#Rajiv Thakur blog
Text
Career, Curriculum, Culture, Community and Cost
Career, Curriculum, Culture, Community and Cost
Business schools are the institutions of higher learning that transform aspirants into competent managers, visionary executives and corporate leaders. Several salient features distinguish a good B-school from a middling one, but some aspects should indeed be seriously considered while choosing a business school.
Broadly speaking, there are 5 C’s that every student of management and business…
View On WordPress
0 notes
Text
MI (Mumbai Indians) was the IPL winner in 2019
IPL 2019 was the 12th Season of IPL (Indian Premier League). VIVO was the title sponsor of IPL (Indian Premier League) 2019. It will be enjoyed full days by all cricket lovers watching it on their TV from all over the world. IPL is treated as a function in India. It has started on 23rd March 2019. IPL Final was played on 12th May 2019 at Wankhede Stadium Mumbai. This is the best platform for young cricketers to show their caliber from all around the world. Lots of young talent has been emerged from the last 11 seasons here like:
Ravinder Jadeja
Shane Watson
Kuldeep Yadav
and many more
IPL is a very colorful platform with lots of fun and entertainment. It is a very fast cricket tournament. Every cricket team plays 20-20 over’s match in this tournament. Many cricketers have become more famous for their best performance in IPL like Steve Smith, Glenn Maxwell, Sunil Narine, Suresh Raina many more. Rajasthan Royal was the first IPL Winner. 2018 IPL Winner was Chennai Super Kings. It has 8 teams which are the same as the previous season. In IPL, the Teams were the following:
1. Chennai Super Kings
2. Rajasthan Royals
3. Mumbai Indians
4. Delhi Capitals
5. Kings XI Punjab
6. Sun Risers Hyderabad
7. Royal Challengers Bangalore
8. Kolkata Knight Riders
IPL Starting Date: 23 March 2019
IPL Final Match Date: 12 May 2019
Mumbai Indians became the first team to win four IPL titles after defeating Chennai Super Kings by one run in a thrilling final, i.e. final match of IPL 2019. Mumbai Indians becomes the first IPL team to beat CSK by 10 wickets in the history of an IPL match. For the Chennai Super Kings team, Shane Watson scored an 80-run well. Faf du Plessis scored 26 runs but the yellow team ultimately fell short by a solitary run. Full Scorecard Earlier, batting first Mumbai Indians posted 149/8 against Chennai Super Kings in the Indian Premier League final. Kieron Pollard scored an unbeaten 41 off 25 balls for the Mumbai Indians. Deepak Chahar was the star with the ball picking up 3/26 while Shardul Thakur and Imran Tahir took two wickets each for Chennai Super King.
The 2019 Indian Premier League Final was a Twenty20 cricket match was played between CSK and the MI on 12 May 2019 at the Rajiv Gandhi International Cricket Stadium in Hyderabad. MI (Mumbai Indians) won the match by a single run and claimed their fourth Indian Premier League title.
After winning the toss, Mumbai Indians elected to do batting first. Mumbai Indians scored 149 runs for eight wickets in their 20 overs, Kieron Pollard top-scored with 41 runs. CSK (Chennai Super Kings) team bowler Deepak Chahar took three wickets easily in the inning and Shane Watson was the highest scorer of the match with scoring 80 runs. Mumbai Indians' player Jasprit Bumrah was awarded as the player of the match for his spell of two for 14, in his four overs.
Mumbai Indians team was the IPL winner 2019.
So anytime you want to obtain information related to current:
recent or latest cricket news
cricket matches every day scores
news related to all sports of cricket events
intend to know about National & International cricket player profiles
intend to know about pitch or stadium weather reports
Therefore, now you all can conveniently see and check all blogs related to cricket news on the Cricket Pagal website cricketpagal.com easily. From Cricket Pagal’s website, you obtain all important details, information and news related to a cricket match. They would certainly likewise provide some weather predictions before the match starts.
0 notes
Video
youtube
Rohit, Vinesh among unprecedented five for Khel Ratna - Click on link to subscribe my channel https://ift.tt/34vXvMA Facebook - https://ift.tt/2Vjiyz6 Twitter - https://twitter.com/HsrSports Pinterest - https://ift.tt/2ywdZIH Tumblr - https://ift.tt/2z5qwmL Blog - https://ift.tt/2VlBDRu #Sports #Sports_News #Tournament Rohit Sharma and Vinesh Phogat. NEW DELHI: Star cricketer Rohit Sharma, wrestler Vinesh Phogat, and women's hockey captain Rani Rampal were among an unprecedented five sportspersons picked for the Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna, while a whopping 29 were recommended for the Arjuna award by the sports ministry's selection committee on Tuesday. Paddler Manika Batra and Rio Paralympic gold-winning high jumper Mariyappan Thangavelu were the other two recommended for the country's highest sporting honour by a 12-member selection committee. Rampal was a late addition to the initial list of four. For the Arjuna, India pacer Ishant Sharma, teen shooting sensations Saurabh Chaudhary and Manu Bhaker, sprinter Dutee Chand, footballer Sandesh Jhinghan, woman cricketer Deepti Sharma, woman boxer Lovlina Borgohain and Indian luge legend Shiva Keshavan are some of the big names to be shortlisted, an official source told PTI. Rower Dattu Bhokannal, boxer Manish Kaushik, wrestler Rahul Aware, recurve archer Atanu Das, women's hockey team player Deepika Thakur, kabaddi player Deepak Hooda, tennis player Divij Sharan, woman paddler Madhurima Patkar and badminton men's doubles pair of Chirag Shetty and Satwiksairaj Rankireddy. The 31-year-old Ishant has played 97 Tests and 80 ODIs for India, grabbing over 400 international wickets. This is the first time in the history of awards that five athletes have been recommended for the top sporting accolade with the final decision resting on sports minister Kiren Rijiju. In 2016, four athletes -- star shuttler P V Sindhu, gymnast Dipa Karmakar, shooter Jitu Rai, and wrestler Sakshi Malik -- were collectively given this award. The 33-year-old Rohit will only be the fourth cricketer after Sachin Tendulkar, just-retired Mahendra Singh Dhoni and current skipper Virat Kohli to be conferred with the Khel Ratna. Tendulkar was the first Indian cricketer to get the honour in 1998, followed by Dhoni in 2007 and Kohli in 2018. Kohli won it jointly with weightlifter Mirabai Chanu. The committee, comprising the likes of Virender Sehwag and former hockey captain Sardar Singh, met at the Sports Authority of India (SAI) headquarters here and finalised the names after deliberations that took up the first half of the day. While Rohit has been recognised for his ever-rising accomplishments with the bat, Vinesh has been rewarded for her gold medals in the 2018 Commonwealth and Asian Games besides a bronze in the 2019 Asian Wrestling Championships. Terming it as one of the biggest moments of her career, Vinesh promised to live upto the expectations associated with the award. "It's a proud moment for me. It was a long wait but it was worthwhile. If God permits I would live up to the reputation associated with this award," Vinesh said. Thangavelu is being rewarded for his gold medal in the 2016 Rio Paralympics in the T42 high jump category. T42 applies to athletes with single above the knee amputations or a disability that is comparable. Star paddler Manika was recommended for her remarkable performance in 2018, a year during which she won the Commonwealth Games gold medal and Asian Games bronze in women's singles. Rani is the lone female hockey player to have been recommended for the honour. Before Rani, only Dhanraj Pillay (2000) and Sardar Singh (2017) won the prestigious award. Sardar, incidentally, was a part of the 12-member selection committee this year. "Rani's name was a late inclusion after some members wanted a discussion on her nomination. After due deliberation, everyone felt that she deserves the recognition for her achievements," a source close to the development told PTI. In a first, this year's National Sports Awards ceremony, which normally held at the Rashtrapati Bhavan, is likely to be conducted virtually due to the COVID-19 pandemic, with all the winners logging in from their respective places to hear their names being announced on August 29. August 29 is celebrated as the National Sports Day to commemorate the birth anniversary of hockey wizard Major Dhyan Chand. The Khel Ratna comprises a medallion, a certificate, and a cash pri..
0 notes
Text
2018 SCC Vol. 2 February 28, 2018 Part 3
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — S. 7(5) — Arbitration clause in a standard form of contract of a party — Incorporation of, by reference — Law summarized: Though a general reference to an earlier contract (Two-contract case) is not sufficient for incorporation of an arbitration clause in the later contract, a general reference to a standard form contract (Single-contract case) would be enough for incorporation of the arbitration clause. M.R. Engineers & Contractors (P) Ltd., (2009) 7 SCC 696, inter alia, lays down that where the contract provides that the standard form of terms and conditions of an independent trade association or professional institution will bind the parties or apply to the contract, such standard form of terms and conditions including any provision for arbitration in such standard terms and conditions, shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference. [Inox Wind Ltd. v. Thermocables Ltd., (2018) 2 SCC 519]
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Ss. 34 and 37 r/w Ss. 16 and 31(6) — Award: Disputes having arisen between the parties, the respondent invoked arbitration and the arbitrator, on 23-7-2015 took up the issue of limitation first, and then decided the same in favour of the claimant stating that their claims had not become time-barred. Following Siemens Atkeingesellschaft, (2007) 4 SCC 451, held, that award dt. 23-7-2015 was an interim award, which being an arbitral award, could be challenged separately and independently under S. 34 of the Act. Moreover, ruling on issue of limitation is not a ruling on issue of jurisdiction of arbitrator, for it to be appealable under S. 37(2)(a). [IFFC Ltd. v. Bhadra Products, (2018) 2 SCC 534]
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Or. 32 Rr. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 12, 13 and 14 — Next friend and guardian ad litem: For institution of suit by next friend, court’s permission is not necessary, if next friend is not otherwise incapacitated. Any person can act as next friend if he has no adverse interest against minor. Next friend need not be a duly appointed guardian under Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956. Concept of guardian under that Act is different from that of next friend or guardian ad litem under Or. 32 CPC as purpose of next friend/guardian ad litem is limited only to looking after interest of minor in particular suit. Merely because certain formalities not observed in appointment of guardian ad litem, decree cannot be set aside if no prejudice is caused to minor defendant thereby. Guardian appointed under 1956 Act can also represent minor in suit if he has no adverse interest against minor. Court required to give notice to minor on his attaining majority about pendency of litigation. It would then be open to him either to continue with suit or to abandon the same. If he chooses to continue, then he may file application before court and consequently next friend/guardian ad litem would stand discharged. Thereafter guardian as defined under S. 4(b) of 1956 Act would automatically continue as guardian. However, if minor after attaining majority continues with the suit of his own, no formal application would be needed. [Nagaiah v. Chowdamma, (2018) 2 SCC 504]
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 439(2) — Application for cancellation of regular bail: Issuance of non-bailable warrant of arrest against appellant by High Court on filing of application for cancellation of regular bail granted to appellant herein by trial court (i.e. Addl. Sessions Judge), not proper. [Upendra Sharma v. State of Bihar, (2018) 2 SCC 472]
Human and Civil Rights — Disabled and Differently-Abled Persons — International Human Rights Law — Rights of visually disabled persons for proper, adequate and safe access to public places: Equality, in international human rights law, founded upon two complementary principles: non-discrimination and reasonable differentiation. Non-discrimination seeks to ensure that all person can equally enjoy and exercise all their rights and freedoms. Discrimination occurs due to arbitrary denial of opportunities of equal participation. Equality not only implies preventing discrimination but remedies discrimination against groups suffering systematic discrimination in society i.e. it embraces notion of positive rights, affirmative action and reasonable accommodation. Earlier traditional approach to disability which depicted it as health and welfare issue to be addressed through care provided to persons with disabilities from a charitable point of view resulted in marginalising disabled persons and their exclusion both from mainstream of society and enjoyment of their fundamental rights and freedoms. However, there was a market shift in the ideology in 1970s and focus now is on providing them with suitable and adequate facilities so that their full potential is realised which in turn leads to augmentation of human resources with progress of nation. [Rajive Raturi v. Union of India, (2018) 2 SCC 413]
Interpretation of Statutes — Basic Rules — Determination of legislative intent — Language of statutory provisions clear and unambiguous: When language of any statutory provisions is clear and unambiguous, it is not necessary to look for any extrinsic aid to find out meaning of statute inasmuch as language used by legislature is indication of legislative intent. [All Kerala Parents’ Assn. of Hearing Impaired v. State of Kerala, (2018) 2 SCC 410]
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Ss. 23(1), 4(1) and 6 — Market value — Determination of — Relevant date for determining compensation: Sale deed relied upon by appellant claimants dt. 27-12-1988 is post notification. Applying Gobinda Chandra Makal, (2011) 9 SCC 207, held, S. 23(1) provides that compensation to be awarded shall be determined by reference court, based upon market value of acquired land at date of publication of notification under S. 4(1) in Gazette. Hence, post-notification instances cannot be taken into consideration for determining compensation of acquired land. [Maya Devi v. State of Haryana, (2018) 2 SCC 474]
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 ��� Ss. 166, 168 and 173 — Death in motor accident — Award of compensation — Reversed by High Court: As false case was set up by appellants to support a claim for compensation, no interference warranted. [Anil v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., (2018) 2 SCC 482]
Penal Code, 1860 — S. 302 or S. 304 Pt. II [S. 300 Exception 4]: In this case repeated six knife-blows by accused to different body parts of deceased, resulted in death of deceased. Said blows were inflicted without premeditation in sudden fight in heat of passion and no evidence was present to suggest that accused had assaulted deceased with intention to cause his death. Moreover, accused showed some contrition upon recovering his senses and took deceased to hospital, etc. Hence, neither fact i.e. merely using knife in commission of offence nor factum of multiple injuries given by accused, sufficient to deny him benefit of S. 300 Exception 4. Conviction under S. 304 Pt. II, restored. Sentence, however, enhanced from 5 yrs’ RI to 10 yrs’ RI. [Atul Thakur v. State of H.P., (2018) 2 SCC 496]
Rent Control and Eviction — Subletting/Sub-Tenant/Sub-Tenancy — Subletting of tenanted premises — Seeking eviction of tenant on ground of: Sine qua non for proving case of subletting is that tenant has either wholly or in part transferred or/and parted with possession of tenanted premises in favour of any third person without landlord’s consent. If tenant is able to prove that he continues to retain exclusive possession over tenanted premises notwithstanding any third party’s induction in said premises, no case of subletting is made out against such tenant. [Flora Elias Nahoum v. Idrish Ali Laskar, (2018) 2 SCC 485]
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 — Ss. 31, 32 and 2(r): Full compliance with statutory provisions directed i.e. (i) 5% seats in government institutions of higher education and other higher educational institutions receiving aid from Government to be reserved for persons with disabilities; (ii) Right to free education to children with benchmark disabilities between age of 6 to 18 yrs. Educational institutions directed to submit list of disabled persons admitted in each course every year to the Chief Commissioner and/or the State Commissioner as case may be and appropriate consequential actions to be taken by them against defaulting institutions. Additionally, law colleges to send intimation in this behalf to BCI while other institutions to notify compliance to UGC. [Disabled Rights Group v. Union of India, (2018) 2 SCC 397]
SCs, STs, OBCs and Minorities — Reserved category status — Determination of — Claim to SC community “Jatav” status on basis of caste status of husband: Caste is determined by birth, which cannot be changed by marriage with person of Scheduled Caste. Since appellant wife was born in “Agarwal” family which falls in general category she should not have been issued with SC certificate. [Sunita Singh v. State of U.P., (2018) 2 SCC 493]
Tweet
The post 2018 SCC Vol. 2 February 28, 2018 Part 3 appeared first on SCC Blog.
2018 SCC Vol. 2 February 28, 2018 Part 3 published first on https://sanantoniolegal.tumblr.com/
0 notes
Text
Career, Curriculum, Culture, Community and Cost
Career, Curriculum, Culture, Community and Cost
Business schools are the institutions of higher learning that transform aspirants into competent managers, visionary executives and corporate leaders. Several salient features distinguish a good B-school from a middling one, but some aspects should indeed be seriously considered while choosing a business school.
Broadly speaking, there are 5 C’s that every student of management and business…
View On WordPress
0 notes
Text
2018 SCC Vol. 2 February 28, 2018 Part 3
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — S. 7(5) — Arbitration clause in a standard form of contract of a party — Incorporation of, by reference — Law summarized: Though a general reference to an earlier contract (Two-contract case) is not sufficient for incorporation of an arbitration clause in the later contract, a general reference to a standard form contract (single-contract case) would be enough for incorporation of the arbitration clause. M.R. Engineers & Contractors (P) Ltd., (2009) 7 SCC 696, inter alia, lays down that where the contract provides that the standard form of terms and conditions of an independent trade association or professional institution will bind the parties or apply to the contract, such standard form of terms and conditions including any provision for arbitration in such standard terms and conditions, shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference. [Inox Wind Ltd. v. Thermocables Ltd., (2018) 2 SCC 519]
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Ss. 34 and 37 r/w Ss. 16 and 31(6) — Award: Disputes having arisen between the parties, the respondent invoked arbitration and the arbitrator, on 23-7-2015 took up the issue of limitation first, and then decided the same in favour of the claimant stating that their claims had not become time-barred. Following Siemens Atkeingesellschaft, (2007) 4 SCC 451, held, that award dt. 23-7-2015 was an interim award, which being an arbitral award, could be challenged separately and independently under S. 34 of the Act. Moreover, ruling on issue of limitation is not a ruling on issue of jurisdiction of arbitrator, for it to be appealable under S. 37(2)(a). [IFFC Ltd. v. Bhadra Products, (2018) 2 SCC 534]
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Or. 32 Rr. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 12, 13 and 14 — Next friend and guardian ad litem: For institution of suit by next friend, court’s permission is not necessary, if next friend is not otherwise incapacitated. Any person can act as next friend if he has no adverse interest against minor. Next friend need not be a duly appointed guardian under Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956. Concept of guardian under that Act is different from that of next friend or guardian ad litem under Or. 32 CPC as purpose of next friend/guardian ad litem is limited only to looking after interest of minor in particular suit. Merely because certain formalities not observed in appointment of guardian ad litem, decree cannot be set aside if no prejudice is caused to minor defendant thereby. Guardian appointed under 1956 Act can also represent minor in suit if he has no adverse interest against minor. Court required to give notice to minor on his attaining majority about pendency of litigation. It would then be open to him either to continue with suit or to abandon the same. If he chooses to continue, then he may file application before court and consequently next friend/guardian ad litem would stand discharged. Thereafter guardian as defined under S. 4(b) of 1956 Act would automatically continue as guardian. However, if minor after attaining majority continues with the suit of his own, no formal application would be needed. [Nagaiah v. Chowdamma, (2018) 2 SCC 504]
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 439(2) — Application for cancellation of regular bail: Issuance of non-bailable warrant of arrest against appellant by High Court on filing of application for cancellation of regular bail granted to appellant herein by trial court (i.e. Addl. Sessions Judge), not proper. [Upendra Sharma v. State of Bihar, (2018) 2 SCC 472]
Human and Civil Rights — Disabled and Differently-Abled Persons — International Human Rights Law — Rights of visually disabled persons for proper, adequate and safe access to public places: Equality, in international human rights law, founded upon two complementary principles: non-discrimination and reasonable differentiation. Non-discrimination seeks to ensure that all person can equally enjoy and exercise all their rights and freedoms. Discrimination occurs due to arbitrary denial of opportunities of equal participation. Equality not only implies preventing discrimination but remedies discrimination against groups suffering systematic discrimination in society i.e. it embraces notion of positive rights, affirmative action and reasonable accommodation. Earlier traditional approach to disability which depicted it as health and welfare issue to be addressed through care provided to persons with disabilities from a charitable point of view resulted in marginalising disabled persons and their exclusion both from mainstream of society and enjoyment of their fundamental rights and freedoms. However, there was a market shift in the ideology in 1970s and focus now is on providing them with suitable and adequate facilities so that their full potential is realised which in turn leads to augmentation of human resources with progress of nation. [Rajive Raturi v. Union of India, (2018) 2 SCC 413]
Interpretation of Statutes — Basic Rules — Determination of legislative intent — Language of statutory provisions clear and unambiguous: When language of any statutory provisions is clear and unambiguous, it is not necessary to look for any extrinsic aid to find out meaning of statute inasmuch as language used by legislature is indication of legislative intent. [All Kerala Parents’ Assn. of Hearing Impaired v. State of Kerala, (2018) 2 SCC 410]
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Ss. 23(1), 4(1) and 6 — Market value — Determination of — Relevant date for determining compensation: Sale deed relied upon by appellant claimants dt. 27-12-1988 is post notification. Applying Gobinda Chandra Makal, (2011) 9 SCC 207, held, S. 23(1) provides that compensation to be awarded shall be determined by reference court, based upon market value of acquired land at date of publication of notification under S. 4(1) in Gazette. Hence, post-notification instances cannot be taken into consideration for determining compensation of acquired land. [Maya Devi v. State of Haryana, (2018) 2 SCC 474]
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Ss. 166, 168 and 173 — Death in motor accident — Award of compensation — Reversed by High Court: As false case was set up by appellants to support a claim for compensation, no interference warranted. [Anil v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., (2018) 2 SCC 482]
Penal Code, 1860 — S. 302 or S. 304 Pt. II [S. 300 Exception 4]: In this case repeated six knife-blows by accused to different body parts of deceased, resulted in death of deceased. Said blows were inflicted without premeditation in sudden fight in heat of passion and no evidence was present to suggest that accused had assaulted deceased with intention to cause his death. Moreover, accused showed some contrition upon recovering his senses and took deceased to hospital, etc. Hence, neither fact i.e. merely using knife in commission of offence nor factum of multiple injuries given by accused, sufficient to deny him benefit of S. 300 Exception 4. Conviction under S. 304 Pt. II, restored. Sentence, however, enhanced from 5 yrs’ RI to 10 yrs’ RI. [Atul Thakur v. State of H.P., (2018) 2 SCC 496]
Rent Control and Eviction — Subletting/Sub-Tenant/Sub-Tenancy — Subletting of tenanted premises — Seeking eviction of tenant on ground of: Sine qua non for proving case of subletting is that tenant has either wholly or in part transferred or/and parted with possession of tenanted premises in favour of any third person without landlord’s consent. If tenant is able to prove that he continues to retain exclusive possession over tenanted premises notwithstanding any third party’s induction in said premises, no case of subletting is made out against such tenant. [Flora Elias Nahoum v. Idrish Ali Laskar, (2018) 2 SCC 485]
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 — Ss. 31, 32 and 2(r): Full compliance with statutory provisions directed i.e. (i) 5% seats in government institutions of higher education and other higher educational institutions receiving aid from Government to be reserved for persons with disabilities; (ii) Right to free education to children with benchmark disabilities between age of 6 to 18 yrs. Educational institutions directed to submit list of disabled persons admitted in each course every year to the Chief Commissioner and/or the State Commissioner as case may be and appropriate consequential actions to be taken by them against defaulting institutions. Additionally, law colleges to send intimation in this behalf to BCI while other institutions to notify compliance to UGC. [Disabled Rights Group v. Union of India, (2018) 2 SCC 397]
SCs, STs, OBCs and Minorities — Reserved category status — Determination of — Claim to SC community “Jatav” status on basis of caste status of husband: Caste is determined by birth, which cannot be changed by marriage with person of Scheduled Caste. Since appellant wife was born in “Agarwal” family which falls in general category she should not have been issued with SC certificate. [Sunita Singh v. State of U.P., (2018) 2 SCC 493]
Tweet
The post 2018 SCC Vol. 2 February 28, 2018 Part 3 appeared first on SCC Blog.
2018 SCC Vol. 2 February 28, 2018 Part 3 published first on https://sanantoniolegal.tumblr.com/
0 notes
Last Seen Blogs
gigi-buffon-blog
Gianluigi Buffon
redditlivetvlinks
İsimsiz
joni64joni
Best off ... pantyhose, stockings, nylons and ...
schmidi78
Online Geld verdienen
