#i expected a devil's advocate. an actually different perspective. not a strawman

[leyacer]

Getting mighty sick of retrospective videos that are over two hours long. I have yet to be convinced anyone actually needed that extra time to adequately make their point

#this is about a d*nganronpa 3 video i watched and all the other retrospective videos i started getting recommended afterwards #like a b0tw retrospective #girl that game is only six years old and we have yet to see its longterm effects on the series #also #dr3 is BAD but they did not need 5 hours to explain that #'this could have been an e-mail' except this could've been a 1-hour video #AT MOST #okay rant incoming about that video in specific #firstly the swapping between the dissections of the arcs #cute idea in theory #but since those arcs are so interlinked and share problems #separating their discussion and being forced to put off discussing certain topics because of that only hampers the analysis #also the 'devil's advocate' character they had to represent criticism from people who like dr3- again a cute idea #but it's so poorly executed #god forbid you have to face an actual reasonable good faith argument in defense of the thing you're criticizing #i expected a devil's advocate. an actually different perspective. not a strawman #that's on me though ig #and the section on chiaki firstly did not need to be put off for that long considering how crucial she is to dr3 and its flaws #and then it just devolved into angry ranting halfway through #everyone's gotta rant once in a while #heck im doing that right now #but after a certain point you're not saying anything anymore #you're just being angry #and so many points in general could have just been a few sentences #leya rambles