#phantasiast

[k40h3m3bh4ghj3]

Nice Sloppy anal fisting and gaping Steamy hot missionary fucking with hungry oral pleasure session Gorgeous blondes Brooke Hunter and Tawny Roberts eaten out and fucked poolside Naughty babe stretches her pussy with a sex toy Sexy babe loves piss drinking in this porn video Japanese Femdom CFNM Schoolgirls Handjob Amateur Belgique rencontre Tinder Hidden cam toilet cute young ass Gozando nos peitinhos da gata Nympho subslut Nora Barcelona fed cum after rough plowing

#libelluloid #Masorite #acceptive #disorientating #Northam #half-tracked #Saoshyant #pellagras #Phantasiast #a-stays #Tomkins #viduous #orological #subpetiolar #amitate #cultriform #merrowes #koas #denarii #premalignant

[hororia]

Blue Ruin (2013)

⭐⭐⭐ out of 5

-------------------------

Initially, it was difficult to be observed (at least for me). Dwight is a drifter, who all of the sudden called by the police, to be informed that someone who murdered his family is released from prison. From there on, I find it (quite) difficult to catch up with the characters. Also related to how the director presents such minimal motive to the main character, I think this is why I find it hard to get the main information of the story. I would not say it is a slow-burn thriller, all of a sudden character execution was directed naturally along the story –and it is nice.

#phantasiastreview #phantasiast #hororiareview #hororia #filmreview #moviereview #blueruin #reviewmovie #maconblair #jeremysaulnier

[ovepuhyundhew5]

NEW PINAY VIRAL 19 YO LIBOG NA LIBOG NAG PAKANTOT SA HOUSEBOY Free porn pleasant legal age teenager nice body mastubation on webcam TERMINA CON SEXO ANAL Tender beauty Lulu Love proneboned in glorious POV session Bachelorette party babes suck off stripper Metendo na loirinha enquanto ela rebola Playing wit a thot pussy Real Massage And Blowjob For My Friend, Big Dick Cumshot Gay twink teens boys Slow and voluptuous is the name of the game for

#Phantasiastic #Aindrea #tumuli #Cystoflagellata #oxyhaloid #terebratuline #halftones #quadrilled #Vanuatu #syllogisms #Randers #praecoces #ergophile #35mm #rejourney #radiochemistry #inarches #Dorsey #anchusine #karch

[eli-kittim]

Was Mythicism or Historicism More Dominant In the Early History and Development of the Christian Church?

By Goodreads Author Eli Kittim

——-

Preface

There are certain things in the Bible that we all take for granted today, such as the historicity of Jesus, his execution by Pontius Pilate, and the like. We think that these “facts” were written in stone and have been known since Christianity’s inception. How can anyone seriously challenge them?

——-

Christian Origins

But early Christianity was not monolithic. It was diverse. There were many different sects that held very different views both about Jesus and the interpretation of the New Testament. Orthodoxy eventually won the day but that doesn’t mean that they necessarily represented the sect that held the hermeneutically-correct and valid Bible interpretations or that they had the correct view about Jesus. Far from it. There were, in fact, diametrically opposed views that ranged from one extreme to another, from a completely human Jesus to a phantom or a ghost that never really existed. But, as we will see, there is a middle ground where mythicism and historicism meet.

——-

Gnosticism

The New Testament is a literary creation. So it’s difficult to probe its historical antecedents. What were some of the opposing views to “Orthodoxy”? One of the most vocal of these Christian sects was centred in Alexandria, Egypt: the Gnostics. They were the first advocates of the “you-don’t-need-religion, you-need-a-relationship-with-Jesus” pitch. Although there were many splinter groups, they all emphasised a personal “gnosis” (knowledge) and acquaintance with spiritual realities rather than a preoccupation with dry religious discourses and traditions. They originated in the first century C.E. and flourished until the second century, during which the Patristic Fathers denounced them as heretics. But were they? According to Bart Ehrman and Elaine Pagels, they were the genuine Christians of that early period whom the Orthodox Church tried to suppress!

——-

To be sure, their theology was influenced by Greek thought, but the focal point of their doctrine and practice was not based on rhetoric or dogma but rather on personal existential experience. And based on their own inimitable style, one can infer that they had better insights into the divine than their orthodox counterparts who did little more than debate the issues.

——-

Docetism

Then there were the Docetists, who held the “heterodox” (i.e. “at variance with orthodoxy”) doctrine that what appeared to be a historical Jesus was nothing more than an apparition or a phantom, and that his phenomenological bodily existence was not real. This is actually more in line with Scripture, which repeatedly talks of visions and apparitions in one form or another (cf. Lk 24.23–24; Gal. 1.11-12). These are the first mythicists who believed that Jesus never existed! There’s a great deal of Biblical evidence that supports this view. This early Christian view called “Docetism” (derived from the Greek term “Dokesis,” meaning “to seem”)——which held that Christ did not really exist in human form, an idea that was later picked up by Islam——attracted some of the greatest Biblical thinkers of Antiquity:

“According to Photius [a 9th century Byzantine Patriarch], Clement of Alexandria held at least a quasi-docetic belief regarding the nature of Christ, namely that the Word/Logos did not became flesh, but only ‘appeared to be in flesh,’ an interpretation which directly denied the reality of the incarnation” (Ashwin-Siejkowski, Piotr. “Clement of Alexandria on Trial: The Evidence of ‘Heresy’ from Photius’ Bibliotheca.” [Leiden: Brill, 2010], p. 95).

As would be expected, Docetism was eventually rejected as a heretical doctrine at the First Council of Nicaea in 325 C.E. But this verdict was issued in the 4th century. And there is a very good reason why mythicism had thitherto been on the upswing. In fact, despite this setback, the hermeneutical doctrine that gave rise to Docetism continued to hold sway over most of the church until the Reformation.

——-

The Monophysite Christian church

According to tradition, the Coptic Church of Egypt was founded by Mark the evangelist in the first century CE. Due to a Christological dispute, this “Monophysite” Christian church was condemned as heretical by the Council of Chalcedon in 451 CE. Instead of accepting the doctrine that Christ was fully human and fully divine, the Coptic church asserted that Christ had only one nature, and that nature was divine. In other words, just like the Docetists they denied the incarnation and therefore they can be technically defined as mythicists! A similar monophysite explanation of how the divine and human relate within the person of Jesus is Eutychianism. Eutychians were often classified as Phantasiasts by their opponents because they reduced Jesus’ incarnation to a phantasm or an illusion of some kind. Their Christology was along the lines of Docetism in that they, too, denied the full reality of Jesus’ humanity. Thus, we find that there were quite a number of sects that denied the historicity of Jesus during the early period of the church. Things started to change with the onset of the first ecumenical councils!

——-

The Alexandrian School

The early Christian church held to an allegorical (theological) Interpretation of the Bible, not a historical one. Philo’s essential approach to Biblical interpretation influenced the Christian School of hermeneutics, which also developed in the city of Alexandria, Egypt. One of its principal leaders was the Great Bible scholar, Clement of Alexandria (150-215 CE), who while acknowledging that the Bible contained various levels of meaning also realized that the non-literal (i.e. the allegorical/mystical) interpretations contained the ideal spiritual insights. Alexandrian hermeneutics were so popular that they eventually became the dominant force in Biblical interpretation up until the time of the Protestant Reformation. So, the allegorical/theological Biblical interpretation that gave rise to such views as Docetism was the mainstay of early Biblical scholarship. This method was obviously more inclined towards the spiritual, the metaphorical, and the metaphysical, dare I say the Gnostic!

——-

The School of Antioch

Sometime towards the end of the 3rd century CE, the School of Antioch was founded. It was the first Seminary, so to speak, founded in Syria that overemphasized the literal interpretation of the Bible and the humanity of Christ. This so-called “exegetical school” interpreted Scripture primarily according to its historical and grammatical sense. In an attempt to offset the earlier excesses of Biblical interpretation that could lead to various questionable doctrines, such as those of Docetism, the Antioch school became increasingly dogmatic and heavily involved in overemphasizing the literal interpretation of the Bible and the full humanity of Jesus. This led to the so-called “Nestorian Heresy,” namely that Jesus possessed two hypostases, one human and one divine! As a result of the condemnation of Nestorius (386 – 450 CE) at the First Council of Ephesus in 431, the Antioch school’s influence declined considerably and never really recovered. Many followers abandoned the school and it eventually moved to another location further East in Persia. Even though the Antiochian school’s tenets had lost traction, they were eventually taken up again by Martin Luther and John Calvin, who restored them to their former glory.

——-

Conclusion

So, the earlier Alexandrian School of allegorical interpretation at least allowed the possibility of mythicism to be considered as a viable option, whereas the later Antiochian school of literal interpretation——which influenced not only “the dogma of Christ” in the early ecumenical councils, but also modern Bible scholarship——eventually became the dominant school of hermeneutics that held to a rigid form of literalism and overemphasized the historicity of Jesus. In other words, the early church was not as adamant about the historicity of Jesus as the later Church! Thus, up until the end of the third century (the Ante-Nicene Era), and just prior to the onset of the first ecumenical council, the allegorical/metaphorical Jesus dominated the Biblical landscape. It was not until much later that the literal, historical interpretation of Jesus became the prevalent view that it is today!

——-

#mythicist #mythicism #historicism #gnostic #gnosticism #docetism #clement of alexandria #Jesus #Alexandrian school #allegorical interpretation #literal interpretation #literalism #School of Antioch #Nestorius #protestant reformation #New Testament #biblical interpretation #bible exegesis #On the Historicity of Jesus #Christian origins #post biblical conpiracy #historical Jesus Studies #Monophysitism #EK #Author EK #EK Ministries #Eli Kittim Ministries #Ministries of Kittim #Eli of Kittim Ministries

[pamphletstoinspire]

Gospel Reading and Commentary for Wednesday, January 9, 2019 - Roman Catholic - Mark 6: 45 - 52

45. And straightway He constrained His disciples to get into the ship, and to go to the other side before unto Bethsaida, while He sent away the people.

46. And when He had sent them away, He departed into a mountain to pray.

47. And when even was come, the ship was in the midst of the sea, and He alone on the land.

48. And He saw them toiling in rowing; for the wind was contrary unto them: and about the fourth watch of the night He cometh unto them, walking upon the sea, and would have passed by them.

49. But when they saw Him walking upon the sea, they supposed it had been a spirit, and cried out:

50. For they all saw Him, and were troubled. And immediately He talked with them, and saith unto them, “Be of good cheer: it is I; be not afraid.”

51. And He went up unto them into the ship; and the wind ceased: and they were sore amazed in themselves beyond measure, and wondered.

52. For they considered not the miracle of the loaves: for their heart was hardened.

Gloss.: The Lord indeed by the miracle of the loaves shewed that He is the Creator of the world: but now by walking on the waves He proved that He had a body free from the weight of all sin, and by appeasing the winds and by calming the rage of the waves, He declared Himself to be the Master of the elements.

Wherefore it is said, “And straightway He constrained His disciples to get into the ship, and to go to the other side before unto Bethsaida, while He sent away the people.”

Pseudo-Chrys., Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc.: He dismisses indeed the people with His blessing and with some cures. But He constrained His disciples, because they could not without pain separate themselves from Him, and that, not only on account of the very great affection which they had for Him, but also because they were at a loss how He would join them.

Bede, in Marc., 2, 27: But it [p. 126] is with reason that we wonder how Mark says, that after the miracle of the loaves the disciples crossed the sea of Bethsaida, when Luke relates that the miracle was done in the parts of Bethsaida [Luke 9:10], unless we understand that Luke means by the desert which is Bethsaida not the country immediately around the town, but the desert places belonging to it. But when Mark says that they should “go before unto Bethsaida,” the town itself is meant.

It goes on: “And when He had sent them away, He departed into a mountain to pray.”

Pseudo-Chrys., Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc.: This we must understand of Christ, in that He is man; He does it also to teach us to be constant in prayer.

Theophylact: But when He had dismissed the crowd, He goes up to pray, for prayer requires rest and silence.

Bede, in Marc., 2, 28: Not every man, however, who prays goes up into a mountain, but he alone prays well, who seeks God in prayer. But he who prays for riches or worldly labour, or for the death of his enemy, sends up from the lowest depths his vile prayers to God.

John says, “When Jesus therefore perceived that they would come and take Him by force and make Him a king, He departed against into a mountain Himself, alone.” [John 6:15]

It goes on: “And when even was come, the ship was in the midst of the sea, and He alone on the land.”

Theophylact: Now the Lord permitted His disciples to be in danger, that they might learn patience; wherefore He did not immediately come to their aid, but allowed them to remain in danger all night, that He might teach them to wait patiently, and not to hope at once for help in tribulations.

For there follows: “And He saw them toiling in rowing, for the wind was contrary unto them: and about the fourth watch of the night, He cometh unto them walking upon the sea.”

Pseudo-Chrys., Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc.: Holy Scripture reckons four watches in the night, making each division three hours; wherefore by the fourth watch it means that which is after the ninth hour, that is, in the tenth or some following hour.

There follows: “And would have passed them.”

Augustine, de Con. Evan., 2, 47: But how could they understand this, except from His going a different way, wishing to pass them as strangers; for they were so far from recognizing Him, as to take Him for a spirit.

For it goes on: “But when they saw Him walking upon the sea, they supposed it had been a spirit, and cried out.”

Theophylact: See again how Christ, though He was about to put and end to [p. 127] their dangers, puts them in greater fear. But He immediately reassured them by His voice, for it continues, “And immediately He talked with them, and said unto them, It is I, be not afraid.”

Chrys., Hom. in Matt., 50: As soon then as they knew Him by His voice, their fear left them.

Augustine: How then could He wish to pass them, whose fears He so reassures, if it were not that His wish to pass them would wring from them that cry, which called for His help?

Bede: [ed. note: This opinion with which Theodorus is charged was one held by the Phantasiasts, a sect of the Monophysites. The denial of the human body to our Lord, was a natural consequence of denying Him a human soul, for how could a human body inclose, so to speak, His Divinity? Theodoras was Bishop of Pharan, in Arabia, and was condemned as the author of the Monothelite heresy in the Lateran Council under Pope Martin I, AD 649. The passage from Dionysius is quoted in Actio 3 of the Council, and occurs de Div. Nom, c. 1] But Theodorus, who was Bishop of Phanara, wrote that the Lord had no bodily weight in His flesh, and walked on the sea without weight; but the Catholic faith declares that He had weight according to the flesh. For Dionysius says, We know not how without plunging in His feet, which had bodily weight and the gravity of matter, He could walk on the wet and unstable substance.

Theophylact: Then by entering into the ship, the Lord restrained the tempest. For it continues, “And He went up unto them into the ship, and the wind ceased.” Great indeed is the miracle of our Lord’s walking on the sea, but the tempest and the contrary wind were there as well, to make the miracle greater. For the Apostles, not understanding from the miracle of the five loaves the power of Christ, now more fully knew it from the miracle of the sea.

Wherefore it goes on, “And they were sore amazed in themselves.” For they understood not concerning the loaves.

Bede: The disciples indeed, who were still carnal, were amazed at the greatness of His virtue, they could not yet however recognise in Him the truth of the Divine Majesty. Wherefore it goes on, “For their hearts were hardened.”

But mystically, the toil of the disciples in rowing, and the contrary wind, mark out the labours of the Holy Church, who amidst the beating waves of the world, and the blasts of unclean spirits, strives to reach the repose of her celestial country. And well is it said that the ship was in the midst of the sea, and He alone on land, for sometimes the Church is afflicted by a pressure from the [p. 128] Gentiles so overwhelming, that her Redeemer seems to have entirely deserted her. But the Lord sees His own, toiling on the sea, for, lest they faint in tribulations, He strengthens them by the look of His love, and sometimes frees them by a visible assistance. Further, in the fourth watch He came to them as daylight approached, for when man lifts up his mind to the light of guidance from on high, the Lord will be with him, and the dangers of temptations will be laid asleep.

Pseudo-Chrys., Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc.: Or else, the first watch means the time up to the deluge; the second, up to Moses; the third, up to the coming of the Lord; in the fourth the Lord came and spoke to His disciples.

Bede: Often then does the love of heaven seem to have deserted the faithful in tribulation, so that it may be thought that Jesus wishes to pass by His disciples, as it were, toiling in the sea. And still do heretics suppose that the Lord was a phantom, and did not take upon Him real flesh from the Virgin.

Pseudo-Jerome: And He says to them, “Be of good cheer, it is I,” because we shall see Him as He is. But the wind and the storm ceased when Jesus sat down, that is, reigned in the ship, which is the Catholic Church.

Bede: In whatsoever heart, also, He is present by the grace of His love, there soon all the strivings of vices, and of the adverse world, or of evil spirits, are kept under and put to rest.

#gospel of mark

[hororia]

Strangers From Hell (2019)

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ out of 5

____________________

Simply a wtf Korean horror series -in a magnificent way. I do not read the comic but taking a glimpse of the drawings, I should say that the movie successfully represent almost all of the characters. I really enjoyed following this series even though it did feel heavy and nerve-racking all the way it goes. I’m not really comfortable with super-friendly and attentive neighbors, as well as with the ones who observe (and maybe judging) you in silence when you’re about to enter your unit/house. Well, this movie has this uncomfortable feeling, plus a freaking tiny bedroom and depressing financial situation -a horrible combo. I’m in love with this work of horror, it has all the dark and traumatic elements in it. With a little bit of gore.

#Strangers from Hell #Hell Is Other People #타인은 지옥이다 #horrorreview #horrorseries #phantasiastreview #phantasiast

[hororia]

Farewell My Concubine (1993)

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ out of 5

____________________

Utterly heartbreaking. Sebenarnya mungkin ada banyak sekali peran dan karakter yang diceritakan, namun karakter Cheng Dieyi di sini cukup merajai jalan cerita. Perjalanan hidup dan karirnya sebagai pemain teater sangat keras dan cukup traumatis. Ini mungkin yang membuatnya sangat bergantung pada karakter Duan Xiaolou, satu-satunya orang yang dia percaya sepanjang hidupnya. Cheng Dieyi adalah sosok yang penuh talenta, ambisius dan pencemburu -emosinya akan memburu ketika ia tau bahwa ia bukan lah the center of attention. Berlapis-lapis kisah politik juga hadir mewarnai konflik karir dan hubungan antara Cheng Dieyi dan Duan Xiaolou, terlalu pelik untuk diulas. Somehow karakter yang diperankan Leslie Cheung ini merefleksikan penerimaan dunia akan film ini, banyak kritikus dan pemerhati film memuji aksinya: ia bernyanyi, lihai berlenggak-lenggok, juga mahir menguasai panggung ketika ia ‘berpura-pura’ beraksi teatrikal. Karya ini benar-benar sebuah maha dari hasil kerja keras para aktor dan semua pekerja di dalamnya.

#farewell my concubine #霸王别姬 #bà wáng bié jī #leslie cheung #Cheung Fat-chung #filmreview #moviereview #dramareview #phantasiastreview #phantasiast

[hororia]

Tales from the Dark (2012-2013)

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ out of 5

____________________

Rasanya seperti kembali ke masa 2000an awal dimana Ind*siar kerap menayangkan film-film horor-thriller Taiwan yang surprisingly cukup membekas di ingatanku. Serial antologi ini punya episode masing-masing yang beberapa ceritanya mungkin klise, tapi tetap terlihat unik dan menarik. Pengemasannya sedikit artistik dan sangat muram, Mungkin juga dibantu dengan bawaan para pemainnya yang pintar memainkan watak dan ekspresi. Nonton serial ini selama seminggu dan rasanya pengen nonton film horor Taiwan yang lain. Bagiku film horor Taiwan punya karakternya sendiri, semacam meninggalkan perasaan suram yang sedikit disturbing -tapi juga puas.

#Tales from the Dark #李碧華鬼魅系列 迷離夜 #taiwanesehorror #horrormovie #horrorreview #filmreview #phantasiastreview #phantasiast

[hororia]

The Lighthouse (2019)

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ out of 5

____________________

Serasa baca literatur dark romanticism ala Edgar Allan Poe atau Nathaniel Hawthorne: dark and trippy. Mempertanyakan yang mana yang benar, siapa yang akan datang, Belum lagi bencana-bencana kecil dan pertanda alam yang seolah mengisyaratkan ada yang salah di sini dan sebaiknya kamu segera pergi. Lumayan slow pace dan membingungkan, but it is a psychological horror movie after all. 

#thelighthouse #roberteggers #moviereview #filmreview #horrorreview #horrormovie #phantasiastreview #phantasiast

[hororia]

The Love Witch (2016)

⭐️⭐️⭐️ out of 5

____________________

The properties and setting are beautiful and flawless, but I don’t really enjoy this narcissistic femme fatale kind of movie. Elaine yang diam-diam adalah seorang penyihir ini banyak membuat bencana bagi para pria yang ia kencani. Konsep cinta dan kematian bagi Elaine adalah linear -terlalu rumit. Selama nonton, cuma bisa asik menikmati setting dan fashion property di film ini.

#filmreview #moviereview #reviewmovie #thelovewitch #samantharobinson #annabiller #phantasiastreview #phantasiast

[hororia]

Midnight Diner: Tokyo (2009)

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ out of 5

____________________

Mengenai makanan dan memori. Jatuh cinta sama serial antologi ini sejak tahun lalu dan menunggu-nunggu season ketiganya! Hadir dengan cerita lepas yang berbeda di tiap episodenya, juru masak sebagai tokoh utamanya selalu menyajikan hidangan custom atas permintaan para pengunjung. Cerita yang berbeda-beda ini kerap datang dari para pengunjung, tidak melulu cerita yang ringan, di season kedua lebih banyak cerita yang lebih mendramatisir dan berani -namun tetap tidak lepas dari kesederhanaan humor di dalamnya. Bagus banget. Kabarnya setting lokasi izakaya di film ini sepenuhnya dibuat layaknya lokasi dan aktivitas sebenarnya di jalanan gang kecil di Tokyo. Yang masih membuat saya penasaran hingga sekarang adalah cerita sang master (juru masak) itu sendiri, setiap melihat goresan luka yang menggaris di wajahnya jadi bertanya-tanya, masa lalu apa yang membawanya ke Tokyo dan membuka izakaya yang unik nan eksperimental ini?

#filmreview #reviewfilm #moviereview #midnightdiner #tokyomidnightdinner #phantasiastreview #phantasiast

[hororia]

The Dirt (2019)

⭐⭐⭐⭐ out of 5

-------------------------

Filmografi band rock Mötley Crüe yang malah vibe-nya kayak film chic-flick awal 2000-an. Dibuka dengan adegan 18+ dan dilanjutkan dengan berbagai adegan bimbingan orangtua --all the scenes you cannot escape. Nggak banyak komentar karena dasarnya enjoi aja nonton film ini. Also, Machine Gun Kelly is super cute and hot here I cannot help but amazed. Mungkin bintang empat ini kudedikasikan aja buat si doi karena aku cukup terhibur.

#thedirt #thedirt2019 #motleycrue #filmography #filmreview #horrorreview #phantasiastreview #phantasiast

[hororia]

Parasite (2019)

Dengan gegap gempita pemberitaan betapa bagusnya film ini, aku menghindari artikel, trailer, ulasan, dsb dst yang membicarakan Parasite. Berbekal pengamatan visual pada poster filmnya, aku membayangkan alien dan segala aktivitas invasinya yang berbumbu thriller. Be it alien, be it a contagious disease -intinya bekal saya tidak banyak. Pas nonton, bayangan ini hilang semua. Tegang banget ketika parasit yang terdahulu mendiami rumah majikan. Berbagai momen haha hihi ala gelapnya komedi di film ini memang patut diamini. Seolah dibuat hepi, berempati, lalu tegang, lalu sedih -pun sedikit jengkel. Sepanjang nonton film ini aku cukup terhibur. Tapi yang pasti film ini bukan juga film yang bagus banget. Seperti makanan: aku pernah makan yang lebih enak daripada ini -mungkin kira-kira begitu. 

#phantasiast #koreanmovie #koreanthrillermovie #filmreview #moviereview #parasite #BongJoon-ho

[hororia]

Romina (2018)

Simply one of the worst horror/thriller movies I’ve ever watch. If there is a petition for taking this movie down from Netflix, I’d be happy to sign in.

#romina #netflix #netflixreview #filmhoror #horrormovie #horrorreview #phantasiast #phantasiastreview

[hororia]

Squid Game (2021)

⭐⭐⭐⭐ out of 5

-------------------------

Dengan segala motif dan konflik sosial ala survival game pada umumnya, pengemasan serial ini apik untuk ditonton. Aku menikmati sekali setiap permainan dan setiap masalah yang ditimbulkan. Permainan tarik tambang menjadi permainan favoritku, menegangkan sekali. Banyaknya teori-teori berkembang dari para penonton juga cukup memeriahkan popularitas Squid Game. Sayangnya, isu efektivitas dalam penerjemahan takarir di serial ini cukup bikin ilfil sehingga membuatku cukup kepikiran setelah selesai menonton serial ini. Lalu adanya season kedua juga agak bikin nggak banyak berharap.

#squidgame #오징어 게임 #Ojing-eo Geim #survivalgame #survivaldeath #phantasiast #moviereview #phantasiastreview #ulasfilm #ulasanfilm #filmreview

[hororia]

The Medium (2021)

⭐️⭐️ out of 5

____________________

Kalau saja mereka fokus akan satu motif, menurutku film ini mungkin bisa jadi menarik. Mungkin maksudnya menceritakan satu hal yang berkelindan dengan hal-hal buruk lainnya. Tapi menurutku malah jatuhnya inkonsisten. Banyak pengambilan gambar ala candid/footage yang jatuhnya juga too good to be true alias disengaja. Jujur kurang bisa menikmati filmnya, padahal ada beberapa motif yang menurutku akan jadi sangat menarik kalau dikembangkan dengan fokus.

#medium #ร่างทรง #RangSong #랑종 #filmreview #moviereview #filmhoror #phantasiastreview #phantasiast #horrormovie #horrorific