#((is literally right before the episode where they're going to bring up Marinette's trauma.))

[miraculouscontent]

Oh God, I just thought of the possibility of love square stans trying to say, “Marinette couldn’t have been in love with Luka because she’s not showing trauma signs!” and them genuinely thinking that this is an okay argument without any sense of awareness as to how that sounds.

#category: salt #salt: fandom #other: ml spoilers #other: ml leaks #other: MLS5bible #((Although technically speaking)) #((if Marinette's stammering is her trauma sign then she DID show those with Luka when they first met)) #((but then he played her song which totally vibe'd her out and her next sentence was completely coherent.)) #((If she never stammered at all as well I suppose you could make the argument that Luka has no connection to Chloe)) #((which essentially ''breaks'' any hold said trauma has on her.)) #((Make of that what you will but regardless--)) #((the idea of using ''trauma signs'' to indicate whether Marinette was ''truly in love'' with someone is...)) #((I don't know but I don't wanna think about it.)) #((Because of the show's inane airing order I'm sure they expect people to completely miss)) #((that the episode where they send Luka away (I presume; not exactly subtle that the only episode summary that mentions him is 'Migration') #((is literally right before the episode where they're going to bring up Marinette's trauma.))