#that the simple straightforward statement about bisexuality that no reasonable person would ever disagree with that i just saw

[genderqueerpond]

man i don’t even know what all the dogwhistles on tumblr mean anymore

#but i have a suspicion #that the simple straightforward statement about bisexuality that no reasonable person would ever disagree with that i just saw #in a ''dni if you disagree with this'' context #was actually putting down either bi lesbians/bi gays or pansexuals #but idk which #maybe both????? #i fucking hate this manner of doing discourse #where someone will state something that no one disagrees with and claim it means something else entirely #and then if you disagree with the complete other thing #people accuse you of disagreeing with the first thing and throw it out of context and make you look terrible #its SO bad faith #lavender thoughts #anyway when i see things like this i ask myself is anyone actually even disagreeing with this and if so who #and 9 times out of 10 the answer is no one #and op is using an uncontroversial statement as a bad faith synonym for some form of exclusionism #in case there was any doubt: EXCLUSIONISM AND IDENTITY POLICING ARE BAD #changing the target won't change that #ps someone called me a rape apoloigist after i posted this which is exactly what i'm talking about #WHERE do you get ''rape'' from ''allowing people to self id as they see fit lmfao Like. #no one is being forced to have sex with bi lesbians or pan people slow your roll #may as well call me a rapist for existing while trans it's the same argument