his answer that she allegedly picked up his metal cane and beat him over the head and body. She then robbed him.â
(Source)
4. Christian engages in illegal vandalism in response to atheist billboard.
âLooks like this theist was too busy during Christmas to find time to commit a misdemeanor, so vandalizing an atheist holiday billboard with the words âGODâS NOT DEADâ had to be put off until the new year.â
(Source)
5. Another Christian murdering an atheist (for being an atheist)âŚ
âLater Braxton told police detectives the victim on the sofa was âa shrine from God,â and that her victim had been shot in the eye for ânot believing in her God.âBraxton told police the body had been there for two or three days.â
(Source)
6. Christian store owner imposes illegal ban on atheists from his store (because they donât believe in god).
âHe saw a presentation that he took offense at: Brother Sam Singleton, Atheist Evangelist, doing a satirical send-up of a Pentecostal revival meeting. And he put a sign on the door to his shop, reading, quote, âSkepticon is NOT Welcomed To My Christian Business.â
(Source)
7. Christian mother abuses son because he is an atheist.
youtube
(Source)
8. Christian group openly advocates for the murder of atheists.
âi say kill them all and let them see for themselves that there is Godâ
âTo ALL ATHEIEST DIE AN GO TO HELL HAHA IF I COULD ID SHOOT ALL OF YOU IN THE HEAD WITH A 12GUAGEâ
âShoot em. At least we know where theyââŹâ˘re going, waste of oxygenâ
âThatâs right: Two weeks was all it took before people were so disturbed by the thought of atheists picking up drive-by litter (possibly discarded aerosol cans, etc.), that they took measures into their own hands â and vandalized county property in what can be best-described as juvenile love notes to Jesus.â
(Source)
10. Christians send death threats to atheist author, he has to cancel a speaking engagement.
My little cousins new favourite game is 'Edward Scissorhands'. The game is literally just him standing there with his arms out looking sad. He loves it.
Gnosis = knowledge. Technically all atheists AND theists are agnostic. Because of an inability to prove there is or is not a god, nobody from either side can realistically make a knowledge claim.
Tj, how would you define atheism? My history professor and I have different definitions. He thinks that atheism is a positive assertion that a god does not exist, and that is true for some, but I say that atheism is simply a lack of belief in god.
I track the Christianity tag here on tumblr and I���ve noticed that lately a lot of atheists and non Christians are using the Christianity tag to spread their non Christian beliefs. Yes, you are free to do what you please but youâre just being flat out rude. I, personally, use that tag to look at encouraging bible verses and quotes relating to Christianity and I feel that thatâs what a lot of other Christians who use that tag, use it for. Iâm Christian, and Iâm not changing my beliefs just because of your little tumblr posts. So please, knock it off.
Iâve recently come to realize that the relationship many religious people have with God is an abusive one.
According to their bible,
God supposedly gave them anything, but then they screwed it up - now they must spend their entire lives trying to make up for it. Constantly trying to win back his forgiveness, apologizing and consulting with him for the majority of their decisions.
If they mess up, they are sent to hell for all eternity. Where they must pay for their sins (which only exist because people you donât even know, messed up). But donât worry! God still loves you.